Judaism

Judaism is the monotheistic religion and civilization of the Jewish people, built around a covenant between God and Israel, the authority of the Torah, and the legal and ethical system known as halakha. Originating in the ancient Near East, it is one of the oldest continuously practiced religions, and it gave rise to the Christian and Islamic traditions, which share its scripture and its belief in a single God. Judaism is also an ethnic and cultural identity, so the entry treats it both as a religious system and as the history of a people that has lived across many lands for more than two thousand years.

The tradition has shaped law, ethics, philosophy, language, literature, music, and the arts far beyond its own community. Its foundational texts, including the Hebrew Bible and the Talmud, have been studied for centuries, and Jewish thinkers contributed to philosophy, ethics, medicine and science. Jewish communities have also endured exile, persecution, and the Holocaust, and their experience has shaped modern debates about human rights and sovereignty. Today roughly 15.8 million people identify as Jewish, with the largest communities in Israel and the United States.

The entry proceeds chronologically and thematically. It first covers identity, core beliefs, and sacred texts, then the legal and ritual system. Next it traces the history from ancient origins and the Second Temple period through rabbinic formation, medieval diaspora life, mysticism, and the modern emancipation and denominational divisions. The final sections address the Holocaust, the State of Israel, demography, daily and life-cycle practice, community institutions, languages and literature, and the arts and ethics.

Who Is a Jew: Identity and Definition

Jewish identity encompasses membership in a religious tradition, belonging to a people, and participation in a culture transmitted through families and communities. These dimensions overlap without being interchangeable: religious observance is not a prerequisite for every form of Jewish identification, and ancestry alone does not determine membership under every religious standard. In its 2020 survey of Jewish Americans, the Pew Research Center found that 59% of Jewish adults described being Jewish primarily as a matter of ancestry or culture, 15% primarily as religion, and 22% as a combination of religion and ancestry or culture. Researchers therefore distinguish religious affiliation, family background, self-identification, and communal recognition rather than treating “Jewish” as a single category with one universally applicable boundary. (pewresearch.org)

Under traditional halakha, or Jewish religious law, the principal routes to Jewish status are birth to a Jewish mother and valid conversion. Orthodox and Conservative Judaism retain the maternal-descent criterion: a child of a Jewish mother is Jewish regardless of the father’s status, whereas a child of a Jewish father and non-Jewish mother requires conversion. The rabbinic rule is expressed in Mishnah Kiddushin 3:12, which assigns the child of a non-Jewish woman her status rather than that of a Jewish father. This rule concerns membership in the Jewish community, not the transmission of every inherited position: priestly and Levitical lineage traditionally pass through the father. Consequently, maternal descent should not be understood as a general system governing all Jewish kinship. (myjewishlearning.com)

Conversion to Judaism provides entry into the Jewish people without requiring Jewish ancestry. Traditional procedures include instruction, acceptance of the commandments before a bet din—a religious court—immersion in a mikveh, and, for male candidates, circumcision or an appropriate covenantal procedure when already circumcised. These are mechanisms for establishing religious status, not simply declarations of personal belief. Conservative rabbinic standards expressly require court-approved immersion and circumcision where applicable. Conversion also illustrates the connection between religion and peoplehood: the Rabbinical Assembly describes candidates as becoming members of the Jewish people, while the Central Conference of American Rabbis recognizes a convert as Jewish rather than as a non-Jewish partner in a mixed marriage. (rabbinicalassembly.org)

Descent criteria differ between religious movements. On March 15, 1983, the Central Conference of American Rabbis adopted a resolution for North American Reform Judaism recognizing children of either a Jewish mother or a Jewish father, provided their Jewish status is established through appropriate public and formal acts of identification with the Jewish faith and people. Examples include receiving a Hebrew name, Torah study, and bar or bat mitzvah. The resolution requires a positive and exclusive Jewish identity; it does not make paternal ancestry alone sufficient. Thus, a person raised Jewish by a Jewish father and non-Jewish mother may be recognized as Jewish within Reform Judaism but require conversion under Orthodox or Conservative standards. (ccarnet.org)

Secular identity introduces another distinction between religious status and lived belonging. Pew’s 2020 survey classified 27% of American Jewish adults as “Jews of no religion”: respondents who described their religion as atheist, agnostic, or nothing in particular, but had a Jewish parent or were raised Jewish and identified as Jewish culturally, ethnically, or through family background. This research category is neither a rabbinic ruling nor a synonym for non-practicing Judaism: respondents identifying their religion as Jewish were classified as “Jews by religion” regardless of observance. Cultural participation can include reading Jewish literature, studying family history, or engaging with Jewish media without belonging to a religious denomination. (pewresearch.org)

Civil law employs definitions for different purposes. Israel’s Law of Return, enacted in 1950 and amended in 1970, defines a Jew for its purposes as someone born to a Jewish mother or converted to Judaism who is not a member of another religion. Separately, its immigration rights extend to children and grandchildren of Jews and specified spouses, subject to statutory exceptions. Eligibility therefore includes some people who are not Jewish under traditional religious law. The statute illustrates why religious membership, ancestry-based immigration eligibility, citizenship, and cultural self-identification cannot be used as interchangeable measures of Jewish identity. (loc.gov)

Core Beliefs and Theology

Jewish monotheism affirms one God and requires exclusive allegiance to that God. The Shema, beginning in Deuteronomy 6:4, expresses this principle; its Hebrew wording is translated both as an affirmation that God is one and as a declaration that God alone is Israel’s God. Exodus 20:3–5 prohibits other gods, the making of images for worship, and bowing to or serving them. These prohibitions connect belief with conduct: divine uniqueness excludes worship directed toward competing deities or their representations. (sefaria.org) In Mishneh Torah, “Foundations of the Torah” 1, Maimonides interprets divine unity as more than numerical singularity. God is neither a body composed of parts nor a member of a class; biblical references to divine hands, movement, or bodily posture are figurative accommodations to human language. (sefaria.org)

The covenant (berit) gives this relationship a collective and intergenerational form. In the biblical narrative, Genesis 17 links God’s covenant with Abraham to descendants, the land of Canaan, and circumcision as its sign. At Sinai, Moses communicates a covenant in which Israel’s status as God’s treasured people is explicitly connected to obedience: Exodus 19:5–6 makes keeping the covenant the condition of becoming a kingdom of priests and a holy nation. Election therefore carries obligations, rather than simply conferring protection. Amos 3:2 makes the connection particularly sharp by presenting Israel’s special relationship with God as the reason for punishment of its wrongdoing. These passages ground chosenness in responsibility toward God and covenantal requirements. (sefaria.org)

Hope for redemption includes the restoration of Israel’s dispersed community and religious life in Zion. In “Kings and Wars” 11:1, Maimonides describes the Messiah as a future king of David’s line who restores Davidic rule, rebuilds the Temple, gathers the dispersed, and renews the observance of laws associated with the restored community. His criteria concern accomplishments, not merely claims or supernatural signs: chapter 11:3 states that the expected king need not perform miracles or raise the dead. (sefaria.org) A different interpretation appears in the Reform Pittsburgh Platform, adopted at a conference held on November 16–19, 1885, convened by Kaufmann Kohler and presided over by Isaac Mayer Wise. It understood messianic hope as the establishment of universal truth, justice, and peace, while rejecting an expectation of return to Palestine or restored sacrificial worship. The contrast concerns the content of redemption—national and institutional restoration, or a universal ethical transformation—not simply whether a better future is expected. (ccarnet.org)

Resurrection, immortality, and the olam ha-ba, or world to come, constitute related but distinguishable theological ideas. Daniel 12:2 depicts people awakening from the dust, some to everlasting life and others to shame. Mishnah Sanhedrin 10:1 declares that Israel has a share in the world to come, but then identifies exclusions, including denial that resurrection is taught by the Torah. (sefaria.org) Maimonides’ “Repentance” 8 describes the world to come as bodiless life, whose blessedness consists in knowledge of God rather than physical pleasures. The 1885 Pittsburgh Platform instead affirmed the immortality of the soul while explicitly rejecting bodily resurrection and everlasting punishment or reward in spatially conceived hell and paradise. These formulations should not be collapsed into a single, uniform account of life after death. (sefaria.org)

Reward and punishment also operate within earthly covenantal history. Deuteronomy 11:13–17 associates obedience with seasonal rain and agricultural abundance, and turning to other gods with drought and loss of the land. Its account concerns the community’s livelihood and continued residence, not only an individual’s fate after death. (sefaria.org) In “Repentance” 5, Maimonides makes free will essential to moral accountability: individuals can choose righteous or wrongful conduct, making commandments, judgment, and repentance meaningful. He also addresses the apparent tension between choice and divine foreknowledge, arguing that God’s knowledge cannot be understood on the model of human knowledge. (chabad.org)

Sacred Texts: Tanakh, Talmud, and Midrash

The Tanakh, or Hebrew Bible, contains 24 books arranged in three divisions: Torah (“Teaching”), Nevi’im (“Prophets”), and Ketuvim (“Writings”); its name is an acronym of these Hebrew terms. The Torah comprises Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. Nevi’im includes historical narratives such as Joshua and Kings alongside prophetic books such as Isaiah and Jeremiah. Ketuvim contains poetry, wisdom, narrative, and historical writing, including Psalms, Job, Esther, Daniel, and Chronicles. The count of 24 treats Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles as one book each, combines Ezra–Nehemiah, and groups the twelve Minor Prophets into a single book. Most of the text is Hebrew, with some passages in Aramaic. (myjewishlearning.com)

The canon developed through successive recognition of texts as authoritative, rather than a single act of compilation. The Torah acquired authority earlier than the complete collection of Writings. Rabbinic tradition associates biblical books with figures such as Moses, David, and Solomon; historical scholarship distinguishes these traditional attributions from questions of composition and editing. Ancient Jewish communities did not all recognize identical collections: texts such as Enoch and Jubilees held authority at Qumran but were excluded from the rabbinic canon. Later rabbinic discussions questioned the apparent contradictions in Ecclesiastes and between Ezekiel and the Torah. The once-common theory that a “Council of Jamnia” definitively closed the canon around 90 CE is not an established historical event; canon formation was a longer process. (myjewishlearning.com)

Rabbinic Judaism distinguishes the Written Torah from the Oral Torah, the inherited body of interpretation and teaching traditionally traced to Moses at Sinai. Its principal early compilation is the Mishnah, edited under Judah ha-Nasi, or Judah the Prince, around 200 CE. Written in Hebrew, it organizes teaching by subject rather than following biblical verses. Its six orders address agriculture and blessings; Sabbaths and festivals; marriage and related matters; civil and criminal law; sacrifices and sacred things; and ritual purity. The Mishnah preserves disagreements between named sages rather than presenting only final rulings. Related teachings appear in the Tosefta (“Supplement”) and in baraitot, traditions outside the Mishnah subsequently cited in rabbinic discussion. (politicalscience.yale.edu)

The Talmud combines the Mishnah with the Gemara, subsequent analysis that examines its wording, tests rules against hypothetical cases, reconciles conflicting traditions, and relates teachings to scripture. Two distinct compilations developed. The Jerusalem Talmud, compiled principally in Galilee rather than Jerusalem, took shape around the fourth and early fifth centuries; the Babylonian Talmud developed in Jewish scholarly centers in Mesopotamia during the fifth and sixth centuries, with later editorial activity. Their Gemaras employ different Aramaic dialects. The Babylonian work generally develops longer arguments and became the dominant basis of subsequent rabbinic study and legal interpretation. Neither covers the entire Mishnah. Both include legal discussion alongside stories, biblical exposition, and ethical teaching, making Talmud study an exercise in reconstructing arguments rather than simply extracting rules. (intellectualdiaspora.org)

Midrash denotes both methods of scriptural interpretation and collections employing them. Unlike the Mishnah’s topical arrangement, midrash commonly proceeds from particular biblical passages. Legal midrash connects commandments to scriptural wording: the Mekhilta interprets Exodus, Sifra interprets Leviticus, and Sifre collections interpret Numbers and Deuteronomy. Narrative and homiletical midrash develops theological and ethical meanings through verbal details, parallels between verses, parables, and expansions of biblical stories. In Genesis Rabbah 22:7, for example, interpreters address Genesis 4:8’s failure to report what Cain said to Abel by proposing disputes over property, sacred space, or marriage. Such explanations preserve alternative readings rather than supplying a single replacement narrative. (myjewishlearning.com)

Later writings extended these interpretive traditions in different directions. The Zohar, a major mystical commentary on the Torah, circulated in late-thirteenth-century Spain through Moses de León. Traditionally attributed to the second-century sage Shimon bar Yochai, it is historically associated with medieval composition and compilation. It reads biblical narratives as disclosures of hidden divine realities, rather than primarily as sources of legal rules. The Zohar thus belongs to the expanding literature of interpretation, not to the 24-book biblical canon; its mystical teachings are distinct from the Mishnah and Gemara’s characteristic legal analysis. (jewishencyclopedia.com)

Law and Practice: Halakha and the Commandments

Halakha encompasses religious duties, civil law, and rules governing daily conduct, rather than separating worship from matters such as contracts, property, and marriage. Its sources include biblical commandments, their interpretation through the Oral Torah, rabbinic enactments, and recognized customs. The traditional count of 613 commandments, or mitzvot, appears in the Babylonian Talmud, Makkot 23b, in a teaching attributed to Rabbi Simlai: 248 positive commands and 365 prohibitions. This enumeration concerns commandments attributed to the Torah, not every subsequent halakhic rule. Its symbolic correspondences—to the bodily members recognized in rabbinic anatomy and the days of the solar year—express the comprehensive scope of obligation. (encyclopedia.yivo.org)

Halakhic reasoning distinguishes scriptural obligations (de-oraita) from rabbinic obligations (de-rabbanan), including protective decrees and institutional enactments. This distinction can affect decisions under uncertainty. In Mishneh Torah, Rebels 1:5, Maimonides states that, when authorities disagree and the correct ruling cannot be determined, a scriptural question calls for the stricter position, whereas a rabbinic question calls for the more lenient one. Elsewhere in that chapter, he describes interpretation, deliberation, and majority voting as mechanisms of the supreme rabbinic court. These are legal procedures within his account of rabbinic authority, not a requirement that every later dispute be settled by counting all rabbis. Religious obligation also incorporates overriding priorities: his laws of the Sabbath explain that danger to life warrants setting aside Sabbath restrictions. (sefaria.org)

Rabbis address particular problems through responsa, the literature of she’elot u-teshuvot, or questions and answers. Such rulings connect the circumstances presented by a questioner with textual interpretation, earlier decisions, and legal precedent. Collections of responsa preserve both practical conclusions and the arguments supporting them. Legal codes organize this extensive material for consultation. Joseph Karo completed the Shulchan Arukh in Safed in 1563, and it was first published in Venice in 1565. Its four divisions address daily worship and festivals; dietary rules and other religious practices; marriage and divorce; and civil law. Moses Isserles’s glosses incorporated Ashkenazi rulings and customs alongside Karo’s predominantly Sephardi positions, allowing differing traditions to remain visible within the same legal work. (encyclopedia.yivo.org)

Kashrut, the dietary laws, illustrates how biblical provisions acquire detailed practical applications through interpretation. Leviticus 11 permits land mammals that both chew the cud and have divided hooves, and aquatic creatures possessing fins and scales; pigs and shellfish consequently fall outside those permitted categories. Rabbinic law also develops the biblical prohibition against cooking a kid in its mother’s milk into rules concerning meat-and-milk mixtures. Shulchan Arukh, Yoreh De‘ah 87, distinguishes the scriptural prohibition concerning meat from kosher domesticated mammals from the rabbinic prohibition on eating poultry with milk. It separately considers cooking, eating, and deriving benefit from mixtures, demonstrating that “forbidden food” is not a single undifferentiated legal category. (sefaria.org)

Ritual purity likewise concerns defined legal states rather than simply cleanliness. Contact with a corpse and certain bodily discharges can produce tum’ah, or ritual impurity; purification procedures vary with its source. Immersion in a mikveh, a legally constituted ritual pool, addresses many forms of impurity, but corpse impurity additionally requires the prescribed sprinkling associated with the red heifer. Purity and hygiene are therefore distinct: water meeting ritual requirements need not possess the characteristics of a modern hygienic bath. These distinctions explain why halakhic discussions specify the source of impurity, the affected person or object, and the required procedure instead of treating purification as ordinary washing. (myjewishlearning.com)

Minhag, established custom, can carry normative authority within a community without becoming a universal biblical commandment. A concrete example appears in Shulchan Arukh, Orach Chayim 453:1: Karo permits cooked rice and legumes during Passover because they do not constitute the prohibited leaven, whereas Isserles records the Ashkenazi custom of abstention and states that it should not be changed. Later commentaries further qualified the code’s rulings and acquired authority in their own right. Diversity of practice thus reflects different inherited customs, interpretations, and hierarchies of authority, as well as disagreement over individual cases. (sefaria.org)

Origins: Ancient Israel and the Bronze Age Near East

The earliest widely accepted extrabiblical reference to Israel occurs on the victory stele of Pharaoh Merneptah, dated to approximately 1208 BCE, near the end of the Bronze Age. Its account of an Egyptian campaign in Canaan names Israel alongside places such as Ashkelon and Gezer, but uses a hieroglyphic determinative identifying Israel as a people rather than a city or territorial state. The inscription establishes the presence of a population called Israel in Canaan; it does not establish that population’s origins or confirm the biblical conquest narrative. Archaeological surveys reveal a marked expansion of small agricultural settlements in the central highlands around 1200 BCE. Continuities in pottery and other material remains underpin models in which early Israelites emerged substantially from local Canaanite populations, potentially incorporating pastoral groups and migrants, rather than through a single invasion. (thetorah.com)

Genesis presents Israel’s ancestry through Abraham and Sarah, Isaac and Rebekah, and Jacob, Leah, and Rachel, linking their households with Mesopotamia, Canaan, and Egypt. These stories are not contemporary Bronze Age records, and no securely identified contemporary evidence independently attests these individuals. Twentieth-century scholars compared their customs with second-millennium BCE documents from Mari and Nuzi: adoption to secure an heir and arrangements for a servant woman to bear children appeared especially suggestive. Such practices, however, were not confined to that millennium and therefore cannot securely date the narratives. Historical interpretation distinguishes between possible memories of older social conditions, the later literary formation of the stories, and their function in explaining kinship, territorial associations, and Israel’s relationship with neighboring peoples. (oyc.yale.edu)

Israelite writings developed within the literary and legal cultures of Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt. Genesis’s flood account shares a sequence of motifs with Mesopotamian traditions preserved in Atrahasis and Gilgamesh: divine destruction, a warned survivor, construction of a vessel, preservation of living creatures, and sacrifice afterward. Biblical law likewise employs the conditional case formulation found in Near Eastern law collections; Exodus 21:28–32, concerning an ox that gores a person, provides a particularly close comparison. Treaty conventions—including historical prologues, obligations, blessings, and curses—also supplied a framework for representing the covenant between God and Israel. Egyptian influence is visible in wisdom literature: Proverbs 22–23 contains close parallels with the Instruction of Amenemope, including prohibitions on exploiting the poor. These correspondences concern texts composed and transmitted over centuries, not proof that the biblical works already existed in the Bronze Age. (thetorah.com)

Religious practices also show continuity with the surrounding West Semitic world. Texts from Ugarit illuminate divine names, poetic imagery, and sacrificial practices also encountered in Israelite literature. El, the senior deity of the Canaanite pantheon, bears titles and protective functions resembling those attributed to God in the patriarchal narratives. Israelites worshiped at local sanctuaries with altars, standing stones, and offerings of animals, grain, and liquids. Biblical polemics against Baal, Asherah, and local “high places” therefore record disputes within Israelite religious life as well as opposition to neighboring cults. The development of exclusive allegiance to Yahweh should not be equated with an already uniform, fully articulated monotheism among the earliest communities. (oyc.yale.edu)

The biblical account places Saul, David, and Solomon before the division into northern Israel and southern Judah, but the scale and organization of their monarchy remain subjects of archaeological debate. Ninth-century BCE inscriptions provide firmer external evidence for the kingdoms: the Moabite Mesha inscription names Omri of Israel, while the Tel Dan stele refers to the “House of David,” indicating a recognized dynastic designation associated with Judah. Israel’s political center was Samaria, whereas Jerusalem became Judah’s royal and religious center. The biblical narrative attributes Jerusalem’s First Temple to Solomon and describes its dedication as the sanctuary of the Ark of the Covenant. Its royal patronage, priesthood, and sacrificial worship tied the monarchy to the cult of Yahweh. Northern Israel fell to Assyria in the late eighth century BCE; Babylonian forces under Nebuchadnezzar II destroyed Jerusalem and its temple in 587/586 BCE. (thetorah.com)

Second Temple Judaism and Hellenistic Pressure

After Cyrus II of Persia conquered Babylon in 539 BCE, displaced Judeans and their descendants were permitted to return to Jerusalem and rebuild its sanctuary. The biblical accounts associate the reconstruction with the governor Zerubbabel and the high priest Joshua; the Second Temple was dedicated in 515 BCE, during the reign of Darius I. Judah, known administratively as Yehud, remained under Persian authority rather than becoming a restored independent monarchy. Its governors and priesthood exercised different forms of local leadership. The fifth-century BCE accounts of Ezra and Nehemiah connect communal reconstruction with the promulgation of Torah, the rebuilding of Jerusalem’s walls, Sabbath observance, and measures regulating marriage and membership. Return did not eliminate the diaspora: Jewish communities continued in Babylonia and elsewhere, including the military settlement at Elephantine in Egypt. (iranicaonline.org)

The conquests of Alexander the Great brought Judea under Macedonian power in 332 BCE. Subsequently, the territory passed through Ptolemaic and Seleucid rule. Hellenistic influence operated through urban institutions, Greek-language education, administration, and participation in a wider Mediterranean culture, not simply through compulsory religious assimilation. Greek-speaking Jews produced translations of their scriptures, especially in Alexandria, demonstrating that Greek culture could serve Jewish religious purposes. In Jerusalem, however, changes to civic institutions became entangled with competition over the high priesthood: Jason obtained royal permission to establish a gymnasium and an institution for training young citizens. Such projects linked elite advancement to Greek civic practices and intensified disputes within Jewish society. (tile.loc.gov)

In 167 BCE, Antiochus IV Epiphanes’ measures against Jewish religious observance and the introduction of a non-Jewish cult into the Temple precipitated the Maccabean revolt. Resistance was led by the priest Mattathias and his sons, notably Judah Maccabee, and involved conflict with both Seleucid forces and Jewish supporters of Hellenization. Judah’s forces recovered and rededicated the Temple in 164 BCE, the event commemorated by Hanukkah. This restoration of worship did not immediately establish political independence. Fighting and negotiation continued, and Simon, Judah’s brother, secured exemption from Seleucid tribute in 142 BCE. The resulting Hasmonean dynasty joined priestly authority with territorial government and subsequently kingship. Its rulers nevertheless participated in the Hellenistic political world they had initially resisted; their coins, for example, combined Jewish symbols and Hebrew inscriptions with Greek inscriptions. (data1.geo.univie.ac.at)

Religious authority was contested among groups conventionally identified as Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes. Josephus describes the Pharisees as accepting inherited interpretations and observances beyond the written Mosaic law, whereas the Sadducees rejected the binding authority of those traditions. They also differed over resurrection, which the Pharisees affirmed and the Sadducees denied. These categories do not encompass every form of Jewish religious life. The Dead Sea Scrolls provide evidence independent of later descriptions: manuscripts from eleven caves near Qumran date from the third century BCE to the first century CE and include approximately 230 biblical manuscripts, alongside commentaries, prayers, calendrical writings, and communal regulations. The Community Rule describes the Yahad, a disciplined association with rules governing admission and conduct. Many scholars associate this community with the Essenes, but the identification does not establish that every Qumran manuscript was composed by them. (bible.org)

Pompey captured Jerusalem in 63 BCE, bringing Judea under Roman domination. Herod, a Roman client king, ruled from 37 to 4 BCE. The revolt against the Roman Empire beginning in 66 CE culminated in the capture of Jerusalem and destruction of the Temple by Titus’ army in 70 CE; resistance continued afterward at strongholds including Masada. The destruction terminated the Jerusalem sacrificial cult and removed its central sanctuary, creating the conditions for the subsequent reorganization of Jewish religious institutions. Further rebellions followed: the Bar Kokhba revolt of 132–135 CE is documented not only by literary accounts but also by coins, military correspondence, and legal documents preserved in Judean desert refuge caves. (rsc.byu.edu)

Formation of Rabbinic Judaism

The destruction of the Jerusalem Temple by the Romans in 70 CE ended its sacrificial service, but did not eliminate institutions of worship outside it. Synagogues already existed in Judaea and the diaspora; their functions included communal assembly and the reading of scripture. After 70, prayer, scriptural interpretation, and the regulation of everyday conduct became increasingly important means of sustaining Jewish religious life without a functioning sanctuary. This was not an immediate transfer of authority from priests to rabbis. Synagogues retained their own leaders, patrons, and customs, while rabbinic circles gradually developed institutions and teachings whose influence extended beyond their students. Inscriptions from late-antique synagogues rarely identify rabbis as congregational officers, cautioning against treating all post-Temple Jewish communities as already governed by rabbinic norms. (encyclopedia.com)

Yavneh, also known as Jamnia, became an important center of this reconstruction. Rabbinic traditions associate its establishment with Yohanan ben Zakkai and its subsequent leadership with Rabban Gamaliel II, active in the late first and early second centuries. Its significance lay in combining teaching with deliberation over religious practice and communal affairs: scholars transmitted inherited interpretations, adjudicated questions, and sought common standards in the absence of the Temple. A concrete example appears in Mishnah Rosh Hashanah 4:1: after the destruction, Yohanan permitted the sounding of the shofar when the festival fell on the Sabbath wherever a court was present, extending a practice previously associated with the Temple. Following the Bar Kokhba revolt of 132–135 CE, rabbinic activity developed in Galilean centers including Usha, Beth Shearim, and Sepphoris. These centers were settings for networks of teachers and judges rather than universities in the modern sense. (encyclopedia.com)

Around 200 CE, Judah ha-Nasi supervised the compilation of the Mishnah, giving accumulated rabbinic teaching a common framework for transmission and discussion. Its six orders contained 63 tractates covering agriculture, festivals, family relations, civil disputes, sacrifices, and purity. The work organized material chiefly by subject rather than by the sequence of biblical verses, and preserved disagreements alongside unattributed rulings. Its treatment of damages, contracts, and marriage supplied material for teachers and judges, while its extensive sacrificial regulations maintained the Temple service as an object of study despite its cessation. Compilation did not extinguish oral transmission: memorization, recitation, and explanation remained central to learning. The Mishnah became a shared starting point from which later scholars could compare inherited opinions and develop further arguments. (myjewishlearning.com)

During the following centuries, scholars known as amoraim interpreted the Mishnah in Roman Palestine and Babylonia, in lower Mesopotamia. In the early third century, Rav, or Abba Arika, taught at Sura, while Samuel was associated with Nehardea; Pumbedita subsequently became another major Babylonian center. Their discussions and those of later generations contributed to the Gemara, which, together with the Mishnah, formed the two Talmuds. The Palestinian, conventionally called Jerusalem, Talmud took shape chiefly in Galilee during the fourth and fifth centuries. The Babylonian Talmud underwent compilation and editorial development during the fifth and sixth centuries. These were cumulative products of teaching and interpretation, not records of a single assembly or compositions completed on one securely identifiable date. (cdn.vanderbilt.edu)

Rabbinic liturgy established a repeatable structure of worship centered on the twice-daily Shema and its accompanying blessings, the Amidah, or standing prayer, and public Torah reading. The Amidah was conventionally called the “Eighteen,” although its standard weekday form eventually contained nineteen blessings. Rabbinic teaching also connected prayer schedules with the former sacrifices: Babylonian Berakhot 26b relates morning and afternoon prayer to the daily offerings, evening prayer to the overnight burning of sacrificial remains, and the additional Musaf prayer to additional offerings. This preserved the sanctuary’s temporal pattern without reproducing its sacrificial acts. The early sources establish prayer themes and structures more clearly than a universally fixed wording; complete prayer books belong to the later, post-Talmudic period. (myjewishlearning.com)

Diaspora Life in the Middle Ages

Under the Abbasid Caliphate, Jewish communal leadership in Iraq combined the exilarchate, a hereditary office recognized by the state, with the scholarly authority of the geonim, heads of the academies of Sura and Pumbedita. The exilarch represented the community before the government, while the academies answered questions about religious law from distant congregations. Written responsa connected communities across political boundaries: the ninth-century gaon Sar Shalom ben Boaz left more than 100 surviving responses, including explanations of differing Babylonian customs that allowed correspondents some choice between practices. This correspondence helped disseminate Babylonian rabbinic learning without eliminating local traditions. (sefaria.jewishencyclopedia.com) Jews under Islamic rule generally held dhimmi, or protected non-Muslim, status, which permitted religious practice and communal administration but entailed the jizya tax and legal inequalities; particular restrictions varied by ruler and period. (en.wikipedia.org)

The Cairo Genizah provides unusually detailed evidence of everyday Jewish life in the Islamic Mediterranean. Beginning in the early eleventh century, the community of Fustat deposited not only religious manuscripts but also business accounts, letters, marriage contracts, divorce deeds, and shopping lists in the storeroom of the Ben Ezra Synagogue. These documents illuminate household relationships and commerce alongside religious institutions; letters to Joseph ibn ʿAwkal, a merchant active around the turn of the eleventh century, record trading connections with North African towns. (lib.cam.ac.uk) In al-Andalus, Muslim-ruled Spain, Jewish courtiers supported scholarship and Hebrew poetry. Hasdai ibn Shaprut, approximately 915–975, served as an adviser to the rulers of Córdoba. Jewish writers adapted Arabic poetic metres to Hebrew and used Arabic for scientific and philosophical prose. Such opportunities were neither universal nor permanent: the Almohad conquests of the twelfth century brought religious coercion, and Maimonides’ family fled Córdoba. (jewishamericanheritagemonth.com)

Two influential regional traditions developed within medieval European Jewry. Ashkenazi culture took shape in northern France and German-speaking lands, whereas Sephardi culture developed in Iberia under both Muslim and Christian governments. They shared rabbinic texts but differed in Hebrew pronunciation, prayer customs, and approaches to scholarship. (jewishamericanheritagemonth.com) Ashkenazi vernacular speech developed into Yiddish, alongside the continued use of Hebrew and Aramaic for study, worship, and writing; medieval migration subsequently carried this culture eastward. (encyclopedia.yivo.org) Communal autonomy provided an institutional framework for these traditions. Communities administered internal justice and collective obligations under privileges granted by rulers. In Poland, Bolesław the Pious’s charter of 1264 recognized Jewish protection and jurisdiction, although communal authority did not extend to capital crimes. This autonomy remained dependent on the surrounding political order rather than constituting independent sovereignty. (encyclopedia.yivo.org)

In Christian Europe, restrictions on occupations and public office coexisted with rulers’ use of Jewish commercial and financial services. Crusading violence and false accusations, including blood libel and claims that Jews caused the Black Death, repeatedly endangered communities. (encyclopedia.ushmm.org) Expulsion could also transfer Jewish property to royal control. Edward I issued England’s expulsion order on July 18, 1290, requiring departure by November 1; approximately 3,000 Jews were forced to leave, and their houses were forfeited to the crown. Philip IV expelled Jews from France in 1306. (nationalarchives.gov.uk) On March 31, 1492, Ferdinand and Isabella ordered Jews who did not convert to Christianity to leave their Spanish realms, disrupting the remaining openly Jewish communities of Iberia. (apnews.com)

Medieval scholars supplied tools of interpretation and legal organization that remained central to later Jewish study. Rashi, Solomon ben Isaac of Troyes (1040–1105), wrote commentaries on the Hebrew Bible and Babylonian Talmud that explained difficult language and arguments; his teaching also helped establish northern France as a centre of rabbinic scholarship. (loc.gov) Maimonides, Moses ben Maimon (1138–1204), settled in Fustat after reaching Egypt in 1166. His fourteen-book Mishneh Torah systematically arranged Jewish law rather than following the Talmud’s sequence of debate. Its comprehensiveness provoked concern among scholars who feared that a definitive code might displace talmudic study. His Guide of the Perplexed, completed in 1190, became a major work of Jewish philosophy, extending his influence beyond legal scholarship. (rep.routledge.com)

Kabbalah, Mysticism, and Jewish Philosophy

Kabbalah—literally “tradition” or “receiving”—developed as a recognizable mystical theology in late twelfth-century Provence and thirteenth-century Spain, drawing on earlier Jewish traditions concerning creation and the divine chariot described in Ezekiel. The Sefer ha-Bahir (“Book of Brilliance”), which circulated in Provence during the late twelfth century, helped establish the symbolism of the sefirot, divine powers through which the hidden God becomes manifest. The Zohar (“Book of Splendor”), a predominantly Aramaic collection of scriptural interpretations and mystical narratives, emerged in late thirteenth-century Castile. Traditionally attributed to the second-century sage Shimon bar Yohai, it is associated by historical scholarship with Moses de León and a medieval literary milieu; the extent of its multiple authorship and earlier textual layers remains debated. (jtsa.edu)

Kabbalistic theology distinguishes Ein Sof, the infinite and unknowable divine reality, from ten sefirot, commonly translated as “emanations.” These include wisdom (Hokhmah), understanding (Binah), loving-kindness (Hesed), judgment or strength (Gevurah), and kingship (Malkhut). They are understood as interrelated manifestations of divinity, not independent gods. Their relationships explain how divine unity can coexist with the differentiated world and how mercy and judgment operate within it. Prayer, scriptural study, and commandments acquire a cosmic significance: properly directed human actions can promote harmony within the divine realm. Mystical intention, or kavvanah, therefore supplements rather than simply replaces outward ritual observance. (myjewishlearning.com)

Jewish philosophy of religion developed alongside these traditions through engagement with Arabic-language theology and Greek philosophy. Saadia Gaon (882–942), in his Book of Beliefs and Opinions, defended the compatibility of reason and revelation using arguments influenced by Islamic kalām. He distinguished commandments accessible to reason, such as prohibitions against murder and theft, from revealed commandments whose particulars require authoritative instruction. Maimonides (1138–1204), writing the Guide of the Perplexed in Judeo-Arabic around 1190, engaged extensively with Aristotle as transmitted through Islamic philosophy. He interpreted biblical descriptions of God’s body or emotions figuratively and argued that divine essence cannot be characterized by ordinary positive attributes. Although he accepted creation, he denied that either creation or the eternity of the universe had been conclusively demonstrated. His rationalism thus included explicit limits on human knowledge. (plato.stanford.edu)

Sixteenth-century Safed became a major center of mystical reinterpretation, notably through Moses Cordovero (1522–1570) and Isaac Luria (1534–1572). Luria’s teachings, transmitted especially through his disciple Hayyim Vital, described creation through tzimtzum, divine withdrawal or contraction; shevirat ha-kelim, the “shattering of the vessels” receiving divine light; and tikkun, repair. In this account, the shattering scattered divine sparks into the material world. Observance of commandments and prayer with appropriate intentions could release and elevate these sparks, contributing to cosmic restoration. This gave everyday religious action a role in overcoming primordial disorder and advancing redemption. (myjewishlearning.com)

Hasidism arose in eighteenth-century Podolia around Israel ben Eliezer, the Baal Shem Tov (c. 1700–1760), and expanded through teachers including Dov Ber of Mezritsh, who died in 1772. Hasidic teachings emphasized devekut, attachment to God, joyful devotion, and the religious significance of ordinary activities. The tzaddik, or rebbe, became a spiritual guide whose authority rested on perceived holiness and charisma; leadership subsequently became largely dynastic. Intellectual contemplation also remained important: Shneur Zalman of Liady’s Tanya, first published in 1797, provided the Chabad school with a systematic account of divine presence and spiritual discipline. (encyclopedia.yivo.org)

Disagreements concerned both methods of knowing God and the authority of religious leaders. Maimonidean interpretation privileged philosophical analysis, whereas Kabbalah assigned revelatory significance to symbolic readings and mystical traditions. Opposition to Hasidism, however, was not simply rationalism confronting mysticism. The organized campaign beginning in Vilna in 1772 challenged altered prayer practices, the popularization of mystical devotion, and the authority of rebbes. Its leading opponents also valued Kabbalah. Hayyim of Volozhin’s Nefesh ha-Hayyim (1824), for example, employed kabbalistic theology while defending Torah study as the central religious activity, showing how mystical concepts supported competing models of Jewish religious life. (plato.stanford.edu)

Haskalah, Emancipation, and Reform

The Haskalah, or Jewish Enlightenment, promoted secular learning, competence in European languages, and participation in wider society without necessarily abandoning Jewish observance. Its advocates, known as maskilim, encouraged changes in education and the cultivation of Hebrew literature alongside vernacular literacy. Moses Mendelssohn (1729–1786), a central figure in Berlin, exemplified this combination: his German translation of the Pentateuch, published in Hebrew characters with the Hebrew commentary Bi’ur in 1780–1783, made German accessible through a familiar script and sacred text. The Hebrew periodical Ha-Me’assef, founded in Königsberg in 1783, provided a forum for the movement. In nineteenth-century Eastern Europe, maskilim likewise used Hebrew writing to advocate educational and occupational change; Isaac Ber Levinsohn’s Te‘udah be-Yisra’el, published in Vilna in 1828, became an influential expression of the Russian Haskalah. (encyclopedia.yivo.org)

Jewish emancipation changed legal status rather than prescribing religious reform. In France, the French Revolution transformed debates about Jews from questions of corporate privileges into questions of individual citizenship. On September 27, 1791, the National Assembly extended full citizenship to the remaining excluded Jewish population. Equality entailed the surrender of separate communal political autonomy: Jews were to participate as citizens subject to the state’s laws. Napoleon subsequently convened Jewish notables in 1806 and a Grand Sanhedrin in 1807 to clarify the relationship between Jewish obligations and French civil authority. Elsewhere, emancipation proceeded unevenly. In Britain, the removal of the parliamentary oath barrier in 1858 allowed Lionel de Rothschild to take his seat without professing Christianity. (myjewishlearning.com)

In North America, settlement and legal equality followed a different chronology. Twenty-three Jewish refugees from Dutch Brazil reached New Amsterdam in 1654, while Jews established themselves in Newport, Rhode Island, by 1658. Colonial settlement and congregational worship did not themselves constitute uniform civic emancipation. After independence, George Washington’s 1790 correspondence with Newport’s Hebrew congregation affirmed liberty of conscience and equal citizenship. State-level restrictions nevertheless persisted: Maryland’s requirement that officeholders declare belief in Christianity prompted petitions beginning in 1797. Its 1826 “Jew Bill” modified that requirement, opening public office to Jews. These developments illustrate the distinction between permission to reside and worship, recognition as citizens, and eligibility for political office. (loc.gov)

Reform Judaism emerged through changes to synagogue worship as well as arguments about religious authority. The Hamburg Temple, dedicated on October 18, 1818, introduced German prayers and organ accompaniment, and modified parts of the traditional messianic liturgy. Vernacular worship raised questions about comprehension and civic integration, while disputes over Hebrew concerned continuity with inherited prayer and the wider Jewish community. Abraham Geiger subsequently advocated reform through historical study of Judaism, distinguishing enduring religious principles from practices shaped by particular historical circumstances. Rabbinical conferences at Brunswick in 1844, Frankfurt in 1845, and Breslau in 1846 attempted to coordinate changes but also exposed disagreements over their permissible extent. Early reformers sometimes defended innovations through rabbinic precedents rather than rejecting traditional authority altogether. (jewishencyclopedia.com)

Traditionalist responses were not uniform. Moses Sofer, the Ḥatam Sofer (1762–1839), opposed religious innovation, adapting a talmudic prohibition concerning new grain into a principle against changes to inherited practice. Samson Raphael Hirsch (1808–1888), by contrast, combined opposition to ritual reform with support for engagement in modern culture and secular education. His approach, associated with Torah im derekh eretz, treated such engagement as compatible with binding religious obligations. These positions differed over how to meet modern conditions, not simply over whether Jews should encounter them. (encyclopedia.yivo.org)

New seminaries institutionalized these competing approaches. Zacharias Frankel became founding director of the Breslau Jewish Theological Seminary in 1854; its “positive-historical” approach joined practical adherence to Judaism with historical inquiry. Esriel Hildesheimer founded an Orthodox rabbinical seminary in Berlin in 1873, combining traditional textual study with subjects including philosophy, pedagogy, and biblical history. In the United States, Isaac Mayer Wise founded Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati in 1875 to train rabbis for the developing Reform movement. Rabbinical preparation thus increasingly incorporated specialized institutions and academic disciplines alongside the study of inherited religious texts. (saebi.isgv.de)

Denominations and Contemporary Movements

Denominational affiliation is especially prominent in the United States, but it does not necessarily indicate synagogue membership or a uniform level of observance. Pew Research Center’s 2020 survey found that 37% of American Jewish adults identified as Reform, 17% as Conservative, and 9% as Orthodox; 4% identified with other branches or multiple streams, while 32% reported no particular denomination. These categories do not map directly onto Israeli identities, where Haredi (“ultra-Orthodox”), Dati (“religious”), Masorti (“traditional”), and Hiloni (“secular”) describe broad social and religious orientations rather than membership in denominational organizations. (pewresearch.org)

Orthodox Judaism treats halakha, Jewish religious law, as binding and responds to new circumstances through inherited methods of rabbinic interpretation. Its internal differences concern engagement with surrounding society as well as religious practice. Haredi communities emphasize intensive religious study and communal boundaries; they include Hasidic and non-Hasidic traditions. Modern Orthodoxy combines halakhic observance with participation in secular education and professional life. Yeshiva University’s ideal of Torah Umadda, integrating Torah learning and secular knowledge, provides an institutional example: Rabbi Norman Lamm’s 1990 book of that title examined how the arts and sciences could fit within an Orthodox religious framework. These orientations therefore differ in their understanding of engagement with modernity, not simply in the amount of religious observance they require. (myjewishlearning.com)

Conservative Judaism, also called Masorti Judaism internationally, maintains halakha as authoritative while emphasizing its historical development and capacity for change through legal interpretation. The Rabbinical Assembly’s Committee on Jewish Law and Standards institutionalizes this approach: a responsum receiving at least six favorable votes becomes an approved position, allowing more than one answer to a question to receive recognition. Reform Judaism places greater emphasis on informed personal choice, adaptation, and the diversity of legitimate Jewish practice. It affirms God, Torah, and Israel as central principles while accepting varied understandings of belief and observance. Its encouragement of study, worship, and ritual distinguishes religious autonomy from the abandonment of tradition. (rabbinicalassembly.org)

Reconstructionist Judaism developed from Mordecai Kaplan’s conception of Judaism as the evolving religious civilization of the Jewish people. This approach encompasses culture, history, language, and collective belonging alongside religion, and explicitly understands human communities as agents of religious change. Kaplan’s religious naturalism interpreted religious experience within the natural world rather than through supernatural intervention. Although he initially promoted Reconstructionism as a school of thought rather than a separate denomination, the opening of the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College in 1968 established an independent institution for training its religious leadership. (reconstructingjudaism.org)

Gender and conversion illustrate how different understandings of authority produce practical divisions. Hebrew Union College–Jewish Institute of Religion ordained Sally Priesand on June 3, 1972, making her the first woman rabbi ordained in North America. By contrast, the Orthodox Union’s 2017 statement rejected women’s appointment to clergy roles or clergy titles within its synagogue framework while recognizing other professional contributions. On March 15, 1983, the Central Conference of American Rabbis adopted a North American Reform resolution recognizing the child of either a Jewish mother or father when Jewish upbringing and public acts established Jewish identification. Conversion also remains a boundary between movements: most Orthodox rabbis do not recognize non-Orthodox conversions, whereas Reform and Reconstructionist rabbis, and Conservative rabbis under specified circumstances, recognize conversions performed outside their own movements. (huc.edu)

Humanistic Judaism offers organized Jewish community without supernatural authority. Its origins lie in Sherwin Wine’s establishment of the Birmingham Temple in Michigan in 1963; its celebrations employ human-centered, non-theistic language while retaining holidays, life-cycle ceremonies, and cultural heritage. Jewish Renewal, associated particularly with Zalman Schachter-Shalomi, instead emphasizes spiritual renewal through contemplation, chant, mysticism, and participatory worship. ALEPH, formed in 1993, supports this transdenominational approach. Neither movement encompasses secular Jewish identity as a whole: secular identification can coexist with selected traditional practices, as Pew’s 2016 Israeli study documented among Hiloni Jews who observed dietary customs or fasted on Yom Kippur. (sherwinwine.com)

The Holocaust and Modern Persecution

The Holocaust, also called the Shoah, was the systematic persecution and murder of approximately six million Jews by Nazi Germany and its allies and collaborators. Between 1933 and 1945, persecution developed from exclusion and dispossession into continent-wide genocide; approximately two-thirds of Europe’s prewar Jewish population were murdered. Nazi classification targeted ancestry rather than religious observance: under the 1935 Nuremberg Laws and their implementing regulations, people with three or four Jewish grandparents were classified as Jews, including converts to Christianity. Secular Jews and religious Jews therefore faced the same underlying threat. During Kristallnacht, on November 9–10, 1938, organized anti-Jewish violence destroyed synagogues and businesses and was followed by further discriminatory measures. (encyclopedia.ushmm.org)

World War II brought millions more Jews under German control. In occupied Poland, German authorities confined Jews in ghettos, where overcrowding, inadequate food, disease, and brutal treatment caused mass death. After Germany invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941, SS and police units, including the Einsatzgruppen, carried out mass shootings that expanded from killing Jewish men to murdering entire communities. The “Final Solution” combined these shootings with deportation to killing centers in occupied Poland, including Chełmno, Bełżec, Sobibór, Treblinka, and Auschwitz-Birkenau. Railways transported victims across Europe, frequently under the deceptive description of “resettlement”; most people sent to killing centers were murdered upon arrival using gas chambers or gas vans. More than 2.7 million Jews were murdered in these five centers. (main.ushmm.org)

Jewish resistance included armed rebellion, escape, partisan activity, clandestine education, religious observance, and documentation. After approximately 265,000 Warsaw Jews were deported to Treblinka in summer 1942, the Jewish Fighting Organization, led by Mordecai Anielewicz, prepared resistance to further deportations. The Warsaw ghetto uprising began on April 19, 1943; German forces suppressed it by May 16. Resistance also sought to preserve communal institutions and historical evidence. Secret schools, prayer gatherings, diaries, and cultural activities countered efforts to destroy Jewish social and religious life. In Warsaw, historian Emanuel Ringelblum organized the clandestine Oneg Shabbat archive, whose participants collected testimony and records of everyday life and persecution and buried materials for later recovery. (encyclopedia.ushmm.org)

Liberation did not immediately restore security or a home. From 1945 to 1952, more than 250,000 Jewish displaced persons lived in camps and urban centers in Germany, Austria, and Italy. Survivors established schools, religious institutions, newspapers, and social organizations; yeshivot operated at Bergen-Belsen, Föhrenwald, and Feldafing. These institutions enabled education, worship, and the formation of new families while survivors awaited resettlement. By 1952, more than 80,000 Jewish displaced persons had immigrated to the United States, approximately 136,000 to Israel, and another 20,000 to other countries, including Canada and South Africa. (encyclopedia.ushmm.org)

Anti-Jewish persecution continued after the Nazi defeat. On July 4, 1946, soldiers, police officers, and civilians in Kielce, Poland, murdered at least 42 Jews following a false accusation of ritual kidnapping. The massacre accelerated the departure of Jewish survivors from Poland. In the Soviet Union, Stalin’s late anti-Jewish campaigns culminated in the “Doctors’ Plot,” publicized in January 1953: physicians, including prominent Jewish doctors, were arrested and accused of participating in a conspiracy against Soviet leaders. Following Stalin’s death on March 5, 1953, Soviet authorities repudiated the accusations and released and rehabilitated the surviving imprisoned doctors. (encyclopedia.ushmm.org)

Commemoration and scholarship preserve both individual experiences and the history of destroyed communities. Survivor testimony featured prominently in Adolf Eichmann’s 1961 trial in Jerusalem. Yad Vashem’s Holocaust remembrance ceremonies include the lighting of six torches, representing the six million murdered Jews. On November 1, 2005, the United Nations designated January 27—the anniversary of Auschwitz’s liberation—as an annual international day of commemoration. Historical estimates of Jewish losses draw on surviving German records, Jewish wartime documentation, resistance records, and prewar and postwar demographic studies; no single Nazi document records every death. (wwv.yadvashem.org)

Zionism, the State of Israel, and Diaspora Communities

Modern Zionism developed in late nineteenth-century Europe as a movement seeking a legally secured Jewish homeland in Palestine. Its organizational methods included immigration, settlement, fundraising, and negotiations with governments. Theodor Herzl convened the First Zionist Congress in Basel in August 1897; its Basel Program proposed promoting Jewish settlement, organizing Jewish communities internationally, strengthening national consciousness, and obtaining governmental approval for the movement’s aims. Herzl was elected president of the resulting Zionist Organization. The program sought a homeland secured through public law rather than defining an immediately realizable sovereign state. Zionist organization therefore joined practical settlement projects to international diplomacy. (jewishvirtuallibrary.org)

On November 29, 1947, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 181 (II), recommending the partition of British Mandatory Palestine into independent Jewish and Arab states linked by an economic union. Jerusalem and its surroundings were to constitute a separately administered international territory, or corpus separatum. The resolution also prescribed constitutional protections for religious freedom, minority rights, and equal citizenship. Jewish leaders accepted partition, while Arab leaders rejected it. On May 14, 1948, David Ben-Gurion proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel, and U.S. president Harry S. Truman recognized the new state that day. Fighting between Jewish and Arab forces, followed by war involving neighboring Arab states, prevented implementation of the proposed arrangement. Approximately 750,000 Palestinians fled or were expelled during the war surrounding Israel’s creation; Palestinians commemorate this displacement and dispossession as the Nakba, meaning “catastrophe.” (un.org)

Israel institutionalized its relationship with Jews outside its territory through immigration legislation. The Law of Return, enacted in 1950, established a right of Jewish immigration, known as aliyah. Its 1970 amendment extended eligibility to a Jew’s children and grandchildren, and to spouses of Jews, their children, and their grandchildren, subject to statutory exceptions. Eligibility under this national law thus extends beyond membership as defined by traditional Jewish religious law. The Jewish Agency provides practical assistance through immigration information, absorption centers, Hebrew instruction, and preparation for employment or university study. Its Ulpan Etzion program, founded in 1949, combines accommodation with intensive Hebrew-language education for immigrant university graduates. (main.knesset.gov.il)

Connections between Israel and diaspora communities also operate without permanent migration. Jewish Agency-supported educational visits bring young people from different countries to Israel; examples include programs for French teenagers and Mexican Jewish day-school students. In the United States, attachment to Israel varies considerably by age and religious affiliation. Pew Research Center’s survey conducted in 2019–2020 found that 82% of Jewish adults considered caring about Israel an essential or important element of being Jewish, while 58% felt very or somewhat emotionally attached to Israel. Attachment was reported by 67% of those aged 65 and older, compared with 48% of those aged 18–29. These measures describe identity and connection, not uniform approval of Israeli governmental policy; the same survey separately documented divergent political assessments. (jewishagency.org)

Religion–state arrangements create another point of interaction and disagreement. The 1947 “status quo” compromise preserved religious authority over Jewish marriage and divorce and provided educational autonomy for different religious groups. The Rabbinical Courts Jurisdiction Law of 1953 subsequently placed Jewish marriage and divorce within a state-recognized rabbinical framework. Orthodox standards govern that framework, including for Jews affiliated with Reform or Conservative Judaism, producing disputes over religious pluralism within both Israel and diaspora communities. In State and Religion in Israel (2018), Gideon Sapir and Daniel Statman distinguish Jewish national identity from compulsory government under halakhah. Their philosophical and legal inquiry examines concrete controversies over marriage, Sabbath observance, and military service by yeshiva students. (wwws.loc.gov)

The constitutional expression of Jewish nationhood is also debated in relation to democracy and minority citizenship. The Basic Law adopted on July 19, 2018, defines Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people and reserves national self-determination within the state to that people. It establishes Hebrew as the state language, gives Arabic a special status, and directs the state to strengthen ties with diaspora Jews and preserve their cultural and religious heritage. Parliamentary debate recorded competing arguments: supporters presented the law as constitutional recognition of Jewish national identity, whereas opponents challenged its implications for equality and the position of non-Jewish citizens. These disputes concern the distribution of national and civic rights as well as the place of religion in public institutions. (main.knesset.gov.il)

Demography and Population Estimates

The global Jewish population was estimated at roughly 15.8 million in 2025, but this figure represents a defined demographic population rather than everyone with Jewish ancestry. The historical comparison remains significant: Israel’s Central Bureau of Statistics gives a worldwide total of 16.6 million in 1939, before the Holocaust, and 11.5 million in 1948. Thus, subsequent population growth had still not restored the prewar total by 2025. The geographical distribution changed much more sharply: approximately 449,000 Jews lived in what became Israel in 1939, and 650,000 in 1948, compared with more than seven million in the mid-2020s. (jpost.com)

Israel and the United States together contain more than 85 percent of the world’s core Jewish population. Sergio DellaPergola’s harmonized estimates for January 1, 2024 placed 7,153,000 Jews in Israel and 6,300,000 in the United States—45.5 and 40.0 percent of the global total, respectively. Other substantial communities were much smaller: France had approximately 438,500 Jews, Canada 400,000, the United Kingdom 313,000, and Argentina 170,000. These figures require a common reference date: the Jewish Agency’s October 2024 announcement rounded the worldwide population to 15.8 million and Israel’s population to 7.3 million, whereas the annual demographic tables described the beginning of that year. (cbs.gov.il)

Jewish demography distinguishes several overlapping populations. The core Jewish population generally includes people identifying as Jewish by religion or otherwise, without another religious identity; it includes secular Jews and is not restricted to synagogue members or religiously observant people. The population with Jewish parents extends the count to additional people with at least one Jewish parent, including those identifying as partly Jewish. The enlarged Jewish population adds non-Jewish members of their households. A further measure estimates people eligible under Israel’s Law of Return, extending beyond the core population to specified descendants and family members. These categories measure different forms of connection and should not be treated as interchangeable estimates of religious adherence. (jewishagency.org)

Estimates combine national censuses, population registers, sample surveys, and communal records of births, deaths, migration, and conversion. Researchers must reconcile differing questions and definitions before comparing countries. The American case illustrates the consequences: Pew Research Center estimated 7.5 million Jews in 2020, including children raised Jewish either exclusively or alongside another religion. DellaPergola’s narrower interpretation of the same survey produced a core estimate of 6.3 million. Pew also counted adults without a religion who considered themselves Jewish through ancestry, upbringing, or culture. Consequently, a survey limited to the question “What is your religion?” would omit part of the population that broader Jewish identity surveys include. (cbs.gov.il)

Age structure and fertility produce divergent regional trajectories. Pew’s 2020 survey found a median age of 49 among Jewish American adults, compared with 46 among American adults generally; Orthodox Jewish adults had a substantially younger median age of 35. In Israel, Jewish fertility averaged approximately 3.0 children per woman in 2023, above generational replacement, and births exceeding deaths supplied most Jewish population growth that year. Migration therefore changes the distribution of Jews between countries, but natural increase is particularly important to Israel’s expanding share of the worldwide population. (pewresearch.org)

Decline elsewhere is uneven rather than universal. A 2020 study by DellaPergola and Daniel Staetsky estimated Europe’s core Jewish population at about 1.3 million, compared with 3.2 million in 1970. Large-scale emigration from the former Soviet Union accounted for much of this contraction, alongside aging and demographic change within remaining communities. Latin American communities have also experienced sustained emigration: more than 36,000 immigrants from the region arrived in Israel between 2001 and 2023. Mexico and Panama were exceptions to the broader regional pattern, receiving Jewish migrants from other Latin American countries. (jpr.org.uk)

Religious Calendar and Life-Cycle Rituals

The Hebrew calendar is lunisolar: months follow the lunar cycle, while intercalation keeps festivals aligned with the solar seasons. Months contain 29 or 30 days; ordinary years have twelve months, and leap years add a second Adar. Seven years in each nineteen-year cycle—years 3, 6, 8, 11, 14, 17, and 19—are leap years, preventing Passover from drifting out of spring. Calendar days begin at sunset rather than midnight, so festivals begin on the preceding evening in civil calendars. Nisan is the first month in the biblical ordering, although the numbered year changes at Rosh Hashanah in Tishrei. (chabad.org)

Passover, Shavuot, and Sukkot are the three biblical pilgrimage festivals, formerly associated with journeys to the Jerusalem Temple. Passover begins on 15 Nisan and commemorates the Exodus: its seder, an ordered ceremonial meal, combines narration, questions, symbolic foods, and unleavened bread, or matzah. It lasts seven days in Israel and traditionally eight in the diaspora. Shavuot begins on 6 Sivan after the forty-nine-day counting of the omer; originally associated with harvest offerings, it acquired the additional meaning of commemorating the giving of the Torah at Sinai. Sukkot begins on 15 Tishrei and lasts seven days, marked by eating—and, in traditional practice, sleeping—in a temporary booth, or sukkah, and using four plant species in worship. Shemini Atzeret follows; Simchat Torah marks the completion and restart of the annual Torah-reading cycle. (myjewishlearning.com)

The High Holidays organize a period of repentance. Rosh Hashanah, observed on 1–2 Tishrei, introduces the Ten Days of Repentance; sounding the shofar, a ram’s-horn trumpet, is a characteristic observance. Yom Kippur on 10 Tishrei centers on confession, prayer, and abstention from food and drink from before sunset until nightfall the following day. Other fasts commemorate historical calamities: Tisha B’Av mourns the destruction of the Jerusalem Temples, while shorter fasts generally extend from dawn to nightfall. The annual cycle also includes Purim, commemorating the deliverance narrated in Esther, and the eight-day Hanukkah festival, commemorating the Temple’s rededication and marked by successive nightly candle-lighting. (en.wikipedia.org)

Shabbat extends from Friday sunset to Saturday nightfall. Traditional observance distinguishes prohibited melakhah from physical exertion: the Mishnah enumerates thirty-nine categories of productive activity, associated with constructing the biblical Tabernacle, rather than simply forbidding strenuous work. These categories include cooking, writing, kindling fire, and carrying between specified domains. Household observances include candle-lighting before sunset, kiddush over wine, blessings over bread, and shared meals; synagogue worship includes the weekly Torah reading. Havdalah, with blessings over wine, fragrant spices, and a flame, marks the separation between sacred and ordinary time. (myjewishlearning.com)

Life-cycle rituals connect changes in personal status with communal recognition. Brit milah, the covenantal circumcision ceremony for boys, traditionally occurs on the eighth day; naming ceremonies for girls take several forms. Bar and bat mitzvah signify responsibility for the commandments, traditionally beginning at thirteen for boys and twelve for girls, although many communities celebrate both at thirteen. This status does not depend on holding a ceremony; public celebrations commonly involve Torah reading and other participation in worship. On March 18, 1922, twelve-year-old Judith Kaplan, daughter of Rabbi Mordecai Kaplan, celebrated a pioneering public American bat mitzvah in New York. (myjewishlearning.com)

A traditional Jewish marriage ceremony takes place beneath a chuppah, or canopy, and includes a ring, a ketubah recording marital obligations, seven blessings, and the breaking of a glass. Mourning proceeds through defined periods following burial: shiva lasts seven days, with mourners receiving visitors, while sheloshim extends through the thirtieth day, including shiva, with reduced restrictions. Mourning for a parent continues for twelve months; the Mourner’s Kaddish is traditionally recited for eleven months. The annual yahrzeit, the anniversary of death according to the Hebrew calendar, renews remembrance through prayer and customary candle-lighting. (myjewishlearning.com)

Synagogues, Rabbis, and Education

The synagogue combines three functions expressed in its Hebrew names: beit tefillah, a house of prayer; beit midrash, a house of study; and beit knesset, a house of assembly. Its activities therefore extend beyond worship to teaching and communal gatherings. Synagogues existed before the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple in 70 CE; afterward, their importance as centers of communal prayer increased. No single style of architecture defines a synagogue, but its furnishings organize worship around scripture: the ark, or aron ha-kodesh, contains Torah scrolls; the bimah provides a platform or reading table; and the ner tamid, an enduring light near the ark, recalls the sanctuary lamp. The ark generally occupies the wall facing Jerusalem. Orthodox congregations separate men’s and women’s seating with a mechitzah, while seating arrangements differ in other movements. (myjewishlearning.com)

A rabbi’s authority rests principally on learning, teaching, and interpretation of Jewish law, rather than on membership in the hereditary priesthood. Rabbinic qualification, usually called semikhah or ordination, is granted by a rabbi or institution after prescribed study; its requirements vary among movements. Congregational rabbis teach, preach, answer religious questions, and provide pastoral leadership. The cantor, or hazzan, specializes in leading prayer and transmitting its musical forms, although knowledgeable lay members can also lead services. Professional preparation combines textual competence with practical training. For example, the Jewish Theological Seminary’s 2024–2025 rabbinical curriculum assumed a five-year course of study encompassing Talmud, biblical interpretation, halakhah, Jewish languages, professional skills, internships, and clinical pastoral education. Its cantorial program included vocal assessment, liturgical modes, performance examinations, and pastoral training. (myjewishlearning.com)

The yeshiva is an institution devoted to intensive study of Jewish texts, especially the Talmud and its commentaries. A beit midrash is the study hall in which such learning takes place and may belong to a yeshiva, synagogue, or independent educational institution. Hayyim of Volozhin established the Volozhin yeshiva around 1803; it became an influential model for Eastern European advanced religious education. A characteristic study method is havruta: partners read a passage, question one another’s interpretations, compare commentaries, and prepare for or review a teacher’s shiur, or lesson. Although paired study has ancient precedents, it should not be treated as the exclusive historical method; individual study and teacher-led instruction also played substantial roles in nineteenth-century yeshivas. (devencyclopedia.yivo.org)

Jewish day schools combine religious and general education in a full-time program, whereas supplementary schools provide Jewish instruction alongside attendance at another school. Curricular priorities vary: schools allocate different amounts of time to Hebrew, scripture, rabbinic texts, prayer, and general subjects. Some are affiliated with Orthodox, Conservative, or Reform Judaism; others are pluralistic community schools. These arrangements have developed through distinct local histories. In the United States, New York’s B’nai Jeshurun established a congregational day school in 1842, part of a nineteenth-century movement combining secular and religious instruction. Synagogue-based afternoon and Sunday schools subsequently became another important institutional form. (myjewishlearning.com)

Tzedakah, obligatory charitable giving, also has an institutional dimension. In Mishneh Torah, “Gifts to the Poor” 9:1–3, the twelfth-century scholar Maimonides prescribed communal trustees who collected contributions and distributed a weekly fund, the kuppah, sufficient to provide poor recipients with seven days’ sustenance. He distinguished this from the tamhui, a daily distribution of food or money, which was not maintained in every community. The regulations specified joint collection by two trustees, placing communal resources under shared administration. In 10:7, Maimonides ranked assistance that prevents dependence—through a gift, loan, partnership, or employment—above other forms of giving. These provisions make mutual aid a structured communal responsibility, with designated officers, collection schedules, and distribution procedures. (chabad.org)

Languages and Literature

Hebrew remained a language of scripture, prayer, scholarship, and literary composition after it ceased to be the ordinary mother tongue of most Jews. Its modern revival therefore expanded an existing textual and religious language into everyday speech rather than reconstructing a wholly lost language. Beginning in late nineteenth-century Palestine, Eliezer Ben-Yehuda promoted Hebrew-speaking households, journalism, and the creation of vocabulary for modern life. Lexical development drew on biblical and rabbinic Hebrew, Aramaic expressions, and newly formed words. Schools, teachers, and successive generations of speakers were essential to making Hebrew a shared vernacular among immigrants with different mother tongues. Literary modernization and spoken revival were related but distinct processes: Hebrew newspapers and secular writing already circulated before a substantial native-speaking population emerged. (en.wikipedia.org)

Diaspora Jewish languages developed through sustained contact with surrounding societies, often combining local linguistic structures with Hebrew-Aramaic vocabulary and distinctive communal usage. Yiddish, associated historically with Ashkenazi Jews, is a West Germanic language with substantial Slavic and Hebrew-Aramaic components, written in the Hebrew alphabet. Linguist Max Weinreich described it as a “fusion language”: in Der zeyde hot gebentsht khanike likht—“The grandfather blessed the Hanukkah candles”—the grammatical framework is Germanic, zeyde is Slavic, khanike is Hebrew-derived, and bentsh has a Romance origin. Ladino, also called Judeo-Spanish or Judezmo, developed from Iberian Romance varieties. Sephardi communities maintained it after the late-fifteenth-century expulsions from Spain, while incorporating Turkish, Greek, Arabic, and other influences in their new homes. (jewishlanguages.org)

Judeo-Arabic encompasses Jewish varieties of Arabic rather than a single uniform language; its written forms commonly employ Hebrew characters. It supported biblical translation, commentary, and philosophy, including Judah Halevi’s Kuzari and Maimonides’ Guide of the Perplexed, both composed in the twelfth century. Other diaspora traditions include Judeo-Persian, Judeo-Italian, Judeo-Greek, and Jewish varieties of Neo-Aramaic. Vernacular writing made inherited learning accessible beyond Hebrew-proficient scholarly circles. A major Ladino example is Jacob Huli’s Me‘am Lo‘ez, an encyclopedic biblical commentary whose first volume appeared in Istanbul in 1730. Ladino also preserved Spanish-derived narrative ballads, or romances, and subsequently developed novels, plays, journalism, and adaptations of European fiction. (jewishlanguages.org)

Medieval Hebrew poetry included both liturgical verse and secular compositions on love, friendship, wine, mourning, and patronage. In tenth-century al-Andalus, Dunash ben Labrat adapted Arabic quantitative metres to Hebrew, establishing techniques developed by Samuel ha-Nagid, Solomon ibn Gabirol, Moses ibn Ezra, and Judah Halevi. Their poetry combined biblical diction with forms and aesthetic conventions learned from Arabic literature; religious commitment did not exclude secular subjects. Modern Hebrew writers likewise reworked inherited language for new purposes. Hayim Nahman Bialik (1873–1934) wrote poetry, children’s literature, translations, and essays. His “On the Slaughter,” written in 1903 after the Kishinev pogrom, used Hebrew poetry to address contemporary persecution. Later writers, including Lea Goldberg, Yehuda Amichai, Amos Oz, and Aharon Appelfeld, extended Hebrew literature into modernist poetry and internationally translated fiction. (assets.press.princeton.edu)

Modern Yiddish literature developed a recognized canon around Sholem Yankev Abramovitsh, whose literary persona was Mendele Moykher-Sforim, Sholem Aleichem, and I. L. Peretz. Sholem Aleichem’s Di yidishe folks-bibliotek, first published in 1888, helped establish a literary platform and promote standards of realism and criticism. Peretz drew on folklore while developing new narrative forms and encouraging younger writers. Translation carried this literature beyond Yiddish readerships: Saul Bellow’s English translation of Isaac Bashevis Singer’s “Gimpel the Fool” helped introduce Singer to American readers. Singer received the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1978, bringing international recognition to a writer who continued composing in Yiddish. (encyclopedia.yivo.org)

Jewish literary production also encompasses writing in languages without a specifically Jewish linguistic designation. The 1966 Nobel Prize in Literature was shared by Hebrew novelist S. Y. Agnon and German-language poet Nelly Sachs, recognizing different literary treatments of Jewish experience. English-language novelist Saul Bellow received the prize in 1976; The Adventures of Augie March (1953), Herzog (1964), and Humboldt’s Gift (1975) became major works of American fiction. These careers illustrate why Jewish literature is not synonymous with Hebrew literature or religious writing: its authors participate simultaneously in Jewish cultural traditions and the literary institutions of the languages in which they write. (nobelprize.org)

Arts, Music, and Ethical Tradition

Jewish liturgical music distinguishes the chanting of scripture from the musical delivery of prayers. In cantillation, Hebrew accent signs (teʿamim) mark stress and syntactic relationships while indicating melodic phrases: conjunctive accents connect words, whereas disjunctive accents establish pauses of different strengths. The notation therefore guides interpretation as well as performance. Ashkenazi, Sephardi, and Middle Eastern communities assign different melodies to the same signs, with additional distinctions between readings from the Torah, the Prophets, and other biblical books. Cantorial prayer, by contrast, permits freer elaboration of traditional musical themes associated with particular services and occasions. (jewishencyclopedia.com)

Jewish musical traditions developed through interaction with surrounding musical cultures and changes in performance settings. Salomon Sulzer, cantor in Vienna, combined inherited synagogue melodies with contemporary choral harmonization in Shir Ẓiyyon, published in two volumes in 1840 and 1865. His arrangements differentiated the cantor’s recitative, the choir’s singing, and congregational responses. Hasidic practice cultivated niggunim, including melodies sung to wordless syllables, as expressions of religious devotion outside as well as within formal worship. In the early twentieth-century United States, immigrant cantors such as Yossele Rosenblatt and Mordechai Hershman extended the audience for cantorial music through touring and commercial recordings, making synagogue vocal styles accessible beyond individual congregations. (jewishencyclopedia.com)

The prohibition on idolatry did not produce a uniform rejection of representational art. The synagogue at Dura-Europos, expanded and redecorated in 244–245 CE, contained extensive biblical figure paintings, demonstrating that narrative images could be accommodated in an ancient Jewish worship space. Manuscript illumination likewise joined sacred texts with regional artistic conventions. The Golden Haggadah, produced around 1320, takes its name from the gold-leaf backgrounds of its miniatures; Italian Renaissance manuscripts of Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah and the Rothschild Mahzor also document collaboration between Jewish scribes and Christian artists. Ceremonial metalwork gave artistic form to ritual through Torah crowns, finials, cases, lamps, and spice containers. Examples include silver Torah finials from early eighteenth-century Mantua and a Torah crown made by Giovanni Maria Ronchi in 1764–1777, whose forms reflect local craftsmanship rather than a single universal Jewish style. (duraeuropos.artgallery.yale.edu)

Jewish ethics connects moral obligations with textual study and legal practice. Deuteronomy 16:20 commands the pursuit of justice, while Leviticus 19:13 prohibits oppression, robbery, and withholding a worker’s wages overnight. These injunctions address concrete relationships rather than separating religious observance from economic conduct. The nineteenth-century Musar movement, initiated by Israel Salanter, made the cultivation of character an explicit educational program. His disciples developed differing approaches: Simḥah Zisl Ziv emphasized disciplined attention, humility, and self-observation, while Natan Tsevi Finkel’s Slobodka school stressed human dignity. Musar entered yeshiva curricula through designated study periods and spiritual supervision; at Slobodka, students devoted half an hour daily to ethical texts, sometimes repeating passages aloud with intense self-exhortation. (sefaria.org)

Tikkun olam, commonly translated as “repair of the world,” has acquired different meanings in different settings. In Mishnah Gittin 4:2, it justifies Rabban Gamaliel the Elder’s restrictions on cancelling a divorce document through a court elsewhere and his requirements for identifying the parties accurately. Here the expression supports legal arrangements intended to prevent harmful uncertainty. Later mystical traditions associated repair with restoring divine or cosmic order; its widespread use for social responsibility and social justice developed particularly in twentieth-century American Jewish life. These meanings should not be treated as interchangeable, although modern interpreters have connected them. (voices.sefaria.org)

Modern applications of Jewish ethics have included participation in campaigns concerning civil rights and public law. Abraham Joshua Heschel marched alongside Martin Luther King Jr. at the beginning of the Selma-to-Montgomery march on March 21, 1965. In his subsequent account, Heschel described the march as both protest and worship, linking political action with religious obligation. The modern social-justice vocabulary of tikkun olam similarly carries inherited ethical language into debates about collective responsibility, but its historical development does not establish a single Jewish political program or erase distinctions between moral exhortation, religious law, and state legislation. (heschel.jtsa.edu)

References

1. Jewish identity and belief in the U.S.pewresearch.org
2. Who Is a Jew: Matrilineal Descentmyjewishlearning.com
3. Mishnah Kiddushin 3:1sefaria.org
4. Code of Professional Conductrabbinicalassembly.org
5. Conversion in a Time of COVID-19rabbinicalassembly.org
6. Conversion to Judaismrabbinicalassembly.org
7. Report of the Committee on Patrilineal Descent on the Status of Children of Mixed Marriagesccarnet.org
8. Child/ren Archives - Page 4 of 4ccarnet.org
9. Baptism and Jewish Statusccarnet.org
10. Jewish Americans in 2020pewresearch.org
11. Deuteronomy 6:4sefaria.org
12. Exodus 20:3sefaria.org
13. Mishneh Torah, Foundations of the Torah 1sefaria.org
14. Mishneh Torah, Foundations of the Torah 1:1sefaria.org
15. Genesis 17sefaria.org
16. Kingdom of Priests (Exodus)voices.sefaria.org
17. Amos 3:2sefaria.org
18. Mishneh Torah, Kings and Wars 11:1 with Translationssefaria.org
19. Judaism and Messiah, Session 6voices.sefaria.org
20. Article Declaration of Principlesccarnet.org
21. Daniel 12:2sefaria.org
22. Mishnah Sanhedrin 10:1sefaria.org
23. The Old Testamentmyjewishlearning.com
24. Books of the Tanakhstjohnsarlingtonva.org
25. The Jewish Study Bible: JPS Tanakhstmarksrva.org
26. Creating the Jewish Canonmyjewishlearning.com
27. The Bible as Christian Scripturesbl-site.org
28. Talmudic Law: A General Overviewpoliticalscience.yale.edu
29. 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Talmuden.wikisource.org
30. What Is the Mishnah?myjewishlearning.com
31. Talmud, Babylonianintellectualdiaspora.org
32. Tale of Two Talmuds: Jerusalem and Babylonianmyjewishlearning.com
33. Talmuden.wikipedia.org
34. Sifra and Sifremyjewishlearning.com
35. Shulḥan ‘arukh — YIVO Encyclopediaencyclopedia.yivo.org
36. Mishneh Torah, Rebels 1 — The Sefaria Librarysefaria.org
37. Talmud — Makkoth (E)halakhah.com
38. Mishneh Torah, Sabbath 2:3 — Sefaria Librarysefaria.org
39. Rabbinic Literature before 1800 — YIVO Encyclopediaencyclopedia.yivo.org
40. Leviticus 11 with Navigation — The Sefaria Librarysefaria.org
41. Shulchan Arukh, Yoreh De'ah 87:10 — The Sefaria Librarysefaria.org
42. Introduction to the Jewish Rules of Purity and Impurity — My Jewish Learningmyjewishlearning.com
43. What Is A Mikveh? — My Jewish Learningmyjewishlearning.com
44. Shulchan Arukh, Orach Chayim 453 — The Sefaria Librarysefaria.org
45. Shulḥan ‘arukh — YIVO Encyclopediaencyclopedia.yivo.org
46. Merneptah Stelethetorah.com
47. Merneptah Steleen.wikipedia.org
48. RLST 145 - Lecture 12 - The Deuteronomistic History: Life in the Land (Joshua and Judges)oyc.yale.edu
49. RLST 145 - Lecture 6 - Biblical Narrative: The Stories of the Patriarchs (Genesis 12-36)oyc.yale.edu
50. The Flood Story in Its Ancient Near Eastern Contextthetorah.com
51. The Ancient Near Eastern Background of Biblical Lawposenlibrary.com
52. Behind | Instruction of Amenemope, Part 1odbu.org
53. RLST 145 - Lecture 7 - Israel in Egypt: Moses and the Beginning of Yahwism (Genesis 37- Exodus 4)oyc.yale.edu
54. Do Biblical Laws Reflect a Tribal Society?thetorah.com
55. Tel Dan Stelethejewishmuseum.org
56. Hellenistic Judaismtile.loc.gov
57. Gymnasium — Jewish Virtual Libraryjewishvirtuallibrary.org
58. The Maccabean Revolt — Digitaler Ausstellungskatalogdata1.geo.univie.ac.at
59. The Hasmonean Calendar Begins with the Rule of Simon the High Priest, 142 B.C.E.thetorah.com
60. Coins (prutot) of the Hasmonean kings Mattathias Antigonus, Judah Aristobulus, and Alexander Jannaeus (Yehonatan)artsandculture.google.com
61. Resurrection in Early Jewish Texts — Posen Libraryposenlibrary.com
62. The Dead Sea Scrolls — Introductiondeadseascrolls.org.il
63. The Dead Sea Scrolls — Featured Scrollsdeadseascrolls.org.il
64. The First Jewish Revolt against Romersc.byu.edu
65. The Dead Sea Scrolls — Historical Timelinedeadseascrolls.org.il
66. Synagogues, Ancientencyclopedia.com
67. Rabbinic and Other Judaisms from 70 to 250cdn.vanderbilt.edu
68. Gamli?el of Yavnehencyclopedia.com
69. Johanan Ben Zakkaiencyclopedia.com
70. Mishnah Rosh Hashanah 4:1–9sefaria.org
71. The Mishnah as a Response to Catastrophemyjewishlearning.com
72. Mishnahen.wikipedia.org
73. Talmudencyclopedia.com
74. History of Jewish Prayermyjewishlearning.com
75. The Amidahmyjewishlearning.com
76. Berakhot 26b with Halakhahsefaria.org
77. EXILARCH - JewishEncyclopedia.comsefaria.jewishencyclopedia.com
78. SAR SHALOM BEN BOAZ - JewishEncyclopedia.comjewishencyclopedia.com
79. Dhimmien.wikipedia.org
80. Jizyaen.wikipedia.org
81. Taylor-Schechter Genizah - A Priceless Collectionlib.cam.ac.uk
82. Genizah Fragments: Volume 9wwwe.lib.cam.ac.uk
83. Judaism – Rabbinic, Ashkenazic, Sephardic | Britannicajewishamericanheritagemonth.com
84. Maimonides (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
85. Yiddish - YIVO Encyclopediaencyclopedia.yivo.org
86. Kahal - YIVO Encyclopediaencyclopedia.yivo.org
87. Antisemitism in History: From the Early Church to 1400encyclopedia.ushmm.org
88. Why the Jews: History of Antisemitismushmm.org
89. The Origins of Kabbalah in Medieval Europe - Jewish Theological Seminaryjtsa.edu
90. Sefer ha-Bahir: The Book of Brilliancemyjewishlearning.com
91. The Archaeology of the Zohar: Sifra Ditseniʽuta as a Sample Textcris.tau.ac.il
92. What Are the Sefirot?myjewishlearning.com
93. The Kabbalistic Conception of Godmyjewishlearning.com
94. Kabbalah and Mysticism 101myjewishlearning.com
95. Saadya [Saadiahplato.stanford.edu
96. Kabbalah and Hasidismmyjewishlearning.com
97. The Ari: Rabbi Isaac Luriamyjewishlearning.com
98. Historical Overview - YIVO Encyclopediaencyclopedia.yivo.org
99. Teachings and Literature - YIVO Encyclopediaencyclopedia.yivo.org
100. Haskalah - YIVO Encyclopediaencyclopedia.yivo.org
101. Moses Mendelssohn - University of Potsdamuni-potsdam.de
102. The Haskalahjewishvirtuallibrary.org
103. French Jewish History, 1650-1914myjewishlearning.com
104. America as a Religious Refuge: The Seventeenth Century, Part 2loc.gov
105. Timeline of Baltimore Jewry: 1657 - 1849jewishmuseummd.org
106. Reform Judaism from the Point of View of the Reform Jewjewishencyclopedia.com
107. Geiger, Abrahamjewishvirtuallibrary.org
108. Sofer, Mosheh - YIVO Encyclopediaencyclopedia.yivo.org
109. Orthodoxy - YIVO Encyclopediaencyclopedia.yivo.org
110. American and Israeli Jews: Twin Portraits From Pew Research Center Surveyspewresearch.org
111. Orthodox Judaism & Halakhahmyjewishlearning.com
112. Haredim (Charedim), or Ultra-Orthodox Jewsmyjewishlearning.com
113. Torah Umadda Reduxyu.edu
114. Conservative / Masorti Movementrabbinicalassembly.org
115. Committee on Jewish Law and Standardsrabbinicalassembly.org
116. What is Reform Judaism?reformjudaism.org
117. Evolving Religious Civilizationreconstructingjudaism.org
118. Rabbi Mordecai Kaplan as an American Thinkerreconstructingjudaism.org
119. The Founding of the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Collegereconstructingjudaism.org
120. Rabbi Sally Priesand ‘72huc.edu
121. The “Final Solution”encyclopedia.ushmm.org
122. Nuremberg Race Lawsencyclopedia.ushmm.org
123. Kristallnachtencyclopedia.ushmm.org
124. World War II and the Holocaust, 1939–1945main.ushmm.org
125. What Were Camps in the Holocaust?ushmm.org
126. The Warsaw Ghetto Uprisingencyclopedia.ushmm.org
127. Warsaw Ghetto Uprisingencyclopedia.ushmm.org
128. Resistanceushmm.org
129. Displaced Personsencyclopedia.ushmm.org
130. The Kielce Pogrom: A Blood Libel Massacre of Holocaust Survivorsencyclopedia.ushmm.org
131. Doctors’ Plotencyclopedia.yivo.org
132. First Zionist Congress & Basel Program (1897)jewishvirtuallibrary.org
133. Palestine plan of partition with economic union — General Assembly resolution 181 (II)un.org
134. Creation of Israel, 1948history.state.gov
135. About the Nakbaun.org
136. Immigration Committee holds emergency meeting on Government's plan to amend the Law of Returnmain.knesset.gov.il
137. Aliyah Servicesjewishagency.org
138. Services for Young Adult Immigrantsjewishagency.org
139. Teen Israel Experience Programsjewishagency.org
140. Israel: Spousal Agreements for Couples Not Belonging to Any Religion—A Civil Marriage Option?wwws.loc.gov
141. Global Jewish population is 15.8 m., almost half live in Israel, CBS revealsjpost.com
142. On the Occasion of Holocaust Day, 2024cbs.gov.il
143. World Jewish Population, 2024cbs.gov.il
144. Jewish Population Rises to 15.8 Million Worldwidejewishagency.org
145. Jewish Population Rises to 15.7 Million Worldwidejewishagency.org
146. How many Jews live in the World?jpr.org.uk
147. World Jewish Population, 2024cbs.gov.il
148. Jews in Europe at the turn of the Millenniumjpr.org.uk
149. Biblical, Rabbinic, and Modern Holidaysmyjewishlearning.com
150. Jewish Holidayshebcal.com
151. Jewish holidaysen.wikipedia.org
152. List of observances set by the Hebrew calendaren.wikipedia.org
153. Shabbat’s Work Prohibitionmyjewishlearning.com
154. Shabbat at Homemyjewishlearning.com
155. Liturgy, Ritual, and Custom for Babiesmyjewishlearning.com
156. Bar and Bat Mitzvah 101myjewishlearning.com
157. The Synagoguemyjewishlearning.com
158. Synagogue Background & Overviewjewishvirtuallibrary.org
159. Division of Religious Leadership Academic Bulletin 2024–2025jtsa.edu
160. Volozhin, Yeshiva ofdevencyclopedia.yivo.org
161. Havruta: Learning in Pairsmyjewishlearning.com
162. Moving Jewishmyjewishlearning.com
163. History of Jewish Schooling in Americamyjewishlearning.com
164. Revival of the Hebrew languageen.wikipedia.org
165. Eliezer Ben-Yehuda and the Making of Modern Hebrewmyjewishlearning.com
166. The Revival of Hebrewmyjewishlearning.com
167. Yiddish (Eastern)jewishlanguages.org
168. FAQs | Jewish Languagesjewishlanguages.org
169. Judeo-Arabic | Jewish Languagesjewishlanguages.org
170. Jacob Huli’s Me‘am lo‘ez (From a People of Foreign Tongue)posenlibrary.com
171. What is Ladino?myjewishlearning.com
172. The Dream of the Poem: Hebrew Poetry from Muslim and Christian Spain, 950–1492assets.press.princeton.edu
173. Hebrew literatureencyclopedia.com
174. Sholem Aleichemencyclopedia.yivo.org
175. ACCENTS IN HEBREWjewishencyclopedia.com
176. CANTILLATIONsefaria.jewishencyclopedia.com
177. ḤAZZANUTsefaria.jewishencyclopedia.com
178. SULZER, SALOMONjewishencyclopedia.com
179. ZEMIROTjewishencyclopedia.com
180. Synagogueduraeuropos.artgallery.yale.edu
181. Add MS 27210searcharchives.bl.uk
182. Jewish Ceremonial Art from The Jewish Museum, New York, at The Cleveland Museum of Artthejewishmuseum.org
183. Deuteronomy 16:20-22sefaria.org
184. Leviticus 19:13sefaria.org