Allah

Allah is the Arabic word for God and, in Islam, the proper name of the one and only God. Etymologically it is usually derived from a contraction of the Arabic al-ilāh, meaning "the God", and it belongs to a wider family of Semitic words for a deity. Islam treats Allah as the sole object of worship, and the Qurʾān stresses his singularity and sole sovereignty. Because Arabic-speaking Jews and Christians have used the same word for God for centuries, the term also raises questions of language, translation and interfaith theology.

The entry follows the subject from its linguistic origins and its use in pre-Islamic Arabia through the Qurʾānic conception of God, the divine names, and the theological debates that followed. It then compares Allah with the God of the Hebrew and Christian scriptures, examines the controversies over the word in non-Arabic translations, and closes with the philosophical problems of reference, divine attributes and the limits of religious language.

Etymology and Semitic roots

The dominant explanation treats Allāh as a fusion of the Arabic definite article al- ("the") with ʾilāh, "deity," which yields al-lāh, "the god." The majority of scholars consider it to be derived from a contraction of the Arabic definite article al- and ilāh "deity, god" to al-lāh meaning "the deity, the God". Britannica is more cautious, describing the name as probably a contraction of the Arabic al-Ilah, 'the God,'. The contraction is not universally accepted. Classical grammarians of the Basra school regarded it as either formed "spontaneously" (murtajal) or as the definite form of lāh (from the verbal root lyh with the meaning of "lofty" or "hidden."). Other early scholars held that it was borrowed from Syriac or Hebrew. In modern scholarship, a minority hypothesis posits that Allah is a loanword from the Syriac Alāhā. Some classical Arabic linguists instead take the root to mean "the one who is worshipped," emphasizing function rather than grammatical contraction. Another minority view treats the name as a unique, non-derived proper noun without linguistic decomposition. A further technical point concerns the root itself: the Semitic root ʾlh may be ʾl with a parasitic h, and ʾl may be an abbreviated form of ʾlh.

The word belongs to a wider Semitic family of divine names. Britannica traces the earliest attested forms to a time when the word for god was il, el, or eloah. Other early forms include Akkadian ʾilum, Ugaritic ʾilu, and Phoenician ʾl. In Aramaic, the Aramaic ʼElāh (אלה) in the absolute form, and in its definite/emphatic form, ʼElāhā (אלהא), as reflected in Biblical Aramaic. The Syriac form ʼAlāhā, both meaning simply "god", or "deity", used by both monotheists and pagans. The lineage also runs through the figure of El. Originally, ʾilāh was used as an epithet for the West Semitic creator god ʾIlu (the Ugaritic version of El), before being adopted as the proper name itself for this god. El was the creator god and chief deity of the Canaanite pantheon, which is why the root is so closely tied to the older Canaanite religious vocabulary.

The Hebrew forms are closely related to Allāh. Elohim is the plural of ʾélôah, often taken to be an expanded form of ʾēl ("god"). Its plural grammar is misleading: although the word is plural in form, in the Hebrew Bible it most often takes singular verbal or pronominal agreement and refers to a single deity, while in other verses it takes plural agreement and refers to gods in the plural. Elohim has an exact cognate in Ugaritic, ʾlhm, and the Arabic ʾilāh ("god, deity") belongs to the same family. The Hebrew form eloah is itself built on the same base, with an added heh as third radical to the biconsonantal root. The shared base is why scholars regard Allāh and Elohim as cognate rather than as borrowings of one another, though the exact mechanics of the Hebrew expansion remain debated.

The term is generally analysed as a title or common noun rather than a strict proper name because of its morphology and use. Its Arabic sense is the term meaning 'God' for speakers of Arabic irrespective of religion. That usage is consistent with the contraction analysis: a form built on "the" plus "god" describes a role or office before it names a particular being. Its alternation with the uncontracted form also suggests this. In some sources, the contracted and un-contracted forms are used interchangeably. The compound analysis itself remains a matter of dispute. The English form is also late: Arabic name for the Supreme Being, 1702, Alha, from Arabic Allah, according to Etymology Online.

Popular accounts sometimes link Allāh to the Hebrew word ʾelah ("oak"). The Biblia Hebraica blog rejects this, stating that the terms are not related. Its argument rests on sound change: historically long /a/ shifted to /o/ in the Canaanite dialects. That shift produced the vowel in ʾeloah and ʾelohim, which is why the oak word does not fit the pattern. Such sound-correspondence arguments, rather than surface resemblance, are the basis on which Semitic etymologies are generally evaluated.

Allah in pre-Islamic Arabia

A high god within a plural religious world

Before the rise of Islam, the phrase al-ilāh ("the god") named a deity who stood at the top of a divine order, and that figure was typically venerated together with lesser gods Allah was the supreme deity and worshipped alongside lesser deities in a pantheon. The phrase worked as a flexible label. It was a generic title applied to whichever god a group considered the highest. Different communities seem to have attached it to their own principal divinities, so its specific content varied from one group to another tribes applied the name to their own personal high god.

The shrine at Mecca

The clearest picture of this plural setting comes from Mecca. According to Islamic tradition, the Kaaba housed about 360 idols, possibly one for each day of the year, and these included a statue of Hubal, the city's chief idol The Kaaba hosted 360 pagan idols (potentially one representing each day of the year) including sculptures and paintings before Islam, notably including a statue of Hubal, the principal idol of Mecca. Visitors from various tribes came once a lunar year, and during that season their feuds were suspended the pre-Islamic Kaaba was a site of worship for various Arabian Bedouin tribes, who would make pilgrimage once every lunar year, setting aside their tribal feuds. The sanctuary was apparently known as Bayt Allah, "house of Allah" Formerly, this stone was called Beit-Allah, meaning "house of Allah.". Yet other deities were honoured in the same precinct, so the title did not exclude rival cults Allah was worshiped alongside other gods at the Kaaba in Mecca.

Personal names and inscriptions

Onomastic evidence is among the strongest indications of antiquity. Names such as ʿAbd Allah ("servant of Allah") show that the word was in use before the Qur'anic period Evidence indicates that Allah was already known in pre-Islamic Arabia: It appeared in personal names. Muhammad's father is traditionally said to have borne this name. Epigraphy is more contested. An inscription from a church at Umm el-Jimal in northern Jordan was first read by Enno Littmann as naming Allah as a proper name, but a second reading by Bellamy and colleagues rejected that interpretation this view was rejected by a second translation of the five-verse inscription made by Bellamy et al. (1985–88).

Scholarly debate over monotheism

Scholars disagree about how monotheistic the pre-Islamic concept was. One line of argument emphasises a move toward a supreme creator. Marshall Hodgson, for example, suggested that some Arab Christians made pilgrimages to the Kaaba and honoured Allah there as the Creator some Arab Christians undertook pilgrimages to the Kaaba, a pagan temple at that time, honoring Allah there as the God the Creator. A second reading holds that the term existed before Islam without carrying an exclusive theology the term existed prior to Islam but lacked exclusive theological definition. A modern linguistic and historical study describes a development from a general word for deity to a name tied to absolute monotheism, though this remains an interpretive model rather than a settled consensus Allah evolved from a general term for deity into a proper name representing absolute monotheism. The relationship between Allah and Hubal, the principal idol, is also disputed, and it bears directly on whether the Qur'anic redefinition of the term represents continuity with earlier practice or a break from it. The Qur'an itself is discussed in a separate section.

Revelation and the Qurʾānic conception of God

The Qurʾān is the text in which the Islamic doctrine of God is set out. The Qurʾān is the sacred scripture of Islam, believed by Muslims to be the direct word of God revealed to the Prophet Muhammad through the angel Gabriel between 610 and 632 CE. Its wording is Classical Arabic, and believers hold that it mirrors an eternal original kept with God. Because the revelation arrived in Arabic, many Muslims treat the language as part of the message rather than a neutral vehicle for it. Historians of doctrine note, however, that the claim that the Arabic text is an exact copy of that original was not universal and only emerged with the development of Islam over time.

At the centre of this conception stands tawḥīd, the affirmation of God's oneness. In theological usage, tawḥīd denotes belief in one reality and in the unity of God and the origin of being and to have faith in his uniqueness in every respect. The Qurʾān expresses this in many formulas, the best known being "There is no god but He" (2:163). Its rejection of associating partners with God is equally explicit. One passage addresses Muhammad directly: follow what has been revealed to you from your Lord, there is no deity except Him, and turn away from those who associate others with Allah. The same logic underlies the injunction against worshipping other powers alongside God, which the text treats as the root of all error.

The Qurʾān also presents God as the sole source of authority and order in the cosmos. Dominion over the heavens and the earth, in all its dimensions, is reserved to Allah alone. The Throne Verse (2:255) describes Him as the Ever-Living, the Sustainer of [all] existence, and other passages build on this with rhetorical questions. One asks whether there is any creator other than Allah who provides for you from the heaven and earth, the implied answer being that there is none. Creation and sustenance are thus treated as acts that belong to God exclusively, and this exclusivity is the basis for the rejection of rival objects of worship.

The Qurʾān also places its own message within a longer sequence of revelation. Verses such as 10:47 state that every nation has had a messenger. The text names about twenty-five prophets, and twenty-one of which also appear in the Bible. Among them are Abraham, Moses and Jesus. Adam was the first Prophet and Muhammad, PBUH, was the last. Muhammad is accordingly called the "seal of the prophets" in the Qurʾān (33:40). The Qurʾān also requires believers to accept all prophets without distinguishing among them, citing 2:136 for this obligation. Scholars note that the Qurʾānic figures of Abraham and Ishmael are the Islamic counterparts of the biblical figures, although the Muslim interpretation of these figures differs radically from the biblical. The sharpest divergence concerns Jesus, who is seen as divine Son of God in Christianity, but a prophet in Islam. Several prophets are also linked specifically to Arabia. The Qurʾān identifies six prophets as God's messengers to pre-Islamic Arabia: Hud, Salih, Abraham, Ishmael, Shu'ayb, and Muhammad.

Divine names and attributes

The Qurʾān repeatedly describes God through names, and it states that the most beautiful names belong to Him. Later Muslim scholarship gathered these into a set of 99, known as the Asmāʾ al-Ḥusnā ("the most beautiful names"), which is not itself a single closed list in the Qurʾān. A widely cited hadith says that God has 99 names and that whoever learns them will enter Paradise, and the enumerated lists that circulate in hadith collections and popular manuals differ somewhat in their members. Among the most familiar names are al-Raḥmān ("the Most Gracious"), al-Raḥīm ("the Most Merciful"), al-Malik ("the Sovereign"), al-Quddūs ("the Holy"), al-Khāliq ("the Creator") and al-ʿAlīm ("the All-Knowing"). The list is conventionally read in thematic clusters: names of mercy and gentleness, names of majesty and power, names of creation and provision, names of knowledge and perception, and names of justice and judgement.

Creation: al-Bāriʾ and al-Muṣawwir

Two names that recur together in the Qurʾān are al-Bāriʾ and al-Muṣawwir. Sūrat al-Ḥashr (59:24) lists God as al-Khāliq, al-Bāriʾ and al-Muṣawwir in one verse, and the translations differ in how they separate these terms. The root of al-Bāriʾ (b-r-ʾ) is commonly linked to bringing something into being, and many commentators take the name to mean an originator who creates without a prior model, sometimes glossed as creation "out of nothing". Others, such as Abdullah Yusuf Ali, read it as a process of evolving from previously created matter. Al-Muṣawwir refers to giving things their definite form, shape and colour. Scholars including Ibn Kathir distinguished the two names by proportion and measure (khalq) and invention (bariʾ), while Mohammad Asad treated the pair as a single idea covering all forms and appearances. The practical consequence drawn in commentary is that the variety of human physical features, and the distinct structure of each living thing, is attributed directly to divine shaping.

Mercy, knowledge and power

The divine attributes of mercy appear most prominently in the Raḥmān and Raḥīm pair. Both derive from the same root and open the basmala ("In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful") that begins nearly every sūrah of the Qurʾān. Knowledge is expressed through names such as al-ʿAlīm and al-Khabīr ("the All-Aware"), which describe a comprehensive awareness of hidden and manifest things. Power is expressed through names such as al-ʿAzīz ("the Almighty"), al-Qahhār ("the Subduer") and al-Jabbār ("the Compeller"). Commentators have also read al-ʿAzīz as meaning that God's dominion over all things cannot be overturned, and al-Qahhār as a name that emphasises the irresistibility of divine will. The Qurʾān often pairs these attributes, so that mercy and power, or knowledge and wisdom, are presented as qualities that qualify one another rather than as separate traits.

Devotion and the naming of Muslims

In personal devotion, the names are used in supplication (duʿāʾ), where a believer addresses God with a name that fits the request, as in calling on al-Razzāq for provision or al-Laṭīf in times of grief. Manuals of piety also encourage reciting the names in sequence, often as part of ritual remembrance and devotional practice alongside Qurʾānic recitation. Popular compilations attach claimed benefits to reciting particular names a set number of times, but these claims are not uniformly accepted in scholarly writing and should be distinguished from the core teaching that the names are to be known and invoked.

The names also shape the naming of Muslims. A hadith recorded in Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim states that the names dearest to God are ʿAbd Allāh and ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, and Muslim scholars have long read this as a preference for names that combine servitude (ʿabd) with a divine name. The construction is an example of a theophoric name, meaning "servant of God", and it is widespread across the Arabic-speaking world and beyond. According to a sayings tradition recorded in Sunan Abī Dāwūd, the Prophet also advised believers to adopt the names of prophets and that the names of war and bitterness were the worst. Muhammad is reported to have renamed a companion, originally ʿAbd ʿAmr, as ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, a case often cited as an early model for this practice.

Theological debates: transcendence, will and predestination

Transcendence and anthropomorphic language

The Qurʾān denies that anything equals God and that he has any like, yet it also speaks of him as having a face, hands and eyes, and as seated on the Throne. Early scholars therefore had to explain how these two kinds of statement fit together. Muslim theologians faced the problem of anthropomorphism on account of the equivocal teaching of the Qur'an and on account of philosophical considerations.

Answers differed sharply. Some schools took the path of explicit incorporealism: Mu'tazilites, Ibadis, Ash'aris, Maturidis, some Hanbalites, Twelver Shi'ism, Ismailism, and Zaydism are all listed among those who denied that God has a body. Traditionalist circles were more often linked with literal readings. The early exegete Muqātil ibn Sulaymān, for instance, was criticised for taking the divine face, eye and hand in a literal sense. He was accused of interpreting the divine attributes literally, sometimes in an anthropomorphic sense. The formula that became standard among traditionalists was to affirm the attributes without asking how they are, without likening them to created things, and without negating them. This is the approach known as tafwīḍ, or "bi-lā kayf". Scholars have also distinguished more finely between positions: one scholar's typology separates silent acceptance of corporeal language, explicit ascription of a body, placing God "above" without bodily language, and full incorporealism. Jon Hoover divides the range of views relating to God's body, location, and spatiality into a fourfold typology.

The Ashʿarī approach tried to hold a middle line. It affirmed the attributes stated in revelation but rejected the implications of bodily resemblance. The affirmation of God's attributes should be coupled with the negation of implied anthropomorphic determinations.

Divine speech and the createdness of the Qurʾān

The most politically charged form of this debate concerned whether the Qurʾān, as God's speech, was eternal or created. The caliph al-Maʾmūn publicly declared his support for the doctrine of createdness in 827, though it was only in 833 that he went on to institute the Mihna. Ibn Hanbal was interrogated and flogged for refusing to accept the Qurʾān's createdness. The Muʿtazila argued from logic: if the Qurʾān is God's word, God must have preceded his own speech, so the Qurʾān cannot be eternal. Sunnis upheld that the Quran was eternal and, therefore, uncreated. The doctrine was not confined to the Muʿtazila; several other theologians also held this position. These theologians have often been characterized in Islamic heresiography as the "Jahmiyya".

A middle position came from Ibn Kullāb, who argued against the Mu'tazilite position that the Qur'an was created, introducing a distinction between God's eternal speech and its temporal expression. The mihna ended under al-Mutawakkil, who in 848 (or possibly 851) formally ended the Mihna, the inquisition enforcing Mu'tazilite doctrine, and subsequently prohibited Mu'tazilite theology.

Divine will, predestination and moral responsibility

By the late 7th and 8th centuries, Muslim scholars split between the Qadariyya (who upheld absolute human free will) and the Jabriyya (who argued for absolute divine determinism). Both positions faced the same objection: if God has no control over human actions, why pray to Him or trust His plan? The term Qadariyya was itself polemical. It derives from the Arabic word qadar, "destiny" or "divine predestination", and was generally applied in a derogatory fashion to defenders of free will by advocates of predestination.

The Muʿtazila rejected compulsion because divine justice seemed to require it. They held that it was "unthinkable" that God "would punish man for what He himself had commanded". Their Sunni opponents, by contrast, labelled the Mu'tazila "Qadariyya", implying they limited God's power by giving humans a share in qadar. Shiʿi authorities likewise treated complete predestination as incompatible with justice. Sunni theologians of the Ashʿarī and Māturīdī schools later developed mediating doctrines, while traditionalists condemned the Jabriya who negated human will, often quoting the Qur'an to refute both. The underlying problem remained unresolved: the apparent conflict is between the sovereignty of Allah and the responsibility of humankind.

Mystical traditions: nearness, love and transcendence

Sufi writers approached the same tension from the side of the inner life. Sufism stressed God's nearness and the believer's love for him, and it often treated the relation between transcendence and closeness as an experiential question, not only a doctrinal one. The early ascetic Rābiʿa al-ʿAdawiyya, who is widely associated with love of God pursued for its own sake, is a frequently cited example. Al-Muḥāsibī, a figure of the same period, opposed the doctrines of the Jahmis, Mu'tazilis, and anthropomorphist theologians, while his writings concentrated on fear and hope, advocating renunciation of worldly attachment as a prerequisite for spiritual discipline. In later Sufi metaphysics, particularly in the work associated with Ibn ʿArabī, the question of divine immanence and transcendence became especially contested. Critics argued that some formulations blurred the distinction between Creator and creation, which is the very line that the kalam debates had worked to protect.

Liturgy, creed and daily practice

The shahāda (Arabic ash-shahāda, "testimony") is the short creed in which a person affirms that there is no god but God and that Muhammad is God's messenger. The Arabic formula, lā ilāha illā Allāh, Muḥammadun rasūlu llāh, has two halves. The first denies that any rival shares in divinity and asserts God's unique reality. The second affirms the prophetic mission of Muhammad. The noun derives from a root meaning to witness, so the creed is framed as a testimony given before God and before others. Pronouncing it sincerely and, in the classical formulation, before witnesses is the act by which a person enters the Muslim community, and it is therefore the standard form of conversion. Jurists and catechetical writers count it as the first of the five pillars of Islam, although the fuller wording with the introductory "I bear witness" (ashhadu) is the one used in the liturgy.

The call to prayer, the adhān, announces the time for the five obligatory daily prayers and for the Friday congregational service. Traditionally a muezzin calls from a minaret; today loudspeakers and recordings are common. The text is a sequence of short Arabic sentences. It opens with four repetitions of "God is greatest," then two statements of testimony, then the calls "come to prayer" and "come to success," and it returns to "God is greatest" and closes with the declaration of God's oneness. The dawn call inserts the phrase "prayer is better than sleep" before its final repetition. Hadith collections report that listeners were expected to repeat the words as they were spoken, with the exception of the two "come to" lines, which received a different response. The name of God thus frames the whole call, and the testimony of the Shahada is embedded in public life at fixed hours.

The five daily prayers (ṣalāt) repeat the same name in their structure. Each unit of prayer begins with the phrase "God is greatest," and the sitting posture at the end includes a formula of testimony that contains the Shahada. Worshippers also recite the opening chapter of the Qur'an, which begins with the invocation "In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate." Outside the formal prayers, devotional life is structured by dhikr, the repeated remembrance of God. Dhikr means "remembrance," and the Qur'an calls believers to remember God and says that hearts find rest in that remembrance. In practice the most common formulas are "Glory be to God" (subḥān Allāh), "Praise be to God" (al-ḥamdu li-llāh) and "God is greatest" (Allāhu akbar), usually repeated 33 or 99 times. Many Muslims count the repetitions on beads (tasbīḥ, also misbaḥa) and others use their fingers, and the same formulas are often said after each obligatory prayer. In Sufi orders, dhikr can become a communal rite of rhythmic chanting that centres on divine names or on the testimony of faith.

Worship in Islam is organised around Arabic, which the Qur'an itself describes as its language of revelation. Canonical prayer is recited in Arabic in all linguistic communities, and translations of the Qur'an are generally treated as interpretations of its meaning rather than as the Qur'an itself. Believers who do not speak Arabic learn the opening chapter, the standard prayer formulas and the call to prayer by heart, often with the help of teachers who correct pronunciation according to the rules of recitation (tajwīd). The result is that the same Arabic words are used in prayer in Indonesia, Turkey, Nigeria or Europe, even though the surrounding conversation is conducted in local languages. This arrangement links the daily practice of very different communities to a single liturgical vocabulary, and the name Allah is among the most frequently recited words in it.

Allah among Arabic-speaking Christians and Jews

In Arabic, the word Allah works as an ordinary noun for God rather than as a sectarian label. In Arabic it is used by Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike to refer to God. The English-speaking world tends to read it differently. In English usage the word typically refers to God only in an Islamic context. Much of the confusion about whether Muslims worship a different deity from Christians and Jews rests on this difference in usage. Arabic-speaking Christians and Jews also call God Allah, and God is called Allah in Arabic Bibles.

The Arabic Bible is the clearest case. Scholars who work on Arab Christian Scripture point to its earliest surviving translations. Imad Shehadeh, who directs an Arab Christian seminary, has noted that the oldest extant Arab Christian translations of Scripture use allâh, and this practice is documented from ancient times until the present. On the Jewish side, the most influential medieval rendering is the Tafsīr of Saadia Gaon (882–942), a rabbinic scholar who wrote in Judeo-Arabic. The Tafsīr was composed around 918 to 942 and translated key biblical terms, including 'Ĕlōhîm as Allāh, so the God who opens Genesis, named in Hebrew as Elohim, appears in Arabic as Allah. Saadia's work also drew on earlier Arabic versions; a scholar has argued that a ninth-century Arabic Pentateuch by Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq contained a philosophical rendering of Genesis 1:1 adopted later by Saadia in the Tafsīr.

The historical depth of Christian usage is debated. Inscriptions and literary references point to the term appearing before Islam. The name is that of the Christian God in the Zebed inscription, north of Najrān. It is the normal Christian pre-Islamic Arabic name for God. That inscription is dated to 512 CE, and its opening phrase invokes al-ilāh in both Arabic and Aramaic. Literary evidence is also cited: according to Shahid, on the authority of 10th-century Muslim scholar Al-Marzubani, "Allah" was also mentioned in pre-Islamic Christian poems by some Ghassanid and Tanukhid poets in Syria and Northern Arabia. Interpretation is contested. Excavated Christian graves at Umm el-Jimal were once read as containing Allah as a proper name, but this view was rejected by a second translation of the five-verse inscription made by Bellamy et al. Some researchers go further and argue that the Arabic word was borrowed from the liturgical language of Arab Christians. One study proposes that most Christian Arabs used Aramaic Scripture and liturgy in which God was called alâh(â), and that they borrowed this term into Arabic as allâh. Other scholars treat this as one hypothesis among several and do not regard it as settled. Syriac-speaking Christians used a cognate form as well, and homilies and liturgical texts written in Syriac also used a nearly homophonous word, Ālāhā, to refer to God in the centuries before Muhammad was born.

Jewish usage followed a similar pattern. Many Jews, Christians, and early Muslims used "Allah" and "al-ilah" synonymously in Classical Arabic. Saadia's translation became authoritative within its community: it has remained to this day the version for the Jews in Arabic-speaking countries. Its influence extended into the liturgy, since the translation of the Torah and several other books has survived intact, and even serves as part of the liturgy of Yemenite Jews. The Tafsīr was written at a time when Jewish communities faced rival Muslim and Karaite arguments, and Saadia wanted a translation that would serve his own community's needs.

Arabic-speaking communities also keep the word's linguistic function distinct from the doctrines attached to it. The Qur'an itself treats the Jewish and Christian God as the same being it calls Allah, while disputing how Jews and Christians understand him. When the Qur'an itself speaks of the Jewish and the Christian conceptions of Allah, it is obviously speaking about the Jewish and Christian God (4:171; 5:18, 64; 9:30). Christian Arabic formulas make the same separation explicit. The Arabic Nicene Creed describes Christ as "One Lord Jesus Christ, the only son of God", and Arab Christians use Allāh al-ab for God the Father, Allāh al-ibn for God the Son, and Allāh al-rūḥ al-quds for God the Holy Spirit. In each case the shared name identifies the referent, while the specific theology is carried by the surrounding terms.

Comparative theology: Islam, Judaism and Christianity

Islamic theology is built on tawḥīd, the doctrine of God's absolute oneness. Islam considers the concept of any "plurality" within God to be a denial of tawhid or monotheism. Tawhid is Islam's central and single most important concept, upon which a Muslim's entire religious adherence rests. The Qurʾān's insistence on God's oneness is read as excluding any other being from sharing his sovereignty or nature. Judaism's own affirmation of one God gives the two traditions a common starting point. Commentators often note that Jews and Muslims resemble each other in their monotheism, their practice of law, and the structure of their works-based worship. Jewish and Islamic theology nonetheless diverge on several points, including the status of Jesus and the relation between later revelation and earlier scripture.

Christian doctrine differs most sharply on the nature of God. In the Trinitarian formulation, God is a single essence in which three distinct persons, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, exist consubstantially and co-eternally. Muslim writers have opposed this doctrine from an early date. The Qurʾān presents Jesus as a servant and prophet, while rejecting the idea that God has a son, and Jesus is regarded in Islam as an important prophet but not as the Son of God or divine. Surah 5 explicitly addresses Christians on this point and calls the Trinity a deviation from the pure worship of God. The Islamic tradition also holds that the message Jesus brought was altered after his disciples reported that he had risen from the dead. Christian theology, by contrast, locates the core of revelation in the incarnation and in Jesus's death and resurrection, so the disagreement concerns the identity of God as well as the figure of Jesus.

The three traditions share a large body of narrative and personnel. The prophets of the past, who in the Qurʾānic account preached the same faith as Muhammad, form the principal subject of several surahs. The Quran's incorporation of earlier Biblical and Jewish material places Muhammad's mission within a larger religious framework. Surah 5 also presents the Qurʾān as a confirmation of the earlier scriptures. Muslims, Jews and Christians therefore agree on Abraham, Moses and Jesus as sacred figures while disagreeing about their message and about which text preserves it accurately. This shared material is the reason the question of whether the traditions speak of the same God has become a theological issue as well as a linguistic one.

The question has been debated in its own right. A 2009 consultation at the Yale Center for Faith and Culture, later published as a volume edited by Miroslav Volf, responded to the need for scholarly focus on post-9/11 discourse about the "same-God" question. Those who answer yes argue that the three communities each believe that their religion contains the full and final revelation of the same God. The same authors also note that this shared belief is the origin of their unity, and also the cause of their division. Those who answer no often rely on Christian doctrine. One such argument holds that conservative Muslims and Jews agree that the three Abrahamic faiths do not worship the same God. Volf has argued that Christians who deny that Jews worship the one true God are being heretical, because Jews do not hold a Trinitarian view of God either.

A middle position distinguishes between senses of "worship." Lydia McGrew argues that in one sense Christians and modern religious Jews worship the same God, and in another sense they do not. She reasons that the God who called Israel out of Egypt is the God Christians worship in a historical sense, while a person who explicitly rejects the Trinity and incarnation worships a different God in a doctrinal sense. Michael Wittmer proposes shifting the focus from identity to acceptance: the most important question is not whether Christians and Muslims worship the same God, but whose worship God accepts. Each of these positions depends on prior commitments about revelation, reference and the meaning of divine names, which the philosophical sections of this entry consider in more detail.

Translation controversies and language policy

The strongest argument for using Allah in non-Arabic translations rests on a long print history in Malay. Christian usage has been traced to a Bible-related Malay text of 1629, the printed Gospel of Matthew by A. C. Ruyl, and the word has been used continuously in Malay and Indonesian from that edition onward, including the first complete Malay Bible by M. Leijdecker and the second by H. C. Klinkert in 1879. Sources differ on when the Leijdecker Bible was completed: one Methodist account gives 1733, while another dates the complete Malay Bible containing Allah for God to 1731–1733. Christian advocates also cite a Malay-language catechism from the sixteenth century, though this claim comes from a Christian federation's own fact sheet. Because the word appears in Malay-speaking Christian worship, the advocates argue that the word has been used in the liturgy, prayers and worship of Malay-speaking Christians from the very beginning.

The translation practice has a basis in Arabic Bibles. Allah is the word used for "God" in all Arabic versions of the Bible, from the old Arabic Bible to the modern Today's Arabic Version. Several Malay translators, according to one account, simply followed this Arabic Christian usage when they first rendered "God" into Malay. Christian bodies in Malaysia did not treat the choice as a recent innovation. At meetings in Kuala Lumpur in 1985 and Kuching in 1989, Malaysian church heads met and reached a unanimous decision to keep the name "Allah" and the Bible. The Bible Society of Malaysia applied this decision in its 1996 revised Malay Bible.

The dispute became a court case through the Catholic weekly The Herald. In 2008 the Home Ministry threatened to revoke the Herald's newspaper permit, which prompted the Catholic Church to sue the government for violating its constitutional rights. On 31 December 2009 the Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled for the paper, holding that even though Islam is the federal religion, this does not empower the government to prohibit the use of the word Allah, and the court found that the word was not exclusive to Muslims. The judgment, delivered by Justice Lau Bee Lan, said the church had a constitutional right to use the word in its newspaper, on the grounds that religions other than Islam can be practised in peace and harmony. The government appealed, and on 14 October 2013 the Court of Appeal unanimously overturned the 2009 High Court ruling. The judges held that the usage of the name "Allah" is not an integral part of the faith and practice of Christianity, and they found no reason for the paper to insist on it, since such usage would inevitably cause confusion within the community. The Federal Court later declined to hear the church's appeal, so the Court of Appeal decision was upheld.

The government then tried to limit the scope of the ruling. Prime Minister Najib Razak's cabinet had earlier adopted a Ten-Point Solution, and after the 2013 decision he said the appeal ruling did not touch the practices of Christians in Sabah and Sarawak, and the Ten-Point Solution was still being maintained. Critics argued that this position contradicted the ruling itself. Churches in the two East Malaysian states said they would not comply. The Sabah Council of Churches stated that churches in the state would continue to use the word in their church services, publications and prayers. Malay-speaking Christians there form a large share of the community: Malay-speaking Christians make up roughly two million of the three million Christians in Malaysia. The Council of Churches of Malaysia argued that the ruling failed to take minority rights into account and would leave Malay-speaking Christians unsure whether they could still use the word. The Catholic Herald's editor, Lawrence Andrew, pointed to an inconsistency: the government allowed the Malay Bible, which uses the word extensively, to be imported and printed while banning it in the paper.

Opposing voices came from Muslim organisations and commentators. Perkasa, a Malay rights group, argued that the Malay Bible could continue to circulate only if it dropped 32 words, including "Allah", which some state Islamic enactments prohibit for non-Muslims. Other Muslim critics argued that the word is a proper name. Mohamed Ajmal, for example, claimed that "Allah" is a proper name and therefore cannot be used by Christians, whose concept of God differs. The Christian Federation of Malaysia responded that the word Allah predates Islam and is not a creation of Muslims, and its existence does not begin with the Qurʾān. The dispute also reached the courts again in 2021. In March of that year the High Court in the case of a Sarawakian Christian, Jill Ireland Lawrence Bill, quashed the 1986 government directive, saying the Home Ministry had overstepped its powers.

The broader debate concerns whether non-Arabic translations should adopt a loanword for God, and what this implies for translation theory. Christians in Malaysia often argue that the problem is not how to translate YHWH or Elohim, but a linguistic problem within the Malay and Indonesian languages. Malay usage gives "Allah" and "Tuhan" different roles: replacing Allah with Tuhan would produce the phrase Tuhan Tuhan for "Lord God", which implies plurality in Malay and suggests belief in many gods. Some Arabic-speaking users object to this on grammatical grounds, arguing that Allah cannot be combined with a possessive pronoun, even in Indonesian. Pope Benedict XVI's 2012 use of "Al-Rab" in an Arabic blessing led some Malaysians to suggest an alternative term, though this proposal has not settled the matter. Because the disputes turn on whether a term's meaning is set by its linguistic history, its theological content, or its political associations, they connect closely with questions in translation studies, linguistics and philosophy of language.

Philosophical problems: reference, attributes and negative theology

Reference, sense and the status of the name

The central question is whether "Allah" and "God" pick out the same being when they are used in different languages and traditions. Philosophy of language separates the sense of an expression, the way it presents its object, from its reference, the object itself. On this view, two expressions can differ in sense while sharing a referent. Edward Feser applies this to the case of Christians and Muslims: expressions like "the God of the Christians" and "the God of the Muslims" differ in sense, but it doesn't follow from that alone that they don't refer to the same God. He also holds that even errors concerning God's Trinitarian nature are not per se sufficient to prevent successful reference. Miroslav Volf takes a related position, placing the agreement in the referent and the disagreement in the description: "The referent is the same," he told Christianity Today. "The description of God is partly different."

Critics reply that reference cannot be cut off from the attributes ascribed to the referent. If the ascribed attributes are sufficiently incompatible, such as strict unity against a Trinity of persons, then a shared target looks like a thin basis for claiming identity. Causal-historical theories of reference, associated with Kripke and Donnellan, add another dimension: the referent of a name depends on the chain of use through which the name entered a community. "Allah" has such a chain in pre-Islamic Arabic, in Arabic Jewish and Christian usage, and in the Qur'an, and the theories do not settle which chain governs the word in a given context.

The grammatical status of the word raises a parallel problem. Its origin in al-ilāh ("the god") suggests a descriptive title rather than a proper name, and "Allah" is a title, like "God," not the personal name of a specific deity, as some popular accounts put it. Arabic has no capital letters, so God is just God. Proper-name status must therefore be read from usage, not orthography. If "Allah" is a description, it denotes whatever uniquely fits the description; if it functions as a name, it behaves like a rigid label fixed by use. The choice between these models largely determines whether disagreements about the God of different faiths are disagreements about reference or about content.

Divine attributes and the essence

Scripture describes God as knowing, powerful, merciful and willing, and theologians had to ask how these attributes relate to the divine essence. If they are real properties distinct from God, God appears composite, which conflicts with tawḥīd. The Mu'tazila responded by denying distinct attributes. The Mu'tazilah deny distinct divine attributes to preserve the unity of Allah's essence. Avicenna took a similar line, to preserve the notion of God's oneness and reject any multiplicity within God.

The Ash'arī school rejected both the identity of attributes with the essence and their complete separation from it. These attributes are eternal, but they are neither identical with His essence, nor are they quite different from or other than His essence. The Mu'tazila formula illustrates the difference: they say God is powerful by His essence, while Ash'arī theologians say God is powerful by His power. The Mutazilites say and uphold that God is powerful by His essence, and in Arabic said, Allah qadir bi-dhatih. Meanwhile, the opponents of the Mutazilites like the Asharites understand and state that God is powerful with His power, Allah qadir bi-qudratih. The later history of the Ash'arī school also shows drift toward Mu'tazilī and philosophical positions on this question.

Apophatic theology and the limits of language

The attribute debate leads directly to questions about what human language can say of God. Muslim theologians held that human language was inadequate to describe God, but also that God had used this language to describe Himself (or His will). Their solution was to say that scriptural terms apply to God in a manner unlike their application to creatures. Ash'arī theology framed this as a middle course between anthropomorphic literalism (tashbīh) and the denial of all attributes (taʿṭīl). The solution proposed by al-Ash'ari concedes that the Supreme Being possesses in a real sense the divine attributes and names mentioned in the Qur'an. The doctrine of divine dissimilarity to created things (mukhālafa) supported this position, and it is also the ground on which apophatic readings rest.

Negative theology, found in Christian, Jewish and Islamic mystical and philosophical writing, holds that God is known more by what he is not than by any positive predicate. Its relevance to naming is that a name can point to God without giving an exhaustive account of him. The ninety-nine names of the Qur'anic tradition can then be read as partial senses that together approach the referent without capturing it. The contrast between this view and a purely descriptive theory of names is sharp: on the apophatic reading, the name refers successfully while the attached descriptions remain provisional.

References

1. Allahen.wikipedia.org
2. Allahbritannica.com
3. Allah - New World Encyclopedianewworldencyclopedia.org
4. The Origin and Evolution of the Word "Allah": A Linguistic and Historical Analysiszenodo.org
5. Ilahen.wikipedia.org
6. Elohimen.wikipedia.org
7. Elohim - Wiktionary, the free dictionaryen.wiktionary.org
8. Allah - Etymology, Origin & Meaning of the Nameetymonline.com
9. The Biblia Hebraica Blog: The Etymology of God and Allahbibliahebraica.blogspot.com
10. graphsearch.epfl.chgraphsearch.epfl.ch
11. Is Allah the Name of God?truediscipleship.com
12. Kaabaen.wikipedia.org
13. Allah (deity)ebsco.com
14. Qur’anbritannica.com
15. Arabic in Islamen.wikipedia.org
16. Chapter 4: Tawhid Or Monotheismal-islam.org
17. The Topic Tawhid Mentioned In Quranthelastdialogue.org
18. Concept of God in the Qur'an by Dr. Muhammad Sharif Chaudhry Chapter 4muslimtents.com
19. Allah - there is no deity except Him, the Ever-Living, the Sustainersurahquran.com
20. Pre-Islamic Arabian Prophetsrsc.byu.edu
21. Abraham, Moses, Jesus And Muhammad: Prophets Of Islam - Ask A (Born Again) Muslimpatheos.com
22. Jesus, Moses, and Other Biblical Prophets in the Quran - The Quran Foundationthequranforfree.com
23. Asmaul Husna: 99 Names of Allahcpsglobal.org
24. Surah Al-Hashr Ayat 24 (59:24 Quran) With Tafsir - My Islammyislam.org
25. Translation comparison for Surah 59. Al-Hashr, Ayah 24alim.org
26. Al-Hashren.wikipedia.org
27. Al-Bari%27en.wikipedia.org
28. Al Bari Meaning: The Evolver or The Maker (99 Names of Allah)myislam.org
29. Al-Mu%E1%B9%A3awwiren.wikipedia.org
30. Hadith: Indeed, the dearest of your names to Allah is ‘Abdullah and ‘Abdur-Rahmān - Encyclopedia of Translated Prophetic Hadithshadeethenc.com
31. SAHIH MUSLIM, Book 25 : The Book on General Behaviour (KITAB AL-ADAB)iium.edu.my
32. Hadith on Names: Use names of prophets, not war or bitternessabuaminaelias.com
33. Abd al-Rahman ibn Awfen.wikipedia.org
34. Abdullah (name)en.wikipedia.org
35. 99 Names of Allah: Understanding Their Significance in Islam - The 99 Namesmatwproject.org
36. Asmaul Husna - 99 Names of Allah audio & translationislamicfinder.org
37. History of Muslim Debate on the Nature of Godchristian-thinktank.com
38. Anthropomorphism and corporealism in Islamen.wikipedia.org
39. Muqatil ibn Sulaymanen.wikipedia.org
40. Mihnaencyclopedia.com
41. Quran: Created or Uncreated?qurantalkblog.com
42. Al-Muhasibien.wikipedia.org
43. Free Will and Predestination (Qadar) in the Qur’an and Islamic Theologythemuslimtimes.info
44. Qadaritesislamic_philosophy_en.en-academic.com
45. Predestination in Islamen.wikipedia.org
46. Predestination vs. Free Will in Islam: Understanding Allah's Qadryaqeeninstitute.org
47. The Uncreated Quran: Doctrinal Lessons from Surah Az-Zumarislamonline.net
48. Quranic creatednessen.wikipedia.org
49. Mihnaen.wikipedia.org
50. Ibn Kullaben.wikipedia.org
51. Tafwiden.wikipedia.org
52. What is Shahada in Islam? - Islamic Relief Australiaislamicrelief.org.au
53. الشَّهَادَةُ Shahada - ReligionFactsreligionfacts.com
54. declaration of faith (shahada) - IslamiCityislamicity.org
55. What Is the Shahada in Islam? - Updated American Standard Versionuasvbible.org
56. The Book of the Adhan (The Call to Prayer) - Sunnah.com - Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم)sunnah.com
57. Adhan or the Muslim call to Prayeralislam.org
58. The Adhan (The Call to Prayer) - IslamOnlineislamonline.net
59. Adhanen.wikipedia.org
60. Tasbih (Islamic Prayer Beads): Meaning & Useprayerwithbeads.com
61. Complete Guide to Dhikr in Islamgrounded-revival.com
62. Tasbihat & Zikr-e-Elahi In Islammuslimandquran.com
63. Hadra (Sufism)en.wikipedia.org
64. What Is the Difference Between Allah and God?britannica.com
65. Allahencyclopedia.com
66. 8 Who Was “Allah” before Islam? Evidence that the Term “Allah”almuslih.org
67. (PDF) "The Torah of Israel in the Tongue of Ishmael: Saadia Gaon and his Arabic Translation of the Pentateuch"academia.edu
68. A Biblical Translation in the Making — Harvard University Presshup.harvard.edu
69. A mid-6th Century (Christian?) proto-Arabic Inscription from N. Arabia Mentioning Al-Ilahjuancole.com
70. Allahtranslate.google.com
71. BIBLE TRANSLATIONS - JewishEncyclopedia.comjewishencyclopedia.com
72. Bible translations into Arabicen.wikipedia.org
73. Allahwayofislam.fandom.com
74. Saadia Gaonen.wikipedia.org
75. Islamic view of the Trinityen.wikipedia.org
76. Irrelevant Questions in the 'Same God' Debatescottgustafson.substack.com
77. Jesus in Islamen.wikipedia.org
78. How can I respond to Muslims’ Questions about the Trinity? - Speak - UCCF Theology Networktheologynetwork.uk
79. Al-Anbiyaen.wikipedia.org
80. Al-Ma%27idahen.wikipedia.org
81. do we worship same god jews christians and muslims dialogue ed miroslav volfmacmillan.yale.edu
82. In spite of their differences, Jews, Christians and Muslims worship the same Godtheconversation.com
83. Do Christians, Jews, and Muslims Worship the Same God?answersingenesis.org
84. What’s Going on at Wheaton? A Modest Proposal for the “Do Christians and Muslims Worship the Same God” Debategoodreads.com
85. Do Christians, Jews, and Muslims Worship the Same God?thegospelcoalition.org
86. Translating the Names of Godkrisispraxis.com
87. The Use Of "Allah" - Joshua Wu Kai-Mingjoshuawu.my
88. www.malaymail.commalaymail.com
89. Timelinestrasbourgconsortium.org
90. www.malaymail.commalaymail.com
91. Archbishop of Kuala Lumpur v Menteri Dalam Negerien.wikipedia.org
92. Putrajaya wins appeal, church can’t use Allah in Herald, court rules - Yahoo News Singaporesg.news.yahoo.com
93. www.malaymail.commalaymail.com
94. The ‘Allah’ case at the Federal Courtweehingthong.org
95. www.malaymail.commalaymail.com
96. Christian churches in Borneo vow to continue using the word ‘Allah’cnn.com
97. ISLAM AND CIVILISATIONAL RENEWAL THE ‘KALIMAH ALLAH’ DEBATE: COMPETINGicrjournal.org
98. www.malaymail.commalaymail.com
99. www.malaymail.commalaymail.com
100. Christian Federation of Malaysia Allah Fact Sheettrinitypj.com
101. Malaysian court: use of 'Allah' by Christians not unlawful - Vatican Newsvaticannews.va
102. Methodist Church In Malaysiamethodistchurch.org.my
103. The history of the ‘Allah’ controversy during the tenure of Archbishop Pakiamheraldmalaysia.com
104. Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: On the “Allah” judgementthenutgraph.com
105. CO13209rsis.edu.sg
106. www.malaymail.commalaymail.com
107. Edward Feser: Christians, Muslims, and the reference of “God”edwardfeser.blogspot.com
108. Are God and Allah the Same Guy?themonastery.org
109. Is Allah and God the Same? The Full Answer, Explained Simplytherevert.com
110. Mars, Ares, Tiw/Tyr, God, Allah — Crooked Timbercrookedtimber.org
111. (PDF) God's Attributesacademia.edu
112. Attributes of God in Islamen.wikipedia.org
113. Chapter 11: Ash’arismal-islam.org
114. History of Islam/The Mutazilites-Asharites debate - Wikibooks, open books for an open worlden.wikibooks.org
115. Ash'arismen.wikipedia.org
116. Is “Allah” Just Another Word for God? - Stand to Reasonstr.org