Jupiter

Jupiter is the fifth planet from the sun and the largest object in the solar-system apart from the Sun itself. It is a gas giant made mostly of hydrogen and helium, with more than twice the mass of all the other planets combined. Its strong gravity, rapidly rotating atmosphere and powerful magnetic-field make it a natural laboratory for planet formation, atmospheric dynamics and the physics of planetary magnetospheres. Its four large Galilean moons, first observed by galileo-galilei in 1610, have since become some of the most important targets for studying possible habitats beyond Earth.

This entry starts from Jupiter's basic physical identity and its place in the solar system, then explains how the planet is thought to have formed and migrated. It moves inward to its interior structure, its layered atmosphere with bands, zones and long-lived storms, and its enormous magnetosphere and radiation belts. Next it covers the faint ring system, the moon system, and Jupiter's gravitational role in shaping asteroids, comets and orbital resonances. The later sections trace the history of observation from ancient records and early telescopes through robotic missions such as Pioneer, Voyager, Galileo and Juno, and then discuss the cultural names and symbolism that the planet has carried across civilizations. The entry closes with the questions that remain open about Jupiter's deep interior, its formation history and the habitability of its icy moons.

Basic Physical Properties and Position

Jupiter is the fifth planet from the Sun, lying beyond the asteroid belt in the Solar System. Its semi-major axis is about 5.2 astronomical units (AU), and its orbit is only slightly elliptical, with an eccentricity of roughly 0.049. Its aphelion is 5.4570 AU and its perihelion is 4.9506 AU, and its sidereal orbital period is 11.862 years. Kepler's third law links these numbers: a period of 11.86 years corresponds to a distance of about 5.2 AU, so one Jovian year lasts almost twelve Earth years. The same distance is used as the reference for the rest of this entry.

Jupiter is also the largest planet, and its dimensions are easiest to grasp when set against Earth and the Sun. Its equatorial radius is 71,492 km, against Earth's 6,378.1 km, a ratio of 11.209, and its volume is about 1,321 times Earth's. Its mass is about 1.898 × 10²⁷ kg, which is roughly 318 times Earth's mass of about 5.97 × 10²⁴ kg, but only about 0.00095 of the Sun's mass. Measured against the Sun, its equatorial radius is about 0.103 of the Sun's, so the planet is roughly a tenth as wide while being about a thousandth as massive. The mass ratio is the more striking figure: in the Solar System its mass is more than twice that of all other planets combined.

The planet spins faster than any other, and this has a visible effect on its shape. Its synodic rotation period is 9.9258 hours, and its sidereal period is 9.9250 hours. Because the body is made of gas and liquid rather than solid rock, different latitudes turn at different rates. Features near the equator suggest a period of about 9 hours 50 minutes, while mid-latitude features give about 9 hours 55 minutes. Jupiter's rapid rotation makes it an oblate spheroid, with the equatorial radius about 7% larger than the polar radius. The link to angular momentum is straightforward. The gas that formed Jupiter inherited spin from the rotating disk around the young Sun, and as it contracted under its own gravity, conservation of angular momentum forced the rotation to speed up, much as a skater spins faster after pulling in her arms. The resulting centrifugal effect is strongest at the equator, which pushes material outward there and gives the planet a flattening of about 0.065. Its moment of inertia factor is 0.2756, below the 0.4 of a uniform sphere, which indicates that most of its mass is concentrated toward the centre.

Jupiter's average density is low. Its mean density is 1.326 g/cm³. That value is about a quarter of Earth's and only slightly above that of water. Its density is close to the Sun's average density, which makes sense given that the two bodies have similar compositions. Hydrogen and helium make up most of the planet's bulk. One summary puts the mix at about 82% hydrogen and 17% helium by mass, and another gives a gassy composition of 90 percent hydrogen and 10 percent helium, so published figures depend on whether the measure is by mass or by number of atoms. Its helium abundance is reported to be about 80% of the Sun's. The abundance of heavier elements is less certain, and it is discussed further in the interior section of this entry.

Formation and Orbital Migration

Competing formation models

Two broad mechanisms are used to explain giant planets. In core accretion, a solid core of roughly 10 Earth masses first assembles from planetesimals, then pulls in the surrounding gas, and a final runaway phase brings the planet to the roughly 318 Earth masses it has today. In the core accretion model, first planetesimals accrete to form a ~10 M⨁ solid rock-ice core, then gas slowly accretes until reaching a mass of ~10-30 M⨁, and finally runaway gas accretion forms the final planet. The rival idea, gravitational instability, has dense clumps inside the protoplanetary disk collapse straight into giant planets. Its appeal is speed: the timescale for giant planet formation by gravitational instabilities is very short (<1,000 y), while core accretion likely requires ≥0.1-1 My to reach the threshold for runaway gas accretion. That delay is the main difficulty for core accretion, since the gas may disperse before the core is ready. Jupiter's mass therefore sets a demanding test: the planet must have pulled in most of its gas quickly once its core was in place.

Timing evidence from meteorites

Meteorites provide the clock. Ages are usually quoted relative to calcium-aluminium-rich inclusions (CAIs), among the oldest solids in the solar system. Dynamical models suggest that the asteroids accreted before Jupiter was fully formed, and combined with the CAI and chondrule ages they place Jupiter's completion more than about 3.5 million years after CAIs formed. Gravitational instability in the disk is unlikely because the process requires massive disks that are well under 1 Myr old. The same analysis finds that the minimum lifetime for the solar nebula inferred from the ages of CB chondrules and CV CAIs is 4.5±0.8 Myr.

A later isotope-and-paleomagnetism study, presented as a conference abstract, reaches a similar picture. It concludes that Jupiter grew from ~50 M⨁ at >3.4-4.6 My after CAI formation to 318 M⨁ over just ~0-1.1 My, indicating a growth rate ≥10× higher than prior to 3.4-4.6 My. The authors read this slow-then-fast sequence as a signature of core accretion. These age estimates depend on modelling assumptions, so they are constraints rather than direct dates.

The Grand Tack

The Grand Tack hypothesis, developed by Walsh and colleagues in 2011, was first aimed at two puzzles: why Mars is so small and why Jupiter sits so far from the Sun. Its answer is that Jupiter formed at a distance of 3.5 AU from the Sun, then migrated inward to 1.5 AU, before reversing course due to capturing Saturn in an orbital resonance, eventually halting near its current orbit at 5.2 AU. The motion is driven by gas-disk physics: hydrodynamics simulations find that Jupiter migrates towards the Sun if it is alone in the gas-disk, while it migrates outward if paired with Saturn.

The inward excursion has consequences for the inner planets. The planetesimal disk was truncated at 1.0 AU by Jupiter's migration, limiting the material available to form Mars. Jupiter also crossed the asteroid belt twice, scattering asteroids outward then inward. This resulted in the asteroid belt having a small mass, a wide range of inclinations and eccentricities, and a population originating from both inside and outside Jupiter's original orbit. The model also addresses the belt's composition. Earlier thinking held that a close pass by Jupiter would have destroyed the belt, but in the Grand Tack Jupiter moves slowly enough to push the belt outward rather than scatter it. Jupiter migrating in and then all the way back out again can solve the long-standing mystery of why the asteroid belt is made up of both dry, rocky objects and icy objects, because on the outward leg Jupiter reaches icy regions and deflects some of those bodies inward. Simulations suggest the belt was first emptied by the passing giants and then partly refilled by surviving planetesimals as Jupiter left for the last time. Not every researcher accepts the Grand Tack as the only route to these outcomes; alternative explanations for the belt's mass deficit exist.

The Nice model

The Nice model, introduced in 2005 and named after the French city, extends this picture to the outer solar system. In its original form, the giant planets emerge from the primordial gaseous nebula in a compact, resonant configuration. Interactions with a surrounding disk of small bodies then make the system unstable. As the primordial Kuiper belt is dynamically eroded by the giant planets, planetesimal driven migration causes Jupiter and Saturn to drift apart. Consequently, they eventually cross the 2:1 MMR, which destabilizes the orbits of Uranus and Neptune.

Jupiter's own migration runs in the opposite direction to the ice giants, which is central to its role. Where Uranus and Saturn scatter planetesimals inward and move outward, this is reversed for Jupiter. Its mass means that its gravitational encounters can eject material from the system. In the five-planet variant, an extra ice giant is thrown out after an encounter with Jupiter, and repeated encounters with it cause jumps in Jupiter's and Saturn's semi-major axes, driving a step-wise separation of their orbits.

The ratio of Jupiter's and Saturn's orbital periods is the key quantity. Successful simulations are checked against the asteroid belt, so the ratio must stay within limits; one recent set of success criteria requires that the period ratio of Jupiter and Saturn does not exceed 2.8 so as to be consistent with the observed effects of this value on the asteroid belt. The original 2:1 starting configuration was chosen somewhat artificially, and models of gas-disk migration favour a 3:2 resonance instead. Even the most successful initial conditions reproduce the outer solar system in broad strokes only a few percent of the time, which keeps the early history of Jupiter an open question.

Interior Structure and Composition

Layered structure

Jupiter's interior cannot be observed directly. Jupiter lacks a solid surface, with its gaseous outer layers seamlessly transitioning into a liquid state under immense pressure as one moves inward. Its structure is therefore inferred from modelling. Before the Juno era, models usually divided the planet into three homogeneous, convective layers: a big compact core made of 100% heavy elements, and two envelope layers. The outer envelope is dominated by molecular hydrogen and contains less helium, while the inner envelope is where hydrogen becomes metallic.

The transition to metallic hydrogen is set by pressure. Below about 1,000 kilometers, hydrogen is compressed into a supercritical fluid, and at depths of around 7,000 kilometers, it takes on metallic properties, enabling it to conduct electricity. Published estimates of where this layer begins are not fully consistent. One popular account places the top of the metallic layer much deeper, extending to the 78th percentile of the planet's radius. Conditions in this region are often given as up to 10,000 K and the pressure is 200GPa. The heaviest component, the core, remains poorly defined. Juno-era illustrations still show a possible inner "rock" core beneath the metallic envelope, but definitive evidence is still lacking.

Pressure, temperature and helium rain

Helium is one of the key tracers of interior processes. The early solar nebula had a protosolar mass fraction of helium calculated to be near Y=0.27. Measurements by the Galileo probe in the atmosphere found a slight depletion of helium (Y=0.238±0.005) compared to the protosolar value. This depletion is the main observational clue for helium rain.

Under the high pressures and temperatures inside the planet, the phase separation between hydrogen and helium leads to the rainout of helium in the deep interiors of Jupiter and Saturn. Because helium is denser than hydrogen in these conditions, droplets sink. Laboratory work supports the idea: researchers compressed hydrogen-helium mixtures between diamonds with a laser, and saw an abrupt increase in how reflective the material was as pressure and temperature rose, which suggested the two elements were separating. Models place the droplets roughly 10,000 to 13,000 km below the tops of Jupiter's hydrogen clouds under extreme conditions. At this distance, the pressure is one to two million times the atmospheric pressure on Earth. The exact demixing boundaries are still debated, since the H-He phase diagram is still being investigated and the exact conditions for H-He demixing remain uncertain.

Gravity data and the dilute core

Juno's gravity measurements have changed the picture of the core. The gravity data are much improved, and the simplest interpretation of the higher order even harmonics implies that the planet may have a diluted central concentration of heavy elements. One influential model found that the entire set of gravity harmonics can be matched with models that assume an ab initio equation of state, wind profiles, and a dilute core of heavy elements that are distributed as far out as 63% of the planet's radius. In that model, heavy elements are predicted to be distributed uniformly and make up only 18% by mass because of dilution with hydrogen and helium. Other analyses describe a core that extends up to as much as half of Jupiter's radius. The conventional picture is also hard to reconcile with the data: the unexpectedly small magnitudes of the moments J4 and J6 do not fit a large, distinct core of rock and ice.

Interpreting gravity data near the centre is difficult. The lower order gravitational even harmonics are sensitive down to about 60% of the planetary radius in Jupiter, so the innermost region is only weakly constrained. For this reason, the existence of such a small core is poorly constrained by observations because gravity data, despite exquisite precision, is very insensitive to planetary properties near the center. Theory offers a possible explanation for a diluted core. In core accretion, once the core mass reaches ~1–2 Earth masses the accreted solid material (heavy elements) vaporise and remain in the planetary envelope, which leaves a deep interior enriched in heavy elements with no sharp core boundary. Mixing by convection could also dissolve core material into the metallic layer.

Internal heat

Jupiter returns more energy to space than it takes in from the Sun. Ground-based infrared observations from Low (1966) revealed that Jupiter and Saturn emit more energy than they receive from the Sun. Slow contraction under gravity can release heat, but their observed luminosities cannot be explained solely by the continued cooling and contraction of the planets and it was suggested that both planets possess an additional internal heat source. One proposed source is helium differentiation: the differentiation of helium, due to a phase separation between hydrogen and helium, releases energy as helium settles. The settling process leads to energy release and can affect planetary evolution. Timing is a constraint. Cooling-age estimates of 4.2 to 5.3 billion years indicate that helium demixing may have not started or only recently, so the relative contributions of contraction and helium separation remain an open question.

Atmosphere, Bands and Storms

Zones, belts and jet streams

Jupiter's visible clouds are arranged in parallel bands that wrap around the planet. Wind direction alternates between adjacent zones and belts. The boundaries between them carry the fastest currents. Spacecraft have shown that the rotation is central to this organization, though the exact causal chain is still debated: researchers are still trying to solve the mystery of how the jet streams form.

A 2021 modelling study proposed one mechanism. Eddies in the cloud layer launch waves that travel both up and down; when the waves break they deposit momentum and thereby replace the friction forces at solid boundaries that drive overturning circulation on rocky planets. Vertical motion is visible in the bands themselves. The horizontal pale zones are caused by upwelling and the formation of high-altitude ammonia ice, and the belts are ruddy-coloured clouds where the air is descending. Lightning, chemical tracers and temperature anomalies also mark this rising and sinking motion, as chemical tracers, lightning, clouds, and temperature anomalies document the rising and sinking in the belts and zones.

Juno's measurements extended this picture downward. Its microwave data show a reversal in the band pattern: the belts and zones undergo a transition around 40 miles (65 kilometers) beneath Jupiter's water clouds. The jets themselves penetrate far deeper. Gravity measurements indicate that the weather layer of Jupiter was more massive, extending much deeper than previously expected. Estimates place the base of the jets roughly 3,000 km below the cloud tops, and Juno also found that the atmosphere's ammonia gas travels up and down in remarkable alignment with the observed jet streams.

The Great Red Spot

The Great Red Spot is the largest atmospheric vortex in the Solar System, and it lies along the southern margin of the South Equatorial Belt. Its first recorded sighting is traditionally attributed to Robert Hooke in 1664 or to Giovanni Cassini in 1665, although Hooke's notes seem to place it in the northern belt; sightings may date back as far as 1664 (by Robert Hooke, who described a red spot, although his notes seem to put it in the North Equatorial Belt) or 1665 (by Giovanni Cassini, who placed the feature in the correct belt). Continuous observation since the 19th century shows the spot shrinking: its east–west width has fallen from roughly 40,000 km in the late 1800s to about 16,000 km today, and it has become rounder in shape.

Its depth was poorly known until Juno. Radiometer observations showed a warm column extending at least 350 kilometers down into the planet's atmosphere. Gravity data, which register the mass redistributed by the storm's winds, gave a figure of about 500 km, and when combined with the MWR data this suggests the anticyclone is between 350 and 500km deep. The storm therefore reaches below the level where water and ammonia condense, which suggests a connection with the deep atmosphere. Juno's data also suggest that the Jupiter maelstrom is linked to jets that go far deeper, hinting that the giant planet's upper and lower atmospheres are tied together.

Polar cyclones and deep circulation

Juno revealed a different kind of storm at each pole. Eight of the cyclones are spinning at Jupiter's north pole, and five at its south pole. The northern group forms an octagon and the southern group a pentagon around a central vortex. Each cyclone has a radius of about 1,000 km (roughly 620 miles.) Their energy comes from below: the rapidly rising air in clouds acts as an energy source that feeds the cyclones.

Their vertical depth is also uncertain but substantial. Microwave observations show that some polar storms extend well beneath the cloud tops, at least 62 miles (100 kilometers) below. Modelling suggests that depth matters for their motion: shallower cyclones drift more slowly, a consequence of stronger vortex stretching. Gravity measurements also show that the winds vary with latitude: they reach about 3,000 km below the visible surface at low latitudes but only 0–500 km at high latitudes.

Chemistry and clouds

Jupiter's visible clouds are cold, windy clouds of ammonia and water, floating in an atmosphere of hydrogen and helium. The cloud decks sit at different depths because each condensate forms at its own temperature and pressure. Ammonia ice forms highest, ammonium hydrosulfide forms in a middle layer, and water clouds form deepest, where temperatures are high enough to keep water in the liquid or ice state. Colour variations are attributed to chemistry in the upper layers, and the reddish belts are thought to reflect plumes of sulfur and phosphorus-containing gases rising from the planet's warmer interior.

Convective storms are the most dynamic part of the cloud layer. Spacecraft have detected lightning in these storms, and the flashes are generally attributed to moist convection in the water-cloud region. Juno's observations of the cyclones show that moist convection sustains the polar storms as well.

Magnetosphere and Radiation Environment

Magnetic field and its origin

Jupiter has the strongest magnetic field of any planet in the solar system. Its magnetic moment is roughly 20,000 times that of Earth, and the equatorial field strength at the surface is about 417 μT (4.17 G). The dipole axis is tilted only about 10° from the rotation axis, and the planet's rapid spin, with a period of just under 10 hours, shapes the surrounding magnetosphere. The field is generated by a dynamo in the interior. Electrically conducting metallic hydrogen, which forms under the enormous pressures deep inside the planet, circulates and produces electric currents that sustain the field. This is the same general electromagnetic principle described in electromagnetism, although the scale is far larger than anything on Earth.

Structure of the magnetosphere

The magnetosphere is the region where Jupiter's field dominates over the solar wind. Because the solar wind moves faster than the speed of sound in its medium, a bow shock forms upstream of the planet. Behind it, the slowed and heated plasma of the magnetosheath is diverted around the magnetospheric obstacle. The outer boundary, the magnetopause, was long treated as nearly impenetrable. Its distance is usually given as 50 to 100 Jupiter radii, and the bow shock sits at roughly 82 radii.

Jupiter's magnetosphere is much larger than its dipole alone would suggest. A plasma disk fed by volcanic material from Io inflates the field, pushing the standoff distance from about 42 radii to more than 90 radii. The magnetotail is the most extreme feature, stretching for up to about 7,000 radii. Electric currents in the equatorial plasma sheet exceed 160 MA. Researchers traditionally divide the magnetosphere into inner, middle and outer regions. Recent Juno-based work suggests the boundaries lie closer to the planet than earlier models implied, with the magnetopause flattened near the poles and inflated on the dusk side. These revised figures are not yet settled.

Radiation belts and protecting spacecraft

Charged particles trapped by the magnetic field form radiation belts, analogous to Earth's Van Allen belts. Jupiter's belts are far more intense, and NASA describes them as the strongest radiation environment in the solar system apart from the Sun itself. The radiation can damage electronics and solar panels. Without protection, a probe in a highly elliptical orbit would receive a dose of more than 20 million rads over a mission.

For this reason, Juno was placed in a highly elliptical polar orbit after entering orbit on 4 July 2016. Its path carries it over the poles and far beyond the orbit of Callisto, while its closest approach lies about 4,200 km above the cloud tops. The orbit was designed to stay clear of the innermost belts, within about 2 radii of the planet. Protection relies on a titanium vault whose walls are about 1.75 cm thick. The vault houses the main computer and the most sensitive electronics, and the team estimated that doses inside it would be about 800 times lower than outside. Other parts are also shielded. Instrument cameras and star trackers receive limited protection, and their software filters out the noise caused by penetrating particles. Some published simulations describe a tantalum shielding box instead of titanium, so the exact shielding materials are reported inconsistently across sources.

Io's plasma torus and the auroras

Io is the main source of heavy ions in the magnetosphere. Volcanic gas from its sulfur dioxide atmosphere is dissociated and ionized, producing a ring of plasma made of electrons and sulfur and oxygen ions. This plasma spreads outward and is heated, forming a broader plasma sheet that extends well beyond the orbits of the Galilean moons. Some of these particles are accelerated and fall into the upper atmosphere, where they produce auroral emission that spans from X-rays to radio waves.

Io also couples electromagnetically to the planet. Currents flow along magnetic field lines from Io into Jupiter's ionosphere, closing near latitudes of about 65° in each hemisphere. Where these currents strike the atmosphere, a bright footprint appears in the aurora. The footprint of Io's flux tube emits only about 10^11 W, less than 1% of Jupiter's total auroral output. The footprints shift position as the moons orbit within the rotating magnetosphere. Europa and Ganymede also produce similar interaction signatures, although Io's contribution is the strongest.

Rings and the Moon System

Ring system

Jupiter's rings were discovered by Voyager 1 in 1979, making Jupiter the third known planet with rings after Saturn and Uranus. They are very different from Saturn's bright, icy rings. Jupiter's rings are faint and dusty, and they contain no significant ice. The system has four main components, listed from the inside out: the halo, the main ring, and two gossamer rings. The halo is a thick torus that reaches from about 92,000 to 122,500 km from the planet's centre. The main ring lies between about 122,500 and 129,000 km and is the brightest and narrowest part of the system. The Amalthea gossamer ring extends from about 129,000 to 182,000 km, and the Thebe gossamer ring extends farther still, beyond the orbit of Thebe.

The optical depth is very low, around 10⁻⁶ even for the densest main ring and 10⁻⁸ to 10⁻⁷ for the gossamer rings. This is why ground-based telescopes could not detect the system before Voyager. The dust comes from high-speed impacts on the small inner moons Metis, Adrastea, Amalthea and Thebe. Each ring's radial extent follows the orbit of its source moon. The outer edge of the main ring almost coincides with Adrastea's orbit, and the outer edges of the two gossamer rings roughly match the orbits of Amalthea and Thebe. The vertical thickness of each ring also matches how far its source moon moves above and below the equatorial plane.

Because the dust is continually lost, the rings must be replenished. Dust grains lose orbital energy through Poynting–Robertson drag, spiral inward, and are eventually removed by collisions with moons or by capture into the planet. New Horizons images from 2007 confirmed that the ring system is refreshed by embedded source bodies. Simulations published in 2022 suggest that destabilising resonances created by the Galilean moons help explain why Jupiter's ring system is so much more tenuous than Saturn's.

The Galilean moons

Galileo's 1610 observations revealed four large moons that are among the most varied bodies in the solar system. Io, the innermost, is the most tidally deformed and heated world known, with hundreds of continually erupting volcanoes; its heat flow is at least twenty times that of Earth. Europa is covered by a smooth ice shell crossed by fractures. Magnetometer data from the Galileo orbiter are consistent with a salty global ocean beneath that ice, and later Hubble observations were reported to show water-vapour plumes. Ganymede is the largest moon in the solar system, larger than Mercury, and it is the only moon known to generate its own magnetic field, which Galileo detected in the late 1990s. Callisto has a heavily cratered surface that records an ancient, lightly altered crust. It lies outside the main orbital resonance and receives little tidal heating. The coming Europa Clipper and ESA's JUICE missions are designed to study these ocean-bearing moons in detail.

Irregular moons and capture

Beyond the Galilean system lies a population of small irregular moons on distant, eccentric and strongly inclined orbits. Recent surveys count roughly 90 known moons in total, and most of them are irregular satellites. Like irregulars around other giant planets, they are thought to be captured bodies that were once in heliocentric orbit. Their orbits are grouped into families. Two families are prograde, including the Himalia group, whose members orbit at inclinations near 28°. Three are retrograde, including the Ananke, Carme and Pasiphae families. The Ananke and Carme families have seven and nine known members, respectively. The most accepted explanation is that each family came from the capture of a parent body followed by fragmentation in collisions, though the origin of the orbital clustering is still not fully settled. Gas drag during capture has been shown in simulations to be a plausible mechanism for the Himalia parent body. Collisions within the Himalia group have helped clear a depletion zone of irregular moons between about 0.05 and 0.12 AU from Jupiter.

Tidal heating and the Laplace resonance

Io, Europa and Ganymede are locked in a 1:2:4 orbital resonance: while Ganymede completes one orbit, Europa completes two and Io completes four. Laplace identified this configuration in 1771, but its consequences were recognised only in 1979, when Peale and colleagues predicted that the resonance would tidally heat Io enough to melt its interior. Voyager 1 then discovered active volcanism on Io in the same year. The mechanism works through feedback. The resonance keeps Io's orbit eccentric, so Jupiter's gravity flexes the moon's body as it moves around its orbit. The internal friction from this flexing turns orbital energy into heat. Tidal dissipation would normally damp the eccentricity and circularise the orbit, but the resonance continually re-excites it, so the heating persists.

The same process affects the other Galilean moons, though far less strongly. Europa experiences moderate heating, and Ganymede may have experienced more heating in the past. Tidal heating is widely thought to help preserve the subsurface oceans of Europa and Ganymede over geological time, while Callisto, which is outside the resonance, has remained largely unheated. Open questions remain, including whether Io has a global magma ocean and how tidal energy is divided between solid and molten layers.

Gravitational Influence and Interactions in the Solar System

Jupiter's mass, roughly 318 times that of the Earth, makes it the most powerful gravitational presence among the planets, and its pull continually reshapes the orbits of smaller bodies in the solar system. For decades the planet has been described as a "shield" that deflects comets and asteroids away from the inner planets, especially Earth. That picture came largely from a 1994 study by George Wetherill, although his simulations were not designed to test whether Jupiter intercepts comets bound for the inner solar system. Later work with more accurate numerical methods has complicated the story. Studies by Horner and Jones and a 2016 reanalysis by Grazier found that Jupiter does remove many long-period comets, which come from the distant Oort cloud, and that the shielding effect is therefore real for that population. For near-Earth asteroids and short-period comets, however, Jupiter often increases the flux of impactors. Its gravity can push these bodies onto Earth-crossing paths, and the Jupiter-family comets are thought to descend from comets that were first perturbed into orbits around the Sun inside Jupiter's path. Because long-period comets make up only a few percent of potential impactors, the net effect on Earth remains an open question.

Jupiter's gravity also acts on a much larger scale. Its pull sends some objects out of the solar system altogether, and it sends others crashing into the planet itself. Impacts on Jupiter are far more frequent than on Earth, and some estimates put comet impacts there more than 2,000 times as often.

Jupiter shares its orbit with thousands of asteroids known as Trojans, which cluster around two stable Lagrange points, L4 and L5, located 60° ahead of and 60° behind the planet along its path around the Sun. At these points, the combined gravity of the Sun and Jupiter, together with the orbital motion, holds small bodies in place. The Trojans do not sit exactly at these points; they oscillate around them and are spread along elongated regions that extend about 26° along Jupiter's orbit. By convention, the L4 group is named after Greek heroes of the Trojan War and the L5 group after Trojan heroes. The first Trojan, 588 Achilles, was found in 1906 by Max Wolf, and by early 2026 about 9,700 had been catalogued at L4 and about 5,900 at L5. Their population is thought to have been captured early in the history of the solar system, and models must also explain why some reach orbital inclinations of around 35°.

Jupiter's gravity also helped carve the main asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter. In 1866 Daniel Kirkwood noticed that the belt contains gaps at specific distances from the Sun. These Kirkwood gaps correspond to orbital resonances with Jupiter, where an asteroid completes a simple whole-number ratio of orbits relative to the planet. The strongest gaps lie at the 3:1 resonance, near 2.5 astronomical units, and at the 5:2, 7:3 and 2:1 resonances. An asteroid that drifts into one of these resonances receives repeated gravitational nudges at the same orbital phase. Its orbit becomes increasingly eccentric, and it is eventually removed from the belt or pushed into a different path, leaving the gap behind.

The most dramatic demonstration of Jupiter's gravitational reach came from Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9. Eugene and Carolyn Shoemaker and David Levy discovered it in March 1993 on photographs taken at Palomar Observatory. Analysis of its orbit showed that it had been captured by Jupiter around 1929. In July 1992 tidal forces from Jupiter broke the nucleus into about 21 fragments, and between 16 and 22 July 1994 these fragments struck the planet's atmosphere at roughly 60 km/s. The impacts were on the night side, so their effects became visible only when rotation brought the sites into view. Dark ejecta deposits remained on the clouds for weeks. The event was the first observed collision between two bodies of the solar system that had been predicted in advance. It provided direct data on impact fireballs, shock chemistry and the upper atmosphere, and it showed how strongly a giant planet can alter the fate of a comet. A 2011 analysis estimated that the impacts were strong enough to tilt Jupiter's thin ring by about 2 kilometres.

Observation History: From Antiquity to Telescopes

Ancient observers

Jupiter is one of the five planets visible to the naked eye, and it was among the first to be tracked systematically. Babylonian astronomers were among the first to map the paths of the sun, moon and visible planets, Jupiter included. Their work was closely tied to divination. Babylonian astrology identified the city's patron god, Marduk, with Jupiter. Its appearance was regarded as an auspicious sign. Because the planet's position mattered for omens, scribes had to predict where it would be. They found that Jupiter moves more slowly through some parts of its path than others.

The mathematical tools behind these predictions were more advanced than earlier histories assumed. Cuneiform tablets from roughly 350 to 50 BCE record Jupiter's motion, and Ossendrijver found that Babylonian astronomers used trapezoid calculations to work out Jupiter's daily movement along the ecliptic. Greek, Hellenistic and Indian astronomers also incorporated Jupiter into their planetary models and calendrical computations, and Ptolemy's geometric framework described its motion with epicycles.

Galileo and the telescope

The telescope changed observation of Jupiter in a single winter. On the night of 7 January 1610, Galileo Galilei used a homemade telescope that magnified objects about twenty times and noticed three points of light near the planet, which he first took for distant stars. Tracking them over several nights, he saw that they moved in a way inconsistent with the background stars, staying close to Jupiter while shifting relative to one another. A fourth point appeared four days later, and by 15 January he realized these were moons orbiting Jupiter.

Galileo published the results in March 1610 in Sidereus Nuncius. The discovery of bodies orbiting something other than Earth struck a blow at the Ptolemaic system, which placed Earth at the centre of all motion. The book itself did not explicitly mention Copernican heliocentrism, but the moons supported Copernicus's arrangement. Galileo's priority is generally accepted, although Simon Marius claimed an earlier observation, but because he did not publish until after Galileo, his records remain uncertain. The moons' names were not settled at once. Galileo called them the "Medicean Stars", but Johannes Kepler suggested the names Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto. The full Copernican argument was pressed later: Galileo faced serious trouble with the Roman Inquisition when he developed its implications two decades later.

Seventeenth-century telescopic work

Robert Hooke's May 1664 record is often cited as the first observation of Jupiter's large red feature, but many argue that the Italian astronomer Giovanni Cassini deserves credit for his observations the following year. In 1665 Cassini described a dark oval at the same latitude as the Great Red Spot, which he named the Permanent Spot, observed by him and other astronomers until 1713. He used the spot to time the planet's rotation. He observed the spot thirteen times between August and October and compiled a table of its transits, from which he calculated a rotation period of 9 hours and 56 minutes. Cassini also was the first to observe differential rotation in Jupiter's atmosphere, around 1690. Whether his spot is the same feature as today's Great Red Spot remains disputed. One study argues that the current Great Red Spot was first reported in 1831 and is not the Permanent Spot. The Great Red Spot itself is discussed in a separate section.

Jupiter's moons also became a practical tool. In 1676 Ole Rømer showed that the speed of light is finite, using timings of eclipses of Jupiter's moons. Cassini initially rejected the result despite Rømer using Cassini's own ephemerides of Jupiter's satellites in his calculations.

Spectroscopy and modern observation

From the nineteenth century onward, observers gained a chemical view of the planet. Spectroscopy showed that light from Jupiter carried absorption features that could be traced to specific gases, and by the early twentieth century ammonia and methane had been identified in its atmosphere. Infrared measurements, first from the ground and later from space, measure the planet's thermal emission and complement spacecraft data. Radio astronomy opened another window: in 1955 bursts of decametric radio emission from Jupiter were detected, and these signals were later linked to the magnetosphere and to Io. Today, ground-based telescopes, infrared and radio facilities continue to track Jupiter's clouds and emissions while spacecraft provide close-range measurements.

Spacecraft Exploration

Robotic probes have visited Jupiter since the early 1970s, and their data changed nearly every part of the picture described elsewhere in this entry.

Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 were the first spacecraft to pass through the Jovian system, flying by in 1973 and 1974. Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 followed in 1979. Their images revealed the planet's faint ring system and showed that Io is volcanically active, the first active volcanism found beyond Earth.

The Galileo mission, launched in 1989, was the first to orbit Jupiter, arriving in December 1995. It released an atmospheric probe that entered the upper atmosphere on 7 December 1995 and transmitted for about an hour, measuring winds, temperature and composition below the cloud tops. The orbiter made repeated close flybys of Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto. Magnetic measurements near Europa suggested a salty, electrically conducting layer beneath the ice, which remains the strongest evidence for a subsurface ocean. Galileo ended in September 2003 with a controlled plunge into Jupiter, chosen to avoid contaminating Europa. Cassini passed the planet at the end of 2000 on its way to Saturn, and its images and magnetospheric measurements complemented Galileo's data.

Juno launched on 5 August 2011 and began orbiting Jupiter in July 2016. Its key milestones include the arrival in orbit around Jupiter on 5 July 2016 and an extension of the mission to September 2025. Juno follows a polar, highly elliptical path, which lets it sample the atmosphere and magnetic field at close range while spending most of each orbit away from the densest radiation. Its findings continue to appear in the literature; results on the planet's size and shape were published in the February 2, 2026, issue of Nature Astronomy.

Juno's current status is the hardest point in this section to confirm. NASA extended the mission multiple times, most recently in 2021, guaranteeing operations through Sept. 30, 2025. The U.S. government shut down the same day Juno's last mission extension expired, and afterwards the spacecraft may already have been switched off, but the space agency would not say. The record then becomes inconsistent. A catalogue page last updated on April 10, 2026 lists the mission as completed, yet NASA reported that Juno captured Thebe, the second largest of Jupiter's inner moons, during a close pass on May 1, 2026. The May 2026 flyby implies the spacecraft was still operating at that point. The official status should be checked against NASA's latest statement before publication.

Two missions will extend the exploration of the Jovian moons after Juno. Europa Clipper was launched on a SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket from Kennedy Space Center on Oct. 14, 2024. It will arrive at the Jupiter system in 2030, orbiting Jupiter instead of Europa to spend less time inside the planet's intense radiation field. Its planned 49 flybys of Europa will take place at closest approaches of 25–100 km. ESA's JUICE mission launched on an Ariane 5 from Europe's Spaceport in Kourou in April 2023. On 28 September 2026 it completed an Earth gravity assist that deflected Juice by an angle of 20° compared to its pre-flyby path and increased its velocity by 3.5 km/s. Its planned route calls for a final Earth flyby in January 2029, putting Juice onto the optimum path to intercept Jupiter in July 2031. After that, the spacecraft is scheduled to carry out 35 flybys of Jupiter's giant moons Ganymede, Europa and Callisto.

Cultural Names and Symbolism

In Western tradition, Jupiter takes its name from the Roman sky god Iuppiter, who was treated as the supreme deity of Roman religion and was largely identified with the Greek Zeus. The name is usually analysed as a compound of Indo-European roots meaning "day" or "bright sky" and "father", so the god was in origin a sky-father. Roman worship also used the alternative name Jove (Iovis), and the English adjective "jovial" descends from the old belief that people born under Jupiter's influence were cheerful and good-humoured. Jove survives in the exclamation "by Jove!", which Romans reportedly used when swearing oaths in court. The day of the week follows the same pattern: Latin Iovis dies became French jeudi and Italian giovedì, while English "Thursday" reflects an interpretation of Jupiter as the Germanic thunder god Thor.

Other cultures tied the planet to their own deities and cosmologies. In Mesopotamian astronomy, Jupiter was associated with Marduk, the chief god of Babylon. In Hindu tradition the planet is linked to Brihaspati, teacher of the gods and one of the nine planetary deities (navagraha), and Hindi retains a name for Thursday derived from him. Greek astronomers, by contrast, sometimes called the planet Phaethon, a name meaning "shining", while the god himself remained Zeus.

China developed a distinctive system. Ancient observers noticed that Jupiter takes about twelve years to circle the sky, so they divided the ecliptic into twelve sections, the shici (十二星次), whose names included Xingji and Xuanxiao. Each year the planet was said to be "in" one section, and the planet was therefore called 岁星 (Suixing, "year star"), which became the basis of the Suixing calendar. Because the planet's real sidereal period is about 11.86 years, the calendar gradually drifted, and by the late Warring States period astronomers had invented an imaginary counter-planet, Taisui (太岁), moving in the opposite direction and completing its circuit in exactly twelve years. The modern Chinese name 木星 (literally "wood star") came later, when the planets were assigned to the Five Phases (五行) of wood, fire, earth, metal and water. Wood was associated with the east and spring, and in this scheme Jupiter became the wood planet. The same naming logic is used in Japanese, Korean and Vietnamese.

In astrology, Jupiter was regarded as one of the most fortunate planets. Ptolemy's second-century treatise Tetrabiblos gave it a benefic role, and in Renaissance courts astronomers were often expected to cast horoscopes and advise rulers. Galileo, Johannes Kepler and others took on such duties, which is one reason why astronomy and astrology were hard to separate in early modern Europe. Over the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, astronomy gradually shed its astrological functions and became a distinct empirical science, although the two traditions did not split cleanly and popular astrology persisted.

Jupiter also appears widely in art and literature. In Dante's Paradiso, the souls of the just in the sphere of Jupiter arrange themselves into the shape of an eagle, the bird of the god. Renaissance painters such as Correggio depicted the god's amorous myths, including Jupiter and Io, and Titian's Danaë shows Jupiter as a shower of gold. In the twentieth century Gustav Holst's orchestral suite The Planets (1914–1916) gave the planet its movement "Bringer of Jollity", which draws on the old association with good humour. Across these traditions, Jupiter is consistently linked with sovereignty, the sky and thunder, and benevolence, even when the names and rituals differ.

Open Questions and Current Research

Deep interior

The core is the least settled part of Jupiter's internal picture. Conventional models assumed a compact core of rock and ice, but the small values of the gravity harmonics J4 and J6 measured by Juno are hard to reproduce with that arrangement. Models that match the full set of harmonics instead place heavy elements in a diluted region that extends to about 63% of the planet's radius. In the core region, heavy elements are predicted to be distributed uniformly and make up only 18% by mass because of dilution with hydrogen and helium. Earlier estimates put the total heavy-element content at 7–25 Earth masses, and later work that fits Juno data has produced a range of values, so the size of the core and its total mass remain uncertain.

This matters for formation theory. The fact that Jupiter's core could be diluted, and yet, the estimated total heavy-element mass in the planet is relatively large challenges planet formation theory. One proposed route to a diluted core is a giant impact early in the planet's history, but this has not been established. Whether the interior is better described by a compact core that was later eroded or by a core that was never sharply defined is still debated.

Atmosphere and winds

Juno's gravity data have constrained how deep the zonal winds reach, but the answer depends on modelling choices. Early inversions suggested that the zonal winds, which rule the dynamics of Jupiter's cloud deck, must slow down significantly beyond a depth of about 3,000 km. Later revisions have found that the revised zonal flows reach to a depth of only about 2,300 km but still explain the gravity data if the latitudinal wind pattern is adjusted somewhat. Researchers also note that the underlying inversion is highly non-unique, so additional constraints, such as magnetic-field measurements, are needed.

Explaining why the jets fade at depth is a separate problem. One line of modelling attributes the braking to the interplay between stable stratification and electromagnetic effects, with the winds quenched where electrical conductivity becomes significant. The depth, origin and long-term behaviour of the Great Red Spot are also poorly constrained, because its roots below the cloud deck cannot be observed directly. Changes in the storm's size and in other large vortices are being tracked, but their deep-seated causes remain open.

Moons

Whether Europa's subsurface ocean is habitable is the central question for the next decade of missions. NASA's Europa Clipper will travel 1.8 billion miles (2.9 billion kilometers) to reach Jupiter in April 2030. Its aim is to determine if Jupiter's icy moon Europa currently has habitable conditions. Its ice-penetrating radar is designed to probe the ice shell, which will help determine how thick the shell is and how it exchanges material with the ocean below.

Ganymede's subsurface water will be examined by ESA's JUICE, which is planned to enter orbit around Ganymede for its close-up science mission in December 2034. Together, the two missions should test whether the ocean worlds are habitable in different ways, and whether Ganymede's internal structure and magnetic field are linked to its water reservoirs. Until these observations arrive, many of the key conclusions about the moons rest on inference from flybys and models.

Formation models and early solar nebula

Jupiter's formation is still debated. In the core-accretion picture, a solid core of several Earth masses must form before it can capture a massive gas envelope quickly, before the nebular gas disperses. Gravitational instability offers a faster alternative in which a gas clump collapses directly. Neither model yet fully explains the planet's heavy-element content, its dilute core, or the timing needed to match meteoritic evidence. Migration adds further uncertainty, because the planet's orbit may have changed substantially after formation, which would alter estimates of where and when it grew.

Jupiter's composition is a key record of the early solar nebula. Its bulk makeup is close to the Sun's, so the planet likely preserves material from the disk, but the heavy elements it contains must be explained by processes that mixed or separated these materials. Reconciling interior data, atmospheric chemistry and dynamical models is the main challenge for future work.

References

1. Jupiteren.wikipedia.org
2. Jupiter Fact Sheetaerospaceastro.com
3. Physical characteristics of Jupiterencyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com
4. Planets Fact Sheet - Universe Todayuniversetoday.com
5. Jupiter: General Featurespas.rochester.edu
6. Jupiter Planet Facts - Largest Planet in the Solar Systemsciencenotes.org
7. METEORITE EVIDENCE FOR FORMATION OF JUPITER ...hou.usra.edu
8. Meteoritical and dynamical constraints on the growth mechanisms and formation times of asteroids and Jupiterarxiv.org
9. Grand tack hypothesisen.wikipedia.org
10. The Dynamical Evolution of the Asteroid Beltarxiv.org
11. Jupiter's "Grand Tack" Reshaped the Solar Systemastrobiology.nasa.gov
12. Born eccentric: constraints on Jupiter and Saturn's pre-instability orbitsarxiv.org
13. fragility of the terrestrial planets during a giant-planet instabilityacademic.oup.com
14. The giant planet instability (the “Nice model”)planetplanet.net
15. Five-planet Nice modelen.wikipedia.org
16. The gravitational braking of captured moons around ringed planetsarxiv.org
17. Lunar and Terrestrial Planet Formation in the Grand Tack Scenarioarxiv.org
18. Populating the asteroid belt from two parent source regions due to the migration of giant planets—“The Grand Tack” - WALSH - 2012 - Meteoritics & Planetary Science - Wiley Online Libraryonlinelibrary.wiley.com
19. Mixing of Condensable Constituents with H-He During the Formation & Evolution of Jupiterarxiv.org
20. Revelations on Jupiter's Formation, Evolution and Interior: Challenges from Juno Resultsarxiv.org
21. Born eccentric: Constraints on Jupiter and Saturn’s pre-instability orbits - ScienceDirectsciencedirect.com
22. The Nice Model - Lucy Mission - Southwest Research Institutelucy.swri.edu
23. Earth and Terrestrial Planet Formationarxiv.org
24. Jupiter's interiorebsco.com
25. Interior and Evolution of the Giant Planetsarxiv.org
26. Jupiter's Core - Universe Todayuniversetoday.com
27. Juno results offer tantalizing hints of Jupiter’s secretsastronomy.com
28. Effects of Helium Phase Separation on the Evolution of Extrasolar Giant Planetsarxiv.org
29. The evolution of Jupiter and Saturn with helium rainarxiv.org
30. Evolution of Jupiter and Saturn with helium rainarxiv.org
31. Laser experiments suggest helium rain falls on Jupitersciencenews.org
32. Jupiter Has Helium Rain, Study Suggestsspace.com
33. Giant Planet Evolution with MESAarxiv.org
34. Jupiter's Interior as Revealed by Junoannualreviews.org
35. (PDF) Juno Spacecraft Measurements of Jupiter’s Gravity Imply a Dilute Coreresearchgate.net
36. Revelations on Jupiter's formation, evolution and interior: Challenges from Juno results - ScienceDirectsciencedirect.com
37. The fuzzy cores of Jupiter and Saturnarxiv.org
38. The Interiors of Jupiter and Saturnarxiv.org
39. Juno - NASA Sciencescience.nasa.gov
40. All about Jupiterhomework.uoregon.edu
41. Jupiter Factsscience.nasa.gov
42. Jupiter's Overturning Circulation: Breaking Waves Take the Place of Solid Boundariesagupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
43. What's going on beneath Jupiter's clouds?skyatnightmagazine.com
44. NASA Juno finds Jupiter's Jet-Streams Are Unearthlyjpl.nasa.gov
45. The depth of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot constrained by Juno gravity overflightsscience.org
46. Jupiter's Clouds: A Primerplanetary.org
47. Jupiter’s massive Great Red Spot is at least 350 kilometers deepsciencenews.org
48. NASA’s Juno spacecraft probes the depths of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot - BBC Science Focus Magazinesciencefocus.com
49. Jupiter's Great Red Spot is even deeper than scientists had thoughtspace.com
50. Researchers find cyclones on Jupiter caused by polar turbulence and convectionnsf.gov
51. Dipping a Toe in Jupiter’s Atmospheric ‘Oceans’ and Polar Cyclonesqbios.gatech.edu
52. NASA's Juno Catches 3 Waves of Jupiter's Polar Cyclonesjpl.nasa.gov
53. Dynamical constraints on the vertical structure of Jupiter’s polar cyclones - PMCpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
54. Jets at Jupiter - NASA Sciencescience.nasa.gov
55. The Roots of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot Run Deep - Sky & Telescopeskyandtelescope.org
56. Juno Mission unveils the depth and structure of planet’s shrinking red spot and colourful bandsstaffblogs.le.ac.uk
57. NASA’s Juno: Science Results Offer First 3D View of Jupiter Atmospherejpl.nasa.gov
58. Juno Mission to Jupiter - eoPortaleoportal.org
59. Deep, Closely-Packed, Long-Lived Cyclones on Jupiter's Polesarxiv.org
60. Magnetosphere of Jupiteren.wikipedia.org
61. Magnetosphere of Jupiter Page 1 of 39lasp.colorado.edu
62. 24 The Configuration of Jupiter's Magnetospherelasp.colorado.edu
63. New Models of Jupiter's Magnetopause and Bow Shock Through the Juno Prime Mission: Probabilistic Location, Shape, and Internally‐Driven Variation - Rutala - 2025 - Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics - Wiley Online Libraryagupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
64. Map of Jupiter's Radiation Environment From Juno's In‐Situ Observationsagupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
65. Radiation Belts - Mission Junomissionjuno.swri.edu
66. JunoCamen.wikipedia.org
67. NASA's Juno spacecraft designed to endure Jupiter's intense radiation - CSMonitor.comcsmonitor.com
68. Spatial variability of CH4 and C2H2 absorptions in Jupiter's auroral regions from Juno-UVS observationsarxiv.org
69. Simulations on the shielding performance of composite materials around Jupiter’s radiation beltspubs.aip.org
70. IO-JUPITER SYSTEM: A UNIQUE CASE OF MOON-PLANET INTERACTIONarxiv.org
71. The 2~$\mu$m spectrum of the auroral emission in the polar regions of Jupiterarxiv.org
72. Jupiter Orbit Insertion Press Kitjpl.nasa.gov
73. Rings around giant planets and smaller bodiesarxiv.org
74. Jupiter's ring systemebsco.com
75. Origins of rings in the solar systemarxiv.org
76. Rings of Jupiteren.wikipedia.org
77. Does Io Have a Magma Ocean? - Eos.orgeos.org
78. Callisto's Nonresonant Orbit as an Outcome of Circum-Jovian Disk Substructurearxiv.org
79. Tidal Heating: Lessons from Io and the Jovian System - Final Reportauthors.library.caltech.edu
80. Capture in restricted four body problemarxiv.org
81. Himalia groupen.wikipedia.org
82. (PDF) New Jupiter Satellites and Moon-Moon Collisionsresearchgate.net
83. Collisional Origin of Families of Irregular Satellites David Nesvorn´y1www2.boulder.swri.edu
84. The moons of Jupiterphys.org
85. Irregular moons possibly injected from the outer solar system by a stellar flybyarxiv.org
86. Workshop: Tidal Heatingkiss.caltech.edu
87. Does Jupiter protect Earth from asteroids and comets?planetary.org
88. Jupiter - friend or foe? III: the Oort cloud cometsarxiv.org
89. The Relationship between Centaurs and Jupiter Family Comets with Implications for K-Pg-type Impactsarxiv.org
90. Is Jupiter Really Our Protective Shield? - ROOM Space Journalroom.eu.com
91. Determining Habitability: Which exoEarths should we search for life?arxiv.org
92. Villain in disguise: Jupiter's role in impacts on Earthphys.org
93. Exploring Jupiter's Trojan Asteroidsastronomy.com
94. Origin and Evolution of Jupiter’s Trojan Asteroidslink.springer.com
95. Jupiter trojanen.wikipedia.org
96. Trojan asteroidbritannica.com
97. Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9britannica.com
98. Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9ebsco.com
99. Shoemaker-Levy 9: Comet's Impact Left Its Mark on Jupiterspace.com
100. The Comet That Battered Jupiter, and Shook Congressscientificamerican.com
101. Omens in the Stars: A Brief History of Babylonian Astrology - Kepler College Research Librarylibrary.keplercollege.org
102. Babylonian astrologyen.wikipedia.org
103. When Jupiter Blazed Over Babylondouglasmacdougal.com
104. Ancient Babylonians Used Calculus to Track Jupiter 1,400 Years Before Anyone Elseinverse.com
105. Galileo’s Legacy: How the Discovery of Jupiter’s Moons 415 Years Ago Shaped Modern Astronomyscitechdaily.com
106. Galilean moonsen.wikipedia.org
107. Jan. 7, 1610: Galileo sees four moons of Jupiterastronomy.com
108. 400 Years: Observing Galileo's Telescope - Humanities & Social Sciences Exhibits - Library at California Institute of Technologylibrary.caltech.edu
109. May 1664: Hooke vs. Cassini: Who discovered Jupiter’s red spot?aps.org
110. Jupiter’s Great Red Spot Is Not Permanent Spot Reported by Cassini, New Study Suggestssci.news
111. The Reception of the Copernican Revolution Among Proven\c{c}al Humanists of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuriesarxiv.org
112. The Discovery of the Galilean Satellitessolarviews.com
113. How Did Jupiter Get Its Great Red Spot?scientificamerican.com
114. Junocnes.fr
115. NASA’s Juno Mission Redefines Size, Shape of Jupiter - NASA Sciencescience.nasa.gov
116. NASA's Juno probe orbiting Jupiter may have come to an end, but no one can confirmspace.com
117. Close Juno flyby unlocks sharp new image of Jupiter moon Thebephys.org
118. NASA's Europa Clipper mission to Jupiter: Mission updatesspace.com
119. Europa Clipper, a mission to Jupiter's icy…planetary.org
120. Europa Clipper: Mission Status One Year Before Launch - ADSui.adsabs.harvard.edu
121. ESA - ESA’s Juice lifts off on quest to discover secrets of Jupiter’s icy moonsesa.int
122. ESA - Successful Earth flyby improves Juice’s course to Jupiteresa.int
123. ESA - Juice to fly past Earth for third gravity assistesa.int
124. ESA’s Juice Just Skimmed Earth’s Atmosphere on Its Way to Jupiterscitechdaily.com
125. ESA Juice Spacecraft Completes Earth Gravity-Assist Flyby En Route to Jupiter - Memesitamemesita.com
126. Jupiter (mythology) - New World Encyclopedianewworldencyclopedia.org
127. Jupitermythopedia.com
128. Jupiter’s Names — The Mythology Behind the Biggest Planetplanetsforkids.org
129. Thursdayen.wikipedia.org
130. 岁星纪年 - 维基百科，自由的百科全书zh.wikipedia.org
131. 干支纪年法的历史源流及文化意涵_理论_人民论坛网rmlt.com.cn
132. 触碰星空，邂逅中国浪漫：195件禁止出境文物系列（15）天文篇 - 经济观察网 － 专业财经新闻网站eeo.com.cn
133. 太岁纪年的实质仍然是岁星纪年 - 知乎zhuanlan.zhihu.com
134. Juno Spacecraft Measurements of Jupiter’s Gravity Imply a Dilute Core - IOPscienceiopscience.iop.org
135. Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements and the role of a dilute core - Wahl - 2017 - Geophysical Research Letters - Wiley Online Libraryagupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
136. The Formation of Jupiter's Diluted Core by a Giant Impact - ADSui.adsabs.harvard.edu
137. Contributions of Jupiter's Deep‐Reaching Surface Winds to Magnetic Field Structure and Secular Variationagupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
138. Quenching of zonal winds in Jupiter’s interiorpnas.org
139. Europa Clipper - NASA Sciencescience.nasa.gov
140. Annwn Regioen.wikipedia.org
141. Jupiter Icy Moons Exploreren.wikipedia.org