Hurricane Katrina was a powerful Atlantic tropical cyclone that developed near the Bahamas in August 2005, crossed southern Florida, and intensified over the Gulf of Mexico before striking the northern Gulf Coast on August 29. It reached Category 5 intensity over water but weakened before its final landfalls. Its exceptionally destructive storm surge devastated coastal communities, particularly in Mississippi and southeastern Louisiana. The National Hurricane Center’s January 2023 revision of its storm report attributed 1,392 deaths to Katrina, replacing earlier estimates exceeding 1,800. (nhc.noaa.gov)
In New Orleans, breaches in levees and floodwalls allowed floodwaters to inundate approximately 80 percent of the city. The resulting disaster combined an extreme weather event with failures of flood-protection infrastructure, widespread displacement, and severe disruption of essential services. Investigations examined both engineering deficiencies and weaknesses in coordination among local, state, and federal authorities. (usace.army.mil)
Katrina became a major reference point in the United States for disaster preparedness, public health, emergency management, and coastal reconstruction. Its aftermath involved prolonged housing recovery, rebuilding of flood defenses, and changes to federal emergency-management law, while the storm’s human consequences remained central to public remembrance. (cdc.gov)
Formation, Intensification, and Track
Katrina was the eleventh named storm of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season. Its precursor developed through the interaction of a tropical wave with the midlevel remnants of Tropical Depression Ten; because Ten’s original low-level circulation had dissipated, the new system was designated Tropical Depression Twelve. It formed at 1800 UTC on August 23 over the southeastern Bahamas, approximately 175 nautical miles southeast of Nassau, after weakening upper-level winds reduced the vertical wind shear that had inhibited development. Aircraft reconnaissance data indicate that it became Tropical Storm Katrina at 1200 UTC on August 24. Initially moving northwestward, the storm turned west toward Florida as a ridge strengthened to its north. (nhc.noaa.gov)
Katrina reached hurricane strength late on August 25 and made its first landfall that evening between Hallandale Beach and North Miami Beach, north of Miami. It was a Category 1 hurricane, with maximum sustained winds of approximately 80 mph. Moving west-southwest across southern Florida, it weakened briefly to a tropical storm before emerging into the Gulf of Mexico early on August 26 and regaining hurricane strength. Its compact inner circulation survived the crossing sufficiently intact for renewed intensification over water. (nhc.noaa.gov)
Over the Gulf, atmospheric and oceanic conditions favored rapid intensification. Weak vertical wind shear and efficient upper-level outflow allowed the circulation to organize, while deep warm water associated with the Loop Current and a warm-core ocean feature supplied heat. The depth of the warm layer mattered as well as surface temperature: hurricane winds mix subsurface water upward, but where warm water extends deeply, this mixing produces less surface cooling and therefore less reduction in the ocean’s energy supply to the storm. NOAA’s satellite-based analysis for August 28 placed the depth of the isotherm at roughly 90 metres across much of the warm ring, reaching approximately 125 metres near its center. (nhc.noaa.gov)
Changes in the eyewall—the ring of intense thunderstorms surrounding the eye—temporarily interrupted strengthening on August 27. An outer eyewall developed as the inner one deteriorated, leaving maximum sustained winds near 100 knots for much of the day. Once the replacement eyewall consolidated and contracted early on August 28, intensification accelerated. Reconnaissance observations showed a 32-millibar pressure fall in 12 hours, to 909 millibars at 1200 UTC. Katrina reached Category 5 strength and attained its estimated peak at 1800 UTC: maximum sustained surface winds of 150 knots, approximately 175 mph or 280 km/h, and a minimum central pressure of 902 millibars. (nhc.noaa.gov)
As the steering ridge retreated eastward and a trough developed over the central United States, Katrina curved northwestward and then northward. Its inner eyewall deteriorated again before landfall without a complete replacement outer eyewall forming, contributing to rapid weakening. Nevertheless, it remained exceptionally large. At 1110 UTC on August 29, it made landfall near Buras, Louisiana, as a Category 3 hurricane with estimated sustained winds of 110 knots; its final landfall near the Pearl River mouth on the Louisiana–Mississippi border was also Category 3, at 105 knots. Inland, Katrina weakened to a tropical storm by 0000 UTC on August 30 and a tropical depression over the Tennessee Valley by 1200 UTC. Accelerating northeastward, it became extratropical by 0000 UTC on August 31, and its remaining low-pressure center was absorbed into a frontal zone over the eastern Great Lakes later that day. (nhc.noaa.gov)
Storm Surge, Wind, and Rainfall
Katrina’s destructive storm surge reflected the size and history of its wind field, not simply its maximum wind speed at landfall on August 29, 2005. Strong onshore winds pushed water toward the northern Gulf Coast over a broad area. The wide, gently sloping continental shelf off Louisiana and Mississippi favored a large rise in water level, while the coastline’s shape and local bays and waterways altered where water accumulated. Larger hurricanes exert wind stress over more ocean surface and can sustain that forcing longer at a given location. Katrina had also generated large northward-moving swells while at Category 4 and 5 strength during the preceding day; breaking waves subsequently contributed additional coastal water-level rise, or wave setup. Its weakening before landfall therefore did not proportionately reduce the coastal flooding hazard. (nhc.noaa.gov)
Post-storm assessments placed surge heights at approximately 24–28 feet (7.3–8.5 metres) along a roughly 20-mile-wide section of the Mississippi coast. Southeastern Louisiana experienced approximately 10–20 feet (3–6 metres) above normal tide levels. These regional figures describe water-level elevations, not uniform depths above the ground. Individual surveyed high-water marks likewise varied: the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Mississippi compilation recorded elevations of 27.0 and 26.2 feet relative to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 at two Hancock County sites. Such measurements require attention to their reference datum and whether a mark represents relatively still water or includes wave effects. (nhc.noaa.gov)
Strictly defined, surge is the storm-generated rise above the predicted astronomical tide; storm tide combines surge with that tide. Neither term, by itself, includes the oscillating waves riding on the elevated water surface. Wave setup raises the mean nearshore water level, while individual breaking waves impose additional, rapidly varying forces. Inundation depth is the height of water above the local ground surface, so the same water-surface elevation produces different flooding depths across uneven terrain. These distinctions explain why a surveyed coastal elevation cannot automatically be read as the depth inside a building, and why waves could attack structures farther inland once surge had submerged the intervening land. (nhc.noaa.gov)
Damaging winds extended across southeastern Louisiana, southern Mississippi, and southwestern Alabama; tropical-storm conditions reached eastward to the western Florida Panhandle. At Grand Isle, Louisiana, a Coastal Marine Automated Network station measured a ten-minute mean wind of 87 mph (140 km/h) and a gust of 114 mph (183 km/h). An experimental ten-metre tower at Mississippi’s Stennis Space Center recorded a one-minute sustained wind of 59 knots and a peak gust of 102 knots. These observations are not directly interchangeable: averaging periods differ, and gusts are brief maxima rather than sustained winds. Many stations failed through destruction, power loss, or communications loss before the strongest conditions, leaving the observational record incomplete. (weather.gov)
Rainfall had a different geographical pattern from the highest surge. In southern Florida it was concentrated south of the track: Homestead Air Force Base reported 14.04 inches (357 mm), compared with generally 2–4 inches in northern Miami-Dade and Broward counties. During the Gulf Coast landfall, the heaviest precipitation occurred along and just west of the centre’s track. A broad area of southeastern Louisiana and southwestern Mississippi received 8–10 inches; the National Weather Service office at Slidell recorded 11.63 inches (295 mm). Totals of 4–8 inches extended inland across Mississippi and parts of the Tennessee Valley. The National Hurricane Center’s report listed 43 reported tornadoes: one in the Florida Keys on August 26, followed by 20 in Georgia and 11 each in Alabama and Mississippi on August 29–30. (nhc.noaa.gov)
Katrina’s Category 3 designation at its Gulf Coast landfalls described its maximum sustained wind, not a complete measure of flood severity. The Saffir–Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale does not encode storm size, coastal bathymetry, rainfall, or tornado occurrence. Earlier versions associated categories with generalized surge ranges, but those ranges were removed when the wind-only scale became operational in 2010 because actual surge also depends on storm dimensions and landfall geography. Katrina’s broad circulation, previously generated waves, and shallow-shelf setting illustrate why a lower landfall wind category did not imply a correspondingly limited coastal water hazard. (nhc.noaa.gov)
Coastal Exposure and Pre-Disaster Preparedness
Southeastern Louisiana’s exposure combined low elevation with dependence on artificial drainage. New Orleans occupied relatively high natural levees beside the Mississippi River but had expanded into former swamps nearer Lake Pontchartrain. Draining these organic-rich soils lowered groundwater levels, encouraging compaction and oxidation and further reducing ground elevation. A 2003 study by Virginia Burkett, David Zilkoski, and David Hart reported average subsidence of about 5 millimeters annually across surveyed leveed areas during 1951–1995; some developed areas already stood 1.5–3 meters below mean sea level. Levees excluded outside water, while canals and pumps removed rainfall and surface runoff from enclosed basins that could not drain naturally. Surrounding waterways also created routes for hurricane surge: water entering Lake Pontchartrain from the Gulf, together with wind-driven setup within the lake, could raise levels against the city’s northern defenses. (usgs.gov)
Congress authorized the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Hurricane Protection Project in 1965. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was responsible for design and construction, with costs divided 70 percent federally and 30 percent among state and local interests. Its design benchmark was the “standard project hurricane,” which the Corps described as approximately equivalent to a fast-moving Category 3 hurricane—not protection against every storm bearing that wind category. Four local levee districts assumed operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation responsibilities as completed project units were transferred to them; most project levees had been transferred before Katrina. Both the Corps and local sponsors had inspection duties. Corps reports for 2001–2004 judged maintenance of completed portions acceptable, a finding about upkeep rather than proof that every structure’s design or construction could withstand the eventual loading. (gao.gov)
Coastal landscape deterioration increased the exposure of this engineered system. The U.S. Geological Survey reported that Louisiana lost more than 1,900 square miles of coastal land between 1932 and 2000 through erosion and subsidence. River levees also largely prevented seasonal floods from replenishing adjacent wetlands with sediment, while deteriorating barrier islands exposed sheltered marshes to stronger marine processes. Marshes and barriers could moderate waves and influence surge propagation, but their protective effect depended on landscape configuration and storm conditions. Their disappearance therefore formed part of the region’s vulnerability; it does not establish a fixed amount of surge reduction per mile of marsh, a percentage of Katrina’s damage attributable to wetland loss, or an alternative to adequate structural defenses. (usgs.gov)
The danger of catastrophic inundation was explicitly considered before 2005. From July 16–23, 2004, the FEMA-sponsored Hurricane Pam planning exercise brought together federal, state, and local emergency officials in Louisiana. Its fictional slow-moving Category 3 hurricane had sustained winds of 120 miles per hour at landfall. The scenario anticipated widespread flooding, disabled utilities, and extensive damage across 13 parishes. GAO subsequently described simulated inundation of New Orleans beneath 15–20 feet of water, together with large-scale evacuation, mass shelter requirements, debris disposal, and disruption of schooling. These were planning assumptions, not forecasts of Katrina’s precise track or consequences. (govinfo.gov)
Pam produced some practical changes but left important arrangements unfinished. Louisiana revised its contraflow evacuation plan, and officials pursued agreements with hospitals and universities for temporary medical staging facilities. Nevertheless, GAO’s March 8, 2006, assessment found that plans for evacuating people requiring special assistance, providing care after landfall, and conducting post-landfall evacuation had not been finalized when Katrina arrived. The documented gap was thus not simply failure to recognize a catastrophic flooding scenario: recognized needs had not all become completed operational arrangements for transportation, shelter, and care. (gao.gov)
Forecasts, Warnings, and Evacuation
Katrina’s forecast threat shifted westward as it crossed southern Florida and entered the Gulf of Mexico. Earlier projections had favored the Alabama–Florida Panhandle region; by the afternoon of August 26, 2005, the National Hurricane Center (NHC) forecast the center passing just east of New Orleans. At 10:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time (CDT) on August 27, the NHC issued a hurricane watch from Morgan City, Louisiana, to the Pearl River’s mouth, approximately 44 hours before the first Louisiana landfall. The watch expanded eastward over Mississippi and Alabama at 4:00 p.m.; at 10:00 p.m., a hurricane warning covered Morgan City to the Alabama–Florida border, including New Orleans and Lake Pontchartrain. These times distinguished the arrival of the center from hazardous conditions, which would begin earlier. (georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov)
The surge forecasts became increasingly explicit. At 4:00 a.m. CDT on August 28, an NHC advisory predicted coastal flooding 15–20 feet above normal tide levels near and east of landfall. By midnight, the forecast specified 18–22 feet, locally as high as 28 feet, accompanied by destructive waves, and warned that some Greater New Orleans levees could be overtopped. These were prospective coastal water-level forecasts, not predictions of uniform inundation depth throughout the city. (nhc.noaa.gov)
At 10:11 a.m. CDT on August 28, the National Weather Service’s New Orleans/Baton Rouge office issued an inland hurricane wind warning headed “DEVASTATING DAMAGE EXPECTED.” It forecast that much of the area could remain uninhabitable for weeks, with severe building damage, airborne debris, prolonged power failures, and water shortages. The bulletin communicated consequences rather than merely a wind category. Issuing such information, however, was distinct from making evacuation possible: the subsequent Government Accountability Office (GAO) review documented requirements for accessible vehicles, pickup arrangements, and communication adapted to people with sensory impairments or limited English proficiency. (weather.gov)
Evacuation orders and highway measures developed over August 27–28. Coastal jurisdictions issued orders on Saturday, while New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin called for voluntary evacuation that afternoon and mandatory evacuation on Sunday morning. Louisiana and Mississippi began contraflow operations at 4:00 p.m. CDT on August 27, reversing selected inbound highway lanes to increase outbound capacity. Traffic monitoring and police deployment supported the operation, although congestion developed, including at the Louisiana–Texas border. Contraflow ended at 5:00 p.m. on August 28 as winds increased, reducing the remaining opportunity for organized departure before landfall. (georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov)
For residents without private vehicles, leaving the region was substantially more difficult. New Orleans planning estimated that over 100,000 residents lacked automobiles. Municipal buses carried people to the Louisiana Superdome, providing movement to refuge within the city rather than evacuation beyond the threatened area. The stadium opened to the general population as a “shelter of last resort”; an estimated 10,000–12,000 people were there by midnight before landfall, including 300–500 people classified as having special needs. This arrangement supplied emergency shelter but did not resolve transportation, accessibility, or continuing medical-support requirements. (georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov)
Hospitals and nursing homes faced separate evacuation decisions. GAO found that facility administrators generally decided whether to evacuate, balancing transportation risks against the ability to maintain care in place; health facilities could be exempt from general evacuation orders. Contracts did not guarantee vehicles when several institutions sought the same limited supply, and ordinary buses could not accommodate every patient’s needs. Federal assistance also contained a transfer-point gap: the National Disaster Medical System’s planned transportation began at mobilization centers, such as airports, rather than at individual facilities. Moreover, it was configured principally for patients requiring hospital care and lacked receiving agreements with nursing homes, complicating arrangements for residents needing long-term accommodation rather than hospitalization. (gao.gov)
Regional Destruction and Infrastructure Disruption
Katrina’s passage across southern Florida on August 25–26, 2005, produced wind damage, rainfall flooding, and electricity interruptions before the much more destructive northern Gulf Coast landfalls. Winds brought down trees and branches in Broward County, while heavy rain flooded buildings, vehicles, and agricultural land in southern Miami-Dade County. Perrine recorded 16.33 inches (415 millimetres) of rain, and Homestead Air Reserve Base recorded 14.04 inches (357 millimetres). Coastal flooding was comparatively localized: water damaged homes, trailers, and vehicles at Flamingo on the peninsula’s southwestern coast. Power failures also affected residents; the National Weather Service documented an indirect death associated with loss of electricity. These impacts belonged to Katrina’s initial Florida crossing, not its August 29 assault on Louisiana and Mississippi. (preview.weather.gov)
On the Mississippi coast, storm surge destroyed residential and commercial waterfronts in Waveland, Bay St. Louis, Gulfport, and Biloxi. United States Geological Survey aerial photographs taken on August 31 documented complete destruction of gulf-front homes and businesses at surveyed locations in all four communities. Damage extended several kilometres inland along much of the coast, rather than remaining confined to beachfront properties. The National Weather Service reported almost total destruction along the immediate coast in Hancock and Harrison counties, with surge damage extending northward along bays and bayous toward Interstate 10. Biloxi’s floating casino facilities were also displaced; post-storm imagery showed the Casino Magic and Grand Casino Biloxi missing from their former waterfront positions. (usgs.gov)
The same water forces severed major transport connections. Along U.S. Highway 90, the St. Louis Bay and Biloxi Bay bridges lost numerous deck spans, interrupting the coastal east–west route. Engineering reconnaissance documented concrete spans lifted or pushed from their supports, alongside scour of bridge foundations and approaches. At St. Louis Bay, almost all spans of the adjacent CSX railway bridge were also lost, and its swing span became inoperable. These were failures of bridge superstructures and approaches, not simply temporary closures caused by water covering the roadway. (nehrpsearch.nist.gov)
In southeastern Louisiana, surge overtopped or breached levees in Plaquemines and St. Bernard parishes, deeply flooding homes and businesses; the particular floodwall failures within New Orleans are treated separately. On Lake Pontchartrain’s northern shore, surge moved through lakeside communities from Mandeville to Slidell and reached depths of approximately six feet in parts of Olde Towne Slidell. Farther east, Alabama experienced substantial coastal destruction despite lying away from Katrina’s centre. Homes in Bayou La Batre were inundated, many houses on western Dauphin Island washed away, and downtown Mobile flooded. High water closed the Wallace Tunnel and damaged or destroyed businesses along the Mobile Bay Causeway. Inland, the damage mechanism shifted toward wind-felled trees, damaged roofs, and downed power lines; in central Alabama, the National Weather Service identified wind rather than rainfall flooding as the principal source of destruction. (preview.weather.gov)
Damage to the electrical grid and telecommunications networks compounded these physical losses. GAO reported that Katrina disabled more than three million customer telephone lines and more than a thousand cellular sites, as well as radio and television stations. This impaired ordinary communication and emergency-service coordination simultaneously. Public services also lost buildings, equipment, and personnel: GAO documented one Mississippi county’s loss of every public building south of Interstate 10 and the evacuation of flood-damaged jails in Orleans and St. Bernard parishes. (gao.gov)
Water and sewer services suffered interconnected equipment, power, and distribution failures. St. Bernard’s drinking-water treatment facility contained 3.5 feet of floodwater, while its system lost power and pressure and sustained distribution-network damage. West Jefferson’s system initially relied on generators and suffered approximately 112 pipe breaks. Restoring electricity therefore did not by itself restore safe service: damaged sections required isolation or repair, and systems required flushing, disinfection, and bacteriological testing. EPA subsequently reported that Katrina affected approximately 208 wastewater treatment facilities—117 in Mississippi, 78 in Louisiana, and 13 in Alabama—with damaged plants and collection systems causing spills and raw-sewage overflows. (nepis.epa.gov)
New Orleans Flooding and Engineering Failures
On August 29, 2005, water entered New Orleans through several distinct breach pathways. Lake Pontchartrain’s elevated water level propagated into the drainage canals, which ordinarily carried pumped rainwater toward the lake. Failure along the eastern bank of the 17th Street Canal admitted water into Lakeview; two breaches on opposite banks of the London Avenue Canal flooded adjoining parts of Gentilly. Along the Industrial Canal, formally the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal, two western-side breaches occurred near its junction with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, while two large breaches farther south on the eastern side opened into the Lower Ninth Ward. These waterways therefore became routes by which external water entered protected urban basins, rather than simply channels carrying local rainfall away. (pubs.usgs.gov)
The failures did not share a single mechanism. Where surge and waves overtopped levees or floodwalls, falling water eroded the protected-side soil, removed support, and enlarged openings. The Interagency Performance Evaluation Task Force (IPET) identified 50 major breaches across the regional protection works: four involved foundation-induced failures, while the remainder resulted from overtopping and scour. The foundation failures occurred before water reached the wall crests, distinguishing them from structures overwhelmed by water flowing over their tops. (usace-cwbi-prod-il2-nld2-docs.s3-us-gov-west-1.amazonaws.com)
The drainage-canal failures exposed weaknesses in the interaction between I-walls—vertical floodwalls supported by steel sheet piling—and their foundations. As a wall deflected, a gap could open between its canal-facing side and the adjacent soil. Water entering that gap transmitted hydrostatic pressure deeper into the embankment, increasing loading and reducing stability. At the 17th Street Canal, failure developed through weak foundation clay; the levee and wall displaced laterally rather than simply toppling. At London Avenue, underlying sand allowed high pore-water pressures and seepage beneath the levees. At the southern breach, the gap connected canal water to the sand layer, producing uplift of the overlying marsh deposits; at the northern breach, high pore pressures and the strength of loose sand contributed to instability. These were foundation and design failures, not merely instances of insufficient wall height. (mvn.usace.army.mil)
Flood depth varied sharply between neighborhoods and with ground elevation. A federal housing assessment using NOAA flood-depth data estimated that 103,513 housing units lay in areas flooded by more than 2 feet (0.6 metres). Its GIS overlay placed 5,648 Lakeview units, 6,792 Gentilly units, and 2,721 Lower Ninth Ward units in the category exceeding 7 feet (2.1 metres). By contrast, no French Quarter or Algiers units were assigned to categories above 2 feet. These were spatial estimates derived from flood grids and census blocks, not individual building inspections. (nola.gov)
Closing the openings required access through a flooded landscape: contractors built access roads, delivered rock and gravel, and prepared multi-ton sandbags, while helicopters placed bags into breaches. Removing the trapped water was a separate operation; the Corps’ Task Force Unwatering removed approximately 250 billion US gallons over 53 days. (govinfo.gov) IPET’s June 2006 draft findings also identified system-wide weaknesses: incomplete sections, inconsistent protective elevations, variable embankment materials, subsidence, and errors in interpreting elevation datums. GAO’s September 2006 review reported that individual projects had not functioned as an integrated protection system. Consequently, an intact neighboring wall could not compensate for a breach that admitted water into the same enclosed basin. (usace-cwbi-prod-il2-nld2-docs.s3-us-gov-west-1.amazonaws.com)
Rescue, Shelter, and Emergency Relief
Search-and-rescue operations began on August 29, 2005, as conditions permitted aircraft and boats to enter the devastated coastal region. In New Orleans, local firefighters, police officers, volunteers, and civilian boat crews removed residents from flooded buildings, while helicopters retrieved people stranded on rooftops. Coast Guard crews conducted rescues along the Mississippi coast that first night and subsequently expanded operations across the flooded area. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported approximately 33,500 Coast Guard rescues and evacuations during Katrina operations. Pre-storm relocation of aircraft and vessels preserved equipment for the response; standardized operating procedures allowed personnel and equipment from different units to work together. Coast Guard Auxiliary volunteers also supplied communications relays when normal networks failed. (georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov)
The Superdome’s population grew as survivors arrived from flooded neighborhoods. Its emergency generators supplied limited lighting, but the loss of air conditioning and running water, deteriorating sanitation, and difficulties delivering food and water made conditions increasingly severe. The Ernest N. Morial Convention Center became another gathering place, although it had not been established as a stocked shelter or designated evacuation point. Consequently, no food or water had been pre-positioned there. On August 31, Louisiana governor Kathleen Blanco and Texas governor Rick Perry agreed to move Superdome evacuees to the Astrodome in Houston. Significant numbers of federally contracted buses arrived that evening; additional destinations were arranged as Houston’s facilities filled. Large-scale evacuation of the Convention Center began on September 3. By September 4, federal reports described both sites as evacuated, although newly arriving survivors still required transportation. (georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov)
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) coordinated federal resource support and deployed urban search-and-rescue task forces, rather than commanding every responding organization. State emergency agencies assembled assistance requests and coordinated state resources and interstate aid. National Guard forces generally remained under governors’ control, while U.S. Northern Command directed the federal military response. Across the operation, more than 50,000 National Guard personnel and 20,000 federal military personnel participated. Military helicopters, medical teams, engineers, ships, and communications equipment supported rescue and relief; deployment of large active-duty ground formations began on September 3, five days after landfall. (gao.gov)
Voluntary organizations supplied shelter, meals, first aid, and emergency financial assistance. The American Red Cross had two distinct functions: providing relief directly and coordinating federal mass-care assistance under Emergency Support Function 6 of the National Response Plan. In the latter role, it received needs identified by states and voluntary organizations and sought federal resources through FEMA. The Salvation Army, religious organizations, and other charities operated alongside this system. GAO’s June 2006 review found that FEMA lacked a comprehensive method for tracking assistance requests submitted by the Red Cross, leaving organizations uncertain whether requested supplies would arrive. The review also identified inconsistent understanding of the agencies’ respective responsibilities and discontinuity caused by staff turnover. (gao.gov)
Operational failures involved both information and logistics. Damage to telecommunications prevented assessments from reaching decision-makers, while military reconnaissance capabilities were not fully incorporated into early damage assessment. Rescue aircraft received assignments from at least two locations without a complete shared picture of outstanding missions. Four days after landfall, overwhelmed FEMA officials asked the Department of Defense to assume substantial responsibility for procuring, transporting, and distributing essential commodities. Because supplies already ordered by FEMA could not be tracked reliably through delivery, military logisticians could not establish their locations. GAO documented an emergency airlift of 1.7 million meals to Mississippi amid uncertainty about food already in transit. (gao.gov)
Mortality, Health, and Population Displacement
The National Hurricane Center’s January 4, 2023 revision attributed 1,392 deaths to Katrina: 520 direct, 565 indirect, and 307 of indeterminate classification. Direct deaths resulted from the storm’s physical forces, including drowning and injuries caused by wind or falling trees; indirect deaths arose from associated circumstances rather than those forces themselves. Of the direct deaths, 341 occurred in Louisiana, 172 in Mississippi, six in Florida, and one in Georgia. Cardiovascular causes accounted for 318 of the indirect fatalities. The indeterminate category comprised deaths for which the available evidence did not establish whether the cause was direct or indirect. Earlier estimates exceeding 1,800 reflected less complete casualty information; the revised assessment incorporated Edward Rappaport’s 2014 research and his 2016 study with B. Wayne Blanchard, which reassessed causes using medical and mortality records. These totals therefore depend on attribution and classification, not simply on counting deaths occurring after landfall. (nhc.noaa.gov)
Older people were disproportionately represented among the dead. A separate Louisiana investigation by Joan Brunkard, Gonza Namulanda, and Raoult Ratard, published in 2008, documented at least 971 Katrina-related deaths within Louisiana and 15 among Louisiana evacuees elsewhere. People aged 75 or older constituted 49% of the Louisiana victims, although they represented fewer than 6% of the state’s population. Flooding, loss of electricity and sanitation, extreme heat, and difficulties evacuating patients disrupted the health-care system. Limited mobility and dependence on caregivers or continuing treatment complicated evacuation and subsequent care for older residents and people with disabilities. These Louisiana findings describe a particular study population and should not be treated as demographic percentages for the entire revised national toll. (ldh.la.gov)
Survivors required treatment for injuries and illnesses as well as continuity of routine care. During September 1–22, 2005, reporting evacuation centers in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas recorded 4,786 visits for chronic illness—33% of the 14,531 visits tabulated across six diagnostic categories. Conditions included diabetes, asthma, emphysema, and cardiovascular disease; medication refills were an immediate operational need. Injuries accounted for 5,716, or 58%, of the corresponding 9,772 visits reported by participating health-care facilities during September 5–22. These were visits, not unique patients, and incomplete population denominators prevented calculation of reliable morbidity rates. (cdc.gov)
Emergency public-health surveillance distinguished localized illness clusters from a generalized epidemic. Louisiana authorities, the CDC, and functioning treatment facilities established active surveillance around New Orleans on September 9. Among 7,508 health-related events recorded for September 8–25, investigators detected no major disease outbreak; investigated rashes were largely noninfectious. Nevertheless, crowded shelters presented specific infectious-disease risks. At Houston’s Reliant Park clinic, 1,169 people reported acute gastroenteritis during September 2–12; norovirus was identified in 22 of 44 tested specimens. Crowding, inadequate hand-washing facilities, sanitation deficiencies, and delays cleaning contaminated bedding facilitated transmission. This substantial shelter-associated outbreak did not establish that widespread epidemics occurred throughout the disaster region. (cdc.gov)
Displacement extended across state boundaries and persisted beyond emergency sheltering. Evacuation centers operated in 30 states and the District of Columbia. A Census Bureau working paper using 2006 American Community Survey data found that 53% of pre-Katrina adult New Orleans residents had returned to—or remained within—the metropolitan area; just under one-third of all adults were again in their former dwelling. Texas housed 18% of the original adult population, other Louisiana locations 12%, and other southern states 12%. These residence observations measure prolonged displacement, not necessarily permanent migration. For the consistent geography of New Orleans city, coterminous with Orleans Parish, decennial census counts fell from 484,674 on April 1, 2000, to 343,829 on April 1, 2010, before reaching 383,997 on April 1, 2020. Those counts document population loss and subsequent growth, but neither isolate Katrina’s effects from other demographic changes nor distinguish returning survivors from newcomers. (cdc.gov)
Economic Losses and Environmental Effects
The National Hurricane Center’s report, updated January 4, 2023, placed Katrina’s United States damage at $125 billion in 2005 dollars, with a 90 percent confidence interval of $97.4–145.5 billion. Its inflation-adjusted equivalent was $186.3 billion in 2022 dollars—not an additional loss. This damage estimate is distinct from insured losses, which concern covered claims, and from government appropriations or expenditures for relief and reconstruction. Nor does it comprehensively measure the subsequent loss of earnings and economic activity. (nhc.noaa.gov) For example, a June 2007 Bureau of Labor Statistics study separately estimated approximately $2.9 billion in lost wages in Orleans Parish during September 2005–June 2006; this is not a region-wide property-damage estimate or a figure to add mechanically to NOAA’s total. (bls.gov)
Disruption to oil and natural gas production extended beyond visibly damaged facilities. Evacuations and precautionary shutdowns initially removed approximately 95 percent of federal offshore Gulf oil production and 88 percent of gas production. The Energy Information Administration’s September 2005 outlook reported that the proportions still shut in on September 6 had fallen to 58 and 42 percent, respectively: substantial improvement, but not restoration. (eia.gov) Ports likewise reopened in stages rather than returning immediately to normal throughput. GAO documented the restoration of limited maritime commerce within four days, while the hurricane report recorded below-normal Mississippi River traffic for at least two weeks. These measures describe different stages of recovery, not contradictory reopening dates. (gao.gov)
Fishing losses involved damaged vessels and ports, debris-obstructed waterways, and closed seafood-processing facilities. On September 9, 2005, Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez declared a fishery failure following what NOAA described as a near-shutdown of fishing in affected Gulf areas. (media.fisheries.noaa.gov) Tourism and local commerce experienced more prolonged employment losses. The June 2007 BLS study found an average year-over-year deficit of approximately 22,900 tourism jobs in Orleans Parish during the first ten post-storm months; total employment remained 92,900 below its year-earlier level in June 2006. (bls.gov) Small-business recovery also depended on access to finance. GAO’s March 8, 2006 testimony identified delays in the Small Business Administration’s Gulf Coast disaster-loan program, which served businesses as well as homeowners and renters: approximately 103,300 applications awaited decisions on February 25, averaging 94 days old. Those figures concern the wider hurricane response, not Katrina-only business losses. (gao.gov)
Coastal change was measured through satellite imagery, aerial photography, airborne lidar, and sediment and seafloor surveys. Along Louisiana’s Chandeleur Islands, storm-driven erosion removed sand and narrowed the underlying marsh platforms. A USGS investigation published in 2009 reported immediate post-Katrina losses of approximately 84 percent of island area and 92 percent of prestorm volume. Repeated lidar surveys and sediment sampling subsequently distinguished surviving landforms, redistributed sand, and potential sources of island rebuilding. These island measurements should not be generalized to the entire Gulf coastline. (usgs.gov)
USGS’s 2007 Data Series 281, prepared by John A. Barras, compared Landsat images before and after both Katrina and Rita and identified a net increase of approximately 217 square miles (562 square kilometers) of coastal Louisiana water area. Approximately 82 square miles lay in basins primarily affected by Katrina, rather than constituting an independently isolated Katrina-only total. (pubs.usgs.gov) Increased mapped water area was not synonymous with permanent wetland destruction: the classification included potentially permanent removal of marsh, residual flooding, and temporary changes associated with vegetation loss. Consequently, two-date land–water comparisons required subsequent observation to establish persistence. (pubs.usgs.gov)
Contamination created localized cleanup problems alongside the landscape damage. At the Murphy Oil refinery in St. Bernard Parish, flood damage to an aboveground tank released approximately one million gallons of mixed crude oil, affecting about 1,800 nearby homes. EPA and Louisiana authorities oversaw residential sampling and cleanup, while the Coast Guard supervised removal from canals and other drainage infrastructure. Debris management required separating household chemicals, electronics, and other potentially hazardous materials from ordinary demolition waste. (gao.gov) Disposal remained a multiyear undertaking: GAO’s August 25, 2008 report recorded approximately 16,900 FEMA-funded home demolitions by July 2008, with an estimated 6,100 homes still awaiting demolition around New Orleans, alongside continuing oversight of landfill operations. (gao.gov)
Housing, Reconstruction, and Uneven Recovery
Temporary accommodation included hotels, subsidized rental housing, and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) travel trailers and manufactured homes placed on private property or in group sites. In 2007, FEMA and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) established the Disaster Housing Assistance Program, which extended rental assistance through local public housing agencies. Transitioning out of temporary accommodation did not necessarily mean obtaining sustainable housing: the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported in August 2009 that FEMA’s measures of departures and site closures did not establish whether households had reached permanent housing. Its review, covering both Katrina and Rita, identified shortages of affordable rentals and difficulties paying security deposits or purchasing furniture, particularly among low-income, older, and disabled residents. (gao.gov)
Louisiana’s Road Home homeowner program, financed through federal Community Development Block Grants, opened statewide in August 2006. Eligible owners of damaged primary residences could repair or rebuild, sell and purchase another home in Louisiana, or sell and leave the state. Basic compensation was capped at $150,000 and calculated using the lower of estimated damage costs or pre-storm property value, with applicable insurance proceeds and other assistance deducted. Consequently, compensation could fall below rebuilding costs where property values were low. Implementation also encountered conflicting federal and state interpretations of whether Road Home constituted compensation or rehabilitation, affecting environmental-review requirements and payment arrangements. Louisiana adopted a lump-sum compensation model in 2007 after repeated revisions. (gao.gov)
Mississippi’s homeowner assistance program began accepting applications in April 2006. Its first phase offered up to $150,000 to otherwise fully insured homeowners whose primary residences suffered Katrina flood damage outside the designated floodplain; recipients were not required to rebuild. A second phase offered up to $100,000 to uninsured or underinsured homeowners with incomes at or below 120 percent of area median income, subject to rebuilding in southern Mississippi and meeting current building standards. Payment progress differed substantially between the states: by March 28, 2007, Mississippi had paid 11,894 first-phase applicants, compared with 4,808 Road Home recipients in Louisiana. These counts measured grant disbursement, not completed reconstruction or household return. (gao.gov)
Renters depended on landlords’ rebuilding decisions as well as the availability of subsidies. Louisiana’s small-rental program opened approximately 17 months after Katrina, and Mississippi’s approximately two years afterward, later than their homeowner programs. GAO’s December 2009 assessment of assistance following Katrina and Rita found that the programs examined had funded repair or replacement of approximately 303,000 owner-occupied units but only 43,000 rental units—about 62 percent and 18 percent, respectively, of damaged units in those tenure categories. Funding did not establish that construction was complete. Meanwhile, HUD’s two-bedroom fair-market-rent benchmark for the New Orleans metropolitan area increased from $676 in fiscal 2005 to $1,030 in fiscal 2009, making return more difficult for households whose incomes had not risen correspondingly. (gao.gov)
Housing and population indicators recorded different dimensions of reconstruction. Within Orleans Parish, which is coterminous with New Orleans, census housing-unit totals fell from 215,091 in 2000 to 189,896 in 2010; these totals included vacant units and therefore did not measure habitable housing available to returning residents. Population declined from 484,674 to 343,829 over the same decade, then increased to 383,997 at the April 1, 2020 census. Neither the later population increase nor the housing inventory identifies how many displaced households returned, because both also reflect subsequent migration and demographic change. (www2.census.gov)
Commercial activity and services followed separate timetables. Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport handled 9,785,394 passengers in 2014, exceeding its 2004 total, an indicator of restored regional travel rather than residential recovery. In eastern New Orleans, restoration of hospital services reached another milestone when New Orleans East Hospital opened on July 12, 2014. Such regional and institutional measures differed in geographical coverage and meaning from neighborhood housing availability or an individual household’s ability to return. (neworleans.com)
Official Investigations and Institutional Changes
The House of Representatives’ select committee issued A Failure of Initiative on February 15, 2006, examining preparation and response across federal, state, and local government. Its 14 major findings included delayed or ineffective execution of the National Response Plan, extensive communications failures, and impaired command arrangements that slowed relief. The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, led by Susan Collins and Joseph Lieberman, approved Hurricane Katrina: A Nation Still Unprepared on May 2, 2006, after 22 public hearings and review of more than 838,000 pages of documents. It identified inadequate preparation despite advance warnings and failures to organize a coordinated catastrophic response. Its proposal to replace FEMA with a National Preparedness and Response Authority was a recommendation, not the organizational arrangement ultimately enacted. (gao.gov)
The White House review, The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned, submitted by Frances Fragos Townsend on February 23, 2006, concentrated on executive-branch performance. It identified 17 critical challenges and proposed 125 recommendations covering preparedness, military support, communications, logistics, evacuation, and other functions; 44 recommendations were designated for implementation before June 1, 2006. Separately, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) examined preparedness, response, recovery, and expenditure controls. Its assessments called for clearer leadership responsibilities, stronger operational capabilities, and better accountability. The published recommendations and target dates represented proposed corrective action rather than proof that the deficiencies had been remedied. (georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov)
The investigations exposed coordination problems within the established system of federalism. Local authorities ordinarily managed incidents initially, states supplied additional assistance, and federal resources supplemented overwhelmed state and local capabilities. Under the National Response Plan, the homeland security secretary coordinated federal domestic incident management; a principal federal official represented the secretary operationally, while a federal coordinating officer administered coordination of Stafford Act relief. GAO found insufficiently clear distinctions between these positions and uncertainty about activating federal arrangements. Although presidential emergency declarations preceded landfall, the secretary formally designated an Incident of National Significance only on August 30, 2005. GAO recommended clarifying both activation procedures and provisions for proactive federal assistance during catastrophes. (gao.gov)
The Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006, enacted on October 4 as Title VI of Public Law 109-295, retained the Federal Emergency Management Agency within the Department of Homeland Security but strengthened its statutory position. It integrated preparedness responsibilities with response, recovery, and mitigation; established qualifications for the administrator; and made that official the principal emergency-management adviser to the president, Homeland Security Council, and homeland security secretary. It also provided for regional strike teams, a National Advisory Council, a disability coordinator, and a national preparedness system incorporating planning, training, exercises, and capability assessment. Most organizational changes took effect on March 31, 2007. Subsequent oversight distinguished structural implementation from demonstrated readiness: GAO’s November 2008 review documented actions taken but cautioned that action on a provision did not necessarily constitute complete implementation. (congress.gov)
Flood-protection reform proceeded on a separate engineering track. Task Force Guardian restored damaged levees and floodwalls to pre-Katrina conditions by the beginning of the 2006 hurricane season, but emergency restoration did not itself provide an integrated long-term system. In September 2006, GAO recommended a comprehensive strategic plan specifying protection objectives, implementation milestones, and independent evaluation. The subsequent Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction System combined strengthened levees and floodwalls with surge barriers, canal closures, and pumping facilities. Its principal perimeter defenses reached the intended 100-year surge-risk-reduction level in 2011, while additional work continued; permanent outfall-canal closures and pumps were completed in May 2018. “100-year” denotes a surge level with a 1 percent annual probability of occurrence or exceedance, not a guarantee against flooding or a prediction of one event per century. Larger surges can exceed the design level, so the system reduces rather than eliminates flood risk. (mvn.usace.army.mil)
Public Memory and Historical Significance
The Hurricane Katrina Memorial at Charity Hospital Cemetery in New Orleans is both a burial place and a site of anniversary observance, commemorating victims whose remains were unidentified or unclaimed. On August 29, 2020, the fifteenth anniversary, the city held a wreath-laying ceremony there with local funeral-directing organizations. On August 29, 2025, twentieth-anniversary observances included another cemetery ceremony, where jazz clarinetist Michael White played “When the Saints Go Marching In” during the wreath procession. In the Lower Ninth Ward, children sang beside the floodwall and residents participated in a second-line parade, joining mourning with public performance. (nola.gov)
Archival projects preserve experiences that physical memorials cannot convey individually. In early October 2005, the Historic New Orleans Collection began recording first responders’ oral histories and systematically photographing the damaged city. Its separate New Orleans Life Story Project responded to the destruction of photographs, correspondence, and other household records by collecting personal narratives about neighborhoods, politics, and culture. The Library of Congress also preserves survivors’ recollections through StoryCorps recordings held by its American Folklife Center. These interviews document remembered experiences and their personal meanings; they are not, by themselves, an independently established chronology of every incident described. (cdn.craft.cloud)
Photography made both destruction and the uneven pace of rebuilding available for repeated public examination. The Historic New Orleans Collection’s documentary program photographed neighborhoods in late 2005 and early 2006, returned in 2007, and conducted another round before its 2010 exhibition, Katrina+5: Documenting Disaster. By then, staff had produced more than 2,700 images, including repeat views of buildings and residents. The exhibition placed photographs alongside interviews, historical maps, documents, and audiovisual material. This arrangement distinguished different kinds of evidence: an image recorded a particular location and moment, while interviews supplied recollections and contextual documents situated them within longer histories of flooding and settlement. (cdn.craft.cloud)
Contemporary journalism became another preserved record of the disaster. In 2006, The Times-Picayune received Pulitzer Prizes for Public Service and Breaking News Reporting; Mississippi’s Sun Herald also received the Public Service award. The citations recognized reporting maintained despite damage to newspaper operations and emphasized its practical role for affected readers. The University of New Orleans subsequently preserved Katrina-era Times-Picayune editions as a distinct archival collection. In music, Allen Toussaint and Elvis Costello’s 2006 album The River in Reverse grew from their collaboration at post-Katrina benefit performances. Such work records artistic responses to displacement and destruction rather than serving as a literal account of particular rescue or flooding events. (pulitzer.org)
Katrina’s historical significance also rests on its evidence of compound infrastructure failure. A 2006 Government Accountability Office assessment highlighted investigators’ finding that southeastern Louisiana’s protective works had not functioned as an integrated system: incomplete structures, inconsistent protection levels, and insufficient redundancy undermined their collective performance. A separate GAO review connected catastrophic-disaster planning with the continuity of communications, government operations, logistics, rescue, and shelter. It documented cases in which people rescued to high ground still waited hours or days without adequate shelter, food, or water. Recovery extended this interdependence over years: damaged housing and disrupted water and wastewater services constrained reoccupation, while displaced workers’ inability to obtain housing complicated the restoration of essential services. These documented relationships make evacuation, shelter, permanent housing, and service restoration interconnected objects of disaster planning rather than separate measures of success. (gao.gov)
References
- Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Katrina, 23–30 August 2005nhc.noaa.gov
- Hurricane Katrina Intermediate Advisory Number 9Anhc.noaa.gov
- Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Katrinaw5jgv.com
- Hurricane Katrina Discussion Number 11nhc.noaa.gov
- Hurricane Katrina Discussion Number 14nhc.noaa.gov
- Operational Hurricane Forecastinggfdl.noaa.gov
- Surface Ocean Conditions During the Passage of Hurricane Katrina in the Gulf of Mexicoaoml.noaa.gov
- Hurricane Katrina Discussion Number 18nhc.noaa.gov
- Hurricane Katrina Discussion Number 17nhc.noaa.gov
- Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2005nhc.noaa.gov
- Storm Surge Overviewnhc.noaa.gov
- 2005 Atlantic Hurricane Season Summarynhc.noaa.gov
- NWS New Orleans/Baton Rouge 20th Anniversary of Hurricane Katrinaweather.gov
- Final Coastal and Riverine High Water Mark Collection for Hurricane Katrina in Mississippifema.gov
- Hurricane Basicsnhc.noaa.gov
- Hurricane Katrina Post-Tropical Cyclone Reportweather.gov
- Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scalenhc.noaa.gov
- Public Information Statement: Experimental Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale Revisionnhc.noaa.gov
- Changes to National Hurricane Center Products for 2010nhc.noaa.gov
- Sea-Level Rise and Subsidence: Implications for Flooding in New Orleans, Louisianausgs.gov
- Elevations for Conceptual Design of Hurricane Protection Structuresmvn.usace.army.mil
- GAO-06-322T Highlights: Hurricane Protection—Statutory and Regulatory Framework for Levee Maintenance and Emergency Response for the Lake Pontchartrain Projectgao.gov
- Recalling the Storm, Preparing for the Futureusgs.gov
- Louisiana Coastal Wetlands: A Resource At Riskpubs.usgs.gov
- Preparing for a Catastrophe: The Hurricane Pam Exercisegovinfo.gov
- Hurricane Katrina: GAO's Preliminary Observations Regarding Preparedness, Response, and Recoverygao.gov
- Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned — Chapter Three: Hurricane Katrina — Pre-Landfallgeorgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
- Hurricane Katrina Advisory Number 21nhc.noaa.gov
- Hurricane Katrina Intermediate Advisory Number 25Anhc.noaa.gov
- NWS New Orleans/Baton Rouge Sun Aug 28 2005 1011 AM Inland Hurricane Warningweather.gov
- Disaster Preparedness: Preliminary Observations on the Evacuation of Vulnerable Populations due to Hurricanes and Other Disastersgao.gov
- Hurricane Katrina: Managing the Crisis and Evacuating New Orleansgovinfo.gov
- Disaster Preparedness: Limitations in Federal Evacuation Assistance for Health Facilities Should Be Addressedgao.gov
- Catastrophic Disasters: Enhanced Leadership, Capabilities, and Accountability Controls Will Improve the Effectiveness of the Nation’s Preparedness, Response, and Recovery Systemgao.gov
- Katrinapreview.weather.gov
- Hurricane Katrina - Before and After Photo Comparisonsusgs.gov
- NWS LIX - Hurricane Katrina Post-Tropical Storm Report pagepreview.weather.gov
- Hurricane Katrina Floods the Southeastern United Statesscience.nasa.gov
- Damage to Bridges from Wind, Storm Surge and Debris in the Wake of Hurricane Katrinanehrpsearch.nist.gov
- Hurricane Katrina - August 2005weather.gov
- 2005 Weather in Reviewweather.gov
- Hurricane Katrina: Providing Oversight of the Nation's Preparedness, Response, and Recovery Activitiesgao.gov
- EPA’s and Louisiana’s Efforts to Assess and Restore Public Drinking Water Systems after Hurricane Katrinanepis.epa.gov
- EPA Provided Quality and Timely Information Regarding Wastewater after Hurricane Katrinaepa.gov
- Hurricane Katrina: Strategic Planning Needed to Guide Future Enhancements Beyond Interim Levee Repairsgao.gov
- Performance Evaluation of the New Orleans and Southeast Louisiana Hurricane Protection System: Volume I, Executive Summary and Overviewusace-cwbi-prod-il2-nld2-docs.s3-us-gov-west-1.amazonaws.com
- Geotechnical Reconnaissance of the Mississippi Riverpubs.usgs.gov
- Outfall Canal Failuresmvn.usace.army.mil
- Extent and Depth of Floodingnola.gov
- Hurricane Katrina: The Defense Department’s Role in the Responsegovinfo.gov
- 170 Hurricane Katrinausace.army.mil
- Coast Guard: Observations on the Preparation, Response, and Recovery Missions Related to Hurricane Katrinagao.gov
- Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned—Chapter Four: A Week of Crisis (August 29–September 5)georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
- Hurricane Katrina: Better Plans and Exercises Need to Guide the Military's Response to Catastrophic Natural Disastersgao.gov
- Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: Coordination between FEMA and the Red Cross Should Be Improved for the 2006 Hurricane Seasongao.gov
- Hurricane Katrina Deaths, Louisiana, 2005ldh.la.gov
- Hurricane Katrina Deaths, Louisiana, 2005 | Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness | Cambridge Corecambridge.org
- Morbidity Surveillance After Hurricane Katrina — Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, September 2005cdc.gov
- Surveillance for Illness and Injury After Hurricane Katrina — New Orleans, Louisiana, September 8–25, 2005cdc.gov
- Norovirus Outbreak Among Evacuees from Hurricane Katrina — Houston, Texas, September 2005cdc.gov
- The Location of Displaced New Orleans Residents in the Year After Hurricane Katrinacensus.gov
- United States: 2010www2.census.gov
- The effects of Hurricane Katrina on the New Orleans economybls.gov
- Short-Term Energy Outlook, September 2005eia.gov
- Hurricane Katrina Triggers Fishery Failure and Fishery Resource Disaster Declaration in the Gulf of Mexicomedia.fisheries.noaa.gov
- Sand resources, regional geology, and coastal processes of the Chandeleur Islands Coastal System: An evaluation of the Breton National Wildlife Refugeusgs.gov
- Satellite Images and Aerial Photographs of the Effects of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on Coastal Louisianapubs.usgs.gov
- Open-File Report 2006-1274: Overview and Methodspubs.usgs.gov
- Hurricane Katrina: EPA's Current and Future Environmental Protection Efforts Could Be Enhanced by Addressing Issues and Challenges Faced on the Gulf Coastgao.gov
- Hurricane Katrina: Continuing Debris Removal and Disposal Issuesgao.gov
- Disaster Housing: FEMA Needs More Detailed Guidance and Performance Measures to Help Ensure Effective Assistance after Major Disastersgao.gov
- Gulf Coast Disaster Recovery: Community Development Block Grant Program Guidance to States Needs to Be Improvedgao.gov
- Disaster Assistance: Federal Assistance for Permanent Housing Primarily Benefited Homeowners; Opportunities Exist to Better Target Rental Housing Needsgao.gov
- Gulf Coast Rebuilding: Preliminary Observations on Progress to Date and Challenges for the Futuregao.gov
- Disaster Assistance: Federal Assistance for Permanent Housing Primarily Benefited Homeowners; Opportunities Exist to Better Target Rental Housing Needsgao.gov
- Airport Surpasses Pre-Katrina Passenger Numbersneworleans.com
- Parish Hospital Service Districtlla.la.gov
- Homeland Security: Preparing for and Responding to Disastersgao.gov
- Hurricane Katrina Report and Recommendations Pass Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committeehsgac.senate.gov
- Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned — Letter from Frances Fragos Townsendgeorgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
- Catastrophic Disasters: Enhanced Leadership, Capabilities, and Accountability Controls Will Improve the Effectiveness of the Nation's Preparedness, Response, and Recovery Systemgao.gov
- Public Law 109–295congress.gov
- H.R. 5441, Enrolled Billgovinfo.gov
- PKEMRA Implementation: An Examination of FEMA's Preparedness and Response Missiongovinfo.gov
- Actions Taken to Implement the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006gao.gov
- Risk Reduction Planmvn.usace.army.mil
- Army Corps Hosts Day of Recognitionmvn.usace.army.mil
- Mayor Cantrell Commemorates Hurricane Katrina 15th Anniversary with Wreath Layingnola.gov
- The Historic New Orleans Collection Quarterly, Spring 2010cdn.craft.cloud
- New Orleans Life Story Projecthnoc.org
- ‘It Gonna Be There With Me’blogs.loc.gov
- Inventory—MSS 331—The Times-Picayune Hurricane Katrina Editions Collectionlibguides.uno.edu
- After the Deluge: Costello, Toussaint Put The River in Reversedocumentary.org