Postmodernism

Postmodernism is a broad designation for artistic, cultural, and intellectual tendencies that challenge or rework the conventions and assumptions of modernism. Rather than a unified movement with a single program, it encompasses differing approaches across architecture, visual art, literature, performance, and philosophy. In the arts, characteristic strategies include historical quotation, eclecticism, irony, appropriation, and the mixing of elite and popular forms; their significance varies between disciplines. (moma.org)

Postmodernism became particularly prominent in late twentieth-century cultural debates. Philosophical discussions questioned unified accounts of knowledge, identity, and historical progress, while architectural and design movements challenged modernist ideals of formal purity and functional clarity. Its importance lies both in these transformations of cultural practice and in the competing interpretations they generated. The term must therefore be distinguished from postmodernity, a proposed historical or social condition, and from the related but nonidentical category of poststructuralism. This article examines its terminology and development, theoretical arguments, manifestations across the arts, international reception, and continuing critical legacy. (plato.stanford.edu)

Meanings, Scope, and Terminological Boundaries

Postmodernism has three overlapping uses: an artistic tendency, an intellectual orientation, and a historical category for interpreting cultural production. These uses identify different objects rather than successive stages of one movement. In the arts, the term commonly describes challenges to the authority of modernism, including the deliberate reuse of historical styles, combinations of popular and elite culture, and crossings between artistic media. The Museum of Modern Art accordingly defines it as an approach or attitude rather than a cohesive movement. Its examples range from Andy Warhol’s Campbell’s Tomato Juice Box (1964) to Ettore Sottsass’s Carlton room divider (1981): objects connected by an interpretive category, not by membership in a single organization or adherence to a common manifesto. (moma.org)

As an intellectual orientation, postmodernism concerns the grounds of knowledge, the stability of meaning, and claims that history follows a universally intelligible course. Jean-François Lyotard’s The Postmodern Condition (1979), for example, examines the legitimation of knowledge rather than defining an architectural or pictorial style. As a category used by cultural historians, however, postmodernism can encompass relationships between cultural forms and social organization. Fredric Jameson’s 1984 essay “Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism” explicitly distinguishes an optional artistic style from a cultural dominant: a prevailing framework within which different, including oppositional, practices coexist. Jameson’s usage is therefore broader than a catalogue of stylistic features. (plato.stanford.edu)

Postmodernity usually names a proposed social and historical condition, whereas postmodernism names cultural practices or interpretations associated with that condition. The distinction separates changes in economic organization, institutions, and communications from the works produced or the arguments advanced within them. It does not establish that every contemporary society has entered a uniform postmodern stage. Nor does a historical diagnosis necessarily entail endorsement of postmodern aesthetics: Jameson analyzes the phenomenon through a critique of capitalism, rather than simply advocating its artistic forms. (english.fju.edu.tw)

Poststructuralism is a more specific designation for theoretical projects associated with critical transformations of structuralist accounts of language, culture, and subjectivity. Its overlap with philosophical postmodernism reflects shared thinkers and questions, not complete equivalence. Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, and Gilles Deleuze are frequently grouped under both headings, although their projects differ and the postmodern label is not their common self-description. Lyotard’s own usage also complicates a purely chronological definition: his discussion of avant-garde art treats the postmodern as a recurring experimental moment within the modern, rather than simply everything produced after modernism ended. (plato.stanford.edu)

Late modernism likewise need not mean postmodernism. In architectural classification, it can designate the continuation and intensification of modernist principles rather than historical quotation or stylistic eclecticism. Charles Jencks’s Late-Modern Architecture and Other Essays (1980) helped formalize this distinction; examples of late-modern tendencies include exaggerated glass envelopes, technological expression, and large-scale forms. Contemporary art, by contrast, is a broader temporal and institutional category, not a single aesthetic program. MoMA’s contemporary-art selection includes painting, software-related design, installation, and performance, demonstrating a scope that cannot be reduced to postmodern stylistic criteria. (planning.lacity.gov)

Disciplinary definitions therefore determine what evidence supports the label. A museum classification, a philosopher’s terminology, and an architect’s account of practice have different evidentiary status. The Victoria and Albert Museum’s exhibition Postmodernism: Style & Subversion 1970–1990, held in 2011–2012, adopted a design-centered chronology and brought together objects and media through retrospective curatorial selection. Its dates define that exhibition’s field, not the duration of every phenomenon called postmodern. Similarly, placing Warhol’s 1964 box within MoMA’s postmodern category documents an institutional interpretation; it does not, by itself, demonstrate that Warhol described the work in those terms. (vam.ac.uk)

Genealogy of the Term and Historical Periodization

The documented history of the terminology does not establish a single inventor of the movement. An important early literary use appears in Federico de Onís’s Antología de la poesía española e hispanoamericana (1882–1932), published in Madrid in 1934. Its section “Postmodernismo (1905–1914)” identified reactions within Spanish and Spanish-American modernismo, including returns to lyrical simplicity, classical tradition, and sentimental irony. This was a classification of poetry already written, not a declaration inaugurating the later international movement. Moreover, the modernismo against which Onís defined his category was a particular Hispanic literary formation, not an exact equivalent of every subsequent use of modernism. The date of the term’s publication and the dates of the works it classified must therefore be distinguished. (cpel.opac.com.ar)

Early English-language circulation likewise involved different historical objects. In his retrospective account “Toward a Concept of Postmodernism,” Ihab Hassan noted Dudley Fitts’s use in An Anthology of Contemporary Latin-American Poetry (1942). He also identified a broader historical usage in D. C. Somervell’s 1947 abridgment of Arnold Toynbee’s A Study of History: Toynbee’s post-modern cycle of Western civilization began around 1875. These examples document the availability of the vocabulary without demonstrating continuity of meaning. A poetic reaction dated 1905–1914 and a civilizational cycle beginning around 1875 cannot simply be treated as successive announcements of the same artistic program. (mariabuszek.com)

In postwar literary criticism, the label became a contested interpretation of contemporary writing. Hassan recalled Irving Howe’s 1959 and Harry Levin’s 1960 discussions as diagnoses of decline from modernist achievement, whereas Leslie Fiedler and Hassan employed it more affirmatively during the 1960s. Their emphases differed: Fiedler challenged high-modernist cultural elitism, while Hassan explored literary silence and the unmaking of established forms. Hassan’s The Dismemberment of Orpheus: Toward a Postmodern Literature, first published in 1971 and issued in a revised edition in 1982, supplied an extended literary genealogy through authors including Hemingway, Kafka, Genet, and Beckett. Its historical reach illustrates why a critic’s retrospective grouping need not coincide with the period when the label gained currency. (mariabuszek.com)

Architectural and philosophical publications subsequently made the vocabulary prominent in additional disciplinary debates. Charles Jencks’s The Language of Post-Modern Architecture appeared in 1977, giving the term a conspicuous place in architectural classification. Jean-François Lyotard’s La Condition postmoderne followed in 1979; its English translation, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, appeared in 1984. Here the organizing question concerned the status and legitimation of knowledge, rather than the dating of a literary style. The two publication dates also distinguish French-language formulation from English-language reception: neither architectural terminology nor philosophical discussion entered all linguistic settings simultaneously. (library.toledomuseum.org)

Endpoints depend equally on what is being periodized. The Victoria and Albert Museum’s exhibition Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970–1990, held from September 24, 2011, to January 15, 2012, selected two decades for a design-focused history encompassing architecture, objects, graphics, fashion, and related arts. Its chronology traced experimental challenges in the 1970s and commercial prominence in the 1980s; 1990 was not presented as the date when all postmodern intellectual activity ceased. The contrast with Onís’s earlier Hispanic category, Hassan’s retrospective literary genealogy, and Lyotard’s intervention shows the evidentiary limits of a synchronized transition. A publication establishes that an author used a designation by a certain date; an exhibition establishes a curatorial period; neither alone establishes when every national culture or artistic discipline entered or left a common historical stage. (vam.ac.uk)

Relations to Modernism and the Avant-Garde

Postmodern challenges to modernism often targeted a particular account of artistic development rather than every modernist practice. In “Modernist Painting” (1960), Clement Greenberg described modernism as self-criticism: each art examined its own procedures to establish what distinguished it from other arts. For painting, this meant acknowledging the flat support, its enclosing shape, and the properties of pigment rather than concealing them through illusion. Artistic autonomy consequently involved judging a work through conditions internal to its medium. Against this model, postmodern approaches admitted mixed media, commercial imagery, and historical quotation, making the relations between art and other cultural practices part of a work’s meaning rather than treating them as extraneous. (csus.edu)

The opposition also concerned innovation and formal coherence. Modernist demands for renewal could present artistic history as successive advances beyond exhausted conventions; postmodern reuse made earlier styles available without necessarily claiming to supersede them. Likewise, the juxtaposition of incompatible styles could resist interpretation as a unified formal whole. These differences should not be converted into an opposition between an invariably orderly modernism and an invariably fragmented postmodernism. Greenberg’s model was one influential formulation, while the historical avant-garde included practices that challenged craftsmanship, intentional control, and the separation of art from everyday materials. Postmodernism’s refusal to recognize a single authoritative style therefore both disputed modernist prescriptions and extended experiments already conducted within twentieth-century modern art. (moma.org)

Collage and readymades supplied concrete precedents. Pablo Picasso’s Still Life with Chair Caning (1912) incorporated printed oilcloth simulating woven cane and used rope around its perimeter. The manufactured fragment was simultaneously a physical material and an imitation of another material, complicating the distinction between representation and the represented object. Dada artists subsequently used collage, photomontage, chance, and performance to disrupt established artistic procedures. Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain (1917), a purchased porcelain urinal signed “R. Mutt,” shifted attention from fabrication to selection, designation, and exhibition; its suppression from the Society of Independent Artists’ exhibition exposed the limits of an ostensibly open admission policy. These works anticipated later questions about authorship and institutional authority, but their early dates and specific avant-garde contexts do not make them members of a later postmodern movement. (assets.moma.org)

Pop art and conceptual art provide important transitional cases. Andy Warhol’s Campbell’s Soup Cans (1962) comprised thirty-two canvases corresponding to thirty-two marketed soup varieties; their initial shelf-like display brought the organization of retail goods into the gallery. Although the paintings mimicked commercial repetition, they were hand-painted, with hand-stamped decorative details. The work thus complicated originality and the distinction between elite art and consumer imagery without simply abandoning painting. Conceptual art challenged the privileged status of the finished object more directly. In “Paragraphs on Conceptual Art” (1967), Sol LeWitt argued that an idea could constitute art even without visual realization. These developments opened routes toward postmodern practices, but neither popular subject matter nor the priority of an idea automatically determines a work’s historical classification. (moma.org)

Experimental narrative likewise complicates accounts of a complete rupture. James Joyce’s Ulysses (1922), a central modernist novel, repeatedly changes its stylistic procedures rather than maintaining a homogeneous narrative voice. “Aeolus” incorporates newspaper headlines and rhetorical display, while “Oxen of the Sun” parodies successive periods of English prose. Such techniques make inherited forms visible as constructed conventions and combine literary experimentation with familiar public language. Their presence within modernism means that stylistic plurality, irony, quotation, and self-reflexivity cannot serve as exclusively postmodern identifiers: the relevant distinction concerns their function and historical setting, not their mere occurrence. (ucl.ac.uk)

Philosophical Sources and Poststructuralist Connections

Friedrich Nietzsche supplied important resources for later challenges to foundationalism: the search for an ultimate, unquestionable basis for knowledge. In On the Genealogy of Morality (1887), especially essay III, section 12, he rejected the ideal of knowledge detached from every perspective. Knowing involves affects, interests, and interpretive capacities; objectivity can therefore mean bringing different perspectives to bear rather than eliminating perspective altogether. His criticism of the subject was similarly directed against a supposedly self-evident foundation. In Beyond Good and Evil (1886), section 12, he proposed understanding the soul as a multiplicity of drives and affects rather than an indivisible substance. On this account, the self emerges from relations among psychological forces instead of existing beforehand as their permanent owner. These arguments challenged both foundational truth and the unitary knowing subject without simply making all interpretations equivalent. (plato.stanford.edu)

Jacques Derrida’s deconstruction examined how philosophical texts establish conceptual hierarchies and how their arguments depend on what those hierarchies subordinate. His three books published in 1967—Of Grammatology, Writing and Difference, and Speech and Phenomena, also translated as Voice and Phenomenon—developed this project through readings of structural linguistics, phenomenology, and the philosophical tradition. The opposition between speech and writing provides a central example: speech has often been treated as directly expressing thought, whereas writing appears as a secondary representation. Derrida argued that the differential relations and repeatability associated with writing already operate within speech. His term différance combines differentiation with deferral: meaning arises through relations among signs, not through an independently present meaning that terminates interpretation. Deconstruction thus works through specific textual dependencies rather than merely reversing a hierarchy or declaring a text meaningless. (plato.stanford.edu)

Michel Foucault’s genealogy addressed the historical formation of practices, institutions, and subjects. In “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History” (1971), he distinguished genealogy from a search for a pure origin: its objects emerge through contingent encounters, conflicts, and transformations. Discipline and Punish (1975) applied this approach to modern punishment. Surveillance, detailed timetables, bodily exercises, and examinations make individuals simultaneously more useful and more controllable; disciplinary power produces capacities and categories rather than operating only through prohibition. The examination, for example, combines observation with normative judgment, turning individuals into documented cases that can be compared and classified. This connects knowledge with power through identifiable institutional procedures, not through the assertion that every factual claim is merely propaganda. Unlike Derrida’s textual analysis, Foucault’s inquiry foregrounds historically organized practices that help constitute their own objects of knowledge. (plato.stanford.edu)

Gilles Deleuze developed a constructive metaphysics of difference rather than treating difference chiefly as a problem for stable meaning. Nietzsche and Philosophy (1962) prepared the ground for Difference and Repetition (1968), which challenged the subordination of difference to identity, resemblance, and opposition. Instead of beginning with already constituted things and asking how they differ, Deleuze investigated differential processes through which things acquire determinate identities. His distinction between the virtual and the actual is crucial: the virtual is real but not yet actualized in a particular form, and actualization produces determinate objects and subjects. Physical intensity offers an illustrative mechanism. A temperature gradient can generate convection once a threshold is crossed; differentiated organization emerges through a process rather than by copying a pre-existing model. (plato.stanford.edu)

Derrida, Foucault, and Deleuze are routinely grouped under poststructuralism and discussed as philosophical sources of postmodernism, but the latter label was not their shared self-description. Their related challenges to foundational subjects and fixed identities do not establish a unified school: deconstruction investigates conceptual and textual dependencies, genealogy reconstructs contingent historical formations, and Deleuze’s philosophy explains the production of difference and individuation. Their association with postmodernism is therefore a classification of overlapping intellectual concerns, not evidence of a common doctrine, method, or declared movement. (plato.stanford.edu)

Knowledge, Metanarratives, and Representation

Jean-François Lyotard’s The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, published in French in 1979 and in English in 1984, examines how knowledge acquires authority in technologically advanced societies. Its central formulation, “incredulity toward metanarratives,” concerns declining confidence in comprehensive accounts that legitimate inquiry and institutions by assigning them a place within universal history. Such metanarratives include the emancipation of humanity through reason, the liberation of the working subject, and the speculative unification of knowledge through the development of Spirit. They are not simply extensive stories: they explain why particular kinds of knowledge deserve authority and what purposes their pursuit should serve. Lyotard’s question is therefore not only whether a scientific statement is true, but also who authorizes the rules by which it becomes acceptable knowledge. (plato.stanford.edu)

Drawing on Ludwig Wittgenstein, Lyotard describes discourse through language games with different rules, participants, and criteria of success. A descriptive statement makes a claim that can be accepted or rejected; a prescription asks its addressee to act; an authorized declaration changes an institutional situation. His example of a rector declaring a university open illustrates why factual accuracy alone cannot explain every utterance’s force: the declaration works through the speaker’s authority and the circumstances of its delivery. Scientific discourse likewise has rules governing evidence, consistency, and the competence of speakers. These rules distinguish admissible from inadmissible claims, but do not automatically authorize science to settle questions of ethics or political obligation. The plurality of games thus challenges a single framework of legitimation without making individual games ruleless. (marxists.org)

Lyotard also connects legitimation to computerization and the circulation of information. He proposes that knowledge increasingly becomes something produced for exchange rather than inseparable from the intellectual formation of its possessor. Under the criterion of performativity, research and education are assessed by their contribution to effective system operation: improving outputs, reducing costs, or increasing usable information. This technical meaning differs from the performative force of an institutional declaration. Against efficiency as the overriding criterion, Lyotard emphasizes paralogy: inquiry that generates unexpected statements, exposes instabilities, or changes established rules. Scientific invention may therefore unsettle the very framework within which a system measures usefulness, rather than merely supply more efficient moves under existing rules. (marxists.org)

Jean Baudrillard’s Simulacra and Simulation (1981) addresses a different problem: the relation between signs and what they supposedly represent. In his account, simulation does not merely reproduce an independently existing object; models and codes can precede and organize what is experienced as reality. A simulacrum, in this developed sense, need not have an identifiable original. Hyperreality names the condition in which representations no longer function as secondary images measured against an external reality, but circulate and generate effects through their relations to other signs. Baudrillard consequently distinguishes simulation from ordinary deception: a lie conceals or misstates something whose truth remains recoverable, whereas simulation destabilizes the distinction through which truth and falsity would be separated. (lib.uci.edu)

Disneyland provides Baudrillard’s concrete example. Its explicitly imaginary setting, he argues, helps sustain the impression that the surrounding United States constitutes an unmediated, authentic reality. His argument is not simply that the park imitates American life inaccurately; it is that designating one bounded space as imaginary conceals the operation of simulation outside it. This claim about representation should not be conflated with Lyotard’s account of competing standards of knowledge. Nor does Lyotard’s rejection of universal legitimation entail that every assertion is equally valid: his language games exclude moves that violate their rules, and his discussion of scientific legitimation explicitly retains internal consistency and experimental verification as conditions of admission. The disputed issue is the authority and scope of standards, not the disappearance of distinctions between supported and unsupported claims. (web.stanford.edu)

Aesthetic Strategies and Interpretive Vocabulary

Quotation inserts a recognizable fragment of an earlier work into a new one: words, images, musical phrases, or architectural motifs retain enough identity for their changed context to become meaningful. Intertextuality concerns the broader relationships through which works acquire meaning from other works, genres, and cultural conventions; it need not involve an identifiable quotation or deliberate borrowing. Julia Kristeva developed the term in essays written between 1966 and 1968, drawing on Mikhail Bakhtin’s account of dialogue between voices and discourses. The distinction separates the reuse of a particular source from participation in a shared representational vocabulary. Cindy Sherman’s Untitled Film Stills (1977–1980), for example, evoke Hollywood, film noir, and European art-house conventions through staging, costumes, and framing rather than reproducing frames from particular films. (blackwellpublishing.co.uk)

Bricolage describes construction from materials already available, often heterogeneous objects or cultural fragments adapted to purposes different from their original ones. Eclecticism, by contrast, describes selection across styles or traditions: its defining feature is stylistic plurality, not the use of found materials. A work can therefore be eclectic without being materially improvised, or bricolaged without quoting historical styles. Postmodern practices frequently combine these operations, making the incompatibility of their components visible rather than subordinating them to a seamless whole. Sigmar Polke’s Watchtower (1984), made with acrylic paint and dry pigment on commercially patterned fabric, juxtaposes floral and mesh patterns, a stencilled tower, and gestural abstraction. MoMA interprets this competition between banal domestic patterns and an ominous image as a layering of historical memory and everyday consciousness, not merely decorative variety. (dig-305-artwork-alt-text-c8b04f.up.railway.app)

Parody and pastiche both reuse recognizable conventions, but their relationship to the borrowed material differs. Parody introduces a perceptible difference that invites commentary on its model; ridicule is possible but not obligatory. Linda Hutcheon’s A Theory of Parody (1985) treats such reuse as an intersection of invention and critique, capable of acknowledging predecessors while questioning their conventions. Pastiche emphasizes imitation or recombination of styles without necessarily making them objects of criticism. In his 1984 essay on postmodernism, Fredric Jameson gave this distinction a particular theoretical force, describing pastiche as “blank parody”: stylistic mimicry deprived of parody’s satirical impulse. This is Jameson’s interpretation of postmodern cultural production, rather than an uncontested definition of every instance of pastiche. Establishing critical commentary requires attention to how a source is transformed and framed, not simply recognition that borrowing has occurred. (eclass.asfa.gr)

Irony operates through a discrepancy between an apparent statement or presentation and the meaning invited by its context; unlike parody, it does not require imitation of an earlier work. Kitsch is instead an evaluative category associated with conventional sentiment, readily consumable effects, and objects judged to exhibit poor taste. Its appropriation need not be ironic: the same sentimental image may be presented affectionately, critically, or ambiguously. These distinctions matter where postmodern art crosses the institutional boundary between elite and popular culture. Advertising, commercial textiles, film publicity, and domestic decoration can become artistic materials without automatically being endorsed or condemned. MoMA identifies this destabilization of cultural hierarchies, together with deliberate stylistic borrowing, as characteristic of the postmodern approach. (newleftreview.org)

Self-reflexivity makes a work’s own conventions, fabrication, or status as representation part of its subject. It may direct attention to narrative construction, theatrical staging, or the selection and transformation of existing images. Mixed media, more narrowly, identifies the combination of different materials or media; their coexistence does not by itself establish a reflexive argument. Polke’s patterned supports and competing painted registers, for instance, make the relationship between manufactured image and artistic intervention conspicuous. Neither mixed media nor quotation is exclusive to postmodernism: bricolage also appears in Cubism, Dada, and Surrealism, while Hutcheon discusses parody in modernist works such as James Joyce’s Ulysses. Classification consequently depends on the techniques’ historical setting, their combination, and their function within a work, rather than on a checklist of isolated devices. (jstor.org)

Architecture and Urban Space

Robert Venturi’s Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture, published by the Museum of Modern Art in 1966, challenged the reduction of architecture to formally pure, functionally explicit objects. Drawing on historical buildings, Venturi argued for ambiguity, conflicting scales, and elements that could perform several roles simultaneously. His Vanna Venturi House in Philadelphia (1964) made this position concrete: its monumental front combined a broken pediment and applied ornament with a modernist ribbon window and a pitched roof recalling American domestic traditions. Historical reference did not require faithful reconstruction of one period; different conventions could coexist within a deliberately complicated composition. (moma.org)

Learning from Las Vegas (1972), by Venturi, Denise Scott Brown, and Steven Izenour, shifted attention from exceptional monuments to commercial landscapes. Its research grew from a Yale studio that studied Las Vegas in 1968. Along the automobile-oriented Strip, buildings stood behind parking areas while large signs communicated identity to moving drivers: understanding urban space therefore required studying speed, distance, lettering, and advertising, not merely enclosed architectural volumes. The authors distinguished the “duck,” whose overall form functions as a symbol, from the “decorated shed,” whose comparatively conventional shelter carries meaning through applied signs and ornament. The distinction separated spatial and structural organization from communication, making an ordinary building with an expressive façade a legitimate alternative to the heroic architectural object. (mitpress.mit.edu)

Charles Jencks’s The Language of Post-Modern Architecture (1977) made communication central to the category through “double coding.” A building could address architects and historically informed viewers through sophisticated allusions while also addressing local inhabitants through familiar forms, recognizable imagery, and associations with traditional buildings. Columns, pediments, ornament, and vernacular references became resources for producing overlapping meanings rather than simply restoring an earlier style. Double coding was thus more specific than eclectic decoration: it proposed simultaneous communication with audiences possessing different architectural knowledge, often by combining modern construction with historical or popular conventions. (books.google.com)

Michael Graves’s Portland Building, completed in 1982 as municipal offices, translated these arguments into a fifteen-story urban block. Its original exterior combined a green-tiled base, pale wall surfaces punctuated by small square windows, terracotta-colored pilasters, an oversized keystone motif, and flattened garlands. These enlarged classical elements organized the building into a legible base, middle, and top rather than exposing its construction as the primary visual subject. Street-level loggias were intended to accommodate shops and sheltered pedestrian activity; inside, a two-story lobby and upper gallery preceded the elevator zone and public meeting rooms. The contrast between its communicative exterior and workplace performance became evident in complaints about limited daylight through dark-tinted glazing. (heritagedata.prd.state.or.us)

Philip Johnson and John Burgee’s AT&T headquarters at 550 Madison Avenue in New York City, completed in 1984, applied historical symbolism to the corporate skyscraper. The thirty-seven-story tower’s pinkish-gray granite cladding contrasted with the glass façades of many neighboring office buildings. A colossal broken pediment gave the skyline a recognizable silhouette, while a monumental entrance arch and originally open twin arcades established a differentiated pedestrian-level base. Its historical references framed a modern office tower rather than reproducing an entire historical building type. Whereas the Las Vegas research examined dispersed roadside communication, AT&T concentrated architectural identity in the crown, material surface, and ceremonial approach of a high-rise urban building. (nyc.gov)

These projects should be distinguished from deconstructivism, despite their shared departure from some modernist conventions. The Museum of Modern Art’s 1988 Deconstructivist Architecture exhibition, organized by Johnson and Mark Wigley, foregrounded distorted geometries, displaced structural relationships, and disruptions within architectural form. Its catalogue distinguished these investigations from postmodernism’s use of historical ornament. Johnson’s involvement in both developments also shows why an architect’s name alone cannot determine classification: the historical quotation and audience-oriented symbolism of AT&T differ from the formal instability emphasized by the later exhibition. (moma.org)

Product Design, Graphics, and Fashion

Studio Alchymia, also spelled Alchimia, founded in Milan in 1976, treated furniture as a vehicle for ornament, symbolism, and craftsmanship rather than merely efficient manufacture. Alessandro Mendini’s Proust armchair, designed in 1978, exemplified this approach: a ready-made Rococo-revival chair was covered with hand-painted dots derived from a painting by Paul Signac. The pattern spread across upholstery and carved wood alike, subordinating distinctions between structure and surface to a borrowed pictorial language. Ettore Sottsass and Michele De Lucchi also worked with Alchymia before participating in Memphis, whose first collection appeared in 1981. Memphis extended experiments with unconventional materials, historical forms, conspicuous color, and motifs excluded from established notions of “good taste.” (philamuseum.org)

Sottsass’s Carlton (1981) combined a bookcase, room divider, and chest of drawers in a nearly two-metre-high, totemic construction. Its medium-density fibreboard and inexpensive plastic laminate contrasted with its fine handcrafting and intended luxury market. Brightly colored planes, patterned surfaces, and diagonal shelves made the object resemble an animated figure as much as conventional storage furniture. Nevertheless, its apparently disorderly composition rests on a structural arrangement of actual and implied equilateral triangles; the sloping shelves can support books that would otherwise topple sideways. Rather than abolishing practical function, Carlton made function coexist with ambiguous imagery and the visual presence of sculpture. (metmuseum.org)

Martine Bedin’s Super lamp, likewise introduced in 1981, transformed lighting into a mobile, companion-like object. Its semicircular lacquered fibreglass body stood on four rubber wheels, with six differently colored cylindrical bulb holders arranged around the curve. Exposed bulbs supplied illumination while completing the lamp’s silhouette, instead of disappearing beneath a conventional shade. Memphis describes its electrical cord and wheeled body as allowing it to follow its owner like a dog on a leash; the arched profile also suggests a stegosaurus. Such associations made handling and movement part of the object’s meaning. The design retained the task of lighting while presenting the appliance as something playful and anthropomorphic. (memphis.it)

Printed media circulated these experiments beyond the comparatively restricted market for furniture: Domus disseminated Italian design, while style magazines connected graphics with music and club culture. In typography and page design, April Greiman’s Does It Make Sense?, produced for Design Quarterly no. 133 in 1986, replaced the ordinary sequence of pages with a large foldout. A digitized self-portrait appeared among diagrams, images, and text, including a timeline of cosmic events and inventions. Greiman used video equipment connected to a Macintosh to convert images into pixels, treating their visible texture as expressive material. Terry Jones’s i-D, launched in 1980, offered another mechanism linking graphics and identity: its sideways smile-and-wink logo became a recurring pose on magazine covers. (vam.ac.uk)

Historical borrowing in fashion design operated through silhouette, fabric, and bodily performance. Vivienne Westwood and Malcolm McLaren’s Pirate collection, Autumn/Winter 1981, combined oversized shirts, draped sashes, and wide-striped trousers with references to seventeenth- and eighteenth-century portraiture. Its influence spread through musicians associated with the New Romantic look. Theatrical dress also developed through exchanges between designers and club participants rather than exclusively through established fashion houses. London venues such as Heaven and Taboo, designers including BodyMap and Leigh Bowery, and magazines such as The Face, i-D, and Blitz provided interconnected settings in which exaggerated silhouettes and subcultural identities circulated. (vam.ac.uk)

Commercial circulation did not necessarily mean inexpensive ownership. Karl Lagerfeld furnished his Monte Carlo apartment with Memphis, demonstrating how an oppositional design vocabulary could become an elite interior style. Corporate manufacturing offered a different route: Michael Graves’s bird-whistle kettle, launched by Alessi in 1985, attached figurative imagery to an everyday appliance whose whistle still signaled boiling water. Alessi reported more than two million sales in its fortieth-anniversary account. The contrast between handcrafted Memphis furniture and an industrially distributed kettle identifies distinct markets for postmodern design: collectible objects, widely reproduced images, and branded household products could share a vocabulary without sharing production methods or prices. (designmuseum.org)

Visual Art, Photography, and Exhibition Practices

Cindy Sherman’s Untitled Film Stills (1977–1980) demonstrates how postmodern photography could investigate representation without copying a particular existing image. Across 69 black-and-white photographs, Sherman used costumes, wigs, poses, lighting, and framing to evoke female characters familiar from postwar cinema. These staged scenes resemble publicity photographs from films, but do not document actual productions. Although Sherman appears in them, they are not straightforward self-portraits: the artist performs recognizable roles rather than presenting a consistent autobiographical identity. Photographic mediation operates through the viewer’s recognition of cinematic conventions, making apparently individual characters legible through already circulating images of femininity. (moma.org)

Sherrie Levine and Richard Prince instead made existing photographs the material of appropriation. In After Walker Evans (1981), Levine photographed published reproductions of Evans’s Depression-era photographs, including his portrait of Alabama sharecropper’s wife Allie Mae Burroughs. The resulting gelatin silver prints retained the earlier compositions while placing them under Levine’s name and a title acknowledging their source. The Metropolitan Museum describes their reception in terms of feminist challenges to artistic authority and critiques of commodification. Prince began rephotographing advertisements in 1977, using cropping, enlargement, blurring, and grouping to detach commercial images from their initial settings. His Cowboys, exhibited from the early 1980s, removed advertising text from Marlboro imagery and presented the remaining scenes as fine-art photographs. Unlike Sherman’s newly staged pictures, these works make the passage from prior photograph to subsequent art object central to their interpretation. (metmuseum.org)

Such practices redirected questions of originality from the invention of an unprecedented image toward selection, reframing, attribution, and circulation. Levine’s Fountain (After Marcel Duchamp) (1991) extended this inquiry into sculpture: a bronze cast of a urinal similar to Duchamp’s readymade converted an industrial object into a materially distinguished sculptural object. The Whitney Museum’s interpretation connects its polished bronze to Constantin Brancusi as well as Duchamp, emphasizing an artistic genealogy rather than simple duplication. These conceptual questions should be distinguished from copyright questions. An artwork’s critical engagement with authorship does not itself settle whether a particular reproduction is legally permissible; under United States fair-use doctrine, courts assess the specific use through multiple statutory factors and a case-by-case inquiry. (whitney.org)

There was no corresponding single postmodern visual style across media. In painting, David Salle’s Muscular Paper (1985) combined oil, synthetic polymer paint, charcoal, canvas, fabric, and painted wood in a three-part construction. MoMA situates his juxtaposition of art-historical and mass-circulated imagery within postmodern pastiche, noting how the paintings frustrate expectations of coherent narrative. In video art, Dara Birnbaum’s Technology/Transformation: Wonder Woman (1978–1979) re-edited television footage to expose the contrast between heroic and trivializing representations of women. Its presentation in a SoHo hair-salon storefront also placed the work outside conventional gallery viewing. Here editing and temporal sequence, rather than a still photograph’s reframing or a sculpture’s material transformation, supplied the mechanism of appropriation. (moma.org)

Exhibitions and criticism helped consolidate these different practices into historical categories. Douglas Crimp organized Pictures at Artists Space in New York City, September 24–October 29, 1977, presenting Troy Brauntuch, Jack Goldstein, Levine, Robert Longo, and Philip Smith; neither Sherman nor Prince participated in that original exhibition. Crimp’s accompanying essay supplied a critical framework for their shared engagement with recognizable imagery. Later institutional presentations enlarged this grouping: the Metropolitan Museum’s The Pictures Generation, 1974–1984 (2009) assembled 160 works by thirty artists across media. Museum collecting likewise established particular bodies of work as historical reference points: MoMA acquired Sherman’s complete Untitled Film Stills in 1995 and exhibited the series in 1997. (artistsspace.org)

Exhibition conditions also became subjects within the art itself. Louise Lawler’s Pollock and Tureen (1984), photographed in the home of collectors Burton and Emily Tremaine, juxtaposed a Jackson Pollock painting with a decorative soup bowl. Rather than isolating the painting as an autonomous masterpiece, Lawler recorded its relationship to domestic display and collected possessions. Her photographs of artworks in galleries, auction houses, storerooms, and private interiors made placement and ownership visible components of artistic meaning, bringing the institutional life of the art object into the image. (metmuseum.org)

Literature and Literary Criticism

Metafiction makes the construction of fiction part of its subject: a narrator may discuss plotting, interrupt a scene to examine its conventions, or reveal characters as inventions. Patricia Waugh’s Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction (1984) treats such writing as an investigation of fictional conventions rather than simply a rejection of storytelling. Other associated devices operate differently. Disrupted chronology separates the order of narration from the sequence of events; an unreliable narrator supplies an account that readers have reasons to question; textual fragmentation juxtaposes episodes, voices, or documents without fully integrating them. Invented manuscripts, footnotes, and scholarly references can borrow documentary authority while exposing its manufacture. These devices need not occur together, and none alone establishes that a work is postmodern. (routledge.com)

Jorge Luis Borges’s “Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius” (1940) provides an early example of fiction crossing the boundary between representation and represented reality. Its investigation of an obscure encyclopedia entry leads to the discovery of an elaborately invented world whose objects and conceptual systems begin displacing the familiar world. The encyclopedia is therefore not merely background information: its descriptions acquire the power to transform reality. John Barth’s Lost in the Funhouse (1968), by contrast, repeatedly directs attention to narrative production itself. The title story interrupts Ambrose’s visit to a seaside funhouse with observations about exposition, characterization, and literary technique, making difficulty in telling the story parallel the character’s difficulty navigating the attraction. These particular works illustrate different strategies, rather than warranting uniform classification of either author’s entire output. (cervantesvirtual.com)

Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow (1973) expands fragmentation into an encyclopedic narrative about wartime Europe and the V-2 rocket. Tyrone Slothrop’s movements connect military intelligence, technological research, and industrial power, but proliferating episodes, anachronisms, and hallucinatory events complicate the reconstruction of a single explanatory order. Italo Calvino’s If on a winter’s night a traveler (1979) instead makes frustrated reading the organizing action: a reader-character’s search for a complete book connects ten interrupted novel openings. The second-person address places the actual reader alongside this fictional reader, while changes of genre repeatedly suspend narrative expectations. Pynchon’s historical-technological proliferation and Calvino’s carefully arranged interruptions exemplify contrasting forms of postmodern experimentation. (penguinrandomhouse.com)

Linda Hutcheon developed historiographic metafiction in A Poetics of Postmodernism (1988) to describe fiction that combines conspicuous self-reflexivity with engagement in historical events and personages. Such novels invoke historical evidence while examining how narrative selects and organizes it; their concern is mediated access to the past, not the proposition that the past never existed. Umberto Eco’s The Name of the Rose (1980), set in a monastery in 1327, combines a murder investigation with a purported manuscript transmission and extensive literary borrowing. Hutcheon includes it among her examples because medieval chronicles and religious testimony interact with conventions drawn from detective fiction and other literary texts. Documentary and fictional discourse remain distinguishable even as the novel makes their relationship problematic. (routledge.com)

Brian McHale’s Postmodernist Fiction (1987) proposes a different organizing distinction: an epistemological dominant in modernist fiction and an ontological dominant in postmodernist fiction. The former foregrounds questions about knowledge—how events can be understood and which interpretations are trustworthy. The latter foregrounds questions about being—which worlds exist, how they differ, and what happens when their boundaries are crossed. “Dominant” identifies a hierarchy of concerns, not an exclusive inventory of techniques: uncertainty about knowledge can coexist with instability between worlds. This approach allows fragmentation or unreliable narration to perform different functions in different works, rather than treating formal experimentation as automatically postmodern. (routledge.com)

Magical realism is likewise not interchangeable with postmodern fiction. Its characteristic procedure presents supernatural occurrences alongside ordinary events without treating them as belonging to categorically different realities. A work may combine that procedure with metafiction or historical revision—as Hutcheon’s inclusion of One Hundred Years of Solitude demonstrates—but magical realism does not necessarily expose its own construction. Experimental modernist writing also employs discontinuous chronology, multiple perspectives, and fragmentation. McHale’s distinction concerns what those devices foreground, rather than a simple succession from coherent modernist narratives to fragmented postmodern ones. (resolve.cambridge.org)

Film, Television, and Screen Culture

In cinema, postmodern strategies frequently involve recombining conventions whose origins remain recognizable: detective plots with science-fiction settings, violent crime with comedy, or contemporary action with images borrowed from earlier screen cultures. Genre hybridization combines narrative expectations; cinematic quotation recalls particular images, scenes, or performance styles; reflexive narration makes storytelling or image production itself an object of attention. These mechanisms need not occur together, and their presence does not establish a film’s classification independently of historical context. Scholarship on Quentin Tarantino illustrates the distinction: a 1999 Journal of Literary Studies article describes Pulp Fiction as postmodern metacinema, whereas The Media Student’s Book examines that designation sceptically, emphasizing its modernist techniques alongside its production and promotion history. (tandfonline.com)

Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner (1982), set in Los Angeles in 2019, constructs its future through accumulated historical layers rather than an entirely new technological environment. Syd Mead, production designer Lawrence G. Paull, and their collaborators combined futuristic machinery with deteriorating buildings, crowded markets, and the lighting and detective iconography of film noir. The Warner Bros. street set was retrofitted with elements from different periods; actual locations included the Bradbury Building, Union Station, and Frank Lloyd Wright’s Mayan-influenced Ennis House. The Tyrell Corporation’s headquarters evokes monumental pyramids, while Deckard’s clothing and investigative role recall earlier Hollywood detectives. Stephen Dalton’s BFI analysis identifies further references to Edward Hopper’s Nighthawks (1942), David Lean’s Great Expectations (1946), and Joan Crawford’s costumes in Mildred Pierce (1945). (bfi.org.uk) In “Ramble City: Postmodernism and ‘Blade Runner’” (1987), Giuliana Bruno interprets this architectural pastiche as a spatial counterpart to unstable memory and reproduced identity: the city combines displaced places and times, just as the replicants complicate distinctions between original and copy. This is an interpretation of the relationship between design and narrative, not simply a classification based on futuristic scenery. (badspaceusao.wordpress.com)

Tarantino’s Pulp Fiction (1994) provides a contrasting case in which the rearrangement of narrative is particularly prominent. Its three interconnected stories unfold outside chronological order, making the presentation of events distinct from their sequence within the fictional world. Crime-film situations are recombined with comic dialogue, popular-cultural references, and abrupt changes of tone. The dance performed by John Travolta and Uma Thurman, the surf-guitar recording “Misirlou” accompanying the opening credits, and the diner robbery place familiar entertainment forms within a violent criminal setting. The 1999 scholarly analysis characterizes the film as a metatext that both inhabits and dismantles crime-movie conventions. Such readings concern the organization and recontextualization of material; nonlinear editing alone is insufficient evidence of a specifically postmodern aesthetic. (bfi.org.uk)

Peter Weir’s The Truman Show (1998) instead makes mediated reality its explicit subject. Truman Burbank unknowingly inhabits a television studio, surrounded by actors performing as his wife, friends, and neighbours; his apparently ordinary life supplies a continuous broadcast. The film therefore separates the protagonist’s understanding of events from the production system that organizes them. A 1999 study in Gramma examines it through postmodernism, hyperreality, and spectacle, emphasizing Hollywood’s reflection on its own representational practices. Kimberly A. Powell’s 2001 analysis identifies an argument against media saturation and contrasts Truman’s values with the materialism of the programme’s director, Christof. The latter reading qualifies any interpretation in which the film simply abolishes the distinction between reality and representation: deception and resistance remain consequential within its narrative. (whatson.bfi.org.uk)

Television, advertising, and music video supplied institutional settings in which stylistic borrowing circulated across programmes, promotional imagery, and commercial entertainment. E. Ann Kaplan’s Rocking Around the Clock (1987) examines MTV in relation to postmodernism and consumer culture, but distinguishes five video types—romantic, socially conscious, nihilistic, classical, and postmodern—rather than classifying the whole medium uniformly. (routledge.com) John T. Caldwell’s Televisuality (1995) connects television’s conspicuous stylistic display during the 1980s to industrial competition between networks and cable. His examples range from prestige drama to Pee-Wee’s Playhouse and reality television, locating visual experimentation in production practices and programme differentiation. Claims about quotation, fragmented presentation, or promotional packaging describe textual and industrial mechanisms; claims that viewers consequently lost historical awareness or could no longer distinguish reality from images require separate evidence about reception. (rutgersuniversitypress.org)

Music and Sonic Practices

In concert-music scholarship, musical postmodernism can designate a compositional practice, an interpretive attitude, or a challenge to the autonomy of the musical work. Jonathan D. Kramer’s “Postmodern Concepts of Musical Time” (1996) identifies overlapping characteristics rather than a necessary checklist: stylistic pluralism, discontinuity, irony, crossings between highbrow and lowbrow styles, and resistance to treating structural unity as an unquestioned value. His account also locates musical temporality partly in listening: different layers can suggest incompatible directions, rates of motion, or historical associations. Kramer therefore distinguishes postmodern interpretations of Beethoven, Mahler, and Ives from retrospectively declaring those composers members of a later movement. This definition complicates a simple chronology in which postmodern music begins when modernism ends. (uh.edu)

Luciano Berio’s Sinfonia, composed in 1968 and revised in 1969 for eight voices and orchestra, demonstrates how quotation can reorganize musical history rather than merely decorate a new composition. Its third movement uses the scherzo of Mahler’s Second Symphony as a continuously developing framework, sometimes plainly audible and sometimes submerged. References to Bach, Beethoven, Brahms, Strauss, Stravinsky, Berg, Webern, Boulez, and other composers enter this framework alongside spoken and sung fragments from Samuel Beckett’s The Unnamable. In Berio’s own explanation, the borrowed materials acquire different meanings through their placement, combination, and transformation. The Mahler movement functions as both a generator and a container: the result is not simply a succession of recognizable quotations, but a new relationship between an inherited structure and competing musical memories. (lucianoberio.org)

Alfred Schnittke’s polystylism makes stylistic confrontation particularly explicit. His Concerto Grosso No. 1 (1977), for two violins, harpsichord, prepared piano, and strings, juxtaposes Baroque formal conventions, freely tonal chromatic writing and microintervals, and commonplace entertainment music. Schnittke described these as interacting musical spheres rather than sharply separated categories. In the Rondo, a tango interrupts and becomes entangled with other thematic materials; the closing passages compress themes from several movements into a crowded musical space. Here stylistic imitation and juxtaposition matter as much as literal quotation: a passage can evoke an earlier musical language without reproducing an identifiable composition. The historical concerto-grosso model consequently becomes a setting for friction between musical idioms, rather than a straightforward restoration of Baroque practice. (boosey.com)

Popular-music discussions place greater emphasis on recordings as compositional materials and on the institutions that circulate them. Sampling incorporates recorded fragments into another musical construction; remixing reworks an existing recording’s materials into a different version. These procedures differ from having performers replay a quoted melody because they can retain the source performance’s timbre, articulation, and recording characteristics. Paul Théberge describes how producers used samplers to isolate fragments and loop grooves from commercial soul, funk, and heavy-metal recordings, as well as film and television soundtracks. His example of Us3’s access to the Blue Note catalogue in 1993 shows archival reuse operating within commercial arrangements. Nevertheless, recorded borrowing is not intrinsically postmodern: electroacoustic composition also transforms sourced sounds, sometimes beyond recognition. Tricia Rose’s Black Noise (1994), grounded in hip-hop’s development within Black urban culture, provides a contrasting emphasis on locally situated histories and social meanings rather than a universal aesthetic of fragmentation. (mtosmt.org)

Minimalism likewise intersects with, but does not coincide with, these categories. Repetition, tonal simplicity, and a regular pulse describe musical procedures, not necessarily historical quotation or pluralism. Robert Fink’s account of post-minimalisms after 1970 examines the diversification of minimalist roots rather than treating post-minimalism and postmodernism as interchangeable terms. Steve Reich’s 1968 essay “Music as a Gradual Process” belongs to a distinct experimental concern with compositional process. By contrast, later combinations of repetitive techniques with heterogeneous inherited idioms can raise the questions of stylistic coexistence emphasized in postmodern scholarship. Kramer’s inclusion of both continuities and breaks with modernism leaves room for experimental complexity as well as accessible musical materials; neither commercial popularity nor rejection of it supplies a sufficient classification. (cambridge.org)

Dance, Theatre, and Performance

Judson Dance Theater developed from experimental composition workshops associated with Robert Dunn and presented its first concert at Judson Memorial Church in New York City on July 6, 1962. Its participants—including Yvonne Rainer, Trisha Brown, and Steve Paxton—questioned what qualified as dance, rather than establishing a uniform movement style. Walking, kneeling, ordinary gestures, games, and practical tasks supplied choreographic material alongside trained dancing. Task-based composition organized actions through instructions or constraints rather than through a dramatic character or musical phrase; improvisation allowed decisions to emerge during performance. The church and other downtown spaces also provided alternatives to conventional theatrical presentation. These experiments challenged the privileged status of virtuoso display without necessarily eliminating physical skill or compositional precision. (davidgordon.nyc)

Rainer’s Trio A, choreographed in 1966, made this distinction particularly clear. Its approximately four-and-a-half-to-five-minute sequence linked discrete movements without emphatic poses or climactic transitions; except for walking, its movements were not repeated. At the premiere, Rainer, David Gordon, and Paxton performed the same sequence independently rather than in unison, under the title The Mind Is a Muscle, Part 1. Apparent ordinariness concealed demanding coordination of the hands, shoulders, limbs, and feet: the rejection of spectacular virtuosity was not a rejection of exactitude. Brown’s Man Walking Down the Side of a Building (1970) relocated pedestrian movement onto a vertical surface. Ropes and a harness enabled the performer to descend a wall, turning the relation between walking, gravity, and architectural orientation into the work’s subject rather than treating scenery as a background for expressive movement. (moma.org)

Paxton extended these investigations into contact improvisation. His Magnesium (1972), performed in an Oberlin College gymnasium, explored falling, rolling, and bodily collision; subsequent performances at New York’s John Weber Gallery in June 1972 developed the practice collaboratively. Movement arose through touch, shifting weight, momentum, and responses to another dancer rather than exclusively through a predetermined sequence. Maintaining contact required continuous adjustment to gravity and balance, distributing compositional decisions among the participants. The practice could be quiet or athletic: improvisation and the inclusion of ordinary movement did not make postmodern dance synonymous with effortless or technically undemanding performance. (moma.org)

In theatre, related departures concerned the organization of representation: speech, images, sound, and bodily action could operate without being subordinated to a continuous plot. Robert Wilson and Philip Glass’s Einstein on the Beach, first performed at the Festival d’Avignon on July 25, 1976, arranged recurrent visual images and abstract dance sequences across four acts connected by short “knee plays.” Its nearly five-hour duration and absence of conventional intermissions replaced narrative progression with sustained patterns of perception. A different mechanism appeared in the Wooster Group’s Hamlet, performed during 2006–2013: the company repurposed the filmed record of Richard Burton’s 1964 Broadway production, attempting to reconstruct a theatrical event from an edited audiovisual document. Such staging makes mediation itself visible, placing inherited performance alongside its contemporary reconstruction rather than presenting an apparently self-contained fictional world. (robertwilson.com)

These practices intersect with, but do not define, postdramatic theatre. Hans-Thies Lehmann’s Postdramatisches Theater (1999; English translation, 2006) developed this category around theatre’s altered relationship to dramatic form, not around membership in a general postmodern epoch. Text can remain present while losing its authority to coordinate every scenic element into a unified action. Wilson’s image-based productions are therefore relevant to postdramatic analysis because of their treatment of theatrical time, space, and representation, not simply because they combine artistic media. Lehmann explicitly distinguished the abandonment of dramatic conventions from a wholesale rejection of modernity: quotation, heterogeneous styles, or multimedia staging alone do not establish either classification. Likewise, Judson’s movement experiments belong to a specific choreographic history and should not be retrospectively treated as applications of his later theatrical terminology. (s3.amazonaws.com)

Cultural Production, Capitalism, and Social Theory

Fredric Jameson’s essay “Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism” appeared in New Left Review in July–August 1984; his expanded book of the same title was published in 1991. Jameson proposed a historical explanation rather than a definition of an artistic style: postmodernism was a cultural dominant, an organizing framework within which different, including oppositional, practices operated. This formulation allowed older and emerging cultural forms to coexist without making every contemporary work postmodern. Drawing on Ernest Mandel’s account of capitalism, Jameson associated the transformation with multinational capital and the extension of commodity relations into previously less commercialized activities, rather than with a society that had moved beyond capitalism. (newleftreview.org)

Jameson’s depthlessness described the displacement of interpretive models that sought an underlying reality behind appearances. His comparison of Vincent van Gogh’s shoe paintings with Andy Warhol’s Diamond Dust Shoes contrasted the reconstruction of a lived social world with an image organized around commodities and photographic surfaces. Weakened historicity meant a diminished capacity to situate experience within historical processes, not the disappearance of historical references. Nostalgia films could reproduce the recognizable styles of an earlier period while substituting those styles for an understanding of its social relations. These were Jameson’s interpretations of particular works and broader tendencies, not neutral measurements of artistic quality. (sites.duke.edu)

Changes in spatial experience supplied another connection between cultural form and economic organization. Jameson examined John Portman’s Bonaventure Hotel in Los Angeles, interpreting its enclosed environment, complex circulation, and disorienting interior as a “hyperspace” that exceeded familiar habits of bodily orientation. The difficulty of locating oneself within the building became an analogy for the difficulty of locating individual experience within multinational production and communications networks. His proposed response, cognitive mapping, concerned representations capable of connecting a person’s immediate surroundings with otherwise difficult-to-perceive social relationships; it was not simply a demand for clearer architectural signage. (sites.duke.edu)

David Harvey’s The Condition of Postmodernity (1989) placed greater explanatory weight on changes in production, labor organization, and capital circulation. His account of flexible accumulation connected more adaptable production systems and rapidly changing markets with accelerated turnover in goods, fashions, and cultural products. Time–space compression named the altered experience produced when transport and communications reduced the time required to coordinate activities across distance. The mechanism was therefore more specific than the proposition that technology created a new sensibility: competitive pressures encouraged faster circulation and geographical reorganization, while communications networks enabled those changes. Harvey treated cultural fragmentation and ephemerality as related to this restructuring, rather than as proof of an entirely new economic system. (books.google.com)

Accounts of consumer society emphasized a different mechanism. In The Consumer Society (1970), Jean Baudrillard analyzed consumption as a system of social meanings, not merely the satisfaction of individual needs. Goods could communicate affiliation and status through their relationships to other goods and consumers. Advertising and mass media thus participated in organizing social differentiation, rather than simply informing purchasers about useful objects. Compared with Jameson’s emphasis on multinational production and Harvey’s on accumulation and turnover, this approach foregrounded the symbolic organization of everyday consumption. (sagepub.com)

These explanations did not require an automatic correspondence between an economic structure and the form of an individual artwork. In “Marxism and Postmodernism” (1989), Jameson explicitly rejected an advance formula for explaining why particular class fractions or styles acquired cultural prominence. He distinguished the groups articulating influential cultural values from the principal agents of economic power. Historical analysis therefore concerned the mediation of cultural production through social groups, institutions, markets, and representational conventions; identifying a cultural dominant was neither an endorsement of its aesthetics nor a claim that every artist directly expressed corporate interests. (newleftreview.org)

Identity, Institutions, and Disciplinary Reception

Encounters between feminism and postmodernism concerned both the representation of gender and the grounds of political agency. Linda Nicholson’s edited collection Feminism/Postmodernism (1990) brought together arguments about gender relations, social criticism, identity, and difference rather than establishing a unified feminist position. The disagreement became explicit in Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange (1995), containing essays and responses by Seyla Benhabib, Judith Butler, Drucilla Cornell, and Nancy Fraser. Its subjects included the usefulness of the postmodern label, the status of feminism’s political subject, and philosophy’s role in social criticism. Benhabib distinguished criticism of an allegedly universal, implicitly masculine subject from the stronger rejection of autonomous subjectivity: she argued that the latter endangered the capacities for reflection and action required by emancipatory politics. Shared opposition to universalized accounts of experience therefore did not entail agreement about agency or justification. (routledge.com)

In feminist art, these questions entered museum programming through exhibitions concerned with how images produce, rather than merely reflect, sexual identities. The New Museum’s Difference: On Representation and Sexuality, shown from December 8, 1984, to February 10, 1985, was organized by Kate Linker, with Jane Weinstock responsible for film and video. Its announced contents included approximately 150 photographs and works on paper, ten videotapes, and sixteen films. Artists included Barbara Kruger, Sherrie Levine, Mary Kelly, and Victor Burgin. Reusing familiar imagery from advertising, photography, books, and cinema allowed works to examine the conventions through which sexual stereotypes became recognizable. The exhibition provides a specific institutional record of representation-centered feminist inquiry, without making every participating artist’s work an expression of one postmodern doctrine. (d2b8urneelikat.cloudfront.net)

In anthropology, Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (1986), edited by James Clifford and George E. Marcus, emerged from an April 1984 seminar at the School of American Research in Santa Fe. Its examination of ethnographic authorship challenged the authority of a narrator who presented another society as an integrated whole while obscuring the encounters, translations, and selections through which the account was produced. Clifford’s introduction, “Partial Truths,” treated cultural descriptions as situated and incomplete; discussion of dialogue and multiple voices concerned how interlocutors’ speech could resist absorption into the ethnographer’s explanatory voice. The volume contained distinct approaches, including Stephen A. Tyler’s explicitly “Post-Modern Ethnography” and Talal Asad’s analysis of cultural translation, rather than a single methodological prescription. (masterasie.hypotheses.org)

Feminist responses also questioned whose experimental writing received disciplinary recognition. Ruth Behar and Deborah A. Gordon’s Women Writing Culture (1995) examined the gendered and racialized formation of anthropology’s canon. Contributors reconsidered Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict alongside Zora Neale Hurston and Ella Deloria, and employed autobiography, fiction, historical analysis, and experimental essays. This extended the debate from the textual construction of other societies to the institutions that classified some authors as theoretical innovators and marginalized others. Reflexive writing thus became a question of professional recognition as well as narrative technique. (lsa.umich.edu)

Historical writing and literary interpretation encountered related disputes over narrative and authority. Hayden White’s Metahistory (1973) examined eight nineteenth-century thinkers, arguing that poetic and linguistic structures helped determine what counted as an appropriate historical explanation. Attention to narrative construction could also enter teaching without displacing evidentiary assessment. “Demystifying Historical Authority,” published by the American Historical Association in February 1988, described classroom handouts that asked students to analyze historians’ viewpoints, periodization, rhetoric, and political assumptions while testing whether their evidence supported their claims. The documented change was an expansion of critical reading to include historians’ own texts, not an abandonment of source criticism. (press.jhu.edu)

University appointments and publications likewise show localized reception rather than universal academic dominance. J. Hillis Miller’s arrival at Yale in 1972 contributed to an intellectual community associated with deconstruction, including Paul de Man, Jacques Derrida, Harold Bloom, and Geoffrey Hartman. Their joint appearance in Deconstruction and Criticism (1979) helped consolidate the public image of a “Yale School.” Yale’s departmental history nevertheless distinguishes rhetorical reading from Bloom’s and Hartman’s differently oriented projects. Such records document the institutional visibility of approaches often discussed alongside postmodernism, while preserving the distinction between an intellectual network, a disciplinary method, and a comprehensive institutional allegiance. (english.yale.edu)

International Circulation and Uneven Cultural Histories

Translation and academic publishing made postmodern terminology available across linguistic boundaries, but also placed it within different intellectual frameworks. Jean-François Lyotard’s The Postmodern Condition reached English-language readers in 1984 through Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi’s translation, published in the University of Minnesota Press’s Theory and History of Literature series with a foreword by Fredric Jameson. The edition brought a French discussion of knowledge into a North American literary-theoretical publishing network. Design terminology circulated through different channels: the magazine Domus, for example, promoted the Italian groups Studio Alchymia and Memphis internationally. Philosophical arguments and visual styles thus travelled through overlapping, rather than identical, institutions and audiences. (upress.umn.edu)

In Japan, international circulation involved participation in production, not simply the importation of European designs. The Milan-based Memphis group, founded in 1981, included Shiro Kuramata, Arata Isozaki, and Masanori Umeda among its Japanese contributors. Umeda’s Tawaraya, shown at the first Memphis exhibition, combined a boxing-ring enclosure with four-and-a-half tatami mats; the designer conceived it as a setting for intellectual combat, drawing on Italian enthusiasm for debate. The National Museum of Modern Art, Kyoto, presented Contemporary Landscape from the Horizon of Postmodern Design in 1985. These exchanges made Japanese designers collaborators in an international movement while bringing locally recognizable materials and spatial conventions into its vocabulary. (momak.go.jp)

Architectural commissions supplied another infrastructure of exchange, connecting foreign architects with local developers, contractors, and sites. Michael Graves’s Hyatt Regency Fukuoka hotel and associated office building, completed in 1994, involved Maeda Construction as associate architect and contractor. The development combined a 200-room hotel with an eleven-storey office building on a narrow site between a park and a river. Its central rotunda and gold-leafed stair translated Graves’s theatrical architectural language into a mixed-use Japanese commission. The project also initiated more than a decade of collaboration with the developer and contractor: international architectural circulation depended on sustained professional relationships as well as published images. (michaelgraves.com)

In China, university teaching and translated lecture collections were important mechanisms. Fredric Jameson lectured at Peking University in 1985; Tang Xiaobing’s Chinese translation appeared in 1987 as Postmodernism and Cultural Theory. Yue Daiyun’s work in comparative literature provided an institutional setting for such exchanges through invitations to foreign scholars, teaching, and publishing. The expansion was measurable: more than forty Chinese universities began offering comparative-literature courses in 1985, and a twenty-six-volume Peking University comparative-literature research series followed in 1987. Jameson’s lectures therefore entered a broader reconstruction of the humanities rather than simply announcing that Chinese culture had passed beyond modernism. Their reception also retained a connection to Marxist cultural analysis. (worldhumanitiesreport.org)

A contrasting formulation emerged in Latin America through Néstor García Canclini’s Culturas híbridas (1989), translated into English as Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity in 1995. Its chapter “Latin American Contradictions: Modernism without Modernization?” separated cultural experimentation from socioeconomic transformation. García Canclini examined interactions among elite art, popular practices, heritage institutions, and mass communication: media could recirculate traditions rather than simply replace them. His account of hybridization resisted both the explanation of Latin American culture as European imitation and the treatment of it as an untouched indigenous essence. Colonial inheritances and uneven modernization produced coexisting historical formations, complicating a single chronology in which traditional society becomes modern and subsequently postmodern. (observatoriocultural.udgvirtual.udg.mx)

Postcolonial theory intersects with these questions without being interchangeable with postmodernism. Its concern with colonial authority, representation, and the consequences of decolonization gives it a different historical focus from classifications of artistic style or accounts of postindustrial knowledge. Kwame Anthony Appiah explicitly examined the relationship in “Is the Post- in Postmodernism the Post- in Postcolonial?” (1991), questioning the opposition between a unitary Africa and a monolithic West. Homi K. Bhabha’s The Location of Culture (1994) developed concepts of mimicry, ambivalence, and hybridity through analyses of colonial discourse; its chapters connected the postcolonial and postmodern through problems of agency and cultural translation. These were specific theoretical intersections, not declarations that formerly colonized societies occupied one shared “postmodern” stage. (appiah.net)

Criticism and Methodological Disputes

Jürgen Habermas’s “Modernity—An Incomplete Project,” first delivered in September 1980, rejected the inference that modernity’s failures required abandoning its intellectual project. He described the Enlightenment project as the development of objective science, universalistic morality and law, and autonomous art, together with efforts to bring their specialized achievements into everyday life. Their separation into expert cultures had created problems, but a return to undifferentiated tradition was not his proposed remedy. Nor did he simply defend every feature of artistic modernism: he questioned avant-garde attempts to dissolve the distinction between art and life, arguing that breaking down one cultural sphere could not by itself overcome the fragmentation of modern experience. His alternative was renewed interaction between specialized cultural knowledge and everyday interpretation. (platypus1917.org)

In The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (German edition, 1985; English translation, 1987), Habermas developed a more specific objection concerning rational justification. Rather than restoring an isolated, sovereign subject, he defended communicative rationality: reason exercised through exchanges in which participants can challenge claims and demand justification. He argued that radical critiques of reason risked a performative contradiction, using argumentative practices whose validity they appeared to deny. His treatment of Michel Foucault questioned the normative basis on which a genealogy of power could condemn domination; his treatment of Jacques Derrida criticized the leveling of distinctions between philosophical argument and literary rhetoric. These were objections to identifiable methods and arguments, not demonstrations that every thinker associated with postmodernism held an identical position. (plato.stanford.edu)

Disputes over relativism likewise turn on the scope of the claim being criticized. The historical variability of beliefs does not, by itself, establish that truth or justification is valid only within a particular framework. Relativism can concern moral judgments, epistemic standards, or truth, without necessarily applying to all three. Jean-François Lyotard’s disagreement with Habermas centered more specifically on consensus: in The Postmodern Condition (1979), he rejected universal consensus as the ultimate goal of discourse and emphasized the invention of new moves and rules within heterogeneous language games. The dispute thus concerned whether shared procedures could justify judgments across differences, rather than merely whether disagreement existed. (plato.stanford.edu)

Intelligibility and evidential standards became especially prominent in the 1996 Sokal affair. The physicist Alan Sokal published “Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity” in Social Text, issues 46–47, before revealing in Lingua Franca that it was a deliberately constructed parody. Its juxtaposition of scientific terminology and cultural-theoretical claims was intended to test editorial judgment. Sokal’s subsequent explanation distinguished legitimate investigation of science’s social organization from unsupported inferences about physical reality, and questioned whether references to mathematics and physics actually supported the arguments in which they appeared. The publication documented an editorial failure in a particular case; it did not constitute an experimental refutation of an entire philosophical or artistic category. (physics.nyu.edu)

The responses also exposed disagreement over what the episode was evidence of. In a letter published on May 23, 1996, Social Text co-editors Bruce Robbins and Andrew Ross denied that questioning scientific authority meant denying the physical universe; they identified research priorities, resource allocation, and public accountability as objects of criticism. Sokal, meanwhile, explicitly stated that his targets extended beyond postmodernism to particular writings in science studies and cultural criticism. Calling a text “postmodern” therefore does not specify whether the objection concerns factual error, unjustified inference, obscure exposition, or an aesthetic preference. Criticism of scientific claims requires scrutiny of those claims; criticism of quotation, fragmentation, or historical borrowing in art addresses different questions. (jwalsh.net)

Later Developments, Preservation, and Legacy

Claims that postmodernism ended refer to different disciplinary histories. The Victoria and Albert Museum’s exhibition Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970–1990, held from 24 September 2011 to 15 January 2012, framed a particular period in design and architecture rather than establishing an endpoint for philosophy or literature. Its accompanying account attributed the movement’s decline partly to its absorption into consumerism and corporate culture, while explicitly acknowledging continuing influence in the twenty-first century. In literary and cultural criticism, Linda Hutcheon’s 2002 epilogue to The Politics of Postmodernism likewise declared the postmodern moment over. Such formulations distinguish the decline of an identifiable movement or critical vocabulary from the disappearance of its techniques and questions. (vam.ac.uk)

Proposed successor categories differ substantially in what they claim to explain. In Post-Postmodernism; or, The Cultural Logic of Just-in-Time Capitalism (2012), Jeffrey T. Nealon used post-postmodernism to describe an intensification—not a simple rejection—of postmodern capitalism, particularly in American cultural life since the 1980s. His argument concerned economic practices increasingly permeating formerly more independent cultural activities. By contrast, Timotheus Vermeulen and Robin van den Akker’s “Notes on Metamodernism” (2010) proposed metamodernism as an emerging artistic sensibility oscillating between modern commitment and postmodern detachment, hope and skepticism, sincerity and irony. They explicitly characterized their formulation as open-ended and essayistic. These terms therefore name attributed interpretations with different objects of analysis, not agreed stages in a universal chronology. (degruyterbrill.com)

Digital cultural production supplies both continuities and changed mechanisms. Lev Manovich’s “Remixability and Modularity” (2005) described how hyperlinks, blogs, tagging, shared platforms, and other Internet channels allowed users to collect, recombine, and recirculate material collaboratively. In “Deep Remixability” (2007), he distinguished the borrowing of existing content from software-enabled combinations of media techniques themselves: animation, live-action footage, typography, and compositing could enter a common production environment. This extends comparison with earlier appropriation while identifying a technical difference in how heterogeneous materials are processed. Literary hypertext offers a more specific connection. Michael Joyce’s afternoon, a story, demonstrated in 1987 and commercially published in 1990, made branching navigation part of narrative interpretation; excerpts subsequently appeared in the 1998 Norton Anthology of Postmodern Fiction. Its links operated within a self-contained work, rather than an unrestricted network of external contributions. (manovich.net)

Architectural preservation has transformed selected postmodern buildings into recognized cultural heritage. No. 1 Poultry in London, designed by James Stirling and Michael Wilford’s practice in 1986–1988 and built in 1994–1997, received Grade II* listing on 28 November 2016. This institutional recognition treats postmodern architecture as a historical resource rather than merely a recently superseded fashion. Retrospective exhibitions perform a related classificatory function: the V&A’s 2011 exhibition assembled more than 250 objects, including architectural drawings, furniture, graphics, costumes, and moving images. Bringing these media together made a cross-disciplinary history visible, while its chosen dates and exhibits necessarily defined the particular version of postmodernism presented. (historicengland.org.uk)

Design objects introduce material problems that stylistic histories alone cannot resolve. The V&A’s conservation publications documented the deterioration of plastics and composite furniture materials, including polyurethane foam and glass-reinforced polyester. Its October 1996 journal described hardened and discolored inflatable furniture and the dilemma posed by replacing collapsed original upholstery to recover an object’s intended form. These are problems of the broader experimental-design collections within which postmodern objects are preserved, not properties exclusive to postmodernism. Conservation must distinguish retaining original substances from retaining appearance, structure, or function; documentation of materials and earlier treatments becomes part of the object’s historical record. (vam.ac.uk)

Performance preservation relies on a different combination of evidence and renewed enactment. The Museum of Modern Art’s Judson Dance Theater: The Work Is Never Done, shown from 16 September 2018 to 3 February 2019, joined photographs, films, scores, objects, and archival materials with live performance. Its program devoted successive periods to artists including Yvonne Rainer, Lucinda Childs, Steve Paxton, and Trisha Brown, and incorporated classes and workshops by Movement Research. Rather than treating an archival image as equivalent to a dance, the exhibition placed documentary traces alongside embodied transmission, allowing the early-1960s experiments associated with postmodern dance to be encountered through both historical records and contemporary performers. (production-gcp.moma.org)

References

1. Postmodernism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
2. Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, NLR I/146, July–August 1984newleftreview.org
3. Introduction to Postmodernismenglish.fju.edu.tw
4. SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statementplanning.lacity.gov
5. What is Postmodernism? · V&Avam.ac.uk
6. Antología de la poesía española e hispanoamericana : 1882-1932cpel.opac.com.ar
7. Federico de Onís, Antología de la poesía española e hispanoamericana (1882-1932)persee.fr
8. Ihab Hassan, “Toward a Concept of Postmodernism”mariabuszek.com
9. The Dismemberment of Orpheus: Toward a Postmodern Literaturebibliovault.org
10. Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970–1990media.vam.ac.uk
11. The art of assemblageassets.moma.org
12. The styles of Ulysses (Chapter 8) - James Joycecambridge.org
13. Friedrich Nietzsche (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
14. Jacques Derrida (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Spring 2021 Edition)plato.stanford.edu
15. Michel Foucault (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
16. Gilles Deleuze (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Summer 2022 Edition)plato.stanford.edu
17. The Postmodern Conditionupress.umn.edu
18. The Postmodern Condition by Jean-Francois Lyotard. 1979marxists.org
19. Texts by Jean Baudrillard, 1981lib.uci.edu
20. Simulacra and Simulationpress.umich.edu
21. Baudrillard_Simulacra and Simulationsweb.stanford.edu
22. Intertextuality: Sample Chapterblackwellpublishing.co.uk
23. Bricolage | Tatedig-305-artwork-alt-text-c8b04f.up.railway.app
24. Parody without Ridicule: Observations on Modern Literary Parodyeclass.asfa.gr
25. A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Formsjstor.org
26. Linda Hutcheonen.wikipedia.org
27. Kitsch (visual art genre) | EBSCOebsco.com
28. 1972: Learning From Las Vegas - MIT Pressmitpress.mit.edu
29. Learning from Las Vegasmitpress.mit.edu
30. Duck vs. Decorated Shed Through the Lens of Vegas Resorts - Duck Duck Shedduckduckshed.com
31. The Language of Post-modern Architecture - Charles Jencks - Google Booksbooks.google.com
32. Portland Public Service Building: National Register of Historic Places Registration Formheritagedata.prd.state.or.us
33. The Portland Building Monographportland.gov
34. LPC Designates The AT&T Headquarters Building As An Individual Landmarknyc.gov
35. 550 Madison Avenue: NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission Briefnyc.gov
36. Deconstructivist architecturemoma.org
37. "Proust" Armchair, Designed 1978; made 1998–1999philamuseum.org
38. Memphis – Design Museumdesignmuseum.org
39. Super – Memphis Milanomemphis.it
40. Memphis Furniture Milano 1984 Cataloguememphis.it
41. See every single i-D cover herei-d.co
42. Vivienne Westwood: punk, new romantic and beyondvam.ac.uk
43. Club to Catwalk: London Fashion in the 1980svam.ac.uk
44. 9093 Kettle by Michael Gravesus.alessi.com
45. Untitled Film Still #65, 1980moca.org
46. Richard Prince Teaching Materialsguggenheim.org
47. Sherrie Levine, Fountain (After Marcel Duchamp), 1991, and Fountain (Buddha), 1996whitney.org
48. U.S. Copyright Office Fair Use Indexcopyright.gov
49. Picturesartistsspace.org
50. Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fictionroutledge.com
51. Postmodernist Fictionroutledge.com
52. Treating the Fiction of Forms: Metafiction in John Barthsciencepublishinggroup.com
53. Gravity's Rainbow (Classics Deluxe Edition)penguinrandomhouse.com
54. Pictures Showing What Happens on Each Page of Thomas Pynchon's Novel Gravity's Rainbowpenguinrandomhouse.com
55. If on a winter's night a traveleren.wikipedia.org
56. If on a Winter's Night a Travelerpenguinrandomhouse.com
57. A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fictionroutledge.com
58. Historiographic Metafiction: Parody and the Intertextuality of Historyeclass.asfa.gr
59. The Name of the Roseen.wikipedia.org
60. The Media Student’s Book: Pulp Fiction case studyroutledgetextbooks.com
61. Blade Runner: anatomy of a classicbfi.org.uk
62. Ramble City: Postmodernism and “Blade Runner”badspaceusao.wordpress.com
63. Pulp Fiction (1994)bfi.org.uk
64. Where to begin with Quentin Tarantinobfi.org.uk
65. 10 great films of 1998bfi.org.uk
66. The Frontier to Innerspace: Arguments Against a Mass-Mediated Culture in The Truman Showscholarworks.uni.edu
67. Rocking Around the Clock: Music Television, Postmodernism, and Consumer Cultureroutledge.com
68. Televisualityrutgersuniversitypress.org
69. Postmodern Concepts of Musical Timeuh.edu
70. Sinfonialucianoberio.org
71. Sinfonia (nota dell’autore)lucianoberio.org
72. Alfred Schnittke — Concerto grosso No. 1boosey.com
73. Mashing: Toward a Typology of Recycled Musicmtosmt.org
74. The Cambridge Companion to Pop and Rock — sample chapterassets.cambridge.org
75. Editorial: Borrowing, quotation, sampling and plunderingcambridge.org
76. Black Noise: Rap Music and Black Culture in Contemporary Americatriciarose.com
77. (Post-)minimalisms 1970–2000: the search for a new mainstreamcambridge.org
78. The Birth of the Judson Dance Theatre: “A Concert of Dance” at Judson Church, July 6, 1962davidgordon.nyc
79. Ralph Lemon: Modern Dancemoma.org
80. Contact Improvisation—Aboutcontactquarterly.com
81. Einstein on the Beachrobertwilson.com
82. Hamletthewoostergroup.org
83. 2007 Archives—The Wooster Groupthewoostergroup.org
84. Postdramatic Theatres3.amazonaws.com
85. Postdramatic Theatre—1st Editionroutledge.com
86. Farewell to Fredric Jamesondukeupress.wordpress.com
87. Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalismsites.duke.edu
88. From LA Hotels to Economic Theory, Fredric Jameson’s Multifaceted Analysis of the Presentliterature.duke.edu
89. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry Into the Origins of Cultural Changebooks.google.com
90. Harvey and Postmodernityversobooks.com
91. The Consumer Societysagepub.com
92. The Consumer Society and the (False) Myth ofiris.uniroma1.it
93. Fredric Jameson, Marxism and Postmodernism, NLR I/176, July–August 1989newleftreview.org
94. Feminism/Postmodernismroutledge.com
95. Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchangeroutledge.com
96. Feminism and Postmodernism: An Uneasy Alliancemarxists.org
97. Difference: On Representation and Sexuality — Press Released2b8urneelikat.cloudfront.net
98. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnographymasterasie.hypotheses.org
99. Women Writing Cultureucpress.edu
100. In Memoriam: Professor J. Hillis Millerenglish.yale.edu
101. History of the Departmentenglish.yale.edu
102. 2nd Collection Gallery Exhibition 2024–2025momak.go.jp
103. Hyatt Regency Fukuoka Hotel & Office Buildingmichaelgraves.com
104. Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies in Chinaworldhumanitiesreport.org
105. Culturas Híbridas: Estrategias para entrar y salir de la modernidadobservatoriocultural.udgvirtual.udg.mx
106. University of Minnesota Press on JSTORjstor.org
107. Hybrid Culturesupress.umn.edu
108. Culturas híbridasbibliotecadigital.uce.edu.ec
109. The Location of Cultureroutledge.com
110. Modernity—An Incomplete Projectplatypus1917.org
111. Relativism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
112. The Politics of Postmodernism — 2nd Editionroutledge.com
113. Notes on metamodernismmetamodernism.com
114. Post-Postmodernism: or, The Cultural Logic of Just-in-Time Capitalismdegruyterbrill.com
115. An Afternoon with afternoon: A Live Group Traversal & Conversationstars.library.ucf.edu
116. afternoon, a storydirectory.eliterature.org
117. Postmodernism Press Releasemedia.vam.ac.uk