Lin Biao

Lin Biao (5 December 1907–13 September 1971) was a Chinese military commander and politician associated with the rise of the Chinese Communist Party and the establishment of the People’s Republic of China. His career extended from the revolutionary armies of the 1920s to senior military and political office under Mao Zedong. He commanded Communist forces in major campaigns of the Chinese Civil War, became one of the People’s Republic’s ten marshals in 1955, and served as minister of national defense from 1959. (berkshirepublishing.com)

During the Cultural Revolution, Lin held a prominent position in the party leadership and promoted the study and dissemination of Mao’s writings. The party constitution adopted in 1969 explicitly designated him as Mao’s successor. His career ended when an aircraft carrying him crashed in Mongolia on 13 September 1971. The crash is documented, but important aspects of the preceding events and Lin’s involvement remain disputed. His biography therefore encompasses both his military and political career and the documentary record through which his death and subsequent official treatment have been studied. (en.wikipedia.org)

Family Background and Military Education

Lin Biao was born on 5 December 1907 in Huanggang County, Hubei Province, with the original name Lin Yurong (林育容) and the courtesy name Yangchun. His later name, Lin Biao (林彪), also appears in English as “Lin Piao”: Biao is the pinyin spelling, whereas Piao follows the Wade–Giles romanization system. These spellings identify the same person, rather than different stages of his career. His cousins Lin Yunan and Lin Yuying influenced his early involvement in revolutionary politics, providing a family connection to the political movement he entered while still a student. (berkshirepublishing.com)

Lin’s political activity preceded his professional military education. In 1925 he participated in student demonstrations associated with the May Thirtieth Movement, which developed after violence against Chinese demonstrators in Shanghai. Following his graduation from middle school, he was selected as a Hubei delegate to a National Student Federation meeting in Shanghai that coordinated student protest activities. During this visit he joined the Socialist Youth League. These activities connected his early revolutionary involvement with organized student politics, rather than with an existing military command. Later that year he travelled to Guangzhou, then commonly called Canton in English, to enter the Whampoa Military Academy. (encyclopedia.com)

Lin enrolled at Whampoa in the autumn of 1925 as a member of its fourth class. The academy had been established in 1924 on Changzhou Island in Guangzhou, with assistance from the Soviet Union and the Chinese Communist Party. Headed by Chiang Kai-shek, it trained officers during the period of cooperation between the Communists and the Kuomintang. Consequently, Lin’s Communist affiliation and his attendance at a Nationalist-led military institution were not mutually exclusive. He associated with other left-wing cadets, and the Berkshire biographical account dates his entry into the Communist Party to his time at the academy. (encyclopedia.com)

Whampoa combined military instruction with political education intended to prepare officers for a revolutionary army. Its Department of Politics organized lectures on political theory and the dissemination of revolutionary ideas, drawing in part on Soviet Red Army practices. Zhou Enlai was among the department’s leading officials, while the Communist educator Yun Daiying compiled a political textbook, The Outline of Political Speeches. Surviving photographs also document cadets undertaking artillery drills. This institutional setting placed Lin’s officer training alongside systematic political instruction; it was not simply a course in battlefield technique. (hk.drsunyatsen.museum)

After graduating with the fourth class in October 1926, Lin became an officer in the regiment commanded by Ye Ting. He participated with that formation in the Northern Expedition, the revolutionary army’s campaign against regional military rulers that extended its control through southern and central China. This assignment moved him directly from academy training into active operations. During the fighting he advanced to company commander by early 1927, acquiring responsibility for a combat unit before the Nationalist–Communist alliance broke apart later that year. (encyclopedia.com)

Revolutionary Warfare and the Long March, 1927–1936

Lin participated in the Nanchang Uprising of August 1927 with troops of the National Revolutionary Army’s 25th Division, subsequently serving as a company commander in its 73rd Regiment. After the insurgent forces were defeated in the Chaozhou–Shantou region of Guangdong that October, he remained with the surviving troops led by Zhu De and Chen Yi. These forces moved through the borderlands of Fujian, Guangdong, Jiangxi, and Hunan. Lin participated in the southern Hunan uprising in January 1928 and accompanied Zhu’s troops to Jinggangshan in April, where they joined the forces of Mao Zedong. His subsequent commands developed within the Fourth Red Army formed from this combination of revolutionary forces. (cpc.people.com.cn)

At Jinggangshan, Lin advanced from battalion commander to commander of the Fourth Red Army’s 28th Regiment. He accompanied the army into southern Jiangxi and western Fujian in January 1929, becoming commander of its First Column that March. Appointment as Fourth Army commander followed in June 1930, and in March 1932 he assumed command of the First Army Corps. These designations represented different organizational levels: the Fourth Army was incorporated into the First Army Corps, which in turn belonged to the larger First Front Army. Lin’s promotion thus placed him in charge of a major formation, rather than the Communist armed forces as a whole. (cpc.people.com.cn)

Lin’s commands participated in defending the Jiangxi Soviet against the encirclement campaigns mounted by Chiang Kai-shek’s Nationalist forces. His troops repeatedly undertook principal attacks, alongside participation in operations at Ganzhou, Zhangzhou, and Nanxiong–Shuikou. During the fourth counter-encirclement campaign in 1933, the First Army Corps fought at Huangpi and Caotaigang; its subordinate divisions carried out distinct attacks within the corps’ coordinated operations. These engagements preceded the unsuccessful defense against the fifth encirclement campaign of 1933–1934, after which the central Communist forces abandoned their Jiangxi base. (cpc.people.com.cn)

When the Long March began in October 1934, Lin commanded the First Army Corps alongside its political commissar, Nie Rongzhen. The corps frequently formed the advance guard, fighting through Nationalist blocking positions and helping open routes for the main force. Lin attended the enlarged Politburo meeting at Zunyi in January 1935 and subsequently directed his formation during the movements across the Chishui River and toward the Jinsha and Dadu rivers. His responsibilities were those of an operational commander: directing subordinate formations and coordinating their movements within decisions made by the army’s higher leadership. (cpc.people.com.cn)

The Dadu crossing illustrates the distinction between corps command and individual units’ actions. On 25 May 1935, the First Regiment of the corps’ First Division, led by Yang Dezhi and political commissar Li Lin, undertook the crossing at Anshunchang. On 29 May, the Fourth Regiment of the Second Division, commanded by Wang Kaixiang with political commissar Yang Chengwu, reached and attacked Luding Bridge. These were operations by units within Lin’s formation, not assaults personally led by him. In September, during a temporary reorganization, Lin became deputy commander of the Shaanxi–Gansu Detachment and commander of its First Column. After reaching northern Shaanxi in October, he resumed command of the First Army Corps and participated in the Zhiluozhen and subsequent eastern campaigns. In June 1936, he was appointed president of the Chinese People’s Anti-Japanese Red Army University, shifting his immediate responsibilities toward military education. (81.mil.cn)

The War against Japan and the Soviet Sojourn

In August 1937, following the outbreak of full-scale war with Japan, Lin Biao became commander of the 115th Division of the Eighth Route Army. The reorganization of Communist forces into formations nominally belonging to the National Revolutionary Army formed part of the Second United Front between the Chinese Communist Party and the Kuomintang. Communist authorities nevertheless retained control of their troops. The Eighth Route Army had three principal divisions—the 115th, 120th, and 129th—each organized around two brigades. Lin’s appointment therefore placed him within the joint anti-Japanese military framework without transferring his force’s political allegiance to the Nationalist government. (rusi.org)

The 115th Division moved into Shanxi to assist resistance to the Japanese advance in the military region commanded by Yan Xishan. On 25 September 1937, Lin and deputy division commander Nie Rongzhen directed the Pingxingguan ambush. The action occurred east of Pingxing Pass, within the wider fighting over the approaches to Taiyuan. Its principal targets were transport and supply elements belonging to the Japanese 5th Division, commanded by Itagaki Seishirō, rather than that division’s entire combat force. Nationalist formations were simultaneously fighting Japanese troops around the pass; the Communist ambush was a distinct operation against the Japanese rear within this broader defensive setting. (en.wikipedia.org)

The terrain enabled the attackers to concentrate fire against Japanese columns confined to a narrow road through a ravine. The targets included a motor-transport column and a baggage train carrying supplies toward the front. Attacking these columns disrupted logistical movement and yielded captured equipment and supplies, but did not destroy the Japanese 5th Division or secure a lasting Chinese victory in the wider campaign. Japanese forces subsequently occupied Pingxingguan. Casualty totals reported for the ambush differ substantially between Chinese accounts and Japanese records and should not be conflated with losses in the surrounding battles. The operation was thus a localized tactical success, not the defeat of the entire Japanese offensive in northern Shanxi. (en.wikipedia.org)

On 2 March 1938, while moving through the area north of Xixian in Shanxi, Lin was accidentally shot by a sentry belonging to Yan Xishan’s forces. He was evacuated to Yan’an for treatment, and Chen Guang, commander of the 343rd Brigade, assumed acting command of the 115th Division. During his convalescence, Lin participated in work at the Anti-Japanese Military and Political University. Later in 1938, he traveled to the Soviet Union for further medical treatment, remaining there until his journey back to China in 1942. (cpc.people.com.cn)

Lin returned to Yan’an via Xinjiang in February 1942. He subsequently worked in military education and at the Central Party School rather than immediately resuming divisional field command. In September, he left Yan’an as Mao Zedong’s representative for discussions with Chiang Kai-shek, reaching Chongqing on 7 October. There he joined Zhou Enlai in negotiations concerning continued anti-Japanese cooperation and the danger of renewed conflict between the two parties, before returning to Yan’an in July 1943. (cpc.people.com.cn)

Command in the Chinese Civil War, 1945–1949

After Japan’s surrender in 1945, Lin Biao was sent to Northeast China, where the Chinese Communist Party concentrated troops transferred from other regions and recruited local forces. His command developed into the Northeast Democratic United Army and, in 1948, the Northeast Field Army. Political commissar Luo Ronghuan and chief of staff Liu Yalou formed the principal leadership team alongside him. Communist control of the region was not secured immediately: after defending the railway junction of Siping in April–May 1946, Lin withdrew his main forces north of the Songhua River. The northern base area provided space for rebuilding, while Communist formations maintained a separate foothold in southern Manchuria. Offensives during 1947–1948 progressively restricted Nationalist control to cities and railway corridors. (en.wikipedia.org)

The Liaoshen Campaign, fought from 12 September to 2 November 1948, converted this territorial advantage into the defeat of the Nationalist armies in Manchuria. An encyclopedic account places the Northeast Field Army’s strength at approximately 700,000, against 550,000 Nationalist troops under Wei Lihuang. The central operational decision was to concentrate against Jinzhou, the railway gateway connecting the Northeast with North China, rather than begin with Shenyang. Mao Zedong pressed for this southern offensive; Lin’s headquarters organized the assault while other formations blocked relief forces, notably at Tashan. Jinzhou fell on 15 October, cutting the principal overland withdrawal route. (berkshirepublishing.com)

Changchun’s garrison then collapsed through defection and surrender following a prolonged Communist blockade that had caused severe civilian starvation. Lin’s forces subsequently concentrated against Liao Yaoxiang’s army group in western Liaoning, defeating it in late October after blocking its movements around Heishan and Dahushan. Shenyang fell on 2 November, bringing the campaign to an end. These operations combined siege, attacks on relief columns, and rapid redeployment: units holding blocking positions enabled the main assault forces to concentrate successively against separate Nationalist groups. The victory removed the principal Nationalist forces from the Northeast and released Lin’s army for operations south of the Great Wall. (en.wikipedia.org)

In the Pingjin Campaign of 29 November 1948–31 January 1949, Lin’s Northeast forces operated together with the North China forces commanded by Nie Rongzhen against Fu Zuoyi’s armies. The joint General Front Committee established on 10 January comprised Lin, Luo, and Nie, with Lin as secretary; command therefore extended beyond Lin’s own field army. North China formations attacked the western positions around Zhangjiakou and Xinbao’an, while Northeast troops isolated Beiping and Tianjin. Liu Yalou directed the Tianjin assault, which began on 14 January and captured the city after approximately twenty-nine hours. Beiping, now Beijing, was transferred through negotiations with Fu rather than stormed: an agreement provided for the withdrawal and reorganization of its garrison, and Communist control was established on 31 January. (en.wikipedia.org)

Renamed the Fourth Field Army in March 1949, Lin’s command advanced into central and southern China. Its advance forces crossed the Yangtze in May and occupied the Wuhan cities on 16–17 May; the main forces followed in stages. The movement required both operational coordination and logistical preparation. In Hunan, forward units maintained contact with Nationalist forces while the main army underwent forty days of rest and reorganization; local party organizations and newly established administrations helped arrange grain supplies. The September–October Hengbao operations used several converging columns against Bai Chongxi’s forces. Farther east, Chen Geng’s Fourth Corps of the Second Field Army cooperated with Fourth Field Army formations in the Guangdong campaign, which captured Guangzhou on 14 October. The subsequent advance into Guangxi continued the effort to intercept retreating armies through wide envelopments rather than merely follow their withdrawal routes. (81.cn)

Senior Office in the People’s Republic, 1949–1959

After the establishment of the People’s Republic of China in October 1949, Lin Biao combined regional military command with senior civilian and party responsibilities. He commanded the Central-South Military Region while retaining the Fourth Field Army command, chaired the Central-South Military and Administrative Committee, and served as first secretary of the Central-South Bureau of the Chinese Communist Party. These were distinct positions: the military command directed armed forces, the committee exercised regional governmental authority, and the party bureau supervised Communist organization and policy. The military-administrative committee was subsequently reorganized as the Central-South Administrative Committee. Lin’s overlapping appointments thus placed him at the intersection of regional army, state, and party institutions rather than merely extending his wartime field command. (cpc.people.com.cn)

His formal responsibilities expanded even as his participation in everyday administration became limited. He moved to Beijing in 1950 and was largely absent from routine official work during much of the early 1950s. In November 1951 he became a vice chairman of the Central People’s Government’s People’s Revolutionary Military Commission, gaining a national military appointment alongside his regional titles. In 1954 he became a vice premier of the State Council under Premier Zhou Enlai and a vice chairman of the National Defense Council. The vice premiership was an office in the central government, not a military rank; the defense council appointment was likewise institutionally separate from command of troops or membership of the military commission. (cpc.people.com.cn)

In April 1955 Lin was elected to the party’s Politburo. That September he also received the rank of Marshal of the People’s Republic of China, becoming one of ten officers awarded it when the new military rank system was introduced. The National People’s Congress Standing Committee approved the marshal appointments on 23 September, and the formal award ceremony followed on 27 September. Lin appeared third in the official ordering, after Zhu De and Peng Dehuai. The marshalship recognized his military standing and service; it did not replace his vice premiership or constitute appointment as defense minister. He also received the first-class August First, Independence and Freedom, and Liberation decorations. (cpc.people.com.cn)

On 25 May 1958, the Fifth Plenum of the Eighth Central Committee elected Lin an additional party vice chairman and a member of the Politburo Standing Committee. These appointments brought him into the party’s highest leadership body while he retained his governmental offices. They were party positions, distinct from the state vice presidency, and did not yet designate him as Mao Zedong’s successor. The precise institutional change was therefore an elevation within the Communist Party’s collective leadership, not the creation of a new state or military rank. (cpc.people.com.cn)

Lin succeeded Peng Dehuai as minister of national defense after the Lushan Conference of July–August 1959. Peng’s letter to Mao of 14 July criticized problems arising from the Great Leap Forward; the subsequent plenum condemned him and several other officials. On 17 September, a presidential order implementing a National People’s Congress Standing Committee decision appointed Lin defense minister and removed Peng from that office. A military commission reorganization announced on 26 September retained Mao as chairman and named Lin, He Long, and Nie Rongzhen as vice chairmen. Lin assumed responsibility for the commission’s day-to-day work, combining the ministerial appointment with operational leadership within the party’s military apparatus. (cpc.people.com.cn)

Defense Leadership and the Dissemination of Mao’s Thought

After succeeding Peng Dehuai as minister of national defense in 1959, Lin Biao placed the study of Mao Zedong’s writings at the center of military political education. References to Mao and Mao Zedong Thought increased markedly in armed-forces publications. This emphasis linked ideological instruction with loyalty to Mao, unity within the Chinese Communist Party, and political control of the army. Military publications became important channels for presenting Mao’s authority as the basis of correct political and military conduct, rather than treating his writings solely as accounts of earlier revolutionary campaigns. (cambridge.org)

A concrete publishing mechanism emerged in 1961, when Lin ordered PLA Daily, the newspaper of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), to print a daily Mao quotation corresponding to its editorial theme. Editors drew on a subject-organized catalogue prepared by Tianjin Daily. In December 1963, a General Political Department work conference endorsed the proposal to turn selected passages into an army handbook. Following revisions, *Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung* appeared in May 1964 with 355 quotations arranged under 30 topics. Editorial selection and compilation were undertaken through the army’s newspaper and political-work apparatus; Lin’s sponsorship and endorsement should therefore be distinguished from personal compilation of the volume. (mao-static.kdl.kcl.ac.uk)

Lin’s handwritten dedication instructed readers to “Study Chairman Mao’s writings, follow his teachings, and act according to his instructions.” Reproducing this inscription in the book placed his endorsement alongside Mao’s selected words. His foreword to the second edition, dated 16 December 1966, supplied a more detailed educational program: readers should begin with specific practical problems, give priority to passages immediately applicable to their work, memorize important statements, and revisit them repeatedly. Units were instructed to select passages according to their tasks, personnel’s current thinking, and working conditions. This prescribed relationship between reading and action made the handbook a tool for organized political instruction rather than simply a collection for private reading. (mao-static.kdl.kcl.ac.uk)

The foreword also extended the intended audience beyond soldiers to workers, peasants, cadres, and intellectuals. It presented Mao’s thought as the guiding principle of party, army, and national activity, and called on newspapers to publish quotations relevant to current issues. These were Lin’s publicly endorsed political claims, not independent assessments of Mao’s theoretical standing. The text associated mastery of Mao’s writings with ideological transformation and national modernization, including modern defense. Its combination of practical study instructions and assertions of Mao’s exceptional authority connected the army’s educational methods with a nationwide campaign of political mobilization. (marxists.org)

The transition to mass civilian distribution preceded that foreword. By March 1966, 28 million copies of the revised edition had been printed; in April, the party center directed the People’s Publishing House to supply the public through Xinhua bookstores. Group study and recitation helped carry military educational practices into civilian settings during the Cultural Revolution. The scale subsequently exceeded internal army requirements by several orders of magnitude: Daniel Leese estimates that official printing between 1966 and 1969 surpassed one billion copies, excluding internal military volumes, foreign-language editions, and numerous local compilations. Lin’s name and inscription thus circulated through a publication whose distribution depended on military political institutions, civilian publishers, and the national bookselling network. (mao-static.kdl.kcl.ac.uk)

Published Speeches and Military-Political Ideas

Long Live the Victory of People’s War!, dated 3 September 1965, appeared under Lin Biao’s name to commemorate the twentieth anniversary of victory in the war against Japan. Foreign Languages Press issued an English-language pamphlet that year. The text presented the wartime experience of the Chinese Communist Party as a demonstration of Mao Zedong’s military theories, then extended that interpretation to contemporary revolutionary struggles abroad. Its introduction attributed Communist military success primarily to political leadership, popular participation, and Mao’s strategic principles. This was an explicitly partisan interpretation of the war, rather than a comprehensive account of the contributions of all Chinese and Allied forces. (marxists.org)

The pamphlet’s account of people’s war made rural bases the institutional foundation of revolutionary military power. It described the peasantry as more than 80 percent of the population of pre-revolutionary China and identified peasants as the principal source of recruits, funds, and supplies. Bases were not merely refuges: they supported party organizations, local government, agricultural and industrial production, education, and armed forces. Rent and interest reductions, together with arrangements for distributing wartime burdens, were presented as ways to secure participation while maintaining an anti-Japanese coalition. The text thus connected popular mobilization to concrete administrative and economic measures, arguing that rural political consolidation enabled the eventual encirclement and capture of cities. These were the pamphlet’s stated explanations, not universal conditions for military victory. (marxists.org)

Its treatment of protracted warfare described a changing relationship between military strength and forms of combat. Initially weaker forces were to avoid unfavorable decisive engagements, use guerrilla operations to weaken opponents, and develop mobile warfare as their capabilities increased. The pamphlet cited village-based methods including mines, tunnels, and small dispersed attacks. For larger operations, it advocated concentrating superior strength against isolated enemy formations; a passage quoted from Mao specified local numerical advantages of two to six times the enemy’s strength. Captured weapons and the incorporation of prisoners were presented as means of expanding the revolutionary army. Political organization remained central: the armed forces were to operate under absolute party leadership, combine regular troops, local forces, and militia, and undertake fighting, mass work, and production. Although the text acknowledged the importance of improved equipment, it assigned greater weight to political consciousness and civilian support. (marxists.org)

Internationally, the pamphlet compared North America and Western Europe to the world’s cities and Asia, Africa, and Latin America to its countryside. It used this analogy to argue that revolutionary movements outside the industrialized capitalist centers could surround and weaken those centers. The United States was identified as the principal imperialist adversary, with Vietnam offered as a contemporary example of resistance through people’s war. Its argument held that geographically dispersed struggles could stretch American forces and supply lines, making success in one region advantageous to movements elsewhere. The attack on Soviet “revisionism” accused the Soviet leadership associated with Nikita Khrushchev and his successors of subordinating revolution to nuclear deterrence and accommodation with Washington. These accusations were contemporary political polemic, not neutral descriptions of Soviet policy. The same text insisted that revolution depended on domestic mobilization and could not be imported, while defending external support for self-reliant movements. (marxists.org)

Published attribution requires distinction from evidence of individual composition. An earlier article under Lin’s name, translated from Hongqi, no. 19 of 1 October 1959, appeared in English as March Ahead Under the Red Flag of the General Line and Mao Tse-tung’s Military Thinking. It likewise combined military modernization with the primacy of party leadership and political work. The publication record also includes speeches from 1966–1967 and the report to the Ninth Party Congress in 1969. Such documents establish positions publicly presented under Lin’s name and authority; their bylines and official titles alone do not establish who drafted each passage or demonstrate his private convictions. Accordingly, the 1965 pamphlet’s arguments can be attributed securely to the published text without treating every formulation as Lin’s independently developed personal theory. (marxists.org)

Cultural Revolution Leadership and Designated Succession

Lin’s public prominence during the opening phase of the Cultural Revolution was expressed through mass rallies, published speeches, and images pairing him with Mao Zedong. On 18 August 1966, he appeared with Mao on the Tiananmen rostrum in Beijing and addressed the rally of revolutionary students and teachers. His speech, published in Peking Review on 26 August, endorsed the movement and presented Mao’s leadership as its guiding authority. The official coverage repeatedly identified Lin as Mao’s close comrade-in-arms. This relationship also became a subject of mass-produced visual propaganda: an August 1967 poster issued by the People’s Fine Arts Publishing House reproduced a photograph of Mao and Lin reviewing Red Guards in 1966, with a caption celebrating both leaders. These dated publications document Lin’s officially promoted position without establishing his private motives or the extent of his involvement in every decision. (marxists.org)

His position as minister of national defense and a senior leader of the People’s Liberation Army connected this public prominence to the military’s expanding domestic responsibilities. In January 1967, Mao, the party leadership, and the Central Military Commission directed the armed forces to support the “revolutionary left”; the order was publicized on 23 January. Military intervention consequently extended beyond national defense into the recognition and support of competing civilian organizations, the administration of institutions, and the restoration of production and order. During 1967–1968, military representatives entered revolutionary committees alongside civilian cadres and representatives of mass organizations under the prescribed “three-in-one” arrangement. Lin’s senior military position thus acquired increased political importance, but these interventions involved central directives and regional commands rather than a single, uniform system of personal control by Lin. (cambridge.org)

The Ninth National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party, held in Beijing from 1 to 24 April 1969, gave Lin’s precedence a formal constitutional expression. He delivered the political report on behalf of the Central Committee on 1 April; the congress adopted it on 14 April together with a revised party constitution. The constitution’s General Programme declared: “Comrade Lin Piao is Comrade Mao Tsetung’s close comrade-in-arms and successor.” This was a designation within the party’s foundational document, not an appointment to the presidency of the People’s Republic. It named the expected successor to Mao’s party leadership while leaving Mao in office and providing no date or detailed procedure for a transfer of authority. The distinction between the party constitution and the state constitution is essential to understanding what the designation conferred. (cpc.people.com.cn)

At the new Central Committee’s first plenary session on 28 April 1969, Mao was elected chairman and Lin the sole vice-chairman. The five-member Politburo Standing Committee consisted of Mao, Lin, Chen Boda, Zhou Enlai, and Kang Sheng. Lin’s wife, Ye Qun, who headed his personal staff office, also entered the Politburo. Her role was therefore both administrative, through Lin’s office, and formally political, through membership in the party’s central leadership. She also participated in the Central Military Commission’s administrative group, an important working body through which senior military business was handled during the Cultural Revolution. (marxistsarchive.mirrors.informatics.coop)

Other senior officers associated with Lin included Huang Yongsheng, chief of the General Staff; Wu Faxian, commander of the air force; Li Zuopeng, political commissar of the navy; and Qiu Huizuo, director of the General Logistics Department. All four joined the Politburo elected in April 1969, placing officials responsible for staff coordination, service leadership, political work, and logistics within the party’s senior decision-making body. Their offices and working relationships identify the institutional network surrounding Lin. They should be distinguished from the later accusations that grouped these individuals together as participants in collective wrongdoing: membership in the same leadership bodies does not by itself establish knowledge of, or authorization for, particular alleged actions. (core.ac.uk)

The Political Breakdown, 1970–1971

The Second Plenum of the Ninth Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party met at Lushan from 23 August to 6 September 1970. Its agenda included revision of the state constitution, economic planning, and preparations for war. Constitutional discussions had already exposed disagreement over retaining the office of state chairman, commonly translated as president. Mao Zedong opposed retaining the office and declined proposals that he occupy it; Lin supported its retention with Mao as chairman. Records of the preparatory discussions also indicate that Lin rejected taking the state vice-chairmanship himself in April 1970. These positions do not, by themselves, establish the later official allegation that Lin sought the presidency as a means of taking supreme power. The constitutional question concerned a state office, distinct from Lin’s existing designation as Mao’s successor in the party leadership. (etheses.lse.ac.uk)

The dispute became entangled with formulations describing Mao’s contribution to Marxism-Leninism as the work of a “genius.” Lin’s opening speech on 23 August defended Mao’s exceptional theoretical authority, while Chen Boda circulated extracts concerning genius from Engels, Lenin, Mao, and Lin. In group discussions, the issue became a vehicle for attacking Zhang Chunqiao, who had disputed the proposed wording. Mao intervened to stop the escalation and directed criticism principally against Chen. In his written comment of 31 August, usually translated as Some Opinions of Mine or A Few Opinions of Mine, Mao challenged Chen’s selection of quotations and rejected an explanation of knowledge based on innate genius. Significantly, the document stated that Mao had discussed the question with Lin and that they shared a position against Chen’s argument. It therefore cannot be read simply as an explicit public denunciation of Lin at that date. (maoistcommunistunion.com)

After the plenum, the campaign to criticize Chen progressively subjected figures associated with Lin to scrutiny. Chief of the General Staff Huang Yongsheng, air force commander Wu Faxian, naval political commissar Li Zuopeng, logistics chief Qiu Huizuo, and Lin’s wife and office head Ye Qun were required to account for their conduct at Lushan. Mao also weakened their institutional position: the removal of Beijing Military Region leaders Li Xuefeng and Zheng Weishan in December 1970 altered a command previously associated with Lin’s supporters. At an April 1971 meeting attended by ninety-nine senior cadres, self-criticisms from the principal figures under scrutiny were distributed. These measures extended the dispute from constitutional wording to military appointments and political accountability. (marxists.org)

During his provincial tour from mid-August to September 1971, Mao told regional leaders that the Lushan affair remained unresolved. The subsequently circulated record of his talks accused Lin and several associates of coordinating a surprise attack at the plenum and explicitly criticized Ye Qun’s management of Lin’s office. Mao described changes to military leadership through the metaphors of “mixing sand” and “undermining the wall.” These statements document Mao’s increasingly adverse assessment of Lin’s political circle; their accusations about concealed intentions remain Mao’s interpretation rather than independent proof of a conspiracy. (marxists.org)

The document known as the “Outline of Project 571” subsequently became central to official accusations of an armed coup and a plot to assassinate Mao. Official accounts attributed its preparation in Shanghai in March 1971 to Lin’s son, Lin Liguo, and air force associates including Zhou Yuchi, Yu Xinye, and Li Weixin. The surviving text combined attacks on Mao’s leadership and Cultural Revolution policies with proposals for violent action. Later government accounts alleged that Lin Biao directed its preparation, whereas historical scholarship has distinguished his son’s activities from evidence concerning the father. Attribution of drafting, possession of a document, knowledge of its contents, and authorization to implement it are separate evidentiary questions: the outline’s association with Lin Liguo’s circle does not independently establish Lin Biao’s authorship or approval. (en.wikipedia.org)

The September 1971 Flight and Crash

In the early hours of 13 September 1971, Lin Biao left China aboard a Hawker Siddeley Trident 1E, aircraft number 256, departing from Shanhaiguan airport near Qinhuangdao in Hebei. The aircraft subsequently crashed near Öndörkhaan in Mongolia, killing all nine people aboard: eight men and one woman. The dead included Lin, his wife Ye Qun, their son Lin Liguo, and pilot Pan Jingyin. The Chinese official chronology places the aircraft’s entry into Mongolian airspace at approximately 1:50 a.m. and the crash at approximately 2:30 a.m. These times describe the reported sequence of the flight; they do not establish why the passengers departed or what occurred aboard the aircraft. (en.wikipedia.org)

Published reconstructions place the family’s departure from their residence at Beidaihe late on 12 September and the aircraft’s takeoff shortly after midnight. Accounts based on later testimony describe warnings from Lin’s daughter, Lin Liheng, to the security authorities, telephone inquiries by Zhou Enlai, and orders intended to prevent an unauthorized departure. They also describe hurried boarding and an incomplete flight crew, without the usual copilot, navigator, or radio operator. Such recollections provide information about preparations on the ground, but accounts differ over refuelling and the communications preceding takeoff. They cannot be treated as a continuous, independently verified record of decisions inside the aircraft. (en.wikipedia.org)

The physical investigation produced a different category of evidence. A Mongolian commission completed its report on 20 November 1971; historian Yu Ruxin published extracts and photographs from it in 2016. The report recorded nine burned bodies, distributed within an area approximately 50 metres by 20 metres, and the recovery of seven pistols and one folding submachine gun. It reported no abnormal gunshot injuries on the bodies examined. Chinese embassy personnel also inspected the crash site, and Chinese and Mongolian officials agreed on burial there on 15 September. The commission’s findings, as reported subsequently, attributed the accident to pilot error rather than hostile fire. These observations concern the wreckage and deaths, not the passengers’ political intentions. (infzm.com)

The Chinese government’s explanation linked the departure to an alleged failed plot against Mao Zedong, associated with the “Outline of Project 571.” In that account, Lin and his companions were fleeing to the Soviet Union, and inadequate fuel forced an attempted landing during which the aircraft struck the ground and caught fire. The attribution is essential: the existence of a fatal flight does not independently establish Lin’s knowledge or authorization of the alleged assassination plan. The fuel explanation also differs from subsequently reported Mongolian investigative findings. Questions about the intended destination, the reason for attempting to land, and Lin’s own participation in the departure therefore remain distinct from the established fact of the crash. (en.wikipedia.org)

Contemporary foreign diplomatic records show how slowly reliable information circulated. In a confidential conversation on 15 October 1971, Henry Kissinger told the Republic of China’s ambassador, James Shen, that American officials had received conflicting reports about Lin, including illness and presence aboard the aircraft that had crashed in Mongolia. Kissinger characterized the reports as fourth-hand and said that no direct reports were available. Such documents establish what foreign governments knew at particular dates, rather than corroborating later reconstructions of the flight. The unresolved evidentiary questions concern the decision to leave China and the aircraft’s final movements; early diplomatic speculation supplies no substitute for records of either. (history.state.gov)

Posthumous Treatment and the Historical Record

Lin’s disappearance from official celebration involved the withdrawal and alteration of publications as well as the production of denunciatory images. In his diplomatic oral history, Chas W. Freeman Jr. recalled finding that the edition of Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung containing Lin’s foreword had been withdrawn from circulation. This recollection documents a particular encounter with the changed publication environment, rather than a complete inventory of removals. The Chinese Posters collection preserves the contrasting visual record: posters celebrating Lin beside Mao Zedong in 1971 were followed by explicitly anti-Lin designs dated August and September 1973. The sequence establishes the reversal of his public representation without treating the accusations printed on those posters as independent evidence of his conduct. (adst.org)

The 1974 “Criticize Lin Biao, Criticize Confucius” campaign linked denunciations of Lin to attacks on Confucius and Confucianism, employing historical analogy within the politics of the Cultural Revolution. Its material organization can be traced through dated publishers’ records. Wu Qizhong’s February 1974 poster, published by Guangdong People’s Publishing House, depicted torn copies of the Analects and a publication bearing the number “571,” visually joining the classical text to the alleged conspiracy associated with Lin’s circle. Its second impression comprised 20,000 copies, following a first impression of 50,000 earlier that month. Another February poster, designed by Zhang Yan and the Jiangsu Provincial Revolutionary Committee’s art creation group, declared the campaign a priority for the party, army, and population. These publications document the campaign’s imagery and intended reach; print runs do not establish how audiences received its message. (chineseposters.net)

Allegations concerning Lin’s associates subsequently entered the proceedings officially designated the trial of the “Lin Biao and Jiang Qing counter-revolutionary cliques.” The Special Court under the Supreme People’s Court began hearings on 20 November 1980 against ten defendants. Five were assigned to the Lin-associated group: Huang Yongsheng, Wu Faxian, Li Zuopeng, Qiu Huizuo, and Jiang Tengjiao. Lin himself, who had died on 13 September 1971, was not a defendant appearing before the court. The proceedings therefore require a distinction between judgments against surviving defendants and the prosecution’s attribution of actions to deceased figures. The trial concluded on 25 January 1981; Huang received eighteen years’ imprisonment, Wu and Li seventeen years each, and Qiu sixteen years. The official documentary compilation A Great Trial in Chinese History (1981) preserves the indictment, courtroom statements, and judgment as records of the state’s case and its legal disposition. (marxists.org)

The historical record comprises sources with different evidentiary purposes. Military records bear on commands, deployments, and operational chronology; party documents record appointments, resolutions, and officially circulated explanations. Published speeches establish positions presented under Lin’s name, but do not by themselves establish sole authorship or private conviction. Propaganda publications document authorized public representations, including the posthumous reversal. Foreign diplomatic recollections and intelligence reports provide external observations, but also preserve contemporary uncertainty: a United States Central Intelligence Agency bulletin dated 24 September 1971 discussed a leadership crisis while still considering Lin a possible successor should Mao be incapacitated. Such a report is evidence of what analysts then believed, not direct testimony about decisions inside Lin’s household. Memoirs and interviews offer otherwise unavailable recollections, whose chronology and claims require comparison with contemporary documents. (chineseposters.net)

Two major studies expanded the examination of this uneven record. Frederick C. Teiwes and Warren Sun’s The Tragedy of Lin Biao: Riding the Tiger during the Cultural Revolution, 1966–1971 (1996) used newly available Chinese sources to reconsider both official accusations and earlier Western interpretations; it also included a critical chronology of Lin’s pre-Cultural Revolution career. Qiu Jin’s The Culture of Power: The Lin Biao Incident in the Cultural Revolution (1999) drew on newly available documents, interviews with former officials and their families, and her father Wu Faxian’s unpublished memoirs. Her family connections supplied access to testimony unavailable in published official accounts, while making the witnesses’ relationships to the accused an important consideration. These works offer historical reconstructions whose claims must be distinguished from the documents and retrospective testimony on which they rest. (books.google.com)

References

1. Lin Biao (1907–1971)berkshirepublishing.com
2. Chinese Romanization Conversionlibrary.pitt.edu
3. Lin Piaoencyclopedia.com
4. The Whampoa Military Academy: Modern China's Crucible for Military Talenthk.drsunyatsen.museum
5. 林 彪--资料中心--中国共产党新闻网cpc.people.com.cn
6. 林彪--七一導航—黨員干部上網指南--人民網cpc.people.com.cn
7. 中国工农红军第一军团zh.wikipedia.org
8. 徐彦刚 - 中国军网81.cn
9. Long Marchen.wikipedia.org
10. Lin Biao | Chinese Posters | Chineseposters.netchineseposters.net
11. History of the PLA’s Ground Force Organisational Structure and Military Regionsrusi.org
12. China at Warcristoraul.org
13. Lin Biaoen.wikipedia.org
14. Nie Rongzhen (1899 - 1992)berkshirepublishing.com
15. Battle of Pingxingguanen.wikipedia.org
16. Battle of Taiyuanen.wikipedia.org
17. Where Chiang Kai-shek Lost China: The Liao-Shen Campaign, 1948jstor.org
18. Liaoxi-Shenyang Campaign (1948–1948)berkshirepublishing.com
19. Liaoshen campaignen.wikipedia.org
20. Pingjin campaignen.wikipedia.org
21. 70年前，刘亚楼是如何在津西古镇杨柳青指挥平津战役的？visitbeijing.com.cn
22. 解放军南下工作团81.cn
23. Order to the Army for the Country-wide Advancecommonprogram.science
24. 湖南和平解放81.cn
25. 千里追歼 席卷湘南81.cn
26. 全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于授予中华人民共和国元帅军衔的决议zh.wikisource.org
27. 中国共产党大事记·1958年--资料中心--中国共产党新闻网cpc.people.com.cn
28. 中国共产党大事记·1959年--资料中心--中国共产党新闻网cpc.people.com.cn
29. Lively Study and Application (Chapter 4) — Mao Cultcambridge.org
30. Little Red Book (红宝书) / Quotations from Chairman Mao (毛主席语录)mao-static.kdl.kcl.ac.uk
31. Little Red Book: Dedication Page Written By Lin Biaomao-static.kdl.kcl.ac.uk
32. Foreword to the Second Editionmarxists.org
33. The Little Red Book (Chapter 5) — Mao Cultcambridge.org
34. Long Live the Victory of People’s War!marxists.org
35. Introductionmarxists.org
36. Rely on the Peasants and Establish Rural Base Areasmarxists.org
37. Build a People’s Army of a New Typemarxists.org
38. Carry out the Strategy and Tactics of People’s Warmarxists.org
39. The International Significance of Comrade Mao-Tse Tung’s Theory of People’s Warmarxists.org
40. Defeat U.S. Imperialism and Its Lackeys by People’s Warmarxists.org
41. The Khruschov Revisionists are Betrayers of People’s Warmarxists.org
42. March Ahead Under the Red Flag of the General Line and Mao Tse-tung’s Military Thinkingmarxists.org
43. The Lin Biao Reference Archivemarxists.org
44. Chairman Mao Is With the Masses — Peking Review, No. 35, 1966marxists.org
45. Our most beloved leader Chairman Mao and his close comrade-in-arms Comrade Lin Biaochineseposters.net
46. Military Forces in the Cultural Revolutioncambridge.org
47. The Cultural Revolution as a Crisis of Representationcambridge.org
48. “Support the Left”: PLA Intervention in the Cultural Revolutioncambridge.org
49. 中国共产党历次全国代表大会数据库：第九次全国代表大会cpc.people.com.cn
50. The Ninth National Congress of the Communist Party of China (Documents)marxists.org
51. 中国共产党章程（1969年4月14日通过）cpc.people.com.cn
52. Press Communique of the First Plenary Session of the Ninth Central Committee of the Communist Party of Chinamarxistsarchive.mirrors.informatics.coop
53. The Security Service for Chinese Central Leaderscambridge.org
54. The People's Liberation Army as Organization: Reference Volume v1.0tile.loc.gov
55. The Fall of Lin Piaocambridge.org
56. The Political Logic of Status Competition: China's Foreign Policy during the Cold War, 1949–1989etheses.lse.ac.uk
57. A Few Opinions Of Minemaoistcommunistunion.com
58. Talks With Responsible Comrades At Various Places During Provincial Tourmarxists.org
59. Project 571en.wikipedia.org
60. Investigation of Lin Biao Clique’s Attempted Coup and Plot to Assassinate Chairman Maomarxists.org
61. Lin Biao incidenten.wikipedia.org
62. 蒙古官方调查报告中的九一三事件infzm.com
63. Lin biao - Enciclopedia - Treccanitreccani.it
64. Historical Documents - Office of the Historianhistory.state.gov
65. Chas W. Freeman Jr. Oral Historyadst.org
66. Criticize Lin Biao and Confucius (1974)chineseposters.net
67. Wage the struggle to criticize Lin Biao, criticize Confucius to the endchineseposters.net
68. Criticizing Lin and Confucius is a matter of prime importance for the whole Party, the whole army and the people of the whole countrychineseposters.net
69. Trial of Lin-Jiang Cliques Beginsmarxists.org
70. A Great Trial in Chinese Historybannedthought.net
71. Central Intelligence Bulletin, 24 September 1971cia.gov
72. The Tragedy of Lin Biao: Riding the Tiger During the Cultural Revolution, 1966–1971books.google.com
73. The Culture of Power: The Lin Biao Incident in the Cultural Revolutiondegruyterbrill.com