Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms

The Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms was a period of political fragmentation in China following the fall of the Tang dynasty in 907. Five successive dynasties claimed imperial authority in the northern heartland, while regional states governed much of the remaining former Tang territory. The Five Dynasties ended with the founding of the Song dynasty in 960, but several regional kingdoms survived until the Song conquered Northern Han in 979. “Ten Kingdoms” is a conventional historical grouping rather than a count of states existing simultaneously; nine were predominantly southern, while Northern Han occupied part of northern China. (cambridge.org)

The period combined warfare and contested succession with developments that helped shape the Song order. Northern rulers rebuilt military and administrative authority, while southern courts supported commerce and regional cultural life. The increasing economic importance of the south, the rise of Kaifeng, and the consolidation of regional governments make the era more than an interruption between two major dynasties. Its history encompasses competing courts, frontier diplomacy, changing institutions, and the gradual reconstruction of a larger imperial state. (cambridge.org)

Historical Terminology, Chronology, and Geography

“Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms” (Wudai Shiguo, 五代十國) combines two different historical classifications. The Five Dynasties were successive imperial regimes based in northern China: Later Liang, Later Tang, Later Jin, Later Han, and Later Zhou. Their conventional sequence runs from 907 to 960. The Ten Kingdoms were a selected group of regional states: Wu, Southern Tang, Wuyue, Min, Chu, Jingnan, Former Shu, Later Shu, Southern Han, and Northern Han. They existed alongside the northern dynasties and, in several cases, continued into the Song dynasty. “Kingdoms” is a collective historiographical label, not a uniform description of their rulers’ titles: some maintained royal rank, while others proclaimed emperors. (en.wikipedia.org)

Three dates define different boundaries. In 907, Zhu Wen displaced the last emperor of the Tang dynasty and founded Later Liang, providing the conventional starting point. In 960, Zhao Kuangyin founded Song in place of Later Zhou, ending the succession of the Five Dynasties but not regional independence. In 979, Song conquered Northern Han, the last surviving state in the conventional Ten Kingdoms list. Thus, 907–960 describes the northern dynastic sequence, whereas 907–979 encompasses the regional states’ final absorption. The latter endpoint does not imply that Song recovered every territory formerly governed by Tang: the Khitan Liao remained a separate northern power. (en.wikipedia.org)

Regional beginnings cannot always be reduced to a single foundation date. Military control, court-bestowed titles, rejection of another dynasty’s authority, and imperial proclamation could occur years apart. Wu illustrates the distinction: Yang Xingmi secured the Tang military governorship of Huainan in 892 and received the title Prince of Wu in 902. His successor Yang Wo refused to recognize Later Liang in 907; Yang Longyan adopted an independent reign title in 919, and Yang Pu proclaimed himself emperor in 927. Dates such as 902 or 907 therefore identify different stages in the same regime’s formation, rather than necessarily contradicting one another. A royal title bestowed by the Tang court did not itself constitute a declaration of independence. (en.wikipedia.org)

The northern dynasties’ principal heartland comprised the Central Plains around the Yellow River, with important political centers at Luoyang and Kaifeng. Their reach extended south toward the Huai and Han rivers and west along the Wei River valley, although control varied between regimes. The regional kingdoms occupied several distinct geographical zones. Wu and Southern Tang held territories around the lower Yangtze, the latter centered on present-day Nanjing; Chu occupied Hunan, and Jingnan was based at Jiangling in Hubei. Former Shu and Later Shu occupied the Sichuan basin, with courts at Chengdu. Along the eastern and southern seaboard, Wuyue centered on Hangzhou, Min on Fujian, and Southern Han on Guangzhou and the Guangdong–Guangxi region. These were shifting political territories, not exact equivalents of modern provinces. (assets.cambridge.org)

Northern Han was the geographical exception: centered on Taiyuan in Shanxi, it continued the Later Han ruling house’s power after the northern dynasty’s replacement in 951. Nor did all ten kingdoms coexist. Among the nine southern kingdoms, no more than seven existed simultaneously; Southern Tang replaced Wu in 937, while Former Shu’s destruction in 925 preceded Later Shu’s establishment in 934. The conventional list also excludes other contemporary powers. These included the Khitan state, Dali in the southwest, and the autonomous Dingnan military governorship in the southern Ordos region. The numerical label consequently identifies a historical grouping rather than an exhaustive inventory of tenth-century states or a map of fifteen simultaneous, mutually exclusive jurisdictions. (cambridge.org)

The Disintegration of Tang Authority

The An Lushan Rebellion of 755–763 altered the balance between the Tang dynasty and its provincial commanders without immediately destroying imperial government. To mobilize resistance, the court established military commands throughout the interior, giving loyalist generals territorial bases from which to obtain recruits, supplies, and money. In parts of Hebei, former rebel commanders retained their armies and jurisdictions after accepting nominal submission. These arrangements made provincial military establishments a lasting feature of government, but autonomy remained uneven: not every governor became independent, and the court continued to appoint officials and conduct military campaigns. Emperor Xianzong, who reigned in 805–820, attempted to subordinate resistant commands, demonstrating that the fragmentation of the late ninth century was not an uninterrupted decline beginning in 755. (cambridge.org)

The office of jiedushi, usually translated as “military governor” or “military commissioner,” became the principal institutional vehicle for regional power. Command over soldiers increasingly coincided with control of tax revenue and the appointment of subordinate officials. A governor could therefore use local income to maintain troops whose employment and rewards depended on his headquarters rather than directly on the emperor. In stronger autonomous commands, succession could be determined by a ruling family or the provincial army, leaving the court to recognize a successor it had not selected. Imperial titles nevertheless remained useful: they supplied formal authorization for authority acquired through military possession. After the suppression of Huang Chao, the court’s dependence on such commanders became particularly acute, since the resources needed to restore order were increasingly outside its direct control. (api.pageplace.de)

The immediate crisis developed from the rebellions associated with Wang Xianzhi and Huang Chao in the 870s. Huang emerged as the principal rebel leader in 878, carried his campaign south to Guangzhou, and then returned north. His army occupied Luoyang in late 880 and entered Chang’an, near present-day Xi’an, early in 881. Emperor Xizong fled to Sichuan, while Huang established a rival imperial regime in the capital. Occupation, fighting, and disrupted cultivation undermined the capital region’s capacity to support the court; officials and other elite residents were also targets of violence. Huang’s forces evacuated Chang’an in spring 883, and he died in 884, but their defeat did not restore the previous distribution of political power. (cambridge.org)

Two beneficiaries of the suppression became rivals for northern supremacy. Zhu Wen, originally a commander under Huang Chao, defected to the Tang in 882 and subsequently established his base at Bianzhou, later known as Kaifeng. Li Keyong, a Shatuo military leader whose forces helped recover Chang’an, built his power in Hedong, centered on Taiyuan. Both operated through Tang military offices, but their armies and alliances gave them independent leverage. Zhu expanded by defeating neighboring commanders and securing other governors’ allegiance; Li’s northern base remained outside his control. Competition between these leaders thus concerned territory, military resources, and possession of the Tang political inheritance, rather than simply opposing rebellion to imperial loyalty. (en.wikipedia.org)

Zhu finally converted dominance over the court into dynastic replacement. In 904 he compelled Emperor Zhaozong to move from Chang’an to Luoyang and subsequently had him killed. Zhaozong’s son, Emperor Ai, occupied the throne under Zhu’s control until 907, when Zhu forced his abdication and proclaimed the Later Liang. Control of the court and central bureaucracy gave the new ruler administrative assets as well as an imperial title. It did not produce universal submission: Li Keyong and other regional rulers remained beyond Liang authority, carrying the military divisions of the late Tang into the successor period. (en.wikipedia.org)

The Five Northern Dynasties

These boundaries distinguish imperial foundations from earlier regional commands. Historical tables sometimes date Later Jin from 937 rather than Shi Jingtang’s proclamation in 936, or end Later Han in 950 rather than 951. The latter variation reflects the distinction between the overthrow of Liu Chengyou and Guo Wei’s formal accession, together with the conversion of Chinese calendar dates into Western years. (en.wikipedia.org)

Zhu Wen, also known as Zhu Quanzhong, founded Later Liang in 907 after compelling the last Tang emperor to abdicate. His power rested on the military establishment centered on Kaifeng, but his dynasty faced a persistent rival in the Shanxi-based Jin principality of Li Keyong and, after 908, Li Keyong’s son Li Cunxu. In 923, Li Cunxu proclaimed an imperial Tang dynasty and subsequently captured Kaifeng, ending Later Liang. His claim was one of restoration, not uninterrupted succession within the earlier Tang ruling house: his paternal family was Shatuo, and its Li surname derived from an imperial grant to his grandfather. Later Tang conquered Former Shu in 925, but Li Cunxu died during a military revolt in 926 and was succeeded by Li Siyuan, Li Keyong’s adopted son. (hkupress.hku.hk)

Later Tang’s fall resulted from external intervention supporting an internal rebellion. In 936, Shi Jingtang, military governor at Taiyuan and Li Siyuan’s son-in-law, rebelled against Emperor Li Congke and obtained Khitan military assistance. The alliance enabled him to establish Later Jin; in return, he accepted a subordinate relationship and ceded the Sixteen Prefectures on the northern frontier. His successor, Shi Chonggui, resisted that relationship, and Khitan forces destroyed Later Jin and occupied Kaifeng in 947. Liu Zhiyuan, another commander based at Taiyuan, proclaimed Later Han that year and took possession of the capital after the Khitan withdrawal. The ruling houses of Later Tang, Later Jin, and Later Han were all of Shatuo origin, although their armies and administrations were not exclusively Shatuo. (en.wikipedia.org)

Later Han’s replacement was a military overthrow rather than a foreign conquest. Liu Zhiyuan died in 948; his successor Liu Chengyou’s attempt to eliminate senior commanders provoked Guo Wei’s rebellion. Guo’s forces defeated the court, and he formally established Later Zhou in 951. Guo Wei, who reigned until 954, began strengthening the central government; his adopted son Chai Rong, also called Guo Rong and known as Emperor Shizong, continued that work during 954–959. After defeating Northern Han and its Khitan allies at Gaoping in 954, Chai reorganized the imperial army, emphasizing the selection of effective soldiers and stricter discipline. These measures increased the court’s capacity to coordinate troops and resources rather than relying solely on regional commanders’ personal forces. (en.wikipedia.org)

Chai Rong’s campaigns against Southern Tang in 956–958 combined repeated land offensives with river operations. The settlement of 958 transferred Southern Tang’s territories north of the Yangtze to Later Zhou and required its ruler Li Jing to relinquish the imperial title and acknowledge Zhou supremacy. Chai’s death in 959 left a child successor, Guo Zongxun; Zhao Kuangyin replaced him with the Song dynasty in 960. The northern courts’ capital choices also reveal different foundations of power. Luoyang, Later Tang’s principal seat, retained the prestige of an earlier imperial center; Kaifeng, used by the other four dynasties for most of their existence, had stronger connections to the eastern waterways and Grand Canal transport system. Its provisioning advantages helped sustain its subsequent role as the Northern Song capital. (en.wikipedia.org)

The Ten Kingdoms and Their Regional Bases

Wu developed from Yang Xingmi’s military command in Huainan, centered on Yangzhou and extending across the lower Yangtze into parts of present-day Jiangsu, Anhui, and Jiangxi. His recognition as prince of Wu in 902 preceded the Tang dynasty’s fall; his successors inherited an established regional administration rather than creating a kingdom in 907. Effective control subsequently passed to Xu Wen and his adopted son Xu Zhigao. In 937, Xu Zhigao replaced the last Yang ruler, Yang Pu, through a formal abdication. His new dynasty, initially named Qi, became Southern Tang in 939, when he adopted the name Li Bian. Its capital was Jinling, present-day Nanjing, whereas Wu’s court had remained at Yangzhou. (en.wikipedia.org)

Wuyue, ruled by the Qian family from Hangzhou, occupied Zhejiang and the southeastern portion of the Yangtze delta. Qian Liu received the title of prince of Yue in 902 and that of Wuyue in 907. His successors maintained nominal allegiance to northern imperial courts while retaining regional government, and the kingdom survived until Qian Chu surrendered its territory in 978. Min followed a different trajectory. The Wang family established its principal center at Fuzhou in mountainous Fujian; Wang Shenzhi received the title of prince of Min in 909. Following his death in 925, succession conflicts fractured the ruling house. Wang Yanzheng established a rival court at Jianzhou in 943, and Southern Tang’s conquest of that center in 945 ended the kingdom without immediately bringing all Fujian under one administration. (cambridge.org)

Chu’s territorial base comprised Hunan’s river valleys and the Dongting Lake basin, with its court at Tanzhou, present-day Changsha. Ma Yin received a princely title in 907 and enhanced royal recognition in 927. The Ma family’s kingdom ended with Southern Tang’s intervention in 951, but this did not end separate government in Hunan: local commanders expelled the occupying forces in 952, and Zhou Xingfeng consolidated a successor regime in 956. Jingnan, also called Nanping, was much smaller, centered on Jiangling in present-day Hubei. Gao Jixing became its military governor in 907 and prince of Nanping in 924. Its position on the middle Yangtze made diplomatic accommodation with larger neighbors essential to its survival. (ru.djvu.online)

Former Shu and Later Shu shared Chengdu and the Sichuan basin but belonged to different ruling families. Wang Jian proclaimed Former Shu in 907; his son Wang Yan surrendered to Later Tang in 925. The intervening northern administration supplied the institutional setting for the second kingdom: Meng Zhixiang, appointed military governor after the conquest, built an autonomous position and proclaimed Later Shu in 934. His son Meng Chang ruled until 965. Southern Han likewise grew from an existing military command, that of Liu Yin around Guangzhou. Liu Yin’s brother Liu Yan proclaimed an empire in 917, initially called Yue and renamed Han in 918, with its main territory in Guangdong and Guangxi. (en.wikipedia.org)

Northern Han was the geographical exception: its capital, Taiyuan, lay in Shanxi rather than southern China. Liu Chong, also known as Liu Min, founded it in 951 after the overthrow of Later Han, preserving a regional branch of that dynasty’s ruling house. It survived until 979. In the comparison below, title dates distinguish formal recognition or imperial proclamation from the earlier establishment of military control; “rulers” identifies the founding figure and final ruler rather than listing every succession. (beckassets.blob.core.windows.net)

The dates and regional bases follow the distinction between dynastic kingdoms and subsequent regimes occupying their former territories, particularly in Hunan and Fujian. (beckassets.blob.core.windows.net)

Armies, Military Households, and Political Succession

Regional armies developed from the military commands of the late Tang dynasty, but their cohesion depended on more than official appointments. Governors and field commanders maintained personal followings whose service connected them to particular patrons rather than permanently to a dynasty. In the south, military confederations could combine migrant adventurers with local armed groups and alliances with resident elites. In the northern imperial regimes, regional forces coexisted with centrally controlled armies that both protected the ruler and campaigned outside the capital. By Later Zhou, the Metropolitan and Palace Commands were the principal concentrations of military power. Their importance made the relationship between emperor and guard commanders as consequential as relations with provincial governors. (cambridge.org)

Adoption and fictive kinship incorporated successful officers into a commander’s household and gave personal service the language of familial obligation. Li Keyong’s adopted commanders, remembered collectively as the “Army of Adopted Sons” (yi’er jun), were a prominent example. Adoption could involve receiving the surname Li, gaining privileged access to the patron, and obtaining substantial military authority; it did not necessarily mean being raised from childhood within his household. Li Siyuan, later emperor of Later Tang, was one such adopted son. These connections also extended across generations: officers’ sons could inherit positions and participate in the same military networks. Military households consequently functioned as families of commanders and dependants through which office, service, and patronage were transmitted, rather than simply as biological lineages. (edizionicafoscari.unive.it)

Marriage supplied another connection between ruling households and senior officers. Shi Jingtang, whose father had served Li Keyong, married a daughter of Li Siyuan and eventually founded Later Jin in 936. Adoption likewise connected Guo Wei to his successor Chai Rong, who became Later Zhou emperor in 954. Such relationships could support succession, but they also placed powerful military men inside an enlarged ruling family without eliminating their separate interests. Shatuo ancestry must therefore be distinguished from political allegiance. Li Keyong’s following incorporated experienced frontier soldiers, locally recruited battalions, and additional manpower enlisted during campaigns. Its commanders included men of Turkic, Uyghur, Khitan, Sogdian, and Chinese backgrounds. “Shatuo” could describe the leadership and political identity of this coalition without accurately identifying the ancestry of every soldier within it. (assets.cambridge.org)

Succession crises exposed the limits of these bonds. In 926, distrust between Li Cunxu’s court and its commanders accompanied a succession of military insurrections, including those at Weizhou, Beizhou, and Bozhou. Li Cunxu died during the upheaval, and his adoptive brother Li Siyuan obtained the throne through a military coup rather than an orderly hereditary transfer. Richard L. Davis’s study of Li Siyuan emphasizes the support he had accumulated among ordinary soldiers through shared campaigning: the capacity to command their confidence could outweigh the claims of the reigning emperor’s immediate family. Mutiny was thus not merely a provincial threat to imperial guards; forces closely associated with the court could also become participants in a change of ruler. (academic.oup.com)

Repeated military upheaval nevertheless coincided with increasingly effective central coordination. Under Guo Wei and Chai Rong, reforms strengthened imperial control over the Metropolitan and Palace Commands and reduced dependence on the personal allegiance of regional governors. Continuous warfare also produced experienced soldiers and officers whose effectiveness carried over into the early Song dynasty. This concentration of force created a distinct succession vulnerability: control of the central armies could provide the means to replace the dynasty itself. In 960, Zhao Kuangyin, head of the Palace Command, displaced Later Zhou. Unlike a provincial commander assembling an independent regional coalition, he occupied an office at the center of an already consolidated military apparatus. (assets.cambridge.org)

Government, Revenue, and Claims to Legitimacy

The successor regimes retained the administrative vocabulary of the Tang dynasty, but offices bearing Tang names did not necessarily retain their former functions. In the northern courts, the Secretariat–Chancellery continued to process government documents, while the Military Affairs Commission became a major center of executive authority; the Six Ministries no longer operated as the integrated administrative apparatus prescribed by Tang institutional texts. Written credentials nevertheless remained important. A Later Tang regulation of 926 required officials seeking replacement appointment certificates to have their claims checked against archived appointment records. Such procedures preserved documentary continuity across changes of dynasty rather than treating every accession as a complete administrative restart. (cambridge.org)

Below the courts, prefectures and counties remained essential units of administration. The central problem was their relationship to the military governors, whose circuit headquarters could stand between local officials and the throne. Rulers sought greater control through appointments, changes in reporting relationships, and the separation of particular prefectural responsibilities from circuit supervision. A Later Han decree of 950, for example, allowed specified prefectures to report nonmilitary business without passing it through their supervisory commissioner. Fiscal supervision provided another route around regional commanders: a Later Jin order of 942 placed subordinate prefectural salt offices under personnel dispatched by the central fiscal administration. These measures targeted particular channels of authority; they did not abolish military governorships or establish uniform central control. (ctext.org)

Agricultural taxation continued to draw on the Tang two-tax framework, with summer and autumn collections, but inherited supplementary demands and additional household levies complicated the distinction between regular taxes and extraordinary exactions. Courts and armies also depended on commercial duties and monopoly income. The northern salt monopoly illustrates how governments combined different methods of extraction. During Later Jin’s Tianfu era, beginning in 936, officials proposed replacing revenue from certain official salt sales with household assessments in five grades, ranging from 200 cash to one string of cash, while permitting private trading. This was not simply deregulation: in December 942 the government imposed salt duties of seven cash per jin in transit and ten cash per jin at sale, while household salt assessments remained in force. (zjgm.cbpt.cnki.net)

Revenue arrangements differed among the regional kingdoms rather than forming a single southern fiscal system. Research on their monopoly institutions identifies government control of salt, tea, and alcoholic beverages, with local administrations participating in or directing collection. Such revenues allowed rulers to exploit taxable production and exchange alongside agricultural assessments, but their administration depended on the territory and commodities available to each regime. The northern salt regulations likewise distinguished producing regions and prescribed sales boundaries: restrictions on moving different kinds of salt into one another’s markets protected official revenue as well as regulating distribution. Fiscal institutions therefore followed regional resources and political jurisdictions, not merely a common inherited list of offices. (xuebao.snnu.edu.cn)

Claims to legitimacy were expressed through titles, calendars, ancestry, and court ritual. The northern courts maintained imperial ancestral temples and debated the posthumous titles and ritual treatment of earlier rulers. Regional rulers could assert a different relationship to the Tang inheritance: Wu continued using the last Tang reign name, Tianyou, after 907 rather than recognizing Later Liang’s calendar, and adopted its own reign name, Wuyi, in 919. In 939 the Southern Tang founder, previously known as Xu Gao, assumed the name Li Bian and promoted a genealogy connecting his house to Tang royalty. Conversely, royal titles conferred by northern courts could coexist with effective regional autonomy, as in Wuyue. Imperial proclamation, dynastic ancestry, and nominal submission were thus distinct political instruments rather than interchangeable measures of territorial control. (zh.wikisource.org)

Civil recruitment also survived unevenly. Wu restored civil service examinations in 909 under Xu Wen’s predominance, and Southern Tang developed examination recruitment alongside other ways of attracting literati. Former Shu, Later Shu, and Southern Han likewise employed examinations, although their implementation and scale differed. In early Southern Tang, examinations could be arranged sporadically when literary submissions were presented, rather than following an uninterrupted annual schedule. These practices supplied officials and strengthened civil administration, but their survival should not be equated with the more extensive examination-centered recruitment associated with the later Song dynasty. (jas.hkbu.edu.hk)

Frontier Powers and Relations beyond the Kingdoms

The Khitan ruler Yelü Abaoji’s accession to paramount leadership in 907 and assumption of imperial status in 916 mark successive stages in the formation of the Liao polity. Rather than simply extending a tribal confederation, the new state developed institutions capable of governing pastoral communities, agricultural settlements, and conquered populations across Inner Mongolia and Manchuria. Its administration combined Khitan political practices with offices and documentary procedures adapted from Chinese government. Expansion therefore brought not only additional cavalry forces but also cities, cultivators, and taxable resources under Khitan rule. Liao stood outside the conventional Five Dynasties sequence, yet became a major participant in northern dynastic succession. (djvu.online)

In 936, Shi Jingtang sought assistance from Abaoji’s successor, Yelü Deguang, against Later Tang. Khitan intervention secured his establishment of Later Jin; Shi subsequently acknowledged Deguang as his symbolic father. The settlement initiated in 936–937 transferred the Sixteen Prefectures, with negotiations and incorporation extending into 938. These territories stretched between Datong and Youzhou, present-day Beijing. Their strategic value lay in the mountain passes, fortified approaches, and footholds in Hebei that they placed under Khitan control, weakening the northern defensive position of subsequent Central Plains regimes. They also enlarged Liao’s agricultural population and administrative resources. (djvu.online)

Relations deteriorated after Shi Jingtang’s death in 942. Khitan campaigns culminated in the destruction of Later Jin and occupation of Kaifeng in 947, although the conquerors soon withdrew from the Central Plains. Northern Han, established around Taiyuan in 951, subsequently relied on Liao protection against Later Zhou and Song. Khitan military assistance helped preserve this smaller regime, while its territory provided a buffer against northern expansion by its southern neighbors. Its dependence continued until Song conquered it in 979, despite Liao efforts to sustain it. (djvu.online)

Other frontier governments likewise fell outside the conventional fifteen-state framework. Dingnan was a Tangut-led military governorship centered on Xiazhou, in northern present-day Shaanxi, near the southern Ordos. Its rulers accepted appointments and titles from successive northern courts while retaining substantial local control. When Later Tang attempted to displace Li Yichao in 933, military resistance frustrated the intervention and he retained the governorship. Farther southwest, Duan Siping founded the Dali kingdom in Yunnan in 937, succeeding the regimes that had followed Nanzhao’s collapse. Dingnan’s nominal attachment to northern courts and Dali’s separate monarchy represented different forms of frontier autonomy, rather than additional members of the Ten Kingdoms. (tile.loc.gov)

Maritime diplomacy connected the regional courts with Korean states and Japan, often through intermediaries whose commercial and official functions overlapped. In 927, Wuyue dispatched a minister carrying a royal letter to mediate between Later Baekje and Goryeo. Goryeo’s ruler Wang Geon received investiture from Later Tang in 933, but recognition did not place his kingdom under that court’s practical administration. Wuyue’s Jiang Xun traveled to Japan repeatedly between 935 and 953 as both a trading participant and court representative. His 953 mission conveyed Qian Chu’s request for copies of Buddhist texts lost during the late-Tang upheavals. These contacts joined interstate negotiation, trade, and religious exchange without requiring a single, centralized diplomatic system. (historyfoundation.or.kr)

Connections with Southeast Asia similarly depended on shipping networks as well as diplomatic missions. Southern Han benefited from Guangzhou’s established position as an international entrepôt, while coastal rulers in Fujian and Zhejiang also cultivated overseas commerce. Champa’s ports along present-day central Vietnam and Srivijaya’s networks around Sumatra linked Chinese coastal markets with wider Indian Ocean routes. Court records represented many overseas exchanges as tribute, but that terminology should not be equated with territorial control: embassies, gifts, merchants, and cargoes moved between governments that retained their own rulers and institutions. Commercial access and ceremonial recognition could coexist with practical political independence. (doi.org)

Economic Geography and Social Change

Repeated warfare in the Yellow River basin disrupted cultivation, displaced households, and diverted labor and supplies into armies, but northern economic decline was neither continuous nor universal. Later Zhou policies show efforts to rebuild the agricultural base: in 953, Guo Wei abolished a cattle levy and transferred fields, houses, and implements from state-managed agricultural estates to their cultivating households. The measure reportedly brought approximately 30,000 households into local administrative registers. Southern regions offered greater opportunities for recovery and settlement, but they were not uniformly peaceful: Min’s internal conflicts and Southern Tang’s expansion subjected parts of Fujian and Hunan to renewed warfare. The contrast was between differing local experiences of insecurity and reconstruction, rather than a devastated north and an untouched, prosperous south. (ru.djvu.online)

Southward migration brought cultivators, artisans, and educated families into economies whose development had already begun under the Tang dynasty. Expanding wet-rice cultivation depended on reclamation and reliable water management, not simply on additional population. In Sichuan, the restoration of Tongji Dike early in the tenth century supported agricultural recovery. Wuyue established an official responsibility for waterways and agriculture, while coastal embankments protected low-lying fields around Hangzhou Bay. Qian Liu ordered construction of a sea dike at Hangzhou in 910; stone-filled bamboo structures formed part of its defenses against the Qiantang River’s tides. These projects document specific interventions, rather than proving that all later Song agricultural advances were already present in the tenth century. (api.pageplace.de)

Water transport connected agricultural districts, urban consumers, and military headquarters. The Grand Canal and its associated waterways helped make Kaifeng a strategic distribution center, with access to grain and other supplies without the long westward journey required to provision Chang’an. Under Later Zhou, work connecting the Cai, Wuzhang, and Bian waterways strengthened this transport network. Chai Rong also ordered an expansion of Kaifeng’s walls and the widening and straightening of its streets in 955. Political fragmentation nevertheless prevented the canal from operating as an uninterrupted, centrally administered supply route across all northern and southern territories; Kaifeng’s much larger Song-era provisioning system should not be projected backward onto this period. (doi.org)

Regional production supplied courts and markets across political boundaries. Sichuan combined silk production with tea cultivation and both private and monopoly-controlled tea commerce. In the lower Yangtze region, Wuyue produced silk textiles and green-glazed Yue ceramics, while Hangzhou linked inland waterways with coastal shipping. Southern Tang’s territories also produced tea and textiles. Guangzhou, the Southern Han capital, continued to connect continental markets with Southeast Asian maritime networks despite the destruction inflicted during Huang Chao’s occupation in 878–879. Trade could therefore recover or change direction even when political violence damaged established merchant communities. (api.pageplace.de)

Military authority, official employment, landed wealth, and commercial expertise overlapped rather than forming entirely separate social spheres. Southern Tang, for example, consulted the former merchant and court scholar Zang Xun about Fujian’s geography when planning an invasion. Cultivators’ relationships with landholders and governments also changed through resettlement and alterations in land tenure, as Guo Wei’s estate transfers demonstrate. Surviving registration figures require particular caution: the addition of 30,000 households to administrative rolls records a change in their fiscal and jurisdictional status, not necessarily an equivalent increase in population. Such figures cannot by themselves establish migration totals, regional population growth, or improvements in ordinary households’ living standards. (ru.djvu.online)

Religious Institutions and Court Patronage

Buddhist monasteries received donations of land, cash, and buildings that supported resident clergy, ritual services, and the preservation and production of texts. In Min, Wuyue, and Southern Tang, royal patronage helped expand monastic communities and estates. Donations were understood to generate religious merit, while rulers also expected monks to perform ceremonies for timely rain, protection, and political stability. These expectations could provoke criticism when monastic wealth appeared disproportionate to its public benefits. Patronage was therefore more than unrestricted generosity: it linked religious institutions to court resources and subjected their leaders to political supervision. In Wuyue, the Qian kings maintained clerical officials and claimed authority to appoint abbots and ordination supervisors. (www11.ihp.sinica.edu.tw)

Regional courts supported overlapping Buddhist networks rather than a single uniform establishment. Wuyue’s earlier kings patronized both Buddhist and Daoist institutions; under its last ruler, Qian Chu, support increasingly favored monks associated with the lineage of Fayan Wenyi (885–958), which also enjoyed patronage in Southern Tang. Their identification with Chan did not exclude scriptural study, Lotus Sutra devotion, Pure Land practices, or esoteric rites. At Hangzhou, Qian Chu appointed Yongming Yanshou (904–975) to Lingyin Monastery in 960 and transferred him to Yongming Monastery in 961. Yanshou’s hundred-fascicle Zongjing lu, or Records of the Source-Mirror, brought scriptural authorities and Chan teachings into an extensive doctrinal compilation, illustrating the cultural work sustained by court-backed monasteries. (doi.org)

Wuyue sponsorship joined monumental construction to the reproduction of sacred objects and texts. Qian Chu commissioned miniature bronze pagodas modeled on the legendary 84,000 stupas of the Indian king Ashoka; a surviving example in the Kyoto National Museum is dated 955. Such objects housed bodily or symbolic relics and made royal devotion materially reproducible. His Leifeng Pagoda project likewise incorporated printed sutra scrolls into cavities within its bricks: a surviving scroll in the Shanghai Museum preserves both text and an illustrated Buddhist narrative. Here woodblock printing served the ritual installation of sacred texts, not merely their circulation for reading. Coastal religious connections also brought overseas students and manuscripts into Wuyue. Yanshou received gifts from Goryeo’s King Gwangjong and trained Korean monks, while Qian Chu supported the recovery from Korea of works associated with the Tiantai master Zhiyi. (knmdb.kyohaku.go.jp)

Northern policy could be markedly different. In 955, Later Zhou’s Chai Rong, known posthumously as Emperor Shizong, ordered the destruction of monasteries lacking officially bestowed name plaques. Historical records report 30,336 establishments dismantled and 2,694 retained; these are transmitted administrative figures rather than a modern census. The same year, copper shortages prompted the collection and melting of bronze Buddhist images for coin production, alongside restrictions on privately held bronze utensils. The measures combined severe institutional suppression with fiscal and monetary objectives. They did not abolish Buddhism: recognized monasteries remained, and the decree’s reach depended on Later Zhou jurisdiction, not on authority over independently governed southern kingdoms such as Wuyue. (jstor.org)

Daoist patronage was especially visible in Former Shu. Du Guangting (850–933), who had served the late Tang court, worked in the religious and political environment of Wang Jian’s regime at Chengdu. His writings systematized liturgy and sacred geography, connecting ritual service with the fortunes of rulers and their territories. His Guangcheng ji preserves ceremonial addresses involving Wang Jian and members of his military household. Court protection of Daoism could coexist with Buddhist patronage rather than requiring exclusive allegiance to one tradition. (plato.stanford.edu)

Local cults and classical court ritual occupied additional, distinct institutional settings. Qian Liu visited the temple of Fangfeng to pray for military success and granted the deity the title “King of Efficacious Virtue,” incorporating a regional sacred figure into royal patronage. Northern courts, meanwhile, continued sacrificial practices associated with Confucian government and ancestor veneration. The Wudai huiyao records officials debating the intervals of di and xia ancestral sacrifices and the offerings appropriate when emperors or their delegates performed ceremonies. These practices operated through local temples, clerical establishments, and court ritual offices, each with different patrons and administrative arrangements. (tandfonline.com)

Literature, Visual Arts, and Printed Texts

Regional courts sustained the development of ci, song lyrics whose unequal line lengths followed established melodies rather than the regular patterns of much Tang poetry. Their performance at banquets connected literary composition with music and elite entertainment. In Former Shu, Wei Zhuang served Wang Jian while continuing a literary career begun under the Tang; his lyrics helped establish the repertoire subsequently preserved in Sichuan anthologies. Zhao Chongzuo’s Huajian ji (Collection from Among the Flowers), compiled in 940 under Later, not Former, Shu, gathered 500 lyrics by eighteen poets. Its treatments of desire, separation, and feminine voices belonged to a culture of musical performance as well as written literary imitation. (metmuseum.org)

Southern Tang provided another important setting for lyric composition. Li Jing, ruler from 943 to 961, and his minister Feng Yansi cultivated lyrics in which seasonal scenery, intimate interiors, and longing carried emotional meaning. Later Song criticism particularly admired Li Jing’s image of a jade pipe sounding through the cold in a small tower. His son Li Yu (937–978), who succeeded him in 961, wrote both courtly love lyrics and poems of displacement and loss. After Southern Tang’s conquest in 975, his captivity supplied the circumstances for lyrics contrasting remembered palace pleasures with his present condition. Song commentators distinguished his earlier and later compositions, helping establish the interpretation of his later work as the lament of a dispossessed ruler. (brill.com)

Landscape painting developed contrasting pictorial vocabularies associated with northern mountains and the southern river country. Jing Hao and Guan Tong became identified with monumental peaks, rocky valleys, and travelers dwarfed by their surroundings; Dong Yuan and the monk Juran with rounded hills, waterways, and the humid scenery of Jiangnan. Dong Yuan worked within the Southern Tang establishment, whereas Juran’s career extended into the Song. These associations should not be mistaken for a securely documented sequence of surviving masterpieces: later critics constructed artistic genealogies, and paintings bearing these names often acquired their attributions long after their supposed creation. Travelers in the Mountains, traditionally attributed to Guan Tong, illustrates the problem. James Cahill considered it plausibly pre-Song, while other assessments identify it as the work of a later follower; its attribution is not equivalent to an authenticated signature. (npm.edu.tw)

Court workshops also supported figure and bird-and-flower painting. Huang Quan worked for the Shu courts and headed Later Shu’s painting establishment before its conquest in 965. Sketches of Rare Birds, traditionally attributed to him, depicts twenty-four birds, insects, and turtles through fine outlines and applied color; an inscription identifies it as material for his son Jubao to practice copying. Calligraphy continued across northern dynastic changes through officials such as Yang Ningshi (873–954), who served all five dynasties. His Shenxian qiju fa, dated to the first Qianyou year, 948, preserves eight lines of cursive writing with varied ink density and deliberately irregular spacing, providing a dated example where many painting attributions remain uncertain. (dpm.org.cn)

Ceramics and religious architecture likewise connected skilled production with regional patrons. A tenth-century Xing-ware porcelain jar in the Metropolitan Museum bears the incised designation xin guan, “new official ware,” indicating production for a northern court. In Wuyue, Qian Chu’s Leifeng Pagoda at Hangzhou, constructed in 972–976, joined monumental building to printed religious objects. Copies of a Buddhist dhāraṇī text dated 975 were enclosed in cavities within its bricks; surviving scrolls and hollow bricks provide material evidence for the coordinated production of architecture and texts. (metmuseum.org)

Woodblock printing expanded through official textual projects rather than originating in this period: the printed Diamond Sutra dated 868 already demonstrates the technique under the Tang. In 932, the Later Tang court authorized the printing of the Confucian classics in a project associated with Feng Dao. Scholars prepared and checked texts against the Tang stone classics before craftsmen carved page-sized wooden blocks. Completed in 953 under Later Zhou, the enterprise conventionally called the printing of the Nine Classics established an official printed textual standard and reusable means of reproduction. Its continuation across successive regimes contrasts with their political instability and supplied a precedent for subsequent Song government editions. (metmuseum.org)

Song Foundation and the End of Regional Independence

In 960, Zhao Kuangyin, commander of the Later Zhou palace army, became emperor following the military uprising at Chenqiao, northeast of Kaifeng. His troops had marched out in response to reports of an invasion by Northern Han and Khitan forces. At Chenqiao they proclaimed him emperor; the traditional account describes soldiers placing a yellow imperial robe on him. Zhao returned to Kaifeng and displaced the child emperor, Gongdi, establishing the Song dynasty as Emperor Taizu. This transfer ended the succession of the Five Northern Dynasties, but not the independence of the surviving regional states. His authority was also contested within the inherited northern realm: the commanders Li Yun and Li Zhongjin rebelled and were defeated later in 960. (assets.cambridge.org)

The first southern expansion combined intervention in a local succession crisis with territorial annexation. In 963, Song troops advanced toward Hunan, ostensibly to assist its ruler Zhou Baoquan against a rebellion. Their route passed through Jingnan, whose ruler Gao Jichong surrendered; Song forces then absorbed Hunan as well. The Hunan regime was a successor to the Ma family’s Chu kingdom, not the original kingdom surviving unchanged. These acquisitions opened approaches to Sichuan and the middle Yangtze basin. A campaign beginning late in 964 brought the surrender of Later Shu in 965, eliminating Meng Chang’s court at Chengdu. Southern Han followed in 971, when Song forces captured its capital at Guangzhou and ended Liu Chang’s rule. (core.ac.uk)

Southern Tang was the next major target. The campaign began in 974 and culminated in the fall of Jinling, present-day Nanjing, conventionally dated to 975. Its ruler Li Yu was taken to the Song capital. The sequence is often described as a “south-first” strategy: remove the southern courts before confronting Northern Han and its Khitan supporters. Actual operations were less orderly. Taizu also launched unsuccessful campaigns against Northern Han during the southern conquests, including expeditions in 963–964 and 968–969. Southern annexation therefore proceeded alongside northern warfare rather than according to an uninterrupted geographical timetable. (en.wikipedia.org)

Taizu died in 976 and was succeeded by his brother Zhao Guangyi, Emperor Taizong. The remaining southern territories were incorporated through negotiated submission rather than the capture of their capitals. In 978, Chen Hongjin surrendered his separately administered territory around Quanzhou and Zhangzhou in southern Fujian. This was a surviving regional military regime, not a restoration of the Min kingdom, which had already disappeared. Qian Chu, the ruler of Wuyue, surrendered shortly afterward, transferring his kingdom, centered on Hangzhou, to Song administration. Wuyue’s earlier acknowledgment of northern imperial authority had not eliminated its separate government; the surrender of 978 converted that relationship into direct incorporation. (fass.ubd.edu.bn)

In 979, Taizong personally directed the final campaign against Northern Han. Song forces besieged Taiyuan, while defeating an attempted relief operation by its ally, the Khitan Liao dynasty. Northern Han’s ruler Liu Jiyuan surrendered, ending the last independent state included in the conventional Ten Kingdoms list. This explains the distinction between 960, the end of the Five Dynasties, and 979, the end of the surviving Ten Kingdoms sequence. It did not mean that Song had recovered all former Tang territory. Much of the Sixteen Prefectures remained under Liao control, and Taizong’s subsequent advance toward Youzhou, in the area of modern Beijing, ended in defeat at the Gaoliang River in 979. (en.wikipedia.org)

Territorial conquest accompanied a continuing redistribution of administrative and military power. Centrally appointed officials increasingly replaced regional military governors in local administration, while the court assumed responsibility for recruiting, equipping, and paying imperial armies. Command was deliberately divided: after 964, Taizu maintained institutional separation between the Bureau of Military Affairs and the civil administration, limiting any minister’s ability to combine control of government with control of troops. These arrangements reduced the autonomous regional power on which earlier regimes had depended; they did not abolish military influence or immediately produce the mature eleventh-century civilian bureaucracy. (en.wikipedia.org)

Historical Sources and Interpretation

The *Old History of the Five Dynasties* (Jiu Wudai shi) was completed in 974 by court historians working under Xue Juzheng. Its 150 chapters combined imperial annals, biographies, and institutional treatises, drawing on records produced by the preceding northern courts. Its compilation must be distinguished from the history of its surviving text: the work ceased to circulate widely after Ouyang Xiu’s replacement gained authority, and the received edition is an eighteenth-century reconstruction. Shao Jinhan and other Qing editors recovered passages from the Yongle Encyclopedia and supplemented them with quotations preserved in Song works. Consequently, the modern text preserves early evidence through a later editorial arrangement, rather than reproducing an intact manuscript of 974. (ctext.org)

Ouyang Xiu’s *New History of the Five Dynasties* (Xin Wudai shi), originally entitled Wudai shiji, was a privately composed, substantially shorter account. Its distinctive contribution was not simply additional information but a reorganization of historical meaning. Compressed annals were accompanied by biographies grouped into morally significant categories, including men who died maintaining their integrity, officials who died in service, and miscellaneous figures whose conduct resisted exemplary classification. Such selection foregrounded loyalty, betrayal, and the obligations of rulers and ministers associated with Confucian political ethics. Northern emperors received basic annals, whereas the regional ruling houses appeared in separate “hereditary house” accounts: literary structure itself distinguished imperial succession from regional authority. (edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de)

Both histories were written within the Song dynasty, whose rulers had succeeded Later Zhou and subsequently absorbed the regional kingdoms. Treating the five northern regimes as a consecutive sequence provided a framework connecting Song rule with the preceding imperial order. Nevertheless, recognizing a dynasty’s place in that sequence did not require approval of its rulers’ conduct. Ouyang’s condemnation of disloyalty and defective government operated within, rather than outside, this chronological framework. Modern historians therefore distinguish the factual information preserved by these works from the assumptions about legitimate succession and political unity embedded in their titles, classifications, and judgments. Early court records were also politically shaped before Song historians incorporated them; comparison between the two histories does not automatically supply two independent witnesses. (edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de)

Sima Guang’s *Zizhi Tongjian*, completed in 1084, supplies a chronological narrative ending in 959, making it especially valuable for coordinating events across successive courts. Its accompanying Kaoyi, or examination of discrepancies, records comparisons among conflicting sources and preserves quotations from material otherwise lost. Regional accounts, including Lu You’s Book of Southern Tang, broaden the record beyond northern succession. Their different geographical focus can recover people and events abbreviated in the general histories, although regional commemorative interests also require scrutiny. (loc.gov)

Archaeology and material culture provide evidence not confined to transmitted narratives. Angela Schottenhammer’s study of Wang Chuzhi (863–923) compares his tomb inscription with official biographies, showing how funerary commemoration constructed a favorable account of a military governor’s career. Such inscriptions contribute dates, family relationships, and political vocabulary without being neutral testimony. Coins offer another material record: the British Museum’s Southern Tang Tangguo tongbao specimen preserves a monetary inscription and copper-alloy composition that can be examined alongside textual descriptions. Surviving paintings present different difficulties. The Metropolitan Museum identifies Riverbank as attributed to Dong Yuan; its published authenticity symposium documents disagreement over both authorship and dating. (epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de)

Modern scholarship increasingly examines regional development and state formation rather than treating the period solely as disorder between two unified empires. The Cambridge History of China emphasizes the construction of institutions capable of mobilizing troops and resources, while Peter Lorge’s 2011 edited volume questions the assumption that dynasties formed uniform cultural units. Important evidentiary limits remain. Household registrations cannot be converted mechanically into population totals: research on Tang registers demonstrates substantial differences between locally recorded households and figures reported centrally. Territorial reconstruction must distinguish claimed authority from effective control, particularly in frontier governorships. Artistic attribution likewise requires separating contemporary objects from later copies, collecting traditions, and retrospective stylistic genealogies. (assets.cambridge.org)

References

1. The Southern Kingdoms between the T’ang and the Sung, 907–979cambridge.org
2. Introduction: The Sung Dynasty and Its Precursors, 907–1279assets.cambridge.org
3. Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms perioden.wikipedia.org
4. Yang Wuen.wikipedia.org
5. The Reach of the Military: Tangcambridge.org
6. Middle Imperial China, 900–1350: A New Historyapi.pageplace.de
7. Huang Chaoen.wikipedia.org
8. Zhu Wenen.wikipedia.org
9. Sui, Tang, Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms (A.D.581–979)east.library.utoronto.ca
10. Fire and Ice: Li Cunxu and the Founding of the Later Tang — previewhkupress.hku.hk
11. The Five Dynastiescambridge.org
12. Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms Period (891–979)berkshirepublishing.com
13. Later Liang (Five Dynasties)en.wikipedia.org
14. Later Jin (Five Dynasties)en.wikipedia.org
15. Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms periodowiki.org
16. Timeline of the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdomsen.wikipedia.org
17. Guo Weien.wikipedia.org
18. Later Zhou conquest of Huainanen.wikipedia.org
19. Kaifengen.wikipedia.org
20. The Cambridge History of China, Volume 5, Part One: Excerptbeckassets.blob.core.windows.net
21. The Cambridge History of China. Volume 5. Part 1. The Sung Dynasty and Its Precursors, 907–1279ru.djvu.online
22. Wuyueen.wikipedia.org
23. Min (Ten Kingdoms)en.wikipedia.org
24. Ma Chuen.wikipedia.org
25. Former Shuen.wikipedia.org
26. Later Shuen.wikipedia.org
27. Meng Zhixiangen.wikipedia.org
28. Southern Hanen.wikipedia.org
29. Northern Hanen.wikipedia.org
30. Ancestral Sites and Lineages of the Later Tang (923–936) and the Later Jin (936–947) Dynasties According to the Song Sourcesiris.unive.it
31. Maddalena Barenghi: Li Keyong’s Client Army and the Daibei Armed Communitiesedizionicafoscari.unive.it
32. From Warhorses to Ploughshares: The Later Tang Reign of Emperor Mingzongjstor.org
33. Military Institutions as a Defining Feature of the Song Dynastycambridge.org
34. Sung Government and Politicscambridge.org
35. 五代會要ctext.org
36. The Essentials of the Five Dynasties Period: Volume 24 五代會要：卷二十四ctext.org
37. 舊五代史：志八ctext.org
38. 五代时期十国割据政权财政体系与货币政策初探zjgm.cbpt.cnki.net
39. 五代會要/卷三zh.wikisource.org
40. On the Southern Tang Imperial Genealogylaw-journals-books.vlex.com
41. The Civil Service Examinations in the Southern Tang: Regional and Historical Significancejas.hkbu.edu.hk
42. The Cambridge History of China, Volume 6: Alien Regimes and Border States, 907–1368djvu.online
43. The Liao Dynasty in PRC Regional Museumspure-oai.bham.ac.uk
44. Translating a Tangut Buddhist Texttile.loc.gov
45. Buddhist kingship and governance in the Dali Kingdom, 1140s to 1200cambridge.org
46. Zhedong Sea Merchants and the China-Japan Trade, ca. 800–1000 CEhistory.ucla.edu
47. The “China Seas” in world history: A general outline of the role of Chinese and East Asian maritime space from its origins to c. 1800doi.org
48. Diplomacy, Trade and Networks: Champa in the Asian Commercial Context (7th–10th Centuries)journals.openedition.org
49. WP29_Schottenhammerepub.oeaw.ac.at
50. Rise and Fall of the Grand Canal in the Ancient Kaifeng City of China: Role of the Grand Canal and Water Supply in Urban and Regional Developmentdoi.org
51. Waterworks behind 'Swords into Plowshares': How advanced was Wuyue's infrastructure?ehangzhou.gov.cn
52. Wuyue Kings and Buddhismchibs.edu.tw
53. Yongming Yanshouencyclopediaofbuddhism.org
54. Encyclopedia of Buddhismwisdomcompassion.org
55. Pagoda (From the 84,000 Pagodas of Qian Hongchu)knmdb.kyohaku.go.jp
56. A Sutra Scroll Deposited in Leifeng Pagoda Commissioned by the King of Wu-Yue Stateshanghaimuseum.net
57. How Zen Became Zen: The Dispute over Enlightenment and the Formation of Chan Buddhism in Song-Dynasty Chinajstor.org
58. Chemical Studies of Chinese Coinage II: From Qin to Yuan (221 BCE–1368 CE)nature.com
59. Religious Daoismplato.stanford.edu
60. Du Guangtingvietheravada.net
61. Guang Cheng Ji 廣成集ctext.org
62. Wei Zhuangen.wikipedia.org
63. Review of Anna M. Shields, Crafting a Collectionafec.hypotheses.org
64. The Development of Ci Poetry Criticism in Song Literary Miscellanies: an Evaluation of Li Yu, Liu Yong, and Su Shibrill.com
65. A Closer Look at Chinese Painting: Selected Works from the Ages in the Museum Collectionnpm.edu.tw
66. PRV Lecture 6ieas.berkeley.edu
67. 黄筌写生珍禽图卷dpm.org.cn
68. 杨凝式dpm.org.cn
69. 杨凝式草书神仙起居法卷dpm.org.cn
70. What Was in the “Precious Casket Seal”?: Material Culture of the Karaṇḍamudrā Dhāraṇī throughout Medieval Maritime Asiamdpi.com
71. The Reunification of China: Excerptassets.cambridge.org
72. The Reunification of China: Frontmatterassets.cambridge.org
73. Chen Hongjinen.wikipedia.org
74. Dashi 大食 reconsideredarthistoriography.wordpress.com
75. Song conquest of Northern Hanen.wikipedia.org
76. History of the Song dynastyen.wikipedia.org
77. Military Institutions as a Defining Feature of the Song Dynastycambridge.org
78. 舊五代史 Jiuwudaishi - Chinese Text Projectctext.org
79. Historiography and Narratives of the Later Tang (923-36) and Later Jin (936-47) Dynasties in Tenth to Eleventh Century Sourcesedoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de
80. 10.09, Ouyang, Historical Records of the Five Dynastiesscholarworks.iu.edu
81. Historical Records of the Five Dynastiesbooks.google.com
82. Ancient China and the Responsibility to Protect: An Under-Studied Topic of Legal Historycambridge.org
83. T’oung Pao 108 (2022), 126–159brill.com
84. A Buried Past: The Tomb Inscription (Muzhiming) and Official Biographies of Wang Chuzhi (863-923)epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de
85. Issues of Authenticity in Chinese Paintinglibmma.contentdm.oclc.org