Cleopatra VII

Cleopatra VII (69–30 BCE) was the last active ruler of the Ptolemaic kingdom of Egypt, a Macedonian Greek dynasty founded by a general of Alexander the Great. She ruled from 51 BCE until her death, and her reign ended with Egypt's annexation by the Roman Empire. Her alliances with Julius Caesar and Mark Antony, her role in the civil wars of late Republican Rome, and her death in 30 BCE have made her one of the most widely known figures of antiquity. Her life is the subject of major ancient sources, most of them written by Romans or Greeks outside her court, and those sources shape how she is remembered.

This entry covers her origins, her struggles for the throne, her relationships with Caesar and Antony, and how she governed Egypt and presented herself as a Hellenistic and Egyptian monarch. It then examines the Roman accounts of her, her enduring presence in literature, drama and film, the scholarly debate over her ancestry, and the archaeological evidence that continues to be studied. The entry separates what is well attested from what is later legend, and it treats the modern debates about her identity as subjects of historiography in their own right.

Dynastic origins and birth

The Ptolemaic dynasty emerged from the division of Alexander the Great's empire. Ptolemy I Soter, one of Alexander the Great's ablest generals, chose Egypt as his share, becoming satrap in 323 B.C.E. and taking the title of king in 305 B.C.E. Reference works therefore date the dynasty's founding to 305 BCE. They describe it as a Macedonian Greek royal family that ruled Egypt from 305 to 30 BCE. Its capital was Alexandria, a Greek polis (city-state) founded by Alexander the Great, which became the capital city and a major center of Greek culture, learning, and trade.

Cleopatra VII was one of three daughters of Ptolemy XII Auletes, alongside Berenice IV and Arsinoe IV. Sources give her birth as early 69 BC or late 70 BC in Alexandria, Ptolemaic Kingdom, and the 69 BCE date is the one most often used.

Her mother is the main uncertainty. Cleopatra V is the only securely attested wife of Ptolemy XII, and her only known child is Berenice IV, though she is often also considered to be the mother of Cleopatra VII. Surviving evidence does not settle the question, since it is possible that Cleopatra V was the mother of Cleopatra VII (the identity of whose mother is nowhere revealed). Cleopatra V's disappearance from the records is central to the argument. Cleopatra Tryphaena disappears from official records a few months after the birth of Cleopatra in 69 BC. Christopher Bennett reasons from this timing that Cleopatra VII must have been conceived before Cleopatra V vanished, which points to her as the mother "certainly conceived before Cleopatra V disappears from the record". Adrian Goldsworthy, by contrast, dismisses the idea of an Egyptian priestly mother as conjecture and regards either Cleopatra V or a concubine of probably Greek origin as the likelier candidate Adrian Goldsworthy dismisses the idea of Cleopatra's mother being a member of an Egyptian priestly family as "pure conjecture,".

Marriage within the family was common among the Ptolemies. Ptolemy IX was married twice, to his sisters Cleopatra IV and Cleopatra Selene. Cleopatra V was likewise the (perhaps full) sister-wife of Ptolemy XII Theos Philopator Philadelphus Neos Dionysus. Ties with the Seleucid house ran in both directions. In 193 BCE, Cleopatra, a Seleucid princess, married King Ptolemy V of Egypt. Later, Tryphaena, a Ptolemaic princess, was queen consort of the Seleucid Empire, with a tenure from 124 BC to 111 BC, and was married to Antiochus VIII Grypus. The recurrence of the name Tryphaena across these branches is one reason the family tree is hard to reconstruct.

Her name is Greek. Britannica renders the Greek name as "Famous in Her Father" and gives her full style as Cleopatra VII Thea Philopator. In ancestry, she was ethnically Greek as a member of the Macedonian Ptolemaic Dynasty, but she was culturally Egyptian and presented herself as an Egyptian queen.

Accession and the struggle with Ptolemy XIII

Ptolemy XII's will, drawn up before his death in 51 BCE, named Cleopatra and her younger brother Ptolemy XIII as joint rulers, with the Roman Republic as their guardian. Ptolemy XII died in 51 BC, his will stated that Ptolemy XIII and Cleopatra VII were to become co-rulers of Egypt, with the Roman Republic as their guardians. The brother was a child. Ptolemy XIII succeeded his father as pharaoh of the Ptolemaic Kingdom in the spring of 51 BC at the age of 11. Because Egyptian tradition expected a woman to rule with a male consort, the arrangement was made explicit: her 12-year-old brother, Ptolemy XIII, was ceremonially married to her. The sources differ on whether the pairing was a full marriage, and they generally agree that the two were not equal partners. Because Ptolemy XIII was ten years old when their rule began, Cleopatra was the dominant partner in the relationship. Within a few months she was already acting alone; Cleopatra soon dropped his name from all official documents, however, and ruled alone.

The royal court, which was dominated by advisers acting in the boy king's name, resisted this independence. Pothinus, a eunuch, served as regent, while the general Achillas and the rhetorician Theodotus of Chios were also among the king's guardians. Ptolemy XIII was underage and Pothinus was appointed as his regent. The general Achillas and the rhetorician Theodotus of Chios were also guardians of the Egyptian king. When both siblings were elevated to senior rule in October 50 BCE, Pothinus acted as regent for him. In 48 BCE the advisers acted to remove her. Under Pothinus' guidance, Ptolemy attempted to depose Cleopatra in order to become sole ruler, while Pothinus planned to act as the power behind the throne. They gained control of Alexandria and forced Cleopatra out of the city. She responded by raising her own forces, and a civil war began in Egypt, while Arsinoe IV also began to claim the throne for herself.

Pompey's flight and murder

The court's policy toward Pompey shifted during this period. In 49 BCE, when Pompey's son came to Egypt seeking military aid against Caesar, Ptolemy XIII had regained equal power with Cleopatra, and both rulers complied with the petition. Among other things, they sent 500 Gabiniani horsemen to Pompey. That alignment did not last. After Caesar's victory at Pharsalus in 48 BCE, Pompey sought asylum in Egypt. The advisers were unwilling to become entangled in the Roman conflict. The advisors of Ptolemy XIII were not willing to get involved in the Roman civil war and decided to murder Pompey in an attempt to please the victorious Caesar. Pompey was killed on 28 September 48 BCE. As Pompey disembarked in Egypt near Pelusium, he was stabbed to death and beheaded. The killing was intended as a gesture toward Caesar, but it had the opposite effect. Rather than rewarding them, Caesar reportedly expressed disgust at the murder of his former ally-turned-rival.

The murder changed the diplomatic position of the Egyptian court. Caesar was already in Alexandria, and his reaction gave Cleopatra an opening that Pothinus had not anticipated. Pothinus had neglected to note that Caesar had been granting clemency to his enemies, including Cassius, Cicero, and Brutus. Cleopatra used Pothinus's mistake to gain favor with Caesar and eventually became his lover. Caesar then had Pothinus executed. Caesar then arranged for the execution of Pothinus and the marriage of Cleopatra to Ptolemy.

The Alexandrine War

Caesar's presence in Alexandria turned a dynastic dispute into a wider conflict. He initially tried to settle the succession and to recover Egyptian debts. Caesar attempted to mediate a succession dispute between Cleopatra and Ptolemy XIII and exact repayment of certain Egyptian debts. His financial demands and conduct then provoked the court's resistance. Caesar's financial demands and high-handedness then triggered a conflict which put him under siege in Alexandria's palace quarter. Achillas led the attack on the Roman forces; rebelling against Caesar's decree, Achillas launched an attack on Caesar's army, which became known as the Alexandrian War. A traditional account, recorded by later writers, says that Cleopatra reached Caesar's quarters hidden in a rolled-up carpet, having been blocked from entering the city openly. When Cleopatra heard that Caesar was in Alexandria, she was determined to see him but realized that Achillas, commander of the Egyptian forces, would not permit her return. She thus surreptitiously bundled herself into a rolled-up carpet.

The fighting ended with the defeat of the king's forces and the death of Ptolemy XIII. Relief forces from Syria broke the siege, and after a battle contesting those forces' crossing of the Nile delta, Ptolemy XIII and Arsinoe's forces were defeated. During the fighting, Ptolemy XIII fell from a boat and drowned in the Nile. The sources give different durations for the conflict: one places the fighting over four months, while others describe a siege of about six months in the palace. The succession that followed had been reshaped by Caesar's intervention, and the Egyptian throne passed to Cleopatra alongside a remaining younger brother, the later Ptolemy XIV.

Caesar, the Alexandrine War and Caesarion

Caesar's intervention in Alexandria

Julius Caesar entered Egypt while pursuing Pompey, who had fled after his defeat at Pharsalus. Caesar had come to Egypt with 3,000 Roman legionaries and 800 Germanic cavalry auxiliaries, and he also aimed to end the quarrel between the siblings, because the disorder in Egypt was interfering with Rome's grain supply. One account gives his arrival at Alexandria as 2nd October 48 BCE. Caesar's first moves angered the court. He occupied part of the royal quarter, demanded a payment of 10 million denarii toward debts left by Ptolemy XII, and required that Cleopatra return to share power with her brother (Caesar landed in Alexandria and arrogantly occupied parts of Alexandria's royal quarter before meeting with Pharaoh Ptolemy XIII; Caesar demanded a payment of 10 million denarii towards a debt of the late Ptolemy XII Auletes).

The court responded by mobilizing force. Pothinus, the regent, summoned the army of Achillas to Alexandria and had the Romans surrounded in the royal quarter (Pothinus was angered by Caesar's brazen takeover of the royal quarter). Cleopatra's secret contact with Caesar was a further provocation. Through a covert return to the city, she was brought into Caesar's presence, an episode that tied her fortunes directly to the Roman dictator (Cleopatra apparently returned to Alexandria and succeeded in having herself smuggled into Caesar's presence.).

The end of the Alexandrine War

The siege lasted through the winter. Relief troops, assembled under Mithridates of Pergamum, marched overland from Asia Minor and eventually broke the blockade (Caesar had requested reinforcements from his allies who gathered an army of about 13,000 troops; The siege was lifted by relief forces arriving from Syria. After a battle contesting those forces' crossing of the Nile delta, Ptolemy XIII and Arsinoe's forces were defeated.). The war itself is generally dated from September 48-January 47 BCE.

The defeat cost Ptolemy XIII his life, and the settlement that followed placed Cleopatra back on the throne. Rather than ruling alone, she shared power with another younger brother, Ptolemy XIV, who was installed as co-ruler (Cleopatra VII and Ptolemy XIV installed as co-rulers of Egypt). Caesar also reinforced the arrangement by naming the successors in a way that favored the surviving royal family, a decision that Roman writers later cited as evidence of his control over Egypt (Caesar appointed those whom [Ptolemy XII] had named [as his successors] in his will).

Caesarion's birth and paternity

Cleopatra's son Caesarion was born in the summer of 47 BCE, a few months after Caesar left Egypt. An Egyptian stele from the Serapeum at Memphis is records his birth on 23 June 47 BC., and the child was conceived during the period when Caesar was in Egypt (He was conceived during Julius Caesar's extended residence in Egypt between September 48 BC and January 47 BC.). Cleopatra then made the relationship public. She gave the boy a name that echoed Caesar's and announced that he was the father (She named her son in his honour and declared publicly that Caesar was the father.).

Ancient authority on the question is divided. Caesar later acknowledged the boy after the couple's arrival in Rome, but some Classical writers questioned the child's paternity, possibly for political reasons (a few Classical authors, perhaps for political reasons, expressed doubts about his paternity.; After Cleopatra's arrival in Rome in 46, Caesar himself, officially recognized the child as his son.).

Caesar's Roman period and its aftermath

In late 46 BCE, Cleopatra travelled to Rome at Caesar's invitation, bringing the infant with her (Cleopatra traveled to Rome at the invitation of Julius Caesar, bringing her infant son Caesarion.). Her presence in the Roman capital, and the honours Caesar extended to her, drew hostility from Roman political circles. The child was seen by some Roman statesmen as a potential rival, while Egyptian priests treated him as a divine heir (From the moment of his birth, Roman statesmen increasingly viewed him as a threat, while Egyptian priests elevated him as a divine heir.).

Caesar's assassination in 44 BCE removed the Roman figure who had underwritten her position. Cleopatra left Rome and returned to Egypt, where Caesarion was formally made her co-ruler (Caesarion reigned as Cleopatra's co-ruler from 2 September 44 BCE to 12 August 30 BCE). The succession question that Caesar had shaped now became a contest among Roman leaders, and the rivalry between Caesar's heirs and his former supporters drove the civil wars that followed.

The alliance with Mark Antony

In 41 BCE, Mark Antony summoned Cleopatra to Tarsus in southern Asia Minor to answer accusations that Egypt had aided his enemies during the civil wars. The meeting was framed as a judicial summons, but it quickly became a personal and political partnership. Later accounts describe her arrival on the Cydnus River in a gilded vessel, dressed as Aphrodite, which drew much of the town to the waterfront. Antony then spent the winter of 41–40 BCE together in Alexandria, where he became enthralled by her charisma, intellect and political acumen. Because Antony needed Egyptian money and naval support for his eastern campaigns, the relationship had a clear material logic from the start. Scholars generally read it as both a bond of affection and an arrangement between two rulers who each needed the other.

Cleopatra and Antony had three children. The twins, Alexander Helios and Cleopatra Selene, were born in 40 BCE. Their father formally acknowledged them during a political meeting with their mother in 37 BCE. Their younger brother, Ptolemy Philadelphus, was born in Antioch in 36 BCE. The relationship also collided with Antony's Roman marriage. In the same year the twins were born, Antony married the sister of Octavian, Octavia, for political reasons, and in 36 BCE he left Octavia in Rome to rejoin Cleopatra in the East. For Roman opinion, the children and the foreign queen were a symbol of a Roman general whose loyalties appeared to be shifting eastward.

The most consequential event was the Donations of Alexandria in 34 BCE. After a campaign against Armenia that was celebrated with a mock Roman triumph in Alexandria, Antony made a proclamation known today as the 'Donations of Alexandria' before crowds seated in the city's gymnasium. He distributed lands held by Rome and Parthia among Cleopatra and their children and proclaimed Caesarion as Caesar's legitimate son. Ptolemy Philadelphus received part of her kingdom, making him ruler of Syria, Phoenicia and Cilicia, and Cleopatra Selene was made ruler of Cyrenaica and Libya. A similar ceremony had taken place at Antioch in 36 BCE, but the 34 BCE act was the one that caused the decisive breach in relations with Rome.

Octavian used these events in a propaganda campaign against Antony. The recognition of Caesarion was especially threatening to Octavian, who was only adopted and could not claim to be Caesar's biological heir. Rumours spread in Rome that Antony intended to transfer the capital from Rome to Alexandria. Octavian portrayed Antony as a Roman general who had abandoned Roman duty for an eastern queen and given Roman territory to her foreign children. The political debate hardened over the following two years.

The rupture became a formal state action in 32 BCE. Octavian had the Roman Senate deprive Antony of his powers and declare war against Cleopatra, in a move that was framed as a war against a foreign queen rather than against a Roman colleague. To avoid another civil war, the declaration did not name Antony, although he chose to join the conflict on Cleopatra's side. This shift in the declared enemy set the stage for the naval confrontation at Actium in the following year.

Ruling Egypt: administration, economy and trade

Cleopatra governed a Ptolemaic kingdom whose revenue rested on land, grain and long-distance commerce. Royal holdings were large: the Ptolemies owned almost half of Egypt's rich farmland, and the crown's income depended heavily on what those fields produced. By the time she was born in 69 BCE, however, the system was under strain. Heavy taxation and an over-reliance on grain agriculture had left the economy stagnant, and the court had already lost much of its popular legitimacy among Egyptians.

Surviving documents show Cleopatra acting directly on fiscal and commercial questions. In late 50 BCE she issued a decree protecting people who transported grain from extortion by local officials, which indicates that she viewed the grain supply as a matter for direct royal supervision. She also used tax relief as a political instrument. For the Roman commander Publius Canidius Crassus, whose loyalty to Mark Antony she wanted, she granted exemption from duties on the export of 10,000 sacks of wheat and on the annual import of 5,000 amphorae of wine from Cos. She wrote a short Greek instruction in her own hand on the royal ordinance, which shows that she handled these concessions personally.

The wealth she administered depended on geography. The Nile's flood regime made harvests predictable, and that regularity underpinned Egypt's grain surpluses. Alexandria linked the grain-rich Nile hinterland with the wider Mediterranean. Goods from the Red Sea reached the Mediterranean through a chain that ran from Berenike and Myos Hormos overland to the Nile and then downriver to the port. Under the Ptolemies, the Eastern Desert routes that carried this traffic seem to have been state sponsored or tightly controlled by the government. Foreign trade was also monetised and regulated: an earlier Ptolemaic decree required foreign merchants to exchange their gold and silver for new Ptolemaic silver coins before buying goods, a system that Cleopatra's administration inherited. Nabataean commerce reinforced Alexandria's position, since the Nabataean trading network channeled almost all of its southern and eastern trade through Alexandria.

Cleopatra's diplomacy was closely tied to these economic interests, and the relationship with Judea is the best-documented case. After Antony gave her territories east of the Egyptian frontier, she received the balsam groves of Jericho and the cities south of the river Eleutherus, except Tyre and Sidon, and Herod then had to lease back his own lands from her. The arrangement served both sides, because the two leaders had a common interest in maintaining productive trade routes and mercantile production in the area. Her dealings with the Nabataeans were more hostile. In 32 BCE, Herod the Great, with the support of Cleopatra, started a war against Nabataea. One source claims that her general Athenion sent Canathans to the aid of the Nabataeans, and this force crushed Herod's army, but the German classical scholar Christoph Schäfer considers Athenion's allegedly attack on Herod is an invention of Josephus or his sources.

Her eastern policy also had to be read against the wider Roman and Parthian rivalry. In 35 BCE, Artavasdes I offered Antony an alliance against Parthia, and Antony gladly accepted. The surviving evidence for Cleopatra's own dealings with the Parthian realm is much thinner than for her relations with Judea and Arabia. The ancient sources also refer to the costs of her wars and to the demands of Roman patrons, but they give few figures, so the scale of her fiscal burden is harder to measure than her diplomatic record. The later Roman period shows how valuable the Egyptian economy had become: Egyptian wheat fed Rome's annona public dole and underwrote Roman political stability for centuries.

Kingship, religion and the image of the goddess

Cleopatra VII ruled as an Egyptian king. She took part in temple rituals and used royal titles that Egyptian priests would have recognized. The earliest evidence of her divine status is a stele from 51 BCE, the year of her accession. A stele erected for the ceremony hailed the young queen as Thea Philopator, "the Father-Loving Goddess," one of the earliest surviving inscriptions bearing Cleopatra's divine titulary. The monument was set up for the burial of a sacred bull, an animal that Egyptians worshipped as a form of the war god Montu, so her divine title was linked from the start to a religious ritual rather than to a purely dynastic claim.

Her association with the goddess Isis became the core of her royal image after 44 BCE. After Caesar's assassination in 44 B.C.—and his subsequent deification by the Roman Senate—Cleopatra drew an even closer parallel with the myth of Isis, who mourned her slain husband, Osiris, while protecting their son, Horus. The Isis parallel allowed her to present her role as protector of a rightful heir. Visual media expressed this directly: in one relief, by placing the cartouche next to the image of the pharaoh as Isis, Cleopatra was portraying herself as the most powerful female deity.

The temple of Dendera is the most important surviving site for this imagery. After elevating Caesarion as her co-ruler, Cleopatra reinforced that imagery through temple reliefs, most notably at the Temple of Dendera, where mother and son appeared together. The carving on the rear exterior wall shows Cleopatra VII Philopator and her son, Ptolemy XV Philopator Philometor Caesar (Caesarion), who was fathered by Julius Caesar. Caesarion is depicted as a pharaoh in these scenes. Sources do not agree on which goddess Cleopatra is shown as. Some describe her as Isis, while another account states that Cleopatra added her deified image to the rear wall of the Dendera temple, depicting herself as Hathor accompanying Caesarion, her chosen successor, pictured as pharaoh. This divergence is consistent with the complex itself, which is centred on the Hathor temple but also includes a Temple of the birth of Isis.

Her religious policy also drew on the Ptolemaic royal cult, which combined Egyptian and Greek elements. Because the monarchy remained staunchly Hellenistic, despite otherwise co-opting Egyptian faith traditions, religion during this period was highly syncretic. Earlier queens had established this model. Ptolemy I also promoted the cult of the deified Alexander, who became the state god of the Ptolemaic kingdom. Arsinoe II, sister-wife of Ptolemy II, was central to this development. Before her death, Arsinoe nominally became a temple-sharing goddess (synnaos thea) in every temple in Egypt. Her royal image blended traditions: she was often shown as the Greek goddess Aphrodite, yet she wore the crown of lower Egypt, with ram's horns, ostrich feathers, and other traditional Egyptian indicators of royalty and/or deification.

Cleopatra's policy of legitimacy built on this precedent. After the sibling-marriage, an Egyptian royal titulature was established for Arsinoe (274 BCE), which was unparalleled in the Pharaonic period – and was not repeated until Cleopatra VII. The dynasty's ideology was therefore a combination of Egyptian and Greek components and cults, and queenship was one of the main channels through which it was expressed. Cleopatra's use of the Egyptian titulary and divine imagery can be read as a deliberate continuation of this tradition, in which a ruling woman could claim the authority of both a king and a goddess.

Language, education and court culture

Multilingualism and its interpretation

Ancient writers, above all Plutarch, credit Cleopatra with an unusually wide command of languages. In his Life of Antony, Plutarch says she could answer foreign envoys in whatever tongue they used, and his list of peoples whose languages she supposedly knew runs from Egyptian and Ethiopian to Parthian. In Antiquity, Cleopatra VII, the last ruler of the Ptolemaic dynasty (ruled 51–30 BCE), was renowned for both her beauty and her intelligence. Modern historians treat the specific list with caution. The many languages that Cleopatra allegedly spoke are treated with skepticism in modern scholarship. The doubt concerns the scope of the list rather than her intelligence. Some items, such as the "Troglodytic" language that Plutarch names, look more like rhetorical flourish than a record of actual conversations. The claim that she could deal with diplomats without interpreters is nonetheless repeated often, and it is usually read as evidence of political skill rather than of a precise linguistic inventory.

A Greek court in an Egyptian kingdom

The Ptolemaic court was a Greek-speaking elite. Here the Macedonian general Ptolemy had become Pharaoh, with a court that spoke Greek. Greek was the language of government documents, diplomacy and literature, and the dynasty's founders and their successors ruled for generations without making Egyptian a court language. The Ptolemies, insisting on Macedonian-Greek superiority, had ruled in Egypt for centuries without ever learning the Egyptian language or fully embracing the customs. Most of the kingdom's population, however, spoke Egyptian in its various forms, so the gap between the court's language and the language of its subjects was a practical problem for any ruler who wished to govern directly. Cleopatra's reputation rests partly on her willingness to bridge that gap. Popular accounts often describe her as the first Ptolemaic queen to learn Egyptian, although this claim rests on a small number of sources and is not firmly established.

Education

Ptolemaic royal children received a formal education, and the sources suggest that girls were not excluded. When the Greeks ruled Egypt in the first century B.C., they stressed education for both royal boys and girls. Cleopatra and her sisters received the same education as their brothers in case one of the girls would rule Egypt. Her training presumably included Greek letters, rhetoric and the classical texts that formed the core of Hellenistic schooling, and the cosmopolitan setting of Alexandria would have offered teachers from many regions. The content, the teachers and the length of her instruction are not directly documented, however, and descriptions of her learning are largely reconstructions based on the court's cultural norms.

The Library and Museum of Alexandria

The intellectual life of the court was closely tied to the Library and the Museum of Alexandria. Demetrius of Phaleron, advisor to King Ptolemy I Soter, is credited with founding the library and Museum around 295 BCE. The Library of Alexandria, the most famous library of Classical antiquity, was part of a research institute called the Alexandrian Museum (Mouseion, "shrine of the Muses") in Alexandria, Egypt. The complex lay close to the royal palace, which made it an institution the court could easily reach. Its holdings were mostly in Greek, but besides Greek literature, the library contained a full corpus of Egyptian records. The Ptolemies continued to support it into the last decades of the dynasty. The Ptolemies continued to cultivate the library until the fall of the dynasty in 30 B.C.E to the Roman Empire. Cleopatra reigned during this period, but the surviving evidence does not show how far she personally directed the institution, and claims about her role in its scholarship should be treated as uncertain.

Coinage, portraiture and visual self-presentation

Coins as the firmest visual evidence

Coins are the most secure visual record of Cleopatra VII, because they can be tied to her reign by mint, date and inscription in a way that most sculptures cannot. Bronze issues from Alexandria show her in a diademed bust facing right, with her hair gathered into the coiled "melon" arrangement that Greek-speaking Ptolemaic women favoured. The reverse keeps the old dynastic design of an eagle on a thunderbolt, flanked by a cornucopia and the letter Π, which marked a value of eighty drachmas. The legend is in the genitive, reading in Greek as "of Queen Cleopatra," a convention that presents the monarch as the owner of the coinage rather than its issuing voice.

Her coin output was not uniform. Silver tetradrachms struck at Ascalon in 50–49 BCE, which were civic rather than royal issues, carry a diademed portrait with the Ptolemaic eagle on the reverse, and they are rare. Scholars have also noted that she minted no gold coins, and they tend to connect this with economic constraints rather than with any change in political message. Coins that show her alone are mostly bronzes from Egypt and from eastern mints under her influence, while the silver she issued with Mark Antony pairs their portraits. Those joint issues, struck in the Levant around 37–36 BCE, illustrate the limits of her formal authority. On one such tetradrachm, Cleopatra appears on the obverse, but Antony's portrait and titles occupy the reverse, the place normally reserved for the issuing authority, because he held imperium over the eastern provinces.

Borrowing from earlier queens

Her coin types are also a deliberate form of self-presentation. Several features recall Arsinoe II, the third-century queen whose gold octadrachms showed a veiled bust wearing the stephane and a double cornucopia. Cleopatra's bronzes reuse the stephane, a crown associated with divinity, together with the melon hairstyle, which Berenice II had also used. The combination of a divine crown and a Greek coiffure shows how she joined Egyptian and Hellenistic elements. Some issues also add a sceptre behind the bust, a motif that echoes earlier Ptolemaic queens. Through these choices, the coins presented her as the heir of a line of queens, not as an isolated ruler.

Sculpture and the problem of attribution

Sculptures are much harder to assign to her. Roman-period portraiture of Ptolemaic queens often repeated earlier models, and this copying makes it difficult to distinguish a likeness of Cleopatra from one of a predecessor. The granite bust in the Royal Ontario Museum, believed to come from the site of the royal palace in Alexandria, is a case in point: its earlier-style features have made its identification hard to settle. A limestone head in the British Museum, found in Rome and dated to about 50–30 BCE, has facial features close to those on her coins. Some scholars regard it as a portrait made in her lifetime, perhaps a model for engravers, while others see it as a later follower's image. The 2001 British Museum exhibition Cleopatra of Egypt: From History to Myth illustrated this uncertainty, since its catalogue cover reproduced a bust that may have been a member of her circle rather than the queen herself.

Visual record and literary image

The coins present a sharply individual profile, with a prominent nose, a firm chin and a diadem that marks royal legitimacy. This restrained image differs from the romantic and exoticised images that developed in later European painting and sculpture, which were shaped more by Roman writers and nineteenth-century taste than by her own coinage. Because the visual evidence is limited and partly uncertain, modern discussion of her appearance rests mainly on the coins, and her political message is read through their iconography: dynastic continuity, divine authority and a claim to Egyptian and Hellenistic kingship.

The Actian War and her death

The rivalry between Octavian and Mark Antony, which had grown since the Second Triumvirate fractured in the 30s BCE, was decided at sea. In early 31 BCE, Octavian's admiral Agrippa cut Antony's supply lines by seizing the port of Methone and then Leucas, which left Antony's fleet short of provisions and dwindling morale. Octavian's land forces took up a fortified position on the coast opposite the Ambracian Gulf. On 2 September 31 BCE, the two fleets met off Actium on the western coast of Greece in the decisive engagement of the civil wars. Antony commanded a larger but slower force, which included Cleopatra's Egyptian squadron. Agrippa's lighter, more manoeuvrable ships gained the advantage in the close fighting.

The turning point, as described in the ancient accounts, came when Cleopatra's squadron withdrew from the fight. Antony followed her with his own ships, leaving the rest of his fleet exposed. Modern historians still debate whether the withdrawal was a panicked flight, a prearranged escape or a decision taken to protect Egyptian assets, and the sources do not settle the question. What is clear is that Antony's fleet was badly broken and that his remaining forces later surrendered. Antony and Cleopatra returned to Alexandria, where they attempted to rebuild their position through negotiations and further mobilisation, but Octavian's advance brought them to a military and political dead end.

Octavian moved against Egypt in the summer of 30 BCE. Antony's forces engaged his army in a few battles, but they were unable to stop the invasion. Cleopatra, fearing that Octavian would eliminate her eldest son, arranged for Caesarion to leave the city with a large sum of wealth, heading toward the Red Sea coast. Accounts differ on the details: some say the young king was then lured back to Alexandria by promises from Octavian's side, while others place his capture after he had already begun his flight. Antony's end came in early August 30 BCE. According to the traditional story, a false report that Cleopatra had died led him to take his own life, which he did by falling on his sword. Plutarch and later writers present this as the moment that forced Cleopatra to make her own decision.

Cleopatra's death is usually dated to August 30 BCE, although some modern sources give 12 August. The traditional account, preserved mainly in Roman writers, holds that she died by poison or by the bite of a snake, the asp. Octavian had intended to lead her through the streets of Rome as part of a triumphal procession, and the threat of that humiliation is the usual explanation given for her suicide. The method of death is still debated, and no archaeological evidence confirms either version. Octavian ordered the execution of Caesarion shortly afterward, which removed the last ruler of the Ptolemaic line. Octavian had earlier displayed the effigy of a reclining queen in his Alexandrian procession, since Cleopatra's body had escaped his grasp.

With these deaths, the Ptolemaic kingdom came to an end, and Egypt was annexed as a Roman province. It was governed directly on Octavian's behalf by a prefect, an equestrian official who was not a member of the Senate and who answered to the emperor. Octavian, who became Augustus in 27 BCE, treated Egypt as his personal domain, and it remained one of the most important grain-producing provinces of the Roman Empire. Cleopatra's death therefore marked the end of the Ptolemaic dynasty, the last major Hellenistic kingdom, and the transfer of the Nile valley to Roman control.

Roman sources and the construction of a legend

Plutarch lived roughly a century after Cleopatra and based his information on earlier material, and he is the most detailed narrator of her life. She appears in Plutarch's Life of Antony, in Dio's histories (books 49, 50 and 51), and in Appian's Civil Wars. Suetonius adds shorter notices, and the Augustan poets Horace and Virgil refer to her in verse. Modern scholars often treat Horace, Plutarch, and Dio Cassius as the three main literary witnesses. Cicero's letters offer a few near-contemporary glimpses of her, which makes them unusually valuable.

Much of the hostile imagery traces back to the years after Actium, when Octavian's circle worked to present her as a danger to Rome. Ronald Syme's assessment is often quoted: Octavian's propaganda magnified Cleopatra beyond all measure and decency. A recent study argues that Octavian framed the conflict in East-versus-West terms, implying that her corrupting Easternness had ruined a proud Roman (by insinuating that Cleopatra's depraved Easternness irrevocably corrupted the once proud Roman). Horace's ode turns the naval confrontation into a contest between a predatory hawk and a helpless dove, and the portrayal of Cleopatra as weak and helpless serves the glorification of Octavian. Virgil's treatment of Actium is similarly one-sided. Octavian's intention to display her in his triumph is recorded by Plutarch, Dio and Horace alike (Octavian's intent to make Cleopatra part of his triumphal procession), and the flight from Actium was presented as evidence of cowardice and treachery (It was portrayed by Octavian's propaganda as proof of the cowardice and treacherous nature of Antony and Cleopatra.).

The moral and literary aims of the later authors also shape their accounts. Plutarch's biography frames the affair as a moral tragedy, and the same method is suspected in Dio and Appian (In Plutarch, the story is one of morality and tragedy. It suited Plutarch to write history as a moral exercise). Dio's version centers on the political power she wielded. The writers who describe her in harsh terms before her death nevertheless present her last act as a dignified choice, a courageous and dignified expression of her desire to die a queen. Historians therefore read these passages as literary constructions as much as factual reports.

Historians separate what can be checked from what is narrated. Coins, inscriptions and documents provide firm evidence for her reign, and documentary evidence from inscriptions is especially important. The narrative sources, by contrast, often disagree on details. The method of her death illustrates the problem: Suetonius indicates that she died from the bite of an asp, whereas Plutarch relates that there were two slight pricks on her arm and that poison might have been hidden in a hollow comb. Such variations show how the tradition accumulated layers of interpretation over time.

The Roman portrait has also proved durable beyond antiquity. Augustan propaganda began to depict Cleopatra as a lascivious, indulgent temptress who focused on usurping the power of elite Roman men, and this image shaped later European writing. Recent scholarship argues that portrayals of the couple in modern media, both positive and negative, have their roots in Octavian's propaganda. Separating the documented queen from the Roman construction remains the central task for historians of her reign.

Literature and drama

Shakespeare and Plutarch

The most influential literary treatment of Cleopatra is William Shakespeare's tragedy. In 1579 Sir Thomas North published his English translation of the first-century historian Plutarch's The Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans. Shakespeare drew on North's version, but he did not reproduce its history. He ignored many of the historical events reported in Lives, so that he could concentrate on the relationship between Antony and Cleopatra. The play's dating is uncertain, but it belongs to the final phase of Shakespeare's great tragic period, and it was first published in the 1623 Folio of Shakespeare's works.

Shakespeare also changed Plutarch's emphasis on Cleopatra. In Plutarch, she was not treated as a figure with thoughts or feelings of her own; her responses were mainly reactions to Antony's suffering. Shakespeare instead gives her a tragic weight comparable to Antony's, along with beautiful and moving soliloquies befitting a queen. He also reshaped the political background. Plutarch's account of Antony's marriage to Octavia, for example, lasts some years and produces children, whereas Shakespeare minimizes the alliance by making it short-lived and barren.

Earlier English and Continental treatments

Shakespeare was not the first English writer to take up her story. Samuel Daniel's closet drama The Tragedy of Cleopatra had been first published in 1594 and was reprinted, 'newly altered', in 1607. Its revisions appear to respond to Shakespeare's play, which suggests that the two dramatists were working on related material in the same period. Geoffrey Chaucer had earlier treated her in "The Legend of Cleopatra," where, according to one study, he used his selection of material to emphasize the sexual aspects of Antony and Cleopatra's wedding night. This reflects a medieval view in which extant medieval accounts of 'Cleopatra's lussuriosa' are unanimous in their outrage at her immorality.

The wider European medieval and Renaissance tradition shaped these depictions. Boccaccio's collection of tales influenced English writers, and The Decameron in particular and Boccaccio's work in general were a major source of inspiration and plots for many English authors in the Renaissance, including Geoffrey Chaucer and William Shakespeare. Writers therefore inherited Roman moral frameworks and reworked them for their own audiences rather than returning to documentary sources.

Dramatic emphasis and its limits

Across these works, the dramatic tradition concentrates on the romance with Antony and on her death, while leaving aside her work as a ruler. Even in Shakespeare's play, the most memorable account of her character is given through a Roman voice: Enobarbus's description of her first meeting with Antony, which is from Plutarch, but how transmuted. John Dryden's All for Love; or, The World Well Lost reworked the same material for a later stage, and it, too, shows how each author adapted her to a different audience and performance setting.

Later novels, operas and historical fiction have continued this pattern. Composers and novelists have repeatedly returned to the Shakespearean and Plutarchan framing, and modern productions based on the story, such as John Adams' new opera with its libretto based on the Shakespearean material, show how far the story's structure has remained in use. In these works, Cleopatra usually stands as a symbol of love, power and tragedy, while the administrative and diplomatic record of her reign has little place in the narrative.

Film and popular culture

Cleopatra has been a recurring subject of the cinema almost since the medium began. A 1917 silent version was made, but no prints of the William Fox production survive, while Cecil B. DeMille's 1934 film starring Claudette Colbert was a box-office success. The best-known screen version is Joseph L. Mankiewicz's 1963 epic, in which Elizabeth Taylor played the queen opposite Richard Burton as Mark Antony and Rex Harrison as Julius Caesar. Its screenplay drew on Carlo Maria Franzero's 1957 biography and on the classical histories of Plutarch, Suetonius and Appian, so the film inherited the same Roman narrative that shapes the ancient record.

The production of the 1963 film became a story in its own right. The budget grew to roughly $44 million, a sum that brought 20th Century Fox close to financial ruin, although the film was the highest-grossing title of its year. The romance that developed between Taylor and Burton on set drew constant press attention, and the film is still often remembered through this tabloid episode and its cost rather than through its artistic merits. Film historians have also noted that the film's glamorous Taylor presents a queen who is alluring and strong, drawn to powerful men, which fits the Roman and Shakespearean image of a seductive ruler rather than the evidence for a politically active administrator.

Later screen and stage productions have followed the same pattern of spectacle and romance, and they have repeatedly reopened debates over Cleopatra's appearance and ancestry. Casting announcements have been contested in several cases. In 2020, the Israeli actress Gal Gadot's selection for a forthcoming film drew accusations of whitewashing, and other actresses, including Angelina Jolie and Lady Gaga, have been named as possible candidates in various projects. Such controversies show that the question of how to depict a Ptolemaic monarch with a Macedonian Greek background remains a live issue for modern audiences.

The most intense recent dispute arose in 2023 over Netflix's docudrama Queen Cleopatra, the second instalment of the African Queens series, which cast the British actress Adele James in the title role and was executive produced by Jada Pinkett-Smith. Egypt's Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities responded that surviving statues show Hellenistic features, including light skin, and the Supreme Council of Antiquities condemned the programme as a falsification of Egyptian history. The producers answered that academics have long debated Cleopatra's parentage and that the casting reflected the multicultural character of ancient Egypt. Egyptian officials also stressed that a documentary, unlike a drama, must rest on historical and scientific evidence, and a state-linked Egyptian broadcaster announced its own large-budget documentary in response. The episode illustrated how entertainment genres, rather than only scholarly publications, now shape public understanding of ancient Egypt and its rulers.

Beyond cinema and television, Cleopatra's image has been adopted in advertising, fashion and other forms of popular entertainment. This wide circulation of a single face and story is one reason she is among the most widely recognized rulers of the ancient world, even though the visual and textual evidence for her appearance is limited, as discussed elsewhere in this article.

Ancestry and identity debates

Historians broadly place Cleopatra's descent among the Macedonian Greek families that had governed Egypt since Ptolemy I, one of Alexander the Great's commanders. The consensus holds that her ancestry was predominantly Macedonian Greek, with a smaller Iranian component. That Iranian strand is usually traced to Sogdian and Persian lineages, and it is generally explained by the dynasty's marriages into the Seleucid house rather than by any direct Egyptian descent. There is a general consensus among scholars that she was predominantly of Macedonian Greek ancestry and may have had minor Iranian descent (Sogdian and Persian). The Ptolemies did intermarry with the Seleucids, and this is the basis for the Iranian component. Scholars generally identify Cleopatra as having been essentially of Greek ancestry with some Persian and Sogdian ancestry, based on the fact that her Macedonian Greek family had intermarried with the Seleucid dynasty.

The sharper uncertainty concerns the maternal line. Her mother is usually identified as Cleopatra V Tryphaena, but no surviving record names her, so the identification remains an inference. Some scholars have argued that the mother may have come from a different background, including an Egyptian family, and this would explain why Roman writers did not attack Cleopatra's legitimacy. Her paternal grandmother is equally obscure. Large swaths of Cleopatra's family tree (for instance her paternal grandmother) are simply not known, and likely never will be. The classicist Mary Beard has put the point bluntly: the truth is that we have no idea of the origins of Cleopatra. She was certainly of a royal Macedonian family, but whether her mother (or any other of her female ancestors) was Egyptian we just don't know.

Claims of Black African ancestry have a specific history. Mary Lefkowitz traces the main origin of the idea to a 1946 book by Joel Augustus Rogers, though the idea of Cleopatra as black goes back to at least the 19th century. A later essay by the Afrocentrist author John Henrik Clarke revived it, and that essay asserted that Cleopatra described herself as black, a claim Lefkowitz rejects on chronological grounds since Cleopatra died long before the period of the New Testament. The idea gained new life after a 2009 study of a skull from Ephesus, which was once linked to her sister Arsinoe. Dr Caroline Wilkinson described a long cranial shape that is common in certain populations, one of which is ancient Egyptians. Another would be black African groups who also show that characteristic. Because that trait occurs in several populations, it cannot by itself establish descent. Representations of Cleopatra in Greek and Roman art and on coins show Mediterranean features, which is one reason mainstream historians reject the claim. The early twentieth-century suggestion that she had Jewish ancestry was likewise not sustained into later twentieth century historiography.

The ethnic question is distinct from nationality and cultural identity, and historians usually keep these categories apart. Cleopatra was born in Alexandria and ruled Egypt as a Ptolemaic monarch. She presented herself in the forms of Egyptian kingship, and her royal image drew on Egyptian religion. Her first language and her education, however, were Greek. Michael Grant's view, often quoted, is that Cleopatra probably had not a drop of Egyptian blood and that she "would have described herself as Greek." Grant's position is a minority reading in one respect, since most scholars accept some Egyptian ancestry in the earlier generations of the family. Public debates continue, however, and modern controversies, including those over casting in the 2023 Netflix docudrama, have revived arguments about her race and "Egyptian" identity. Egypt's former antiquities minister Zahi Hawass rejected the Black-Cleopatra idea and said she was light-skinned, not Black.

Archaeology and unresolved questions

Cleopatra's tomb has never been found. Archaeologists have debated whether the temple complex of Taposiris Magna, about 30 miles west of Alexandria, conceals it. The temple complex lies near Taposiris Magna, which is about 30 miles west of Alexandria, and some scholars have long linked it to Egypt's last pharaoh. Dominican archaeologist Kathleen Martínez has led excavations there for roughly two decades. While most Egyptologists maintain that the queen was buried in Alexandria, Martínez argues that the evidence points to Taposiris Magna. Her reasoning rests partly on the temple's dedication to Osiris, whose cult was closely tied to the afterlife.

The excavated finds are the strongest material basis for the theory. Egypt's Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities announced 337 ancient coins bearing the queen's face, a marble statue, and ceremonial vessels from the Ptolemaic period. Most of the coins were found in a concentrated "sacred trench" near a temple wall, where the team unearthed more than 330 coins that appear to have been deliberately hidden. Martínez interprets this as an effort to keep the objects from Roman hands. The discoveries were presented in the National Geographic documentary Cleopatra's Final Secret, which premiered on the National Geographic channel in September 2025. The marble head that Martínez identifies as a portrait of Cleopatra is disputed, since some archaeologists cite marked discrepancies between the artifact and other known portraits of the queen.

Many specialists remain sceptical. Nearly a dozen scholars with expertise in Cleopatra told Live Science that it is unlikely she was buried at Taposiris Magna. Former antiquities minister Zahi Hawass has said there is no evidence for the tomb at the site, and scholars consulted by Live Science noted that the burials at Taposiris Magna seem to be of religious figures rather than royalty. Coins and objects show that the site was active during Cleopatra's reign, but they do not establish that it held her burial. A 2025 report also described a massive submerged port off Egypt's northern coast near the temple, which Martínez's team links to a possible tunnel connecting the temple to the sea.

Underwater archaeology in Alexandria's harbour has produced more concrete results. Excavations led by the European Institute for Underwater Archaeology (IEASM), directed by Franck Goddio, have worked in the Portus Magnus, where the ruins are believed to hold the remnants of Cleopatra's palace complex. The "believed" qualifier matters, since the palace itself has not been securely identified in the sea. The team has also worked near the sunken island of Antirhodos, where the excavations revealed a temple to the goddess Isis which was renovated by Cleopatra VII, as well as the Timonium, a palace built by Mark Antony.

The most spectacular find is a thalamegos, a ceremonial barge. The wreck consists of well-preserved timbers about 28 meters long, from a boat that was originally about 35 meters long and about 7 meters wide. Its design gave maximum width, allowing space for a central pavilion and an elaborately decorated cabin. The wreck lies less than 50 meters from the remains of the Temple of Isis. Researchers suggest that the vessel might have sunk in a catastrophic event around CE 50, when earthquakes and tidal waves caused large parts of Alexandria's shoreline, palaces, and temples to collapse into the sea. Greek graffiti found on the ship dates to the first half of the first century CE, but its content is still unclear.

Attributions of skeletal remains show how fragile such identifications can be. In 1929, Austrian archaeologist Josef Keil recovered a skull from a water-filled sarcophagus in the "Octagon" at Ephesus, a structure whose architecture resembled Alexandria's Pharos. Although there were no grave goods or inscriptions, the architectural similarities and historical reports led to speculation that the tomb belonged to Arsinoë IV. Arsinoë, Cleopatra's younger sister, had been executed at Ephesus in 41 BCE. Hilke Thür had earlier argued for the identification on circumstantial grounds. A 2025 study led by anthropologist Gerhard Weber of the University of Vienna used micro-CT scanning, radiocarbon dating and DNA analysis, and revealed that the remains are those of a young boy with developmental disorders. The radiocarbon range was consistent with Arsinoë's lifetime, but morphological investigations showed significant deviations. The search for her remains continues.

Modern historiography and open questions

Modern scholarship has moved away from the image of a seductive foreign queen toward a view of Cleopatra as a skilled and politically active ruler who navigated Roman power and Egyptian tradition. Much of that shift comes from recognizing where the older image originated. Most ancient sources come from the perspective of Rome, her enemy, and portray her as a scandalous, ambitious and drunken figure who embodied the temptations of the East. Such representations were maintained in the Western tradition, built upon during the medieval and Renaissance periods, and remain common today. Historians now set these Roman and later European portraits against Egyptian material, where she appears as a queen and divine figure, and against medieval Arabic writing, which preserves her as a scholar and philosopher.

The reliability of the sources remains a central problem. The contemporaneous sources that survive were all written by Roman authors who readily employed invective. Research on her personality and conduct is therefore cautious, since claims about her character and actions are often difficult to verify, and academic studies openly admit this. Some scholars also argue that the loss of material after 30 BCE distorts the record, suggesting that documents related to her reign disappeared under Octavian's rule, and art and statuary depicting the queen were destroyed. Her literary output is similarly uncertain. Texts on cosmetics, gynecology and alchemy have been attributed to her, but there is no definitive evidence of any extant work written by her.

Chronological questions are also open. Because the surviving documentation is uneven, the order and duration of some events in her reign, including the early phase of joint rule and the period of expulsion from power, can be reconstructed only in outline. Accurate records of her reign are few and far between, so the information available before her time is lacking. Historians continue to weigh the Greek and Latin narratives against the scattered papyri, inscriptions and coins. The nature of her personal and political bonds with Julius Caesar and Mark Antony is especially contested. Some accounts describe them mainly as romantic, while others read them chiefly as diplomatic and dynastic arrangements, and the evidence rarely settles the question decisively.

The question of her royal identity has become a further point of debate. Ancient reports credit her with reportedly learning the Egyptian language, something no other Ptolemy did, and taking part in ceremonies involving the Apis bull. Scholars weigh these details against her Macedonian Greek dynastic background. The issue is less about whether she was Greek or Egyptian than about how the two frameworks fit together: whether her kingship should be read mainly through Hellenistic monarchy, through the religious role of the pharaoh, or through a deliberate combination of both. Each reading shapes how her temple patronage, titles and coinage are interpreted.

New evidence continues to revise these views. Studies of coins, portraits and inscriptions allow historians to test older assumptions about how she presented herself, while the reassessment of Greek, Latin and later Arabic texts changes how their claims are weighed. Because each category of evidence has its own biases, scholars increasingly compare them rather than relying on any single narrative. The resulting picture is more precise about what can be known and more cautious about what cannot.

References

1. Ptolemaic Dynastyebsco.com
2. Ptolemaic dynastybritannica.com
3. Ptolemaic Kingdomen.wikipedia.org
4. Cleopatraen.wikipedia.org
5. Who Were the Seven Cleopatras?thecollector.com
6. Cleopatra V Tryphaena (c. 95–c. 57 BCE)encyclopedia.com
7. Cleopatra (The Diary of Samuel Pepys)pepysdiary.com
8. Ptolemy XII Auletesen.wikipedia.org
9. Antiochus VIII Grypusen.wikipedia.org
10. Tryphaenaen.wikipedia.org
11. Cleopatrabritannica.com
12. Cleopatra VII: The Last Great Pharaoh of Ancient Egypt - World History Encyclopediaworldhistory.org
13. Ptolemaic Dynasty and Seleucid Kingdomebsco.com
14. Pothinusen.wikipedia.org
15. Ptolemy XIII Theos Philopatoren.wikipedia.org
16. Cleopatra VII - Oxford Referenceoxfordreference.com
17. Gabinianien.wikipedia.org
18. Sextus Pompeysullacoins.com
19. Alexandrian waren.wikipedia.org
20. Cleopatra VII, Last of Ptolemies, Reignsebsco.com
21. Siege of Alexandria (47 BC)en.wikipedia.org
22. Siege of Alexandria (47 BC)historica.fandom.com
23. C. Julius Caesar (48 - 47 BC) - Roman Republickeytoumbria.com
24. Battle of the Nile (47 BC)en.wikipedia.org
25. Caesarion - World History Encyclopediaworldhistory.org
26. Caesarionen.wikipedia.org
27. The tragically short life of Caesarion, the only child of Julius Caesar and Cleopatra - History Skillshistoryskills.com
28. Caesarionbritannica.com
29. Cleopatra and Mark Antony Built a Power Bloc That Nearly Split Rome in Twohistorycollection.com
30. Relationship between Cleopatra and Antony and how it shaped the ancient world - World History Eduworldhistoryedu.com
31. Cleopatra’s Complicated Inner Circle: Siblings, Successors and Lovershistory.com
32. Cleopatra Selene IIen.wikipedia.org
33. Cleopatra & Antony - World History Encyclopediaworldhistory.org
34. Ptolemy Philadelphus (son of Cleopatra)en.wikipedia.org
35. Chaos is a Ladder: Octavian and the Death of the Roman Republicthecollector.com
36. The Rise And Fall Of Cleopatra And Ptolemaic Egyptworldatlas.com
37. Donations of Alexandriaen.wikipedia.org
38. Iullus Antoniusen.wikipedia.org
39. The Ptolemaic Dynastyoerproject.com
40. The case of Queen Cleopatra VII, the last pharaoh of Egypttandfonline.com
41. 8 Ancient Port Cities that Controlled Global Tradeworldatlas.com
42. The Greek and Roman Ports of the Red Sea Coast in the ...ancientportsantiques.com
43. Alexandria, Center of Tradenabataea.net
44. Contextualizing the Nabataeansescholarship.org
45. Full article: Finding strategic communication & diverse leadership in the ancient world: The case of Queen Cleopatra VII, the last pharaoh of Egypttandfonline.com
46. Nabataeansen.wikipedia.org
47. Athenion (general)en.wikipedia.org
48. Artavasdes I of Media Atropateneen.wikipedia.org
49. How Cleopatra Crafted Her Divine Imagehistory.com
50. "Cleopatra as the Goddess Isis" by Morehead State University. Camden-Carroll Library.scholarworks.moreheadstate.edu
51. Dendera Temple complexen.wikipedia.org
52. Column: Dendera temple and ties to Cleopatrayouarecurrent.com
53. Arsinoe II Philadelphus - World History Encyclopediaworldhistory.org
54. (PDF) Arsinoe, Berenice, and Cleopatra: The ‘ABC’ of the Ptolemaic Ruler Cult in the Times of Crisisresearchgate.net
55. Cleopatra’s Languagesanetoday.org
56. The Museum and Library at Alexandria - Collection at Bartleby.combartleby.com
57. Cleopatra’s Educationheathervoight.com
58. Library of Alexandriabritannica.com
59. The Library of Alexandriastudy.com
60. 5 Things Everyone Gets Wrong About Cleopatrahistory.howstuffworks.com
61. Numismaticscleopatradigitized.wordpress.com
62. The Beauty of Cleopatrapenelope.uchicago.edu
63. Cat. 22 Tetradrachm Portraying Queen Cleopatra VIIpublications.artic.edu
64. Franck Goddio: Exhibitions: Exhibitions: Cleopatra of Egypt, from History to Mythfranckgoddio.org
65. Portrait Head (possibly Cleopatra VII) - Egypt Museumegypt-museum.com
66. Studies in Ancient Art and Civilization 14 Kraków 2010 Agnieszka Fulińskaberlinarchaeology.wordpress.com
67. Cleopatra VII and Her Coinskinzercoins.com
68. Cleopatra VII: The Last Ptolemytaylorhartley.us
69. Bust of Cleopatraen.wikipedia.org
70. Cleopatra's Coins Show a Plain Face She Chose to Project as Powerhistorycollection.com
71. Battle of Actium - World History Encyclopediaworldhistory.org
72. Battle of Actiumebsco.com
73. Cleopatra Commits Suicideebsco.com
74. Cleopatra - Kidskids.britannica.com
75. Roman Egypt - World History Encyclopediaworldhistory.org
76. Cleopatra VII - Facts, Mark Antony & Deathbiography.com
77. 79 Acta Theologica Supplementum 7 2005 THE DEATH OF CLEOPATRA ABSTRACTjournals.ufs.ac.za
78. Cleopatra: Egyptian Queen « Roman History 31 BC - AD 117ancientromanhistory31-14.com
79. Motivation for Cleopatra's Suicide in the Ancient Textsdigitalcommons.macalester.edu
80. Jump to ratings and reviewsgoodreads.com
81. Octavian and Deaths of Antony, Cleopatra and Their Childreneurope.factsanddetails.com
82. "She Put On a Look of Rapture": The Construction of Cleopatra and Mark Antony in Octavian's Propaganda - the University of Groningen research portalresearch.rug.nl
83. The Characterization of Cleopatratruiz98.wordpress.com
84. The Battle of Actium: Rise of the Roman Empirebattlemerchant.com
85. The Death of Cleopatrapenelope.uchicago.edu
86. The Eroticization of Cleopatra VII in Roman Literature and Artdigitalcommons.providence.edu
87. Cleopatra. A Sourcebook. Oklahoma Series in Classical Culture, 31bmcr.brynmawr.edu
88. (PDF) Octavian, Antony and Cleopatra: Propaganda and Warresearchgate.net
89. Dates and Sourcesrsc.org.uk
90. Shakespeare's Sources for Antony and Cleopatrashakespeare-online.com
91. Antony and Cleopatrashakespeare-encyclopedia.stanford.edu
92. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville University of Arkansas, Fayettevillescholarworks.uark.edu
93. Renaissance Writerscourses.lumenlearning.com
94. Antony and Cleopatraencyclopedia.com
95. Cleopatra Before Shakespearesfopera.com
96. Antony and Cleopatrabritannica.com
97. Literature in the Renaissancecourses.lumenlearning.com
98. Cleopatra (1963)historical-films.fandom.com
99. Cleopatra (1963 film)en.wikipedia.org
100. Elizabeth Taylor Shines at 1963 'Cleopatra' Premieres in These Rare Photosyahoo.com
101. The Production of Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor's 'Cleopatra' Was a Glorious Disastercollider.com
102. 1963 CLEOPATRA FILM STARRING ELIZABETH TAYLOR RICHARD BURTON REX MARK ANTONY HARRISON JULIUS CAESAR THE BLOCKBUSTER PICTURE THAT NEARLY BANKRUPT 20TH CENTURY FOX EPIC BIOPICcleopatrancienthegyptianmummy.com
103. Cleopatra (1963)blogs.dickinson.edu
104. Cleopatra (1963)filmyap.substack.com
105. Egyptian Governmental Agency Responds to Netflix's Queen Cleopatra Casting Controversymovieweb.com
106. Netflix's Cleopatra controversy, explainedtheweek.com
107. Netflix’s ‘Queen Cleopatra’ EP Says Controversial Casting Choice “Reflects The Multicultural Nature Of Ancient Egypt”deadline.com
108. Netflix's Black Cleopatra Controversy Has Egyptian Broadcaster Making New Doc in Responsemovieweb.com
109. queen cleopatra black egypt netflix series rcna81924nbcnews.com
110. Netflix and Egypt Are at Odds Over an African Cleopatrapressreader.com
111. Ethnicity of Cleopatraen.wikipedia.org
112. Cleopatra - Ethnicity of Celebsethnicelebs.com
113. Social:Ethnicity of Cleopatra - HandWikihandwiki.org
114. Dispelling Some Myths: Cleopatra the “African” Queentastesofhistory.co.uk
115. Cleopatra race controversymilitary-history.fandom.com
116. Series heats up debate over Cleopatra’s racepressreader.com
117. Cleopatra’s true racial background (and does it really matter?)blog.oup.com
118. Ethnicity of Cleopatra - Wikiwandwikiwand.com
119. Lost port discovery brings Cleopatra’s elusive tomb a step closerarchaeologymag.com
120. Khentiamentiu: Search for Cleopatra’s Tomb Yields Trove of Ancient Artifactskhentiamentiu.blogspot.com
121. New documentary looks for Cleopatra's tomb — do newfound coins and a submerged port in Egypt point the way?yahoo.com
122. Where is Cleopatra's tomb?foxnews.com
123. Ancient pleasure boat found near palace ruins tied to history's most controversial queenfoxnews.com
124. We discovered an ancient 'party boat' in the waters of Alexandria. Here's what might have happened on boardphys.org
125. Ancient Egyptian pleasure boat unearthed in Alexandria’s sunken harborarchaeologymag.com
126. Study reveals Ephesos skull is not Cleopatra’s sister but an 11-year-old boy’sarchaeologymag.com
127. Ephesus Skull Mystery Solved: Remains Confirmed as Boy, Not Arsinoë IV! — My Classics Portalmyclassicsportal.co.uk
128. Egyptian Coins Feature Cleopatra - Numismatic Newsnumismaticnews.net
129. Site Linked to Cleopatra’s Tomb, Taposiris Magna, Reveals Underwater Harbor and Secret Tunnel - GreekReporter.comgreekreporter.com
130. Bones of Cleopatra's sister Arsinoe IV possibly identified in Greece - UPI.comupi.com
131. DNA Testing Shatters Cleopatra Legend: Ephesos Skull Identified As Male Childscitechdaily.com
132. Goddess, whore, queen and scholar: An introduction to the historiography of Cleopatra VII Philopatorsearch.informit.org
133. LIFE Summer Research Grant Reflections: A New Look at Cleopatra: Egypt, Rome, and Beyond - Duke University Libraries Blogsblogs.library.duke.edu
134. Kleopatra VII and the Legacy of Ptolemaic Queenshipcamws.org